Re: [WISPA] Netflix

2007-10-02 Thread Tom DeReggi
They could have rerouted traffic instead of blackholing all of Level3. And what message would that send? Did you expect Cogent to jsut take it in the chin, and accept the fate LEvel3 dictated? I disagree. Level3 could have bandwidth limited Cogent, instead of depeering Cogent. Cogent did

Re: [WISPA] Netflix

2007-10-02 Thread Matt Liotta
Tom DeReggi wrote: And what message would that send? Did you expect Cogent to jsut take it in the chin, and accept the fate LEvel3 dictated? I disagree. This was a peering contract dispute. I imagine Level3 was within their rights to cancel the contract otherwise we would have seen a lawsuit.

[WISPA] iPhone

2007-10-02 Thread Travis Johnson
Hi, About a week ago I decided to buy an iPhone off ebay (brand new) to play with... I wasn't planning on keeping it as my phone, but wanted to play to see what all the hype was about. We don't have ATT service in our area, so once the phone arrived I had to hack it to use Edge Wireless (a

Re: [WISPA] iPhone

2007-10-02 Thread Ryan Langseth
I would not mind trying one, but GSM is not an option around here :( Ryan Travis Johnson wrote: Hi, About a week ago I decided to buy an iPhone off ebay (brand new) to play with... I wasn't planning on keeping it as my phone, but wanted to play to see what all the hype was about. We don't

RE: [WISPA] iPhone

2007-10-02 Thread Brad Belton
I read somewhere that you don't want to perform the latest Update from Apple with a hacked IPhone. Something about the update can break the hacked phones. Of course Apple says the update has no intention of doing so...yah right! Quick search came up with this:

Re: [WISPA] Leasing 2.3 or 2.5 GHz Licensed Spectrum

2007-10-02 Thread Jeffrey Thomas
They have submitted for several OET's from my understanding, for those frequencies. On Oct 1, 2007, at 9:52 PM, Patrick Leary wrote: And speaking of misleading Jeff, you should do the basic diligence before reporting what is or is not available in the U.S. from any vendor. All are welcome to

RE: [WISPA] Leasing 2.3 or 2.5 GHz Licensed Spectrum

2007-10-02 Thread Rick Harnish
Have you verified your information source with research or are you suggesting we believe your third party understanding? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Thomas Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 4:28 PM To: WISPA General List Subject:

[WISPA] Charles Wu email address

2007-10-02 Thread Jack Unger
Can anyone help me email Charles? My email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced. Thanks !! jack -- Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. FCC License # PG-12-25133 Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993 Author of the WISP Handbook - Deploying License-Free Wireless

Re: [WISPA] Charles Wu email address

2007-10-02 Thread Dylan Oliver
Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED], -- Dylan Oliver Primaverity, LLC ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON ** ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA

Re: [WISPA] Leasing 2.3 or 2.5 GHz Licensed Spectrum

2007-10-02 Thread Jeffrey Thomas
Rick, When your Rep @ xyz company says they have applied for FCC clearance and expect type certification to be completed within 2-3 weeks, I would say thats pretty good info, you are correct that I probably should take the time to verify everything they have stated- and I do agree I should

[WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Patrick Leary
Hi folks, So how many of you using it have experienced the DFS2 kicking in? I am curious because we are not getting many reports where radars are forcing the radios to vacate and move to another channel. We are getting asked this a lot of late since we released our 5.4 PMP, but so far we don't

Re: [WISPA] Netflix

2007-10-02 Thread Tom DeReggi
Most cable and DSL contracts give providers 30 days to fix an outage, without gross neglaence or financial compensation, when you read the fine print. But I can tell you that after 3 days, its living hell for both parties if its not involved, regardless of what the contract says. You can now

Re: [WISPA] iPhone

2007-10-02 Thread Tom DeReggi
I'm interested in more feedback. Cool for you as the CEO? or cool as a future phone for your techs? I was considering getting one, for the awesome screen, but was concerned about its missing features. Am I correct that it will not support GPS or Camera? You can listen to your music Do you

Re: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Tom DeReggi
No but I'll tell you that the wireline providers are using the DFS2 issue as a major negative against us. I'm getting asked about it, alot from prospects. It would be nice to learn very few are effected by it, for building possitive public perception. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc

Re: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Ryan Langseth
We have a tranzeo PTP link directly south of an Air Force base (the link runs east-west), the East endpoint is right south of the base, less than 3 miles. We put it in the 5.8 range because it dropped once. Here is the DFS info we have: Channel RADAR EventsTime Since Last

Re: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Zachery Wolfinger
Well, since you asked ;-) We tried to deploy an Alvarion 5.4GHz B100 link in Indianapolis. DFS2 kicked in big time. To the point that the radios shut down all frequencies and would not communicate with each other. Sitting in the lab they worked fine. It's possible that at least one

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Patrick Leary
Well, I guess the DFS2 mechanism works! And the radios could not find an open (non radar) frequency? Patrick Leary AVP, Market Development Alvarion, Inc. o: 650.314.2628 c: 760.580.0080 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Marty Dougherty
We have a couple deployed less then 4 miles from Dulles Airport...one AU has los to the airport..while we see noise on a few of the 5.4 channels we have not seen any radar at allMarty -Original Message- From: Zachery Wolfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Gino Villarini
A Fcc certification search gives no results for Tranzeo in 5.4 Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Langseth Sent: Tuesday,

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Mike Bushard, Jr
Ryan, Is that the same Link Jim had problems with every once in while after dark? We figured they must have been testing the new top secret aircraft.. Mike Bushard, Jr Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC 320-256-WISP (9477) 320-256-9478 Fax -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Mike Bushard, Jr
I think he was talking 5.3 Mike Bushard, Jr Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC 320-256-WISP (9477) 320-256-9478 Fax -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 8:26 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: RE:

Re: [WISPA] iPhone

2007-10-02 Thread Travis Johnson
Tom, It's just plain cool. I had a Palm Treo 650 before. We use SMS more than anything else... it's how we talk to our techs and installers, it's how we get alerts, it's how I talk to my family (wife and kids), etc. so that part was very critical for me... and the Treo was the only phone

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yup, and the channels listed there are not in the 5.4 range. But part of the frequency it does support has a DFS requirement (from my understanding), just relaying some info. - Original Message Follows - From: Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope, before everything out there was 2.4, There is one link to the east that could have been affected by radar from the airport. Ryan - Original Message Follows - From: Mike Bushard, Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ? Date:

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Brad Belton
This doesn't come as a surprise. We deployed a couple VL units and they were all but shut down due to a less than ideal RF environment. Countless hours over days if not weeks with Alvarion's finest in an effort to remedy the situation were unsuccessful. Reflecting back on our particular

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Gino Villarini
So Brad, what did you use? Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Belton Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 11:18 PM To: 'WISPA General

RE: [WISPA] iPhone

2007-10-02 Thread Brad Belton
Have to agree the iPhone is just plain cool. Sure makes my Sprint HTC Mogul look like a clunky, dumpy brick by comparison! lol I've been a Sprint wireless subscriber since their inception. Just can't bring myself to jump ship...even for the iPhone. sigh Best, Brad -Original

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Brad Belton
Hello Gino, Well, I don't want to be accused of hijacking a thread and morphing it into an advertisement for another brand, but IMO a radio without a CSMA mechanism, with software controlled dual polarity and with a RX threshold would most likely perform better in a hostile RF environment. At

Re: [WISPA] iPhone

2007-10-02 Thread Jeromie Reeves
Has anyone picked up a Cect P168, Cect 599, or any of the other iClones? I am thinking I would rather get 4 of the clones for the same price as 1 iPhone (and not be locked into ATT whom does not work out here). So far the only missing feature I want on the clones is wifi On 10/2/07, Brad Belton

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Patrick Leary
What a load of garbage. Brad resisted our help at every turn. I was on some of the calls and I personally made a site visit. I even had some of our engineers calling me to ask for my help to get Brad to work with them because he would not call them back and/or refused suggestions or offers of

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Gino Villarini
Judd Dare wow ... that's a old one ... I wonder ehats he's up to lately, He kicked me off his list about 2 years ago... Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Brad Belton
Absolute mistruths. Should I start posting emails between Alvarion engineers and me? I still have all the surveys...one after another and another Your site visit was to a meeting on the other side of town before the gear was even deployed! Lol! The client was my client not the third

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Brad Belton
Still has his own list. Pretty sure Patrick is an active contributor over theregrin Best, Brad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 11:16 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.4

RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?

2007-10-02 Thread Brad Belton
A quick email search comes up with dozens of emails with several subjects spread out over several months all relating to this link. How about your 5-17-06 email? How about Keith Edmonds (Alvarion Engineer) 5-26-06 email or should I say emails? Skip ahead through dozens of emails between

[WISPA] A Reminder about personal attacks on list

2007-10-02 Thread Jack Unger
May I remind the two gentlemen who are now attacking each other over the performance of Alvarion 5.4 GHz equipment and the deployment thereof that WISPA does NOT approve of personal attacks on-list. If the two of you feel you must persist in attacking each other (and the attacks appear to be

[WISPA] Long Distance StarOS links

2007-10-02 Thread Matt Larsen - Lists
Hi all, Today we finished replacing our long Trango links with StarOS links, WAR-4 boards running version 3 of StarOS - hooked up to 4' Radiowaves dishes. Here are the results: 42 mile shot 10mhz channel size -58 signal strength 10-12meg throughput 62 mile shot 10mhz channel size -60

RE: [WISPA] Long Distance StarOS links

2007-10-02 Thread Gino Villarini
Wonder what would Trango Atlas Backhauls would have performed in that scenario Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists