[WISPA] RB532 Harmful Noise at 899 also

2007-10-24 Thread Tom DeReggi
In the past several have mentioned the RB532that spews harmful noise (out of band, I think around 400mhz?) when 48volt PS was used. Just had an insodent today, (with a test unit that was installed in the field still). It was spewing out interference at 899Mhz noise interfering with Nextel.

Re: [WISPA] RB532 Harmful Noise at 899 also

2007-10-24 Thread Travis Johnson
Tom, If you post about it on the Mikrotik support forum, you will magically see your post disappear about 2-3 days later. Go ahead, try it... I've done it twice now (from two different accounts). The noise doesn't really exist... it was all in your mind... :) Travis Microserv Tom DeReggi

Re: [WISPA] RB532 Harmful Noise at 899 also

2007-10-24 Thread Brian Rohrbacher
Where's my tin foil hat when I need it. Travis Johnson wrote: Tom, If you post about it on the Mikrotik support forum, you will magically see your post disappear about 2-3 days later. Go ahead, try it... I've done it twice now (from two different accounts). The noise doesn't

RE: [WISPA] RB532 Harmful Noise at 899 also

2007-10-24 Thread Mac Dearman
Tom, I have had some issues in the 149/151MHz range at 48Vdc and have had a spectrum analyzer sniffing the board and the POE to check for other out of band emissions and have never seen an instance with MT at that high of a frequency. The problems were on the older RB532 and it is well

Re: [WISPA] RB532 Harmful Noise at 899 also

2007-10-24 Thread Travis Johnson
Mac, Are you saying the new RB532's (400mhz versions for example) do not have noise issues when running 48V PoE? Travis Microserv Mac Dearman wrote: Tom, I have had some issues in the 149/151MHz range at 48Vdc and have had a spectrum analyzer sniffing the board and the POE to check

Re: [WISPA] Trango Site

2007-10-24 Thread John Seaman
We are back in business. Thanks everyone for your concern. The last several days were pure chaos here in San Diego county. Many of us were evacuated from our homes at 4 am Monday morning as the flames were approaching various neighborhoods. The immediate area where the Trango facility is

RE: [WISPA] RB532 Harmful Noise at 899 also

2007-10-24 Thread Mac Dearman
That is correct Travis. The noise issue - once found was fixed immediately and has not been an issue for many months now AFAIK. Mac From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 11:28 AM To: WISPA General List

[WISPA] FWD: NYS AG Cuomo settles with VZ Wirelss on unlimited data

2007-10-24 Thread Scottie Arnett
-- Original Message -- From: d berns [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Telecom Regulation the Internet[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:57:57 -0400 http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2007/oct/oct23a_07.html VERIZON WIRELESS AGREES TO

Re: [WISPA] Advertising

2007-10-24 Thread John Thomas
I guess if you wanted to push the envelope, you could put a Squid server in your core, do a download of a large file and then repeat. You could then advertise the second rate as up to X Mbps, and it would be technically correct. John Travis Johnson wrote: Marlon, We already did that...

Re: [WISPA] Advertising

2007-10-24 Thread John Thomas
I used to have a 192k SDSL connection to the Internet. When the price went up to $129 per month, I ended up going to a cable modem that was rated at 6 meg downloads. My wife was very vocal about how much slower the cable modem was. I don't know what they do, but DNS lookups are horrible on the