Re: [WISPA] Thanking Marlon and multipath experience

2009-05-22 Thread Patrick Shoemaker
Not trying to be pedantic here, but I think some clarification is needed 
regarding reflection, refraction, and diffraction.

Reflection is the phenomenon that occurs when an EM wave encounters a 
surface (larger than approximately one wavelength), hits it, and leaves 
the surface with reduced intensity. Same thing as light hitting a 
mirror. It's the big one for multipath.

Refraction is the effect that bends an EM wave when it transitions 
between two different media with different permittivities. We see this 
effect when you put a stick in a pool of water, and the stick looks bent 
at the surface of the water.

Diffraction (knife-edge diffraction) is the phenomenon that allows EM 
waves to travel around objects. It's the reason you can get an AM radio 
signal in a valley obstructed by mountains on all sides, the 
mountaintops diffract the signal and fill the valley with RF. It's my 
understanding that this phenomenon is not really worth considering at 
the frequencies we're using.

Hope that helps!

Patrick Shoemaker
Vector Data Systems LLC
shoemak...@vectordatasystems.com
office: (301) 358-1690 x36
http://www.vectordatasystems.com


Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
 Glad to be of help Forbes!  Once in a while I make a lucky guess.  grin
 
 OK, design note time.
 
 I work to keep all of my links in the -65 to -75 range.  If you look up the 
 specs for your radios you will likely find that this is well above the 
 lowest receive signal level, but not too far above it.
 
 Why is this important?  As I've been taught over the years (Thanks Jaime, 
 Bob and others) most knife edged refraction (a bounced signal off of an 
 object) will be about 30 dB down below the original signal level.
 
 So if your radio has a max sensitivity of -94 and you have a -65 signal 
 you'll be almost out of the possibility of the receive radio even picking up 
 your refracted signal.  Think of the refraction as a reflection or echo.  An 
 echo makes it really hard to understand someone.  Multipath is the same 
 thing.  But if you can make the echo so quiet that you can't hear is it 
 won't hurt anything, even if it's there.
 
 MOST of my towers put out LESS than 1 WATT!  A few are still close to 4 
 watts, but changes in AP's allow me to run ever lower tx powers.  Believe it 
 or not I have customers getting over 2 megs of service from systems that are 
 less than 2 watts and at ranges of 18 miles!  Yes I can prove this if anyone 
 wants to come visit
 
 If you are picking up your towers at levels above -60 to -65 you'll have a 
 LOT more trouble on your network.  Especially tower to tower.  Turn the 
 danged things down.  If you need more power at a customer's place install a 
 bigger antenna!
 
 Over the years I've run into many companies that try to use a bigger stick. 
 They systems never work well for long.  The more customers go on it the 
 worse that problem gets too.  I fact I have started pulling customers from a 
 competitor in the area.  He's running a system near me that looks to be 
 running about 42 watts (remember we're only allowed 4).  Why am I 
 getting his customers?  Because his system doesn't work right.  Much of that 
 is due to his design flaws.
 
 OK, next question is, how do I know what he's running?  All you need to know 
 is what gain the antenna is at your end, what the receive signal is and how 
 far the transmitter is away from you.  From there it's easy with a formula. 
 At 42dB I have him at about a 15dB antenna and 1 or so watt TX power.  A 
 VERY common config sold by some distributors.  It's too bad, these never 
 work well long term and rotten wisp networks give us all a bad name.
 
 Anyway, Forbes, try turning that power down.  WAY down.  I'll bet you can go 
 back to g mode and have even more stability than you have now.
 
 laters,
 marlon
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Forbes Mercy forbes.me...@wabroadband.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 1:47 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] Thanking Marlon and multipath experience
 
 
 I admit that most of you can dance around me in the field of RF.  I'm more 
 of an installer and management type.  Today I had a Nano CPE with a -48 dbi 
 signal which, as you know, is amazing; it should be it was a block away from 
 the tower.  The problem is the customer had long outages and erratic 
 service.  Aiming away from the tower kept the great connection but still 
 crappy pings.
 
 Marlon suggested Multipath as a possibility and advised to turn the radio to 
 B only and reduce the power on the radio. I had heard of Multipath but 
 never experienced it. We changed both settings and while the signal stayed 
 at -48dbi the time-outs and erratic pings went away.  90% of our system is 
 two or more miles from towers, so we never had this problem before. This 
 particular town is the only place where the towers are on buildings all 
 within ½ mile of nearly everyone
 
 
 It answered a lot of problems for others in town we 

Re: [WISPA] Thanking Marlon and multipath experience

2009-05-22 Thread Patrick Leary
Nice explanation that takes me way back to my fiber optics days. 


Patrick Leary
Aperto Networks
813.426.4230 mobile

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Patrick Shoemaker
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 5:16 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Thanking Marlon and multipath experience

Not trying to be pedantic here, but I think some clarification is needed 
regarding reflection, refraction, and diffraction.

Reflection is the phenomenon that occurs when an EM wave encounters a surface 
(larger than approximately one wavelength), hits it, and leaves the surface 
with reduced intensity. Same thing as light hitting a mirror. It's the big one 
for multipath.

Refraction is the effect that bends an EM wave when it transitions between 
two different media with different permittivities. We see this effect when you 
put a stick in a pool of water, and the stick looks bent at the surface of the 
water.

Diffraction (knife-edge diffraction) is the phenomenon that allows EM waves to 
travel around objects. It's the reason you can get an AM radio signal in a 
valley obstructed by mountains on all sides, the mountaintops diffract the 
signal and fill the valley with RF. It's my understanding that this 
phenomenon is not really worth considering at the frequencies we're using.

Hope that helps!

Patrick Shoemaker
Vector Data Systems LLC
shoemak...@vectordatasystems.com
office: (301) 358-1690 x36
http://www.vectordatasystems.com


Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
 Glad to be of help Forbes!  Once in a while I make a lucky guess.  
 grin
 
 OK, design note time.
 
 I work to keep all of my links in the -65 to -75 range.  If you look 
 up the specs for your radios you will likely find that this is well 
 above the lowest receive signal level, but not too far above it.
 
 Why is this important?  As I've been taught over the years (Thanks 
 Jaime, Bob and others) most knife edged refraction (a bounced signal 
 off of an
 object) will be about 30 dB down below the original signal level.
 
 So if your radio has a max sensitivity of -94 and you have a -65 
 signal you'll be almost out of the possibility of the receive radio 
 even picking up your refracted signal.  Think of the refraction as a 
 reflection or echo.  An echo makes it really hard to understand 
 someone.  Multipath is the same thing.  But if you can make the echo 
 so quiet that you can't hear is it won't hurt anything, even if it's there.
 
 MOST of my towers put out LESS than 1 WATT!  A few are still close 
 to 4 watts, but changes in AP's allow me to run ever lower tx powers.  
 Believe it or not I have customers getting over 2 megs of service from 
 systems that are less than 2 watts and at ranges of 18 miles!  Yes I 
 can prove this if anyone wants to come visit
 
 If you are picking up your towers at levels above -60 to -65 you'll 
 have a LOT more trouble on your network.  Especially tower to tower.  
 Turn the danged things down.  If you need more power at a customer's 
 place install a bigger antenna!
 
 Over the years I've run into many companies that try to use a bigger stick. 
 They systems never work well for long.  The more customers go on it 
 the worse that problem gets too.  I fact I have started pulling 
 customers from a competitor in the area.  He's running a system near 
 me that looks to be running about 42 watts (remember we're only 
 allowed 4).  Why am I getting his customers?  Because his system 
 doesn't work right.  Much of that is due to his design flaws.
 
 OK, next question is, how do I know what he's running?  All you need 
 to know is what gain the antenna is at your end, what the receive 
 signal is and how far the transmitter is away from you.  From there it's easy 
 with a formula.
 At 42dB I have him at about a 15dB antenna and 1 or so watt TX power.  
 A VERY common config sold by some distributors.  It's too bad, these 
 never work well long term and rotten wisp networks give us all a bad name.
 
 Anyway, Forbes, try turning that power down.  WAY down.  I'll bet you 
 can go back to g mode and have even more stability than you have now.
 
 laters,
 marlon
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Forbes Mercy forbes.me...@wabroadband.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 1:47 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] Thanking Marlon and multipath experience
 
 
 I admit that most of you can dance around me in the field of RF.  I'm 
 more of an installer and management type.  Today I had a Nano CPE with 
 a -48 dbi signal which, as you know, is amazing; it should be it was a 
 block away from the tower.  The problem is the customer had long 
 outages and erratic service.  Aiming away from the tower kept the 
 great connection but still crappy pings.
 
 Marlon suggested Multipath as a possibility and advised to turn the 
 radio to B only and reduce the power on the radio. I had heard of 
 Multipath but never experienced it. 

Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-22 Thread Charles Wu
I've never found a lender willing to lend against using the in-place used 
equipment as colladeral.
It is the biggest double standard.
I find it highly ironic that they'll use a car for colladeral that looses 
50% of its value the day it leaves the lot, and has a rate of failure and 
risk of damage higher than just about any product on the market, and it has 
a huge cash burn (gas :-). but yet lendors won't put equivellent value on 
wireless gear, that holds its value, Ebay boasting easilly 50% after 3-4 
years of use, even after fully depreciated.
I'll never understand the lending market.

The big difference is that a car loan is tied to your personal credit, just 
like a credit card, and very few are going to borrow $1 million for a car 
(while plenty here could easily use $1 million for their network)

FWIW, every industry specific vertical (e.g., restaurants, medical devices, 
manufacturing etc) has the same problem when it comes down to infrastructure 
financing -- traditional lenders won't finance business-specific machinery -- 
rather, they only use stuff they know as collateral (e.g., real estate, cash 
flow)

That said, when it comes down to cash flow, it's worth analyzing and 
understanding that most ISPs (specifically facilities based ones) are probably 
pretty short on cash flow given the fact that

1. the business is based upon a recurring subscription model where I invest 
(e.g., in CPE) to earn a residual contract (e.g., $50 / month service)
2. ISPs are generally cash-poor due to the fact that excess cash flow usually 
gets reinvested into the business (more infrastructure)

An argument could be made that the most valuable assets of an ISP are the 
recurring contracts / revenue / etc -- and that's something that financial 
institutions understand (e.g., receivables / factoring) and ultimately, that's 
what an ISP is worth (some multiple of MRC)

That said, I wonder if a case be made on financing secured by monthly recurring 
revenue...thoughts?

-Charles



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-22 Thread jp
In a worse case scenario, a car is probably considerably easier to repo 
than the antenna on my roof and radio in my attic. And the car would be 
worth a magnitude more money. The installed infrastructure is worthless 
if it costs a huge amount to get to it.

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:27:09PM -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote:
 I've never found a lender willing to lend against using the in-place used 
 equipment as colladeral.
 It is the biggest double standard.
 I find it highly ironic that they'll use a car for colladeral that looses 
 50% of its value the day it leaves the lot, and has a rate of failure and 
 risk of damage higher than just about any product on the market, and it has 
 a huge cash burn (gas :-). but yet lendors won't put equivellent value on 
 wireless gear, that holds its value, Ebay boasting easilly 50% after 3-4 
 years of use, even after fully depreciated.
 I'll never understand the lending market.
 
 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: rea...@muddyfrogwater.us
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 1:55 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability
 
 
  Answers in-line.
 
 
  
  insert witty tagline here
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Charles Wu c...@cticonnect.com
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:49 AM
  Subject: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability
 
 
  With all the hype being generated by the stimulus bill, we have been
  approached by a multitude of third party financial organizations that 
  have
  a renewed interest in potentially financing rural broadband...now,
  specifically, for WISPs, in the past, equipment leasing has been a very
  popular option for financing, but in looking at our numbers over the past
  year, I've noticed a marked decline in the amount of leasing that we do -
  that said, I have the following questions for the listserv about 
  financing
 
  Assuming that WISPs are still need to buy equipment...
 
  1. Are you able to just purchase equipment out of cash-flow organically
  generated from operations
 
  Other than originally starting with our own personal seed money, that's 
  what
  we've done.
 
  2. Have you gone to more traditional forms of money (e.g., bank / SBA /
  RUS loans)?
 
  I could not qualify for any of them.
 
  3. Are you doing more vendor leasing programs (e.g., Motorola 3% 
  financing
  deal)
 
  Never sought any.
 
  4. Have you not been able to borrow money due to the credit crunch (e.g.,
  not deploying as aggressively)
 
  My corporation hasn't ever been able to obtain hard money credit.In
  fact, the credit crunch start last Fall raised my 30+ day past due
  amount from a piddly $1200 to at one time to almost $13,000 in just four
  months.   That almost put us under, and we're still barely scraping by 
  until
  our seasonally variable cash flow revives come August, with still several
  thousand on the books that's very slowly getting chipped away at.
 
  5. Are you holding off on deployments because of the economy
 
  No, we're holding off due to lack of cash flow.   We have plenty of people
  waiting for us to build infrastructure out to them.
 
  6. Have you gone to Agility...cough Louie the loanshark =)
 
  After much discussion, being some of the first people Agility contacted, 
  we
  have not done any business with them.   In my estimation, they wanted
  control over our business and day to day decisions, which we concluded was
  both unwarranted and unwise.
 
 
  Or any other thoughts / comments on this topic?
 
 
  WISP equipment is not really a commodity in that there is almost no 
  market
  for it outside of the maker-vendor relationship.  Other than Ebay, and a
  couple of people who attempt to do it piecemeal, there is no market 
  which
  stabilizes the value of used equipment, making them a commodity you can
  borrow against.
 
  Perhaps it would be more useful, if vendors had the ability to get capital
  and create stable working and short term credit relationships with their
  buyers, kind of like the used car market.
 
 
 
  -Charles
 
 
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  

Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-22 Thread jp
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:49:01AM -0500, Charles Wu wrote:
 With all the hype being generated by the stimulus bill, we have been 
 approached by a multitude of third party financial organizations that have a 
 renewed interest in potentially financing rural broadband...now, 
 specifically, for WISPs, in the past, equipment leasing has been a very 
 popular option for financing, but in looking at our numbers over the past 
 year, I've noticed a marked decline in the amount of leasing that we do - 
 that said, I have the following questions for the listserv about financing
 
 Assuming that WISPs are still need to buy equipment...
 
 1.Are you able to just purchase equipment out of cash-flow 
 organically generated from operations

Yes, unless it's a large project on a short time table. We've been 
buying wireless gear for 11 years now. In the early years, our wireless 
deployment was funded by dialup revenue, but now it's a self-sustaining 
major part of our business, and dialup is a very small part. We've had 
some loans for big deployments in the past, and the amounts of money 
spent on loan repayment currently are comparable to what we'd be 
spending on equipment to meet current demands. So as those are paid off, 
we have more money to spend on gear each month. We'll save our loan 
tolerance for big projects that require high capex, and buy customer 
radios and modest project infrastructure out of our pocket every month 
or a shorter term line of credit.

Things like Alvarion's comnet let us get quantity pricing breaks on 
radios as long as we commit to regular CPE deliveries of certain 
quantity levels, so that works good for cash-flow focused ISPs.

 2.Have you gone to more traditional forms of money (e.g., bank / 
 SBA / RUS loans)?

We've had bank loans and SBA backed bank loans in the past. 

 3.Are you doing more vendor leasing programs (e.g., Motorola 3% 
 financing deal)

No.

 4.Have you not been able to borrow money due to the credit 
 crunch (e.g., not deploying as aggressively)
 5.Are you holding off on deployments because of the economy

I could be deploying a lot more if the economy were better and more 
people were more willing to get nicer Internet services.

 6.Have you gone to Agility...cough Louie the loanshark =)

I've investigated leasing, and it appears to be a choice for when the 
bank doesn't want to deal with you. If I had that sort of relationship 
with the bank, I'd want to fix that before spending more money.


 
 Or any other thoughts / comments on this topic?
 
 -Charles
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
/*
Jason Philbrook   |   Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
KB1IOJ|   Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting 
 http://f64.nu/   |   for Midcoast Mainehttp://www.midcoast.com/
*/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-22 Thread eje
Just as a side note here. For our new building we just moved into about 6mo ago 
we had to put up our inventory as collateral plus a bunch of other things. Even 
brand new unused equipment they would only give 10c on the dollar for our 
inventory based on our cost. Tried to explain until I was blue in the face that 
not a single piece of the equipment we have is obsolete and stock is being 
rotated at least for 90% of the inventory every 90 days or less and that if 
they would let us handle the sale in the case of a failure we would have at 
least 75% sold at cost or even small markup and be sold within 45 days. 
Remaining 25% would take probably another 90 days to sell at cost or at slight 
profit. But no go. Only thing I managed was to convince one of the senior 
bankers that he would buy the inventory at the 10c on the dollar personally and 
let me sell it and split the profit with me. Not like that is likely to happen 
but with that in mind I can see why a bank due to lack of knowled
 ge etc would use a WISP radio equipment installed all over the place as 
securement for a loan. After all your talking used equipment at 100's of 
locations most of the time not directly controlled by the WISP when they will 
only give 10c on the dollar for brand new equipment in box non which is older 
then a year and all being at one location in a building they own. 

/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: Jason Hensley jhens...@mozarks.com

Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:49:07 
To: 'WISPA General List'wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


Most lenders I've worked with really don't seem to even consider lending
against recurring revenue as the recurring revenue is what they will use to
justify to themselves, board, investors, and the FDIC that it's a reasonable
loan.  The recurring revenue is not really considered an asset because if
the business goes south, the recurring revenue is gone and their left
holding basically nothing but blue sky.  Hard assets can be sold and at
least recoup a portion of what they loaned the business. 

There are plenty of places out there that will do Accounts Receivables
loans, but most of those seem to be kinda like the payday loan people.  Big
fee up front, and huge interest rates.  



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 8:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

I've never found a lender willing to lend against using the in-place used 
equipment as colladeral.
It is the biggest double standard.
I find it highly ironic that they'll use a car for colladeral that looses 
50% of its value the day it leaves the lot, and has a rate of failure and 
risk of damage higher than just about any product on the market, and it has

a huge cash burn (gas :-). but yet lendors won't put equivellent value on 
wireless gear, that holds its value, Ebay boasting easilly 50% after 3-4 
years of use, even after fully depreciated.
I'll never understand the lending market.

The big difference is that a car loan is tied to your personal credit, just
like a credit card, and very few are going to borrow $1 million for a car
(while plenty here could easily use $1 million for their network)

FWIW, every industry specific vertical (e.g., restaurants, medical devices,
manufacturing etc) has the same problem when it comes down to infrastructure
financing -- traditional lenders won't finance business-specific machinery
-- rather, they only use stuff they know as collateral (e.g., real estate,
cash flow)

That said, when it comes down to cash flow, it's worth analyzing and
understanding that most ISPs (specifically facilities based ones) are
probably pretty short on cash flow given the fact that

1. the business is based upon a recurring subscription model where I invest
(e.g., in CPE) to earn a residual contract (e.g., $50 / month service)
2. ISPs are generally cash-poor due to the fact that excess cash flow
usually gets reinvested into the business (more infrastructure)

An argument could be made that the most valuable assets of an ISP are the
recurring contracts / revenue / etc -- and that's something that financial
institutions understand (e.g., receivables / factoring) and ultimately,
that's what an ISP is worth (some multiple of MRC)

That said, I wonder if a case be made on financing secured by monthly
recurring revenue...thoughts?

-Charles




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




[WISPA] Water tower question

2009-05-22 Thread Jason Hensley
We've gotten access to two water towers that are what I call bubble
towers.  An example is here:
http://www.watertowers.com/photos_314_Arboretum_Water_Tower.html

Obviously we'll have to sector around it, etc etc, not worried about that.
Question is, for anyone who has mounted on a tower like this, how do you get
your cabling to the ground?  Do you go down the legs or is there some other
way to do it?  Only way we've come up with is to either rappel down or talk
the fire dept into helping with their ladder truck and bring the cables down
one of the legs.  Neither option is very attractive.  Is there some other
way to get the cabling down the tower?  

Thanks!




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Water tower question

2009-05-22 Thread Nick Olsen
Bring it down along the ladder? Just drop it all the way down then as you 
descend secure it?

Nick Olsen

Brevard Wireless


From: Jason Hensley jhens...@mozarks.com
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 12:14 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Water tower question 

We've gotten access to two water towers that are what I call bubble
towers.  An example is here:
http://www.watertowers.com/photos_314_Arboretum_Water_Tower.html

Obviously we'll have to sector around it, etc etc, not worried about that.
Question is, for anyone who has mounted on a tower like this, how do you 
get
your cabling to the ground?  Do you go down the legs or is there some 
other
way to do it?  Only way we've come up with is to either rappel down or 
talk
the fire dept into helping with their ladder truck and bring the cables 
down
one of the legs.  Neither option is very attractive.  Is there some other
way to get the cabling down the tower?  

Thanks!



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Water tower question

2009-05-22 Thread Scott Carullo
run power and fiber up the side of the ladder or conduit that their power 
goes for the light on top.

If you don't need connection below then just run power.  Put box at top 
with equipment and 5 foot aluminum 1.5 or 2 inch pipes with two u-bolts 
each or pipe clamps depending on how you have to mount them.  tape wires 
running around top to middle guard rail inside and you are good to go...   
put ups inside little hut or have box on outside with one.

Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102

 Original Message 
 From: Jason Hensley jhens...@mozarks.com
 Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 12:14 PM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Water tower question
 
 We've gotten access to two water towers that are what I call bubble
 towers.  An example is here:
 http://www.watertowers.com/photos_314_Arboretum_Water_Tower.html
 
 Obviously we'll have to sector around it, etc etc, not worried about 
that.
 Question is, for anyone who has mounted on a tower like this, how do you 
get
 your cabling to the ground?  Do you go down the legs or is there some 
other
 way to do it?  Only way we've come up with is to either rappel down or 
talk
 the fire dept into helping with their ladder truck and bring the cables 
down
 one of the legs.  Neither option is very attractive.  Is there some 
other
 way to get the cabling down the tower?  
 
 Thanks!
 
 
 
 


 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 


  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Water tower question

2009-05-22 Thread Scott Carullo

Ok, assuming there is no ladder (which would be odd) then they still have 
conduit already attached for lights at top.  Run next to it.

Only other option depending on your relationship with them is to put 
flasher circuit on top and use existing power already in conduit - that way 
your gear doesn't turn on and off every few sec ;)

Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102

 Original Message 
 From: Jason Hensley jhens...@mozarks.com
 Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 12:14 PM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Water tower question
 
 We've gotten access to two water towers that are what I call bubble
 towers.  An example is here:
 http://www.watertowers.com/photos_314_Arboretum_Water_Tower.html
 
 Obviously we'll have to sector around it, etc etc, not worried about 
that.
 Question is, for anyone who has mounted on a tower like this, how do you 
get
 your cabling to the ground?  Do you go down the legs or is there some 
other
 way to do it?  Only way we've come up with is to either rappel down or 
talk
 the fire dept into helping with their ladder truck and bring the cables 
down
 one of the legs.  Neither option is very attractive.  Is there some 
other
 way to get the cabling down the tower?  
 
 Thanks!
 
 
 
 


 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 


  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Water tower question

2009-05-22 Thread Mac Dearman
I forgot to add something VERY important - -  The less you have touching
anything of theirs the better off you will be in the future when it comes
time for them to sandblast and paint!! Put your sectors standing off the
handrails as far as possible using DB clamps and run your own conduit to
attach your CAT5 to!!

Mac




 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Jason Hensley
 Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:13 AM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: [WISPA] Water tower question
 
 We've gotten access to two water towers that are what I call bubble
 towers.  An example is here:
 http://www.watertowers.com/photos_314_Arboretum_Water_Tower.html
 
 Obviously we'll have to sector around it, etc etc, not worried about
 that.
 Question is, for anyone who has mounted on a tower like this, how do
 you get
 your cabling to the ground?  Do you go down the legs or is there some
 other
 way to do it?  Only way we've come up with is to either rappel down or
 talk
 the fire dept into helping with their ladder truck and bring the cables
 down
 one of the legs.  Neither option is very attractive.  Is there some
 other
 way to get the cabling down the tower?
 
 Thanks!
 
 
 
 ---
 -
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 -
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.5.238 / Virus Database: 270.12.33/2120 - Release Date:
 05/19/09 06:21:00




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Water tower question

2009-05-22 Thread Jason Hensley
On important thing I failed to mention, no ladder access from the outside
of the tower.  Ladder runs up the inside of the middle of the tower, all the
way to the top and outside the top hatch, then down a ladder to the catwalk.
If there was a ladder on one of the outside legs I wouldn't be asking the
question :-)  Got 4 other towers we're on that we don't have this issue
with.



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:43 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Water tower question

I forgot to add something VERY important - -  The less you have touching
anything of theirs the better off you will be in the future when it comes
time for them to sandblast and paint!! Put your sectors standing off the
handrails as far as possible using DB clamps and run your own conduit to
attach your CAT5 to!!

Mac




 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Jason Hensley
 Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:13 AM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: [WISPA] Water tower question
 
 We've gotten access to two water towers that are what I call bubble
 towers.  An example is here:
 http://www.watertowers.com/photos_314_Arboretum_Water_Tower.html
 
 Obviously we'll have to sector around it, etc etc, not worried about
 that.
 Question is, for anyone who has mounted on a tower like this, how do
 you get
 your cabling to the ground?  Do you go down the legs or is there some
 other
 way to do it?  Only way we've come up with is to either rappel down or
 talk
 the fire dept into helping with their ladder truck and bring the cables
 down
 one of the legs.  Neither option is very attractive.  Is there some
 other
 way to get the cabling down the tower?
 
 Thanks!
 
 
 
 ---
 -
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 -
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.5.238 / Virus Database: 270.12.33/2120 - Release Date:
 05/19/09 06:21:00





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Wireless Beehive 58DP

2009-05-22 Thread Jayson Baker
Anyone used the 58DP from WB?

Anyone have them in stock?

Jayson



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-22 Thread jp
Just for round representative numbers, lets say you have have a pretty 
established customer base and you have the staff and the growth 
potential to install $10k/month worth of new CPE.

I would buy $10k/month worth of CPE to get what I need when I need it.
When I have more customers, I can spend proportionately more.

If you lease enough CPE to cost you $10k/month, you have a big pile of 
CPE sitting around that's costing you money and isn't making money. You 
eventually get them installed, and can repeat the less efficient 
stepwise function again. If you break it down to lower amounts, it's 
still a stepwise function of outlay versus return.

After a while, you'll have reached a certain size where the lease or 
loan bills will be higher than the cost to continue the same growth rate 
without borrowing.

If something happens where we each have a couple real bad months of 
business, I can just defer some installs or upgrades, which would not be 
pleasant. You would be unable to pay the leasing company, which could be 
less pleasant still.

If a loan or lease helps you get better CPE, it's worth it though. I 
think buying quality gear with a loan or lease is a better plan than 
suffering with junk you bought because it was all you could afford to 
scrouge together or because some non-technical manager was too cheap.

I'm not at all against loans or leasing. I built a nice datacenter with 
a loan, as I would not have been able to build it any other way. It's 
been really useful and worth every penny. I bought a tower site with a 
mortgage, I have a tenant whose lease pays the majority of the payment, 
and it's almost paid off. I recently accepted a private loan to put 
infrastructure in an area that was without broadband; it was simpler and 
faster than applying for a grant and it got them to the top of the list 
of our projects, as there is still more demand than any one company's 
means.

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:10:26AM -0600, Travis Johnson wrote:
 Lease, lease, lease.br
 br
 Why spend money each month paying for CPE up front for every customer?
 Are you doing that with bandwidth? Are you doing that with employees? br
 br
 We spend $7 per month per CPE for 36 months. It's just part of doing
 business... just like insurance, bandwidth, payroll, etc. It's one of
 those monthly expenses that is just part of operating in this industry.
 We then use the install fee to cover the truck roll, router, etc.br
 br
 So we are making a profit on every single customer we install starting
 from the day they are installed.br
 br
 Travisbr
 Microservbr
 br
 jp wrote:
 blockquote cite=mid:20090522152952.gb15...@saucer.midcoast.com
  type=cite
   pre wrap=On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:49:01AM -0500, Charles Wu wrote:
   /pre
   blockquote type=cite
 pre wrap=With all the hype being generated by the stimulus bill, we 
 have been approached by a multitude of third party financial organizations 
 that have a renewed interest in potentially financing rural broadband...now, 
 specifically, for WISPs, in the past, equipment leasing has been a very 
 popular option for financing, but in looking at our numbers over the past 
 year, I've noticed a marked decline in the amount of leasing that we do - 
 that said, I have the following questions for the listserv about financing
 
 Assuming that WISPs are still need to buy equipment...
 
 1.Are you able to just purchase equipment out of cash-flow 
 organically generated from operations
 /pre
   /blockquote
   pre wrap=!
 Yes, unless it's a large project on a short time table. We've been 
 buying wireless gear for 11 years now. In the early years, our wireless 
 deployment was funded by dialup revenue, but now it's a self-sustaining 
 major part of our business, and dialup is a very small part. We've had 
 some loans for big deployments in the past, and the amounts of money 
 spent on loan repayment currently are comparable to what we'd be 
 spending on equipment to meet current demands. So as those are paid off, 
 we have more money to spend on gear each month. We'll save our loan 
 tolerance for big projects that require high capex, and buy customer 
 radios and modest project infrastructure out of our pocket every month 
 or a shorter term line of credit.
 
 Things like Alvarion's comnet let us get quantity pricing breaks on 
 radios as long as we commit to regular CPE deliveries of certain 
 quantity levels, so that works good for cash-flow focused ISPs.
 
   /pre
   blockquote type=cite
 pre wrap=2.   Have you gone to more traditional forms of money (e.g., 
 bank / 
 SBA / RUS loans)?
 /pre
   /blockquote
   pre wrap=!
 We've had bank loans and SBA backed bank loans in the past. 
 
   /pre
   blockquote type=cite
 pre wrap=3.   Are you doing more vendor leasing programs (e.g., 
 Motorola 3% 
 financing deal)
 /pre
   /blockquote
   pre wrap=!
 No.
 
   /pre
   blockquote type=cite
 pre wrap=4.   Have you not been able to borrow money 

Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-22 Thread Tom DeReggi
I liked Agility's initial concept. For the buyer to present a BASIC 
spreadsheet type business plan, showing how they will without a doubt be 
able to generate enough revenue to pay the lease. All banks should do that, 
to understand what it is they are lending for.
But for everything that followed after that concept, they lost me :-)

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


Well, Agility will but what out for the terms! -RickG

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net 
wrote:
 I've never found a lender willing to lend against using the in-place used
 equipment as colladeral.
 It is the biggest double standard.
 I find it highly ironic that they'll use a car for colladeral that looses
 50% of its value the day it leaves the lot, and has a rate of failure and
 risk of damage higher than just about any product on the market, and it 
 has
 a huge cash burn (gas :-). but yet lendors won't put equivellent value on
 wireless gear, that holds its value, Ebay boasting easilly 50% after 3-4
 years of use, even after fully depreciated.
 I'll never understand the lending market.

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message -
 From: rea...@muddyfrogwater.us
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 1:55 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital 
 Availability


 Answers in-line.


 
 insert witty tagline here

 - Original Message -
 From: Charles Wu c...@cticonnect.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:49 AM
 Subject: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


 With all the hype being generated by the stimulus bill, we have been
 approached by a multitude of third party financial organizations that
 have
 a renewed interest in potentially financing rural broadband...now,
 specifically, for WISPs, in the past, equipment leasing has been a very
 popular option for financing, but in looking at our numbers over the 
 past
 year, I've noticed a marked decline in the amount of leasing that we 
 do -
 that said, I have the following questions for the listserv about
 financing

 Assuming that WISPs are still need to buy equipment...

 1. Are you able to just purchase equipment out of cash-flow organically
 generated from operations

 Other than originally starting with our own personal seed money, that's
 what
 we've done.

 2. Have you gone to more traditional forms of money (e.g., bank / SBA /
 RUS loans)?

 I could not qualify for any of them.

 3. Are you doing more vendor leasing programs (e.g., Motorola 3%
 financing
 deal)

 Never sought any.

 4. Have you not been able to borrow money due to the credit crunch 
 (e.g.,
 not deploying as aggressively)

 My corporation hasn't ever been able to obtain hard money credit. In
 fact, the credit crunch start last Fall raised my 30+ day past due
 amount from a piddly $1200 to at one time to almost $13,000 in just four
 months. That almost put us under, and we're still barely scraping by
 until
 our seasonally variable cash flow revives come August, with still several
 thousand on the books that's very slowly getting chipped away at.

 5. Are you holding off on deployments because of the economy

 No, we're holding off due to lack of cash flow. We have plenty of people
 waiting for us to build infrastructure out to them.

 6. Have you gone to Agility...cough Louie the loanshark =)

 After much discussion, being some of the first people Agility contacted,
 we
 have not done any business with them. In my estimation, they wanted
 control over our business and day to day decisions, which we concluded 
 was
 both unwarranted and unwise.


 Or any other thoughts / comments on this topic?


 WISP equipment is not really a commodity in that there is almost no
 market
 for it outside of the maker-vendor relationship. Other than Ebay, and a
 couple of people who attempt to do it piecemeal, there is no market
 which
 stabilizes the value of used equipment, making them a commodity you can
 borrow against.

 Perhaps it would be more useful, if vendors had the ability to get 
 capital
 and create stable working and short term credit relationships with their
 buyers, kind of like the used car market.



 -Charles


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: 

Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-22 Thread Charles Wu
Lease, lease, lease.

Agreed that leasing is a great option, but in looking at my numbers these past 
few months, I've noticed that the amount of leasing that we do is a fraction of 
what we used to do 12 months ago (if it wasn't for the Motorola 3% program, I 
don't think we'd be doing any leasing) - part of it is because many of our 
leasing vendors aren't leasing anymore (e.g., GE Capital), but given that 
infrastructure sales haven't dropped off that much in this economy (in fact, 
our March numbers for 2009 were BETTER than our March 2008 numbers), I'm trying 
to understand why people who may have leased in the past no longer seem to be 
leasing (obviously, you're still leasing away so this question doesn't apply to 
you =)...

So if you were leasing 12 months ago, but no longer are, Is it because


1.   The economy sucks and you're not buying new equipment?

2.   The economy is fine, you want to lease equipment but can't get 
approved?

3.   The economy is fine, but you're making so much money that you no 
longer need to lease equipment?

Just curiosity on my side

-Charles





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-22 Thread Gino Villarini
Option 3


Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 4:50 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital
Availability

Lease, lease, lease.

Agreed that leasing is a great option, but in looking at my numbers
these past few months, I've noticed that the amount of leasing that we
do is a fraction of what we used to do 12 months ago (if it wasn't for
the Motorola 3% program, I don't think we'd be doing any leasing) - part
of it is because many of our leasing vendors aren't leasing anymore
(e.g., GE Capital), but given that infrastructure sales haven't dropped
off that much in this economy (in fact, our March numbers for 2009 were
BETTER than our March 2008 numbers), I'm trying to understand why people
who may have leased in the past no longer seem to be leasing (obviously,
you're still leasing away so this question doesn't apply to you =)...

So if you were leasing 12 months ago, but no longer are, Is it because


1.   The economy sucks and you're not buying new equipment?

2.   The economy is fine, you want to lease equipment but can't get
approved?

3.   The economy is fine, but you're making so much money that you
no longer need to lease equipment?

Just curiosity on my side

-Charles






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-22 Thread Travis Johnson




We are still leasing, but also #3 applies as well... but we are putting
the cash flow money into other things... like real estate, that is dirt
cheap right now... ;)

Travis
Microserv

Charles Wu wrote:

  
Lease, lease, lease.

  
  
Agreed that leasing is a great option, but in looking at my numbers these past few months, I've noticed that the amount of leasing that we do is a fraction of what we used to do 12 months ago (if it wasn't for the Motorola 3% program, I don't think we'd be doing any leasing) - part of it is because many of our leasing vendors aren't leasing anymore (e.g., GE Capital), but given that infrastructure sales haven't dropped off that much in this economy (in fact, our March numbers for 2009 were BETTER than our March 2008 numbers), I'm trying to understand why people who may have leased in the past no longer seem to be leasing (obviously, you're still leasing away so this question doesn't apply to you =)...

So if you were leasing 12 months ago, but no longer are, Is it because


1.   The economy sucks and you're not buying new equipment?

2.   The economy is fine, you want to lease equipment but can't get approved?

3.   The economy is fine, but you're making so much money that you no longer need to lease equipment?

Just curiosity on my side

-Charles





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-22 Thread Tom DeReggi
 The big difference is that a car loan is tied to your personal credit, 
 just like a credit card,

So are most business loans, when they are made to a small business. I've yet 
to find a traditional lender willing to consider my business on its own.
We just aren't large (signficant) enough, in their minds.  So a car loan 
ONLY had personal colladeral.  Wireless Gear has BOTH personal colladeral 
AND business colladeral and future generated revenue. Clearly that is a step 
up over a car loan's colladeral. The ONLY advantage a Car Loan adds, is 
every American is a prospective buyer.  But they also forget, that every one 
is selling, so there is a lot of competition for the liquidation.  A 
Wireless radio is a like a money tree, and the car is the opposite that 
consumes money off the tree. Clearly the wireless radio is the safer bet.

 That said, I wonder if a case be made on financing secured by monthly 
 recurring revenue...thoughts?

I guess we can argue that they already ask for financials, to look at 
monthly net profit. But a lender would never really care about revenue, 
because they'd never want to wait to sell your business to collect on a 
multiples of revenue. Thats what investors do.  All leasors care about is 
how the payment is going to be made.

What I will say is... Is I had successfully gotten a loan, by bringing in 
and showing the bank new signed long term monthly revenue contracts. Showing 
the new money that would be earned, if the loan was given.  That worked. The 
side effect was 1) when they saw how much profit there was for the 
borrower, they raised the interest to try to get a higher piece of the 
action. 2) They wanted the contract term (length) to match the loan term 
(payback schedule).  But for the borrower, the risk was significantly 
increased and growth potential significantly compromised, being forced to do 
a 1 yr loan for a 1 yr broadband contracts. Meaning, almost 100% of revenue 
went to pay the loan payment.  This didn't meet the need of the bank or 
borrower based on risk. The secret was getting long term contracts (3yr), 
from customers.  But its hard to get 3yr contracts from new subs that never 
tried a new wireless technology before. They always want to try it before 
they commit to it long term. So a catch 22 from the start.  The other 
problem was... they then asked, what if the customer cancels, because you 
don;t provide your SLA.  It was just to complicated for the average lendor, 
as average lenders generally re-sell the loans, and need to be able to 
easily justify the loan.

But lending by monthly revenue does make sense, if the borrower can find a 
lender they can really talk to.  The trick to prove is that there is a 
replicatable profit from every dollar of revenue, even if it is not shown on 
the books because it typically is reinvested by choice. Once a lender 
understands that, reporting and measuring revenue growth is one of the 
easiest things to provide and prove to a lender.
For example, if your lender is your bank, they have the bank records to 
prove and see your deposits.

There are programs already based around this for high risk borrowers. They 
look at your monthly credit card transaction or monthly bank deposits, and 
then give credit limit based on how much that is, and do auto payments from 
that source.  Meaning the have a mechanism to take fro mthe revenue first. 
The only problem is they ONLY look at revenue, not at your business, and 
therefore label you high risk, and charge loan shark rates. I've seen it 
offered as high as 35-40% interest.

I still think the only thing they'll ever consider is cash flow, and what 
has to be done is to get a lender willing to seperate what costs on your 
balance sheet didn;t have to be costs. Meaning what could be the company 
cash flow, IF the monthly profit was not re-invested? A lender has to 
understand your business to understand that.   Which again is the problem.

My personal opinion is there is no answer to the problem. The only answer is 
to be patient, and chip away at the problem every day, until the company can 
emerge to the stage that has healthy cash flow, and is worthy in the eyes of 
the traditional lendor.

The only other answer is to find private lendors. That have fewer otpions to 
get a return on their money. Who are willing to take risk for higher reward. 
Anyone with any sense can see the high ROI in lending to a WISP with a good 
business strategy, and ultimately that it is less risk.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Charles Wu c...@cticonnect.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


 I've never found a lender willing to lend against using the in-place used
equipment as colladeral.
It is the biggest double standard.
I find it highly ironic that they'll use a car for 

Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-22 Thread George Rogato
Travis Johnson wrote:
  but we are putting the cash flow money into other things... like real 
 estate, that is dirt cheap right now... ;)
Thats what we did in Novemeber.
Got a 500k property for about 325k .
And got the owner to carry 90% @ 6% on an 8 year term. Not much interest 
to pay, just a heavy monthly payment.
But, I hope the market turns around so I can sell, get my profit and 
principle back so I can plow fiber  into my infrastructure.






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Water tower question

2009-05-22 Thread Scott Carullo

Got SCUBA lol?

Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102

 Original Message 
 From: Jason Hensley jhens...@mozarks.com
 Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 12:57 PM
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Water tower question
 
 On important thing I failed to mention, no ladder access from the 
outside
 of the tower.  Ladder runs up the inside of the middle of the tower, all 
the
 way to the top and outside the top hatch, then down a ladder to the 
catwalk.
 If there was a ladder on one of the outside legs I wouldn't be asking 
the
 question :-)  Got 4 other towers we're on that we don't have this issue
 with.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Mac Dearman
 Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:43 AM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Water tower question
 
 I forgot to add something VERY important - -  The less you have touching
 anything of theirs the better off you will be in the future when it 
comes
 time for them to sandblast and paint!! Put your sectors standing off 
the
 handrails as far as possible using DB clamps and run your own conduit to
 attach your CAT5 to!!
 
 Mac
 
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] 
On
  Behalf Of Jason Hensley
  Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:13 AM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: [WISPA] Water tower question
  
  We've gotten access to two water towers that are what I call bubble
  towers.  An example is here:
  http://www.watertowers.com/photos_314_Arboretum_Water_Tower.html
  
  Obviously we'll have to sector around it, etc etc, not worried about
  that.
  Question is, for anyone who has mounted on a tower like this, how do
  you get
  your cabling to the ground?  Do you go down the legs or is there some
  other
  way to do it?  Only way we've come up with is to either rappel down or
  talk
  the fire dept into helping with their ladder truck and bring the 
cables
  down
  one of the legs.  Neither option is very attractive.  Is there some
  other
  way to get the cabling down the tower?
  
  Thanks!
  
  
  
  
---
  -
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
---
  -
  
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
  
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 8.5.238 / Virus Database: 270.12.33/2120 - Release Date:
  05/19/09 06:21:00
 
 
 
 


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 


 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 


 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 


  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-22 Thread Tom DeReggi
Maybe when talking about CPE.

But what about when one is talking about a $10,000 Part101 radio?

Just like a car, all that the lender should need is to hold the title of 
the radio until paid off, and get a down payment of $2000 to cover the cost 
of tower climber/repo man, and a signed letter of authorization from lanlord 
stating the location of the tower gear is installed on and they acknowledge 
that the gear is not abandoned equipment. (So it does not automatically 
become property of landlord in 4 months, and teh landlord knows the 
equipment owner has first rights to the gear).

Think about it... Wouldn't repo costs be reduced when the repo man knows 
exactly where to find the radio? A car can easilly be relocated and 
hard-to-find, when the owner skips town.
Plus the home likely has an owner with a shot gun or a big dog, which the 
tower/MTU likely does not.  The MTU building might even have a security 
guard to escort teh lender safely to the roof :-)


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: jp j...@saucer.midcoast.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


 In a worse case scenario, a car is probably considerably easier to repo
 than the antenna on my roof and radio in my attic. And the car would be
 worth a magnitude more money. The installed infrastructure is worthless
 if it costs a huge amount to get to it.

 On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:27:09PM -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote:
 I've never found a lender willing to lend against using the in-place used
 equipment as colladeral.
 It is the biggest double standard.
 I find it highly ironic that they'll use a car for colladeral that looses
 50% of its value the day it leaves the lot, and has a rate of failure and
 risk of damage higher than just about any product on the market, and it 
 has
 a huge cash burn (gas :-). but yet lendors won't put equivellent value on
 wireless gear, that holds its value, Ebay boasting easilly 50% after 3-4
 years of use, even after fully depreciated.
 I'll never understand the lending market.

 Tom DeReggi
 RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
 IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


 - Original Message - 
 From: rea...@muddyfrogwater.us
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 1:55 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital 
 Availability


  Answers in-line.
 
 
  
  insert witty tagline here
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Charles Wu c...@cticonnect.com
  To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:49 AM
  Subject: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability
 
 
  With all the hype being generated by the stimulus bill, we have been
  approached by a multitude of third party financial organizations that
  have
  a renewed interest in potentially financing rural broadband...now,
  specifically, for WISPs, in the past, equipment leasing has been a 
  very
  popular option for financing, but in looking at our numbers over the 
  past
  year, I've noticed a marked decline in the amount of leasing that we 
  do -
  that said, I have the following questions for the listserv about
  financing
 
  Assuming that WISPs are still need to buy equipment...
 
  1. Are you able to just purchase equipment out of cash-flow 
  organically
  generated from operations
 
  Other than originally starting with our own personal seed money, that's
  what
  we've done.
 
  2. Have you gone to more traditional forms of money (e.g., bank / SBA 
  /
  RUS loans)?
 
  I could not qualify for any of them.
 
  3. Are you doing more vendor leasing programs (e.g., Motorola 3%
  financing
  deal)
 
  Never sought any.
 
  4. Have you not been able to borrow money due to the credit crunch 
  (e.g.,
  not deploying as aggressively)
 
  My corporation hasn't ever been able to obtain hard money credit.In
  fact, the credit crunch start last Fall raised my 30+ day past due
  amount from a piddly $1200 to at one time to almost $13,000 in just 
  four
  months.   That almost put us under, and we're still barely scraping by
  until
  our seasonally variable cash flow revives come August, with still 
  several
  thousand on the books that's very slowly getting chipped away at.
 
  5. Are you holding off on deployments because of the economy
 
  No, we're holding off due to lack of cash flow.   We have plenty of 
  people
  waiting for us to build infrastructure out to them.
 
  6. Have you gone to Agility...cough Louie the loanshark =)
 
  After much discussion, being some of the first people Agility 
  contacted,
  we
  have not done any business with them.   In my estimation, they wanted
  control over our business and day to day decisions, which we concluded 
  was
  both unwarranted and unwise.
 
 
  Or any other thoughts / comments 

Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-22 Thread Travis Johnson




The banks can sell a car with little effort. They already have
relationships with dealers and auctions. And often, if the consumer's
credit is questionable, the dealer will guarantee to take the car back
if the loan defaults.

Who is going to buy a $10,000 radio that has been repo'd? Even for $5k,
I wouldn't touch it. I'd buy a new radio with warranty, that I know is
good and hasn't been fried or broken.

The banks will never loan on the equipment alone. There is no security
there... but again, why do you need a bank loan for equipment when you
can just lease it and get the same results? Up to 60 months with $1
buyout is the same as a 5 year bank loan. What's the difference?

Travis
Microserv

Tom DeReggi wrote:

  Maybe when talking about CPE.

But what about when one is talking about a $10,000 Part101 radio?

Just like a car, all that the lender should need is to "hold the title" of 
the radio until paid off, and get a down payment of $2000 to cover the cost 
of tower climber/repo man, and a signed letter of authorization from lanlord 
stating the location of the tower gear is installed on and they acknowledge 
that the gear is not abandoned equipment. (So it does not automatically 
become property of landlord in 4 months, and teh landlord knows the 
equipment owner has first rights to the gear).

Think about it... Wouldn't repo costs be reduced when the repo man knows 
exactly where to find the radio? A car can easilly be relocated and 
hard-to-find, when the owner skips town.
Plus the home likely has an owner with a shot gun or a big dog, which the 
tower/MTU likely does not.  The MTU building might even have a security 
guard to escort teh lender safely to the roof :-)


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "jp" j...@saucer.midcoast.com
To: "WISPA General List" wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability


  
  
In a worse case scenario, a car is probably considerably easier to repo
than the antenna on my roof and radio in my attic. And the car would be
worth a magnitude more money. The installed infrastructure is worthless
if it costs a huge amount to get to it.

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:27:09PM -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote:


  I've never found a lender willing to lend against using the in-place used
equipment as colladeral.
It is the biggest double standard.
I find it highly ironic that they'll use a car for colladeral that looses
50% of its value the day it leaves the lot, and has a rate of failure and
risk of damage higher than just about any product on the market, and it 
has
a huge cash burn (gas :-). but yet lendors won't put equivellent value on
wireless gear, that holds its value, Ebay boasting easilly 50% after 3-4
years of use, even after fully depreciated.
I'll never understand the lending market.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: rea...@muddyfrogwater.us
To: "WISPA General List" wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital 
Availability


  
  
Answers in-line.



insert witty tagline here

- Original Message - 
From: "Charles Wu" c...@cticonnect.com
To: "WISPA General List" wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:49 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability




  With all the hype being generated by the stimulus bill, we have been
approached by a multitude of third party financial organizations that
have
a renewed interest in potentially financing rural broadband...now,
specifically, for WISPs, in the past, equipment leasing has been a 
very
popular option for financing, but in looking at our numbers over the 
past
year, I've noticed a marked decline in the amount of leasing that we 
do -
that said, I have the following questions for the listserv about
financing

Assuming that WISPs are still need to buy equipment...

1. Are you able to just purchase equipment out of cash-flow 
organically
generated from operations
  

Other than originally starting with our own personal seed money, that's
what
we've done.



  2. Have you gone to more traditional forms of money (e.g., bank / SBA 
/
RUS loans)?
  

I could not qualify for any of them.



  3. Are you doing more vendor leasing programs (e.g., Motorola 3%
financing
deal)
  

Never sought any.



  4. Have you not been able to borrow money due to the credit crunch 
(e.g.,
not deploying as aggressively)
  

My corporation hasn't ever been able to obtain hard money credit.In
fact, the "credit crunch" start last Fall raised my 

Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

2009-05-22 Thread Charles Wu
Well Gino, it looks you're buying ski tickets next time =)

-Charles

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 3:54 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital Availability

Option 3


Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 4:50 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quesiton on Funding / Financing / Capital
Availability

Lease, lease, lease.

Agreed that leasing is a great option, but in looking at my numbers
these past few months, I've noticed that the amount of leasing that we
do is a fraction of what we used to do 12 months ago (if it wasn't for
the Motorola 3% program, I don't think we'd be doing any leasing) - part
of it is because many of our leasing vendors aren't leasing anymore
(e.g., GE Capital), but given that infrastructure sales haven't dropped
off that much in this economy (in fact, our March numbers for 2009 were
BETTER than our March 2008 numbers), I'm trying to understand why people
who may have leased in the past no longer seem to be leasing (obviously,
you're still leasing away so this question doesn't apply to you =)...

So if you were leasing 12 months ago, but no longer are, Is it because


1.   The economy sucks and you're not buying new equipment?

2.   The economy is fine, you want to lease equipment but can't get
approved?

3.   The economy is fine, but you're making so much money that you
no longer need to lease equipment?

Just curiosity on my side

-Charles






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/