Anyone have any experience with ntop? Specially, with analysis of
netflow and voip.
-Matt
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
I prefer analyzing with Wireshark, as it is much easier and has a lot of
tools.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
--- Sir Arthur Conan
From Fierce Broadband Wireless newsletter.
1. NTIA drops 'buy American' requirements for broadband stimulus funds
http://lists.fiercemarkets.com/c.html?rtr=ons=69l,17i30,8mf,hv2k,fgtc,c2vj,8xz2
By Lynnette Luna
I am looking for something more historical and high level.
-Matt
On Jun 29, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
I prefer analyzing with Wireshark, as it is much easier and has a
lot of
tools.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH
Maybe you're looking for something like Cacti? Or custom MRTG graphs.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
2009/6/29 Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com:
Maybe you're looking for something like Cacti? Or custom MRTG graphs.
No, he sounds like he wants NTOP.
Do you have any specific questions? Yes, it can identify most VoIP
traffic, and yes, it can take a netflow feed.
8 dB Maxrad units. Good vertical coverage and they are easy to weather
proof. Don't forget to order the mmk 8 mounts. I've cc'd Lee at Hutton/EC
with this.
Oh yeah, with the 8dB units make sure you don't go over 28dB on your tx
output (I usually run about 17 on my systems) or you'll be over
Gain only comes from narrowing coverage with antennas.
If there are both 120* antennas you can't have HIGHER gain with GREATER
coverage It takes half the coverage area go give you twice the power
(3DB of gain).
http://www.odessaoffice.com/wireless/antenna/how_to_pick_the_right_antenna.htm
Marlon,
Not sure what you are saying here. According to the vendors specificatons.
Teletronics 15-124 - 19DB horizontal w/8 degree vertical beamwidth.
Tranzeo TR-24H-120-16 - 16DB horizontal w/6 degree vertical beamwidth.
Yes it is odd that the Teletronics claims a higher VB, but then again
I have to wonder if some of the client radios may be pointed at
sidelobes rather then the main beam. One thing you see between the two
antennas published patterns is the lack of pronounced sidelobes on the
teletronics.
Regards
Michael Baird
Gain only comes from narrowing coverage with
On Jun 29, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Jeremy Parr wrote:
Do you have any specific questions? Yes, it can identify most VoIP
traffic, and yes, it can take a netflow feed.
I am looking for a few things. One is to be able to track utilization
on a per AS basis both in realtime and over time. We have
Would like to get 10 miles out of it for overlap but can go less.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 11:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Antenna Recommendations
How far do
I'm looking at picking up a gross of old Alvarion 5.8Ghz VL SUs. They
are a mix of Rev A and B. I know that you can't do 10Mhz channels on
anything before Rev C, but is there anything else to watch out for?
WISPA
The only other restrictions I am aware of is that they do not
support modulation level 8 and you cannot enable burst mode if you use
wep. Not sure if Rev A has additional restrictions, we have a couple of
Rev B so that is how I know those.
* Larry A. Weidig (lwei...@excel.net)
*
I wouldnt use an omni to go 10 miles. Why not sector?
-RickG
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Robert Westrobert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
Would like to get 10 miles out of it for overlap but can go less.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
2009/6/29 Jeremy Parr jeremyp...@gmail.com:
I'm looking at picking up a gross of old Alvarion 5.8Ghz VL SUs. They
are a mix of Rev A and B. I know that you can't do 10Mhz channels on
anything before Rev C, but is there anything else to watch out for?
I found this jewel below:
Rev A was the
I think they are pretty nice radios.
They have a smaller concatenation packet size of 2200 versus 4032 for c+
revisions.
They have a higher gain than the newer smaller units, which makes up for the
lack of
modulation 8 in best case, and providers higher gain in normal situations.
I know the
10 is a dream... I know. But been thinking of going sector. Not
many users there at the moment but replacing the antennas may be a good
reason to upgrade the whole mess. Really only need a good 3 to 5 miles but
further is always better for redundancy.
-Original Message-
Matt,
Are you looking for specific specs like latency and jitter?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 12:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ntop
On Jun 29,
Our own, Jack Unger, was recently captured on film relaxing in Tennessee.
http://www.wispa.org/2009/06/29/fispa-and-wispa-boards-meet-in-nashville/
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Now that one will go down as a classic.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:59:11
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Cc: memb...@wispa.org; 'Motorola Canopy User Group'motor...@wispa.org
Subject:
21 matches
Mail list logo
