femtocells
This is a great innovation that can help wisps gain market share.
With these femtocells, the cell phone works in the house so the consumer
doesn't need to have an extra land line.
The customer is probably paying 80.00 or so for their dsl - telephone
line. No land line needed for us
Hmm I see better opportunity going to the Cellco directly and offer them
the service, so that they do a bundle to the end user... Internet -
Femtocell
And you make and arrangement with the cellco to deliver the traffic
directly to them instead of going to the internet...Saving them some $$
On
I should have prefaced that with the word some.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Comcast will also be
It's interesting to see how the wireless carriers are trying to compete
with VoIP and (at the same time) leverage the broader coverage of
broadband in areas where cell service is weak.
On the cool side:
A few of us here have been using T-Mobile's wifi service and GSM+WiFi
phones for the past
to watch how you use the Internet, read your e-mail or
keep you from visiting sites it deems inappropriate. Some reserve the
right to block traffic and, for any reason, cut off a service that many
users now find essential.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080404/ap_on_hi_te/isp_fine_print
George Rogato wrote:
ISPs hog rights in fine print
What part of that makes you think that anyone is going after WISPs
specifically? Pretty much every ISP large and small I've known, either
as an end-user or a competitor, has something very similar in their
contract somewhere.
David Smith
from visiting sites it deems inappropriate. Some reserve the
right to block traffic and, for any reason, cut off a service that many
users now find essential.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080404/ap_on_hi_te/isp_fine_print
Not wisps, but rather internet service providers in general.
David E. Smith wrote:
George Rogato wrote:
ISPs hog rights in fine print
What part of that makes you think that anyone is going after WISPs
specifically? Pretty much every ISP large and small I've known, either
as an
We've seen the same thing here. Providers are selective to what price they
offer who.
We've seen $1000 per 5mb hear also. Clearly not the same good deal as $50 for
50mbps.
No matter what they offer, I just don't see Comcast giving the $200
bi-diectional 50mbps service to businesses.
If they
Reality of 50mbps.
Well, they can do it eventually, anyone can that offers Fiber.
The question is, how quickly do they want to give away their margin? and How
quickly can they deploy?
Thats the real questions, as long as their is an underserved market, WISPs have
a future.
How long would it
What I really think the Cable Cos are doing is trying to buy Public and
government support, using the old Telco trick.
Make the public think Comcast is going to provide the holy grail t
oconsumers, so support them, and don't beat them up in upcomming
legislation.
I can see it already... Dont
did you ever get this resolved?
On Wed, Jan 9, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Niemantsverdriet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying a new install of IPTrack. I have my router all set up and
sending NetFlow data (verified by tcpdump and NTOP) however when I try
to start IPTrack I get these errors:
This error generally comes from a variable being used in the regex
(pattern matching) in the script isn't set for whatever reason. It's
usually fairly simple to track down; you could probably pay someone
who knows perl to knock this out in an hour or so or track down the
variable yourself if
Bandwidth management is a tricky topic, very nuanced, and varies from
provider to provider. In someways, despite some of the net neutrality
discussions focusing around disclosure, this may end up becoming a bit
of a secret sauce because it is so heavily tied into quality
perception. In the end,
14 matches
Mail list logo
