Welcome back to the list, Roger.
Marlon,
I had a crimper like that with a crack in it. Poor crimps kept biting me
in the posterior, till I bought one of these:
http://www.all-spec.com/1/viewitem/30-496/ALLSPEC/prodinfo/allspecsession=1393318938D195632promoid=w3path=vend
I got mine locally
Kurt,
Please point out where I said or even implied that you didn't file. You
did, however, suggest we should have a poll to decide whether we should
comply with FCC regulations.
I would like to call your attention to one of your posts where you said,
Buy from someone that imports 5.4 moto
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
- Original Message - From: Bob Moldashel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st
Oh Marlon, Marlon, Marlon..
Hey Scott,
By no
they're EZ RJ45 crimpers / ends. and yeah, they're around 50 - 70 cents PER
CONNECTOR.
BUT I'll tell you whatsince I bought them, I've NEVER remade a cable, NOR
have I
had to use a cable tester...
I won't go back now... actually feel helpless to borrow someone else's crimpers
/ ends
What is your time worth?
-Matt
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
That's it. Thanks!
Do you really pay $.60 per connector??? Maybe it's not as nice of a
tool as I thought
laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)
Got price down to $0.49 in bulk from:
http://www.telephoneparts.com/product/EZRJ45?OVRAW=ez-rj45OVKEY=ez%2520rj45
OVMTC=standard#ez-rj45%20crimping%20tool
Dave
Keep looking
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent:
Hi All,
For those that think it's no big deal to not fill this out. Please read
the note below from Ellen Burton with the FCC. She's in charge of this
form.
Guys, they are making this as easy as they can for us. I think we have
nothing to gain and much to loose by being a PITA.
EZ is not for speed. It's for doing the job right. One service call
because of your fast crimp and all the speed for years of fast
crimping is lost.
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
I can crimp a regular rj45 connector faster than you can crimp your EZ
ones. If you know what you are doing you have
I'll take that challenge :)
I can crimp EZ's faster than you can pull the tension out of a guy wire
on the tower someone's climbing!
I never said EZ's were for people that didn't know what they were doing,
I said they were for people that valued their time
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
I can crimp a
Thanks.
That's the native file format that the fcc wants used. But many here don't
have excel.
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my
I would like to welcome Jack Unger to WISPA. He has joined
WISPA as a full paid member this morning. His website is http://www.ask-wi.com/
He is best known for his training seminars around the world
and for his book, Deploying License-Free
Wireless Wide-Area Networks.
I have bought those before. They are kind of a cool novelty, but they
don't add THAT much reliability/speed/ease of use/etc IMO.
pd
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
That's it. Thanks!
Do you really pay $.60 per connector??? Maybe it's not as nice of a
tool as I thought
Your better off on the ground than on a tower anyway Rick.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
114 S. Walnut St.
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Smith
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:55
Please don't continue on this topic.
Mark Nash
Network Engineer
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
- Original Message -
From: Rick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday,
To All,
I agree, this thread is starting to get old and is bordering on verbal
attacks from several parties. Enough opinions have been given for people to
make up their own mind. Just because one person likes or dislikes something
doesn't mean that others will. Please refrain from pushing your
Title: Message
Oh well, decided to baby-sit my network and spend the money
on joining WISPA ;-)
Maybe I will catch you too, at the next
one.
Victoria Proffer
www.StLouisBroadBand.com
314-974-5600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Linda
PondSent: Wednesday,
I'm the one who turned Rick and many others onto these Marlon - We've been using them for almost 3yrs. We have had 1 truck roll due to a bad crimp in this amount of time. Yes they are expensive if you look at it on a per crimp basis - but what is $1.10 per install worth to you in time /
Does anyone have a good recommendation on some Mesh
equipment. I have a small town that wants to provide Internet access to
the entire town and I'm thinking of using mesh technology. Any ideas would
be great.
Thanks,
Steve
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
ISPlists wrote:
Does anyone have a good recommendation on some Mesh equipment. I have a
small town that wants to provide Internet access to the entire town and
I'm thinking of using mesh technology. Any ideas would be great.
Thanks,
Steve
Lonnie just released a beta mesh upgrade for
Unless you expect to handle only very low levels of traffic, avoid mesh
nodes with only one radio. Choose nodes that have one radio on 2.4 GHz
for customer connections and one radio on 5.8 GHz for backhauling. In
other words, separate the access traffic from the backhaul traffic.
Your overall
Kurt is slowly proving himself as an idiot on this list. Kurt - GROW UP - You don't always have to be the person to one up everyone.
JohnnyO
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 13:54 -0500, Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
EZ is not for speed. It's for doing the job right. One service call
because of your
JohnnyO wrote:
Kurt is slowly proving himself as an idiot on this list. Kurt - GROW UP
- You don't always have to be the person to one up everyone.
JohnnyO
Maybe the best way to handle gripes is to take it off list and email him
directly.
The other day on the dslreports list that Mark
The local electronics store sold me a pair of crimpers that listed for
$55, but since the package was trashed, he gave me $10 off. Boy, I have
never regretted it. No more of those cheap ones. Not a single bad crimp
since I changed crimpers and yes, we use the cheap standard ends. We had
Whaa wha wha wha wh!
Guys, your making me sick.
Please stop - Pleaseeaasee.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
Anyone covering this area - contact me offlist - have a business account for you.
JohnnyO
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Hi Jack,
This is the way Lonnie described his version of mesh a few months back.
George
Jack Unger wrote:
Unless you expect to handle only very low levels of traffic, avoid mesh
nodes with only one radio. Choose nodes that have one radio on 2.4 GHz
for customer connections and one radio on
George,
I haven't seen his description but I'm glad to hear he's on the right
track. Do you recall a link to his information?
Thanks,
jack
George wrote:
Hi Jack,
This is the way Lonnie described his version of mesh a few months back.
George
Jack Unger wrote:
Unless you expect
This is from a post I made in the Summer. It runs very nicely on out
4 radio WAR boards. Pretty sweet actually.
Lonnie
*
I think you are basing your dislike on standard AdHoc mesh. Remember
I too have come out and said it is not worth our time. We have
Or realize that everyone in the world is using the precious 5.8Ghz spectrum
already for long critical links, that are limited to 5.8Ghz for PtP rule
higher SU antenna, or long distance.
5.3Ghz is an ideal backhaul channel for MESH, up to 7 miles (with 2 ft
dish), and avoid the interference
I am trying to get an install done tonight but can only get -112 dbm on
a Canopy SM with a M2 yagi. I hung the Canopy yesterday (my first one)
and did an install. I did one install earlier today with the 13 dbi
yagi from CTI, so I know I'm not doing something on the radio wrong.
Anyway,
Some IDIOT that was in my enclosure bumped the power supply and
unplugged the AP. The idiot was me.
Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
I am trying to get an install done tonight but can only get -112 dbm
on a Canopy SM with a M2 yagi. I hung the Canopy yesterday (my first
one) and did an install. I
I have never used the Solectek equipment and am looking at
either trying their Skyway 7101 or the Trango Atlas for some short building to
building links. I have seen enough favorable posts about the Atlas to
know plenty of you are using it successfully although I sure wish I
could get one
On all due respectIt didn't answer the question..
-B-
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Hi All,
For those that think it's no big deal to not fill this out.
Please read the note below from Ellen Burton with the FCC. She's in
charge of this form.
Guys, they are
Title: Message
Hi
Matt,
Your
questions on the Skyway 7000 Trango Atlas would be answered by our
Backhaul Bash Report (costs $3k)
or--you can go to WiNOG and see a presentation of the results
live
http://www.winog.com/austin_2006/sessions/day3_backhaul1.htm
That will do it every time...
I forgot to plug in the sync cable once, at the top of the tower.
Mike Bushard, Jr
Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:49 PM
You still using WRAP boards I got some for sale mounted in some nice
NEMA 4 enclosures, 6ghz arrestors, the whole works.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
114 S. Walnut St.
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
yes, I use WRAP boards
North East Oregon Fastnet, LLC 509-593-4061
personal correspondence to: mark at neofast dot net
sales inquiries to: purchasing at neofast dot net
Fast Internet, NO WIRES!
-
- Original
Tom,
You make a very good point that 5.3 GHz should be used wherever possible
while reserving 5.8 for longer-distance backhauling and supercell use.
We should all be thinking in terms of using 5.3 whenever we can and
reserving the higher-power 5.8 authorization for those situations where
we
That has been our whole focus.
The first part of the puzzle was the 4 port WAR boards. It is so easy
to deploy a repeater and one or more micro cells if they all come in
one box and you simply attach antennas.
Then we developed the 5 and 10 MHz channel widths. At 5 MHz width,
for instance, you
39 matches
Mail list logo