[WISPA] Just got bit by 3.65Ghz rules...

I was in the process of registering a location in preparation to run a licensed 3.65 ghz link. In fact, I wanted to run 3 of them from the same site. That can be done by using 5 mhz channels, and at this time, that would be sufficient bandwidth... But no. At 5 mhz bandwidth, I can't have

Re: [WISPA] IP based security system

I've always been impressed by the webcams that Borealis Broadband has in Anchorage. http://www.borealisbroadband.net/webcams.htm It looks like those are Mobotix. When you say expensive, can you give some sample prices. (there is a link off to a vendor on URL above, they seem to start at

Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction

LOL, not. They would all have to have Hams and be in my service area... On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 9:19 PM, RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Victoria Proffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have had to deal with a similar situation. I talked to the guy and told him

Re: [WISPA] Pathloss 4

Daniel, Most professionals use Pathloss. Most if not all commercial carriers use Pathloss I've been engineering Paths for 8 years and swear by it. Its worth it Knowing how to use it properly is priceless. I'm not in here much any more because some of the members like to go

Re: [WISPA] Pathloss 4

Thanks Mikey... I know most of licensed link companies use it, but looking a that $4k price tag makes me really want to think twice about it! Daniel White 3-dB Networks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MichaelDavidLake Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [WISPA] Pathloss 4

What can it do that Radio Mobile does not? I have been engineering microwave paths since 1978. Back in the day it was curved path profile paper and counting elevation lines on a topo map. I have used about a half dozen software products over the years, including the original on line version

Re: [WISPA] Pathloss 4

Chuck, I am probably one of the biggest supporters of Radio Mobile, love the software and agree with you. What Radio Mobile does not do well is things like reliability factors for hot standby and if you build in diversity antennas. For most WISP's this is not an issue. To that end, Radio

Re: [WISPA] Pathloss 4

Most of the tools use the old ATT long lines long haul and short haul availbility factors that were generated for analog radios. It is the opinion of some that digital radios do not need to need nearly as much fade margin as the old analogs. I would have to say, that our experience with some 60

Re: [WISPA] polling

Anything that's WiMAX --- WiNOG Wireless Roadshows Coming to a City Near You http://www.winog.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 9:59 PM To: [EMAIL

Re: [WISPA] Pathloss 4

I don't know the answer to that question. I have always pondered the issue of fade margin on digital paths. If you factor in an error checking in both the modulation methods and the TCPIP stack, you can deal with minor fades and in many cases you might not even notice a short fade. At that point

Re: [WISPA] Pathloss 4

I'll take a copy of your excel file Charles. ;-) - Original Message - From: Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 9:24 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Pathloss 4 Hi Michael, All Pathloss basically does is calculate

Re: [WISPA] Pathloss 4

Bah... You're supposed to be the creative, inquisitive one Chuck =) In all honesty, we've been making some internal changes to accommodate nLoS (specifically, knife-edge and a few others) -- wanna be as nifty and cool as the Orthogon calculator...when that's done, I'll be sure to send it over

[WISPA] Fw: [TowerTalk] Fw: BIG TOWER SALE

Anyone need a tower? marlon - Original Message - From: Joe Rudi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 10:53 AM Subject: [TowerTalk] Fw: BIG TOWER SALE I am down sizing at my new location and now have over 500 feet of well

Re: [WISPA] Fw: [TowerTalk] Fw: BIG TOWER SALE

pictures?? On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Anyone need a tower? marlon - Original Message - From: Joe Rudi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 10:53 AM Subject: [TowerTalk]

Re: [WISPA] Pathloss 4

I can't speak to Pathloss as I have not used it, but I will agree that RM is pretty accurate. It comes down to the accuacy and attention to detail. Garbage in = garbage out. __ Jerry Richardson airCloud Communications -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: [WISPA] IP based security system

List prices range from $795 to around $1500, depending on whether they are single or dual lens (day / night) and the output resolution. We mostly use the m22 it or the m22 sec, which range from $795 to $995. You can find some discounts, but there's not a lot of margin in these products. Tom S.

[WISPA] ATT - Wireless is Answer for Rural Markets

ATT http://www.att.com may look to WiMAX to provide broadband in rural markets http://www.wimaxforum.org/technology/, according to their CTO John Donovan. “WiMAX could come in handy in some U.S. markets, particularly rural areas where it's becoming prohibitively expensive to maintain copper,”