[WISPA] Test, Ignore

2008-01-10 Thread David E. Smith
One more test message (to make sure I've fixed a lingering glitch in mailing list archiving and those nifty Web pages). David Smith MVN.net WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/

Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

2008-01-10 Thread Matt Liotta
Mike Bushard, Jr wrote: Hmmm. I didn't know their was a profile for 3650.. I believe there are profiles for 2.3, 2.5, 3.4-3.8, and 5.x. -Matt WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/

Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

2008-01-10 Thread Mike Hammett
Whose gear? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 11:07 AM Subject: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX

Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

2008-01-10 Thread Matt Liotta
Mike Hammett wrote: Whose gear? We have not announced a vendor at present. That announcement will be forth coming. -Matt WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/

Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

2008-01-10 Thread Steve Stroh
Slight correction: Mobile WiMAX profiles for 2.3 / 2.5 Fixed WiMAX profiles for 3.5 (non-US), but NOT 3.65 GHz in the US because of the unique contention protocol requirements (systems for 3.65 GHz should be considered proprietary and quite possibly non-interoperable). NO formal WiMAX profile,

Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

2008-01-10 Thread Matt Liotta
Steve Stroh wrote: Fixed WiMAX profiles for 3.5 (non-US), but NOT 3.65 GHz in the US because of the unique contention protocol requirements (systems for 3.65 GHz should be considered proprietary and quite possibly non-interoperable). The lower 25Mhz of 3.65Ghz does not have a contention

Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

2008-01-10 Thread Mike Bushard, Jr
Do your radios have sub channelization? I Congratulate you on the build, but I have to question if stuff like this is not part of the total misunderstanding of WiMAX (what it is and isn't). I really don't think WiMAX is the right term, Maybe WiMAX based, but it definitely is not WiMAX. We just

Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

2008-01-10 Thread Clint Ricker
I'd like to make a point in return. This is a press release, and it is generally used for marketing and publicity. Who the flip cares about the exact nuances in technology? If Matt's company expresses their product in terms that their target market understands, then it is good marketing. It's

Re: [WISPA] Advice for Ad supported wireless and dialup

2008-01-10 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
NNN!! Don't go there. I don't know of ANY that have survived that. Even NetZERO isn't really $0.00 anymore. Why in the world would you want to do something like this in the first place? marlon - Original Message - From: Ty Carter Lightwave Communications [EMAIL