Steve, I see a lot of discussion about 3650, but at the moment, it appears
either difficult, impossible, or unpredictable, to get licensed for that
spectrum.
What I've been able to see, is that only 'experimental' deployments can get
licensed on that band, and so... only a small amount of
Patrick,
What is the current state of WIMAX roll out? I remember a while ago
Nokia backed out saying it was a NON ISSUE for a while...
If you know of any real wimax AP's out there... will you post them at
http://map.wirelessinternetcoverage.com ?
On 4/21/06, Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why would our possition be to volunteer to contribute?
They'll make us pay on their own, I see no reason to incurage it.
The contributors should be the mature high volume telecoms, that aren't hurt
by contributing.
The whole robin hood thing, take a little bit from each of the rich to
subsidize
PAtrick,
[I should insert a note here that recognizes that bringing to market a
system that might be considered spectrally abusive so that it itself
survives, all while conforming perfectly within the regulations, may be
considered to be an entirely sound, even smart, competitive strategy --
Steve,
In theory, I fully agree with your view.
The problem is that theory does not always play out in the real world. 5
years later, I still have 10 mbps gear, and very few places that can risk
using faster gear. (although we are finding ways, such as getting higher
power with PtP to use
PAtrick,
Agreed, 3650 was proof that the FCC sees the points at hand. I thought they
took great risk and great support to make the 3650 rules as they did. The
fear is that if nobody takes advantage of the space, they are not likely to
go out on a limb again. Someone has got to make some
