It is true that a 802.11 based 3.650 product is not going to be any better
than 2.4. A wimax based 3.650 product is going to gve field performance
much like 2.4. A diversity based 3.650 system is going to provide coverage
much like, and oftentimes exceeding that of 900Mhz. These observations
I don't think I'd go that far. In many areas 2.4 is useless, so by that
very token, 3.650 would be a world of better because it's virgin territory.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Mike Cowan
Well there is NLOS performance and spectrum crowding to be considered.
Not sure which Mike Cowan was referring to.
Mike Hammett wrote:
I don't think I'd go that far. In many areas 2.4 is useless, so by that
very token, 3.650 would be a world of better because it's virgin territory.
From
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/broadbandgrants/BTOPQuarterlyReport_090518.pdf
In addition,
NTIA intends to release a separate NOFA with respect to the broadband map.
Excellent!
Would be awesome if they break it down per state/major metro area. Such
that multiple players can bid on the
Hrm.
Broadband Map Posted to WebsiteFebruary 17, 2011
Wonder if any of the new census data will be available by then? That
would help with showing some real numbers/markets/updated incomes etc.
Charles Wyble wrote:
From
David Hulsebus wrote:
Ryan, How do you like the Moonblink antennas?
Eh, they are OK. Getting timely shipping and shipping information out of
Moonblink makes ordering from them a head-ache for my ordering person.
The antennas are sleek aluminum but they are fragile so you can't handle
them much
I am curious if anyone can tell me the technical reason why 900MHZ has
no reasonable cost CPE. Here I am paying $70 for CPE on 2.4 gear, $90
for 5.8 but the best price I can find is $290 for 900 MHZ. Just curious
as to why?
Forbes
The cards are more expensive to manufacture, due to lower volumes but also
the higher power they need to pump out (we add an external heat sink because
they get too hot for our comfort), and the exotic filtering necessary to get
them to work correctly on the very noisy 900Mhz band. The SR9 and
Moto is about the same for each band though 900 is a bit more :/
On 6/5/09, D. Ryan Spott rsp...@cspott.com wrote:
I agree,
I think we are all waiting for UBNT to crush the pricing as they have
done in 2.4 5.8.
ryan
Forbes Mercy wrote:
I am curious if anyone can tell me the technical
I have a few horizontal and they do tend to traverse through woods
better than the verticals, but the noise floor for us is just the
opposite. There are a half dozen Canopy systems running horizontal
omni's just to my east destroying most of the 900 spectrum. I don't have
any sectors wider
I agree with your sentiment that 900 stuff is too expensive.
But I was pleasantly surprised. while looking around DoubleRadius last
weekend, to see Tranzeo TR-SL9 client radios for $234. (8dB or N
connector, take your pick). I missed any announcement of them.
One could hope that a multipack
I emailed Ubiquity about that very subject, here was their response:
Hello,
Not at this time as there are size limitations do to the size of 900Mhz
antennas.
Thanks,
_
Michael Ford
Ubiquiti Support Team
-Original
I'd offer technical reason not to buy 900 system based primarily on
price. The build-your-own gear using XR9 or SR9 type cards or wifi
systems converted to do 900 are inferior to popular proprietary 900
systems in many cases where interference exists.
I have used Alvarion BA-II 900, Trango
I'm a little under that, not by any great amount.
Mine's star-os, ubiqiti radios, and small yagi.We also have labor on top
of our cash price, but last I checked, we were about 265 for 900 cpe.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From:
Please share how so we all know!
On 6/5/09, Randy Cosby dco...@infowest.com wrote:
Never mind, I got it...
Randy Cosby wrote:
Anyone know how to reset the usernames/passwords to default on a Rev. 2
dragonwave airpair?
--
Randy Cosby
Vice President
InfoWest, Inc
work: 435-773-6071
I will invite any 3.65 Mfg to let me test their gear in my environment. I have
found nothing to work past 2 miles in the hills and trees of TN, except 900 Mhz
Canopy.
Scottie
-- Original Message --
From: Mike Cowan mi...@wirelessconnections.net
The WiMax guys aren't interested in the WISP market... they are after
the cell guys and big operators looking to place 5,000 and 10,000 CPE
orders.
Travis
Microserv
Scottie Arnett wrote:
I will invite any 3.65 Mfg to let me test their gear in my environment. I have found nothing to work
I've got a question that tangentially pertains to wireless stuff, but
isn't really related to wireless technology, per se.
We sometimes have several people working on KMZ files, and the different
versions that we have gets really out of hand, and I'm hoping for a
web-based (LAMP?) solution
Forbes Mercy wrote:
I am curious if anyone can tell me the technical reason why 900MHZ has
no reasonable cost CPE. Here I am paying $70 for CPE on 2.4 gear, $90
for 5.8 but the best price I can find is $290 for 900 MHZ. Just curious
as to why?
This is a good question, as I have not had to
I agree. When you see wifi vendors with sub-$1000 APs in the 2.4 space and they
suddenly want to sell yo basically the same tech (at a different freq range)
for $1 there is a problem.
Someone is cashing in on hype becase the RD CANNOT be that expensive when you
take volume of CPE/AP sales
KMZ is a binary file format?
What do you use for XLS/Word version control? Or do you simply use the
built in reconciliation functionality?
I'm also interested in what folks are using for binary source control.
KMZ/SHP etc.
Rogelio wrote:
I've got a question that tangentially pertains to
Charles Wyble wrote:
KMZ is a binary file format?
KMZ is an XML-ish format you use for Google Earth locations, which are
insanely handy when planning out wi-fi spots
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyhole_Markup_Language
(While reading the wikipedia page just now, I found this interesting
Ah.
Well then if it's text, git may be useful. Trac is a good frontend, that
I use on a regular basis.
Or something more along the lines of sharepoint I really like
http://www.knowledgetree.com/ http://www.knowledgetree.com/opensource
Rogelio wrote:
Charles Wyble wrote:
KMZ is a
Charles Wyble wrote:
Well then if it's text, git may be useful. Trac is a good frontend, that
I use on a regular basis.
Or something more along the lines of sharepoint I really like
http://www.knowledgetree.com/ http://www.knowledgetree.com/opensource
I've heard great things about
Subversion. ;)
Bitch to setup but then easy.
ryan
-Original Message-
From: Rogelio scubac...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 6:23 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] document version control? (e.g. web-based solution to check
out KMZ files)
I've got a
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:27 PM, D. Ryan Spott rsp...@cspott.com wrote:
Subversion. ;)
Bitch to setup but then easy.
Thanks, I'll look into possibly doing that also.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
I apologize for my language. :(
I am 3 pitchers in after a long week. Turning off the not so smart
phone now!!
ryan
On Jun 5, 2009, at 9:44 PM, Rogelio scubac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:27 PM, D. Ryan Spott rsp...@cspott.com
wrote:
Subversion. ;)
Bitch to setup but
27 matches
Mail list logo
