In the past several have mentioned the RB532that spews harmful noise (out of
band, I think around 400mhz?) when 48volt PS was used.
Just had an insodent today, (with a test unit that was installed in the
field still). It was spewing out interference at 899Mhz noise interfering
with Nextel.
Tom,
If you post about it on the Mikrotik support forum, you will magically
see your post disappear about 2-3 days later. Go ahead, try it... I've
done it twice now (from two different accounts). The noise doesn't
really exist... it was all in your mind... :)
Travis
Microserv
Tom DeReggi
Where's my tin foil hat when I need it.
Travis Johnson wrote:
Tom,
If you post about it on the Mikrotik support forum, you will magically
see your post disappear about 2-3 days later. Go ahead, try it... I've
done it twice now (from two different accounts). The noise doesn't
Tom,
I have had some issues in the 149/151MHz range at 48Vdc and have had a
spectrum analyzer sniffing the board and the POE to check for other out of
band emissions and have never seen an instance with MT at that high of a
frequency. The problems were on the older RB532 and it is well
Mac,
Are you saying the new RB532's (400mhz versions for example) do not
have noise issues when running 48V PoE?
Travis
Microserv
Mac Dearman wrote:
Tom,
I have had some issues in the 149/151MHz range at 48Vdc and have had a
spectrum analyzer sniffing the board and the POE to check
We are back in business. Thanks everyone for your concern. The last
several days were pure chaos here in San Diego county. Many of us were
evacuated from our homes at 4 am Monday morning as the flames were
approaching various neighborhoods. The immediate area where the Trango
facility is
That is correct Travis. The noise issue - once found was fixed immediately
and has not been an issue for many months now AFAIK.
Mac
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 11:28 AM
To: WISPA General List
-- Original Message --
From: d berns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Telecom Regulation the Internet[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:57:57 -0400
http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2007/oct/oct23a_07.html
VERIZON WIRELESS AGREES TO
I guess if you wanted to push the envelope, you could put a Squid
server in your core, do a download of a large file and then repeat. You
could then advertise the second rate as up to X Mbps, and it would be
technically correct.
John
Travis Johnson wrote:
Marlon,
We already did that...
I used to have a 192k SDSL connection to the Internet. When the price
went up to $129 per month, I ended up going to a cable modem that was
rated at 6 meg downloads. My wife was very vocal about how much slower
the cable modem was. I don't know what they do, but DNS lookups are
horrible on the
10 matches
Mail list logo