Call me and we can talk about this. I'm pacific time.
509.988.0260
Having said that. What's your budget?
Don't use WDS. Radios do NOT like being repeaters. They want to come in
wireless out via wire or vice versa. If you need to move further down the
road, use two radios for it.
You can
I wouldn't necessarily say that a layer 2 mesh is more difficult to
troubleshoot than a layer 3 mesh with tunnels on top to achieve layer 2
functionality is... :)
L2 mesh networks can be quite scalable, especially when separating end
user traffic by performing l3 routing over the l2 mesh or by usi
Hiya Mac,
We need to know who are vendors and who are wisps.
Our require a majority of the elected board be wisps. It'll be harder to vote
correctly without knowing which group people fall under.
thanks,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Mac Dearman
To: 'Principal WISPA Member
He's cc'd here.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "rabbtux rabbtux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ip accounting solns
> Marlon,
>
> Please expand. What solution are you speaking of? any link or contact
> info?
>
I can't think of a reason why anyone would deploy a layer 2 mesh with
an Ethernet based medium (which wifi inherently is). Conventional
wisdom in large scale sp architecture is to do anything of any size or
complexity in layer 3. Layer 2 is really bad at scalability and
really hard to tro
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 20:52 -0400, Matt Hardy wrote:
> Yes a layer 2 mesh is protocol dependent, so you're stuck to IP traffic
> only.
Oops... i mean, Layer 3 is protocol dependent :)
> Also, when using a layer 3 mesh, roaming and convergence time can also
> increase (slowing things down) a
Yes a layer 2 mesh is protocol dependent, so you're stuck to IP traffic
only.
Also, when using a layer 3 mesh, roaming and convergence time can also
increase (slowing things down) as when things move around, extra things
have to happen... layer 3 stuff... OLSR tables updated, IPs updated, ARP
entr
I recently met someone who is doing a WiMAX project in Israel.
That's not my specialty, but if someone here is interested, I would be
happy to forward you the scope of work that he emailed me.
WISPA Wants You! Join
300-400 feet, 1100 feet? Heck you should be able to cover this area with a
9db omni and be done with it.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shaun R.
Sent
Hello Shaun,
We really need to know more about what exactly isn't working well with your
current setup to better help, but I'll give you two suggestions to consider.
Ditch the omni antennas and place all three APS on the center building with
the Internet feed. Then use three 120* or maybe better
10 matches
Mail list logo
