Re: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM
Way to go MT Chicken Chasing Team ! You latvians rock ! This goes to prove that once again - hands down - Mikrotik is the best PC / SBC Router platform out there bar none ! Regards, JohnnyO - Original Message - From: Smith, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 6:28 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM I second that :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jenco Wireless Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 7:26 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM I knew that when everyone was getting worked up about Calea that MT would come through. Thanks Mikrotik Brad H On 5/23/07, Frank Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know the technical requirements of CALEA? If so please send me a link to the final draft. thanks frank - Original Message - From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM Meaning 2.9.44? Does anyone know if what MT's doing meets the technical requirements of CALEA? I know there's still staffing and contact issues. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Doug Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:28 PM Subject: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM For those who aren't on Mikrotik's mailing list: - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:46 AM Subject: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM Eight days until the US MUM! There is still time to get a good deal on flights and hotel accommodations. http://mum.mikrotik.com/2007/US/ The following CALEA features will be included in the next version of both RouterOS 2.9.XX and 3.X beta. CALEA features included in RouterOS --- Multiple subject/multiple destination packet interception and streaming in following formats: * Call Content Connection (CCC) Interface according to PKT-SP-ES-DCI-I01-060914 (PacketCable 2.0 PacketCable Electronic Surveillance Delivery Function to Collection Function Interface Specification) * Call Content Connection (CCC) Interface according to ANSI/SCTE 24-13 2006 (IPCalblecom Electronic Surveillance Standard) that is approved method for Communication Content delivery to LEA according to ATIS-113.2007 (Lawfully Authorized Electronic Surveillance For Internet Access and Services) * TZSP format - for reception with 'Ethereal', tcpdump, trafr (sniffer stream reader for linux) - http://www.mikrotik.com/download.html CALEA-server package * accepts multiple CCC streams (identified by destination port/source address/case id) * stores communication content according to IP Network Access Intercept Requirements and Method(FBI-WISPA draft) specified full content intercept requirements (without out-of-band events) * stores communication content of multiple subjects/cases * stores communication content in libpcap format * new libpcap file based on different conditions (interval/size/packet count) * generates hash for each pcap file (md5/sha1/sha256) Initial documentation can be found at: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Calea Don't forget to attend the MUM CALEA Panel Discussion and register for the MikroTik CALEA Workshop: - MikroTik CALEA Workshop, Wednesday May 30th 1-5PM (registration required [EMAIL PROTECTED]) - CALEA Panel Discussion, Friday June 1st 11:15-12:45 http://mum.mikrotik.com/2007/US/agenda Regards, Training MikroTik -- -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/815 - Release Date: 5/22/2007 3:49 PM -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
RE: [WISPA] QB Integration Survey
As for recurring, Memorized Transactions works great for us. Set it and forget it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Ratcliffe Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 1:36 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] QB Integration Survey I'm working with a Quickbooks module developer on some new stuff, and doing some brainstorming today, I wanted to get a feel for whether these modules would be good for the (W)ISP industry if we developed them: * Module for ISP-style QB recurring billing * QB Customer payment web portal interface * RADIUS server QB interface for customers * Hotspot billing integration * Ability to import VOIP call-detail-records bill customers based on usage * Ability to import RADIUS accounting records for customer usage billing These aren't developed yet but as developers would like to see what kind of market is out there for small ISPs. Many who probably use Quickbooks already for accounting. Please reply OFFLIST. -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] 700 Auction
Small telecom bidders ask court to void FCC spectrum auction By Peg Brickley Last Update: 4:14 PM ET May 23, 2007 http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/small-telecom-bidders-ask-court/story.aspx?guid=%7B6F2B0C5B-209A-4DC3-87A3-CAB7A02B96B8%7D http://tinyurl.com/2kdvam Lawyers for small telecommunications bidders Wednesday asked a federal appeals court in Philadelphia to throw out a $13.75 billion auction of wireless spectrum on the grounds that last-minute changes made it unfair. Upsetting the August 2006 auction could turn the industry upside down, said William Lake, attorney for T-Mobile USA, a subsidiary of German telecommunications giant Deutsche Telekom AG , and for a trade association of wireless carriers, Washington, D.C.-based CTIA-The Wireless Association. T-Mobile was the largest winner at the big auction under attack, claiming $4.2 billion worth of the spectrum in a sale of public airwaves long reserved for government and official uses. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals must decide whether to overturn the auction, and what to do about Federal Communications Commission rule changes that kicked in just before the big sale. The decision could also have an impact on the next big FCC auction, expected by January 2008, of 700 megahertz band spectrum that is expected to fetch up to $15 billion. The FCC defended its auction rule changes as the fair product of a fair process. If the appeals court voids the rules on technical grounds, the FCC will likely enact substantially the same rules again, said Joseph Palmore, deputy general counsel for the FCC. Dennis Corbett, lawyer for Council Tree Communications Inc. and two other auction challengers, said the FCC rule changes, almost on the eve of the auction, put a damper on his clients' chances in the bidding. In one crucial change, the FCC doubled the length of time winning bidders must hold their spectrum before selling it, pushing the exit horizon to 10 years, which is longer than the venture capitalists who finance small bidders like to hold their investments. Corbett said the changes frightened off private equity investors. What the agency did here, instead of being proactive and helping small businesses, it dropped those pianos on their heads, Corbett said. With no one to stake them to a seat at the auction table, small bidders can't compete with telecommunications giants hungry for spectrum, Corbett said. When you go out to find capital, which is the hardest thing for a small business, the investors need to know the rules of the road, Corbett said. He said the FCC acted with illegal haste last year, and that the auction should be unwound. Judges on the three-member panel that will decide whether last year's auction results stand or fall expressed concern about creating a major disturbance in the telecommunications industry. Nullifying the auction would be very disruptive, U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Michael A. Chagares said. However, Chagares suggested, vacating the FCC rule changes that small bidders blamed for unfairness, a fix for future auctions, might be a less drastic remedy. Corbett, lawyer for the small bidders, said the court should get rid of the new FCC rules in time for the next spectrum auction even if the court decides there's nothing to be done about last year's auction. The 700 megahertz is a huge auction of beachfront spectrum, he said. These rules should not infect yet another auction. They're bad rules. Get rid of them. FCC attorney Palmore, however, warned that throwing out the rules would make big trouble. It would throw into question and create incredible uncertainty for future auctions, he said. The appeals court did not say when it will issue a decision. The court could uphold the rules and last year's auction, vacate either the rules or the auction, or do nothing, bowing to an FCC argument the appeal didn't come in time. In addition to Council Tree Communications, Bethel Native Corp. and the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council are challenging the FCC. As designated entities under rules designed to make sure deep-pocketed telecommunications enterprises don't dominate auctions, they are entitled to bidding credits to compensate for their financial disadvantages. Such entities often sell off acquired spectrum rights to help finance their telecommunications ventures. -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] white space device
White space device at FCC http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070522-new-superfast-wireless-broadband-device-prototype-submitted-to-fcc.html While the Federal Communications Commission moves ahead with planning for the upcoming 700MHz spectrum auction, the White Space Coalition has submitted a second prototype white space wireless broadband device to the FCC for testing. White space devices could use the so-called white space in the current analog television spectrum (2MHz to 698MHz) to deliver wireless broadband service. Former FCC chief engineer Edmond Thomas (and current technology policy advisor for the law firm of Harris, Wiltshire Grannis, which is representing the Coalition) told Ars that he believes white space broadband could deliver download speeds of up to 80Mbps, which would make it extremely competitive with fiber-to-the-premises solutions like Verizon's FiOS networks. The newest white space prototype is manufactured by Philips Electronics of North America and consists of a TV tuner, a digital processing board, and a PC which provides the UI, control, and signal processing. It's proof-of-concept hardware intended to demonstrate that it's possible to sense the presence of TV signals and transmit wireless IP data in a way that does not interfere with TV. According to an FCC filing seen by Ars Technica, the new prototype is capable of picking up analog and digital television signals as well as wireless microphone signals (which operate in the same part of the spectrum). It works similarly to the Microsoft-manufactured spectrum sensing device submitted earlier this year. Microsoft also submitted a transmission device to the FCC for testing which will be used to show that white space broadband transmissions won't interfere with TV signals. -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM
Now on to the FCC certification issue! :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JohnnyO Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 2:25 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM Importance: High Way to go MT Chicken Chasing Team ! You latvians rock ! This goes to prove that once again - hands down - Mikrotik is the best PC / SBC Router platform out there bar none ! Regards, JohnnyO - Original Message - From: Smith, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 6:28 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM I second that :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jenco Wireless Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 7:26 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM I knew that when everyone was getting worked up about Calea that MT would come through. Thanks Mikrotik Brad H On 5/23/07, Frank Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know the technical requirements of CALEA? If so please send me a link to the final draft. thanks frank - Original Message - From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM Meaning 2.9.44? Does anyone know if what MT's doing meets the technical requirements of CALEA? I know there's still staffing and contact issues. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Doug Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:28 PM Subject: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM For those who aren't on Mikrotik's mailing list: - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:46 AM Subject: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM Eight days until the US MUM! There is still time to get a good deal on flights and hotel accommodations. http://mum.mikrotik.com/2007/US/ The following CALEA features will be included in the next version of both RouterOS 2.9.XX and 3.X beta. CALEA features included in RouterOS --- Multiple subject/multiple destination packet interception and streaming in following formats: * Call Content Connection (CCC) Interface according to PKT-SP-ES-DCI-I01-060914 (PacketCable 2.0 PacketCable Electronic Surveillance Delivery Function to Collection Function Interface Specification) * Call Content Connection (CCC) Interface according to ANSI/SCTE 24-13 2006 (IPCalblecom Electronic Surveillance Standard) that is approved method for Communication Content delivery to LEA according to ATIS-113.2007 (Lawfully Authorized Electronic Surveillance For Internet Access and Services) * TZSP format - for reception with 'Ethereal', tcpdump, trafr (sniffer stream reader for linux) - http://www.mikrotik.com/download.html CALEA-server package * accepts multiple CCC streams (identified by destination port/source address/case id) * stores communication content according to IP Network Access Intercept Requirements and Method(FBI-WISPA draft) specified full content intercept requirements (without out-of-band events) * stores communication content of multiple subjects/cases * stores communication content in libpcap format * new libpcap file based on different conditions (interval/size/packet count) * generates hash for each pcap file (md5/sha1/sha256) Initial documentation can be found at: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Calea Don't forget to attend the MUM CALEA Panel Discussion and register for the MikroTik CALEA Workshop: - MikroTik CALEA Workshop, Wednesday May 30th 1-5PM (registration required [EMAIL PROTECTED]) - CALEA Panel Discussion, Friday June 1st 11:15-12:45 http://mum.mikrotik.com/2007/US/agenda Regards, Training MikroTik -- -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/815 - Release Date: 5/22/2007 3:49 PM -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless
RE: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM
Amen on that! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cliff Leboeuf Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 12:42 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM Now on to the FCC certification issue! :) -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Best night cameras
I need cameras that will take pictures in the night. Something that is reasonable in price and maybe can catch a license plate number. It does not have to be an ip camera. Does anyone have experience in this? -- George Rogato Welcome to WISPA www.wispa.org http://signup.wispa.org/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Best night cameras
George, do you want to catch them with stealth or deter them? Opposite and maybe cheaper approach, bright motion sensing lighting and a cheaper med to hi res camera? Chuck Profito 209-988-7388 CV-ACCESS, INC [EMAIL PROTECTED] Providing High Speed Broadband to Rural Central California -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Rogato Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 10:12 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Best night cameras I need cameras that will take pictures in the night. Something that is reasonable in price and maybe can catch a license plate number. It does not have to be an ip camera. Does anyone have experience in this? -- George Rogato Welcome to WISPA www.wispa.org http://signup.wispa.org/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Best night cameras
George, I use these and find them exceptional. They see in brilliant color in the day (up to 5 megapixels) and have night mode that's BW but equal in resolution and will see a lot more than you can but isn't for total darkness. It can read a plate at 100 feet, I'd guess, in moonlight, and still catch a wide image (you can digitally zoom up...not bad when you start with 5 megapixels). If you want, I can send you an image or try their site: http://www.iqeye.com/productlist.html It is an IP camera that has Web access, very rich triggering options including selected parts of the image for e-mail or FTP. It doesn't have an AP built in, however, so you need PoE or other power. . . . j o n a t h a n -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Rogato Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 12:12 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Best night cameras I need cameras that will take pictures in the night. Something that is reasonable in price and maybe can catch a license plate number. It does not have to be an ip camera. Does anyone have experience in this? -- George Rogato Welcome to WISPA www.wispa.org http://signup.wispa.org/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Mike Hammett wrote: Meaning 2.9.44? Meaning 3.0 Does anyone know if what MT's doing meets the technical requirements of CALEA? I know there's still staffing and contact issues. The solution will meet the technical requirements. -- Butch Evans Network Engineering and Security Consulting 573-276-2879 http://www.butchevans.com/ My calendar: http://tinyurl.com/y24ad6 Training Partners: http://tinyurl.com/smfkf Mikrotik Certified Consultant http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM
The press release I reposted mentions 2.9.xx and 3.0. The following CALEA features will be included in the next version of both RouterOS 2.9.XX and 3.X beta. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Butch Evans Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 2:53 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM On Wed, 23 May 2007, Mike Hammett wrote: Meaning 2.9.44? Meaning 3.0 Does anyone know if what MT's doing meets the technical requirements of CALEA? I know there's still staffing and contact issues. The solution will meet the technical requirements. -- Butch Evans Network Engineering and Security Consulting 573-276-2879 http://www.butchevans.com/ My calendar: http://tinyurl.com/y24ad6 Training Partners: http://tinyurl.com/smfkf Mikrotik Certified Consultant http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.7/816 - Release Date: 5/23/2007 3:59 PM -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Cabling - RF Industries
We are currently working on improving our inventory and infrastructure. Currently we make a lot of our own cables, except for things like pigtails, but we are looking at switching to premade cables for radio to antenna jumpers and such. What do you think of cables and connectors from RF Industries? Has anyone had problems with them? How about good experiences? Thanks, Ryan -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Cabling - RF Industries
We use their connectors, but use all Times for LMR. Our Pre-made Jumper come form PCS Tech. They sweep them to the freq we specify. Never had a issue yet, well that was caused by faulty materials anyway. Mike Bushard, Jr Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC 320-256-WISP (9477) 320-256-9478 Fax -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Langseth Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 2:52 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Cabling - RF Industries We are currently working on improving our inventory and infrastructure. Currently we make a lot of our own cables, except for things like pigtails, but we are looking at switching to premade cables for radio to antenna jumpers and such. What do you think of cables and connectors from RF Industries? Has anyone had problems with them? How about good experiences? Thanks, Ryan -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Doug Ratcliffe wrote: The press release I reposted mentions 2.9.xx and 3.0. The following CALEA features will be included in the next version of both RouterOS 2.9.XX and 3.X beta. Not sure how, but I missed that altogether. :-) Thanks for the correction. -- Butch Evans Network Engineering and Security Consulting 573-276-2879 http://www.butchevans.com/ My calendar: http://tinyurl.com/y24ad6 Training Partners: http://tinyurl.com/smfkf Mikrotik Certified Consultant http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] IPv6 - anyone using it?
With the recent announcement by ARIN to start pushing IPv6 uptake, and the run out date of v4 is as soon as 2010, I was wondering is anyone are here using v6 in some form or planning the switchover? Since it is much more than renumbering customers, the needed time for deploying it will be much longer, is your infrastructure ready for it? http://www.arin.net/announcements/20070521.html http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070521-arin-its-time-to- migrate-to-ipv6.html Have a great evening, Ryan -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] IPv6 - anyone using it?
I really dread IPv6.so much more complicated. I probably would run it, but from my understanding there is a ton of equipment on the internet backbone that won't route it. Not to mention how many SOHO routers and PC's are ready for it? Will your CPE support it? And the list goes on, I foresee a mad rush for upgrades and implementation the day v4 space is gone, and not a second before. Mike Bushard, Jr Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC 320-256-WISP (9477) 320-256-9478 Fax -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Langseth Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 10:09 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] IPv6 - anyone using it? With the recent announcement by ARIN to start pushing IPv6 uptake, and the run out date of v4 is as soon as 2010, I was wondering is anyone are here using v6 in some form or planning the switchover? Since it is much more than renumbering customers, the needed time for deploying it will be much longer, is your infrastructure ready for it? http://www.arin.net/announcements/20070521.html http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070521-arin-its-time-to- migrate-to-ipv6.html Have a great evening, Ryan -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
