On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 00:57 -0500, Butch Evans wrote:
MED, in my experience, is not as commonly used. It is only useful if
the peer does not add other preferences for your AS.
I should clarify this. Most companies that create local preference will
at least allow you to opt out via
OK, maybe just to prove to myself old dogs can learn new tricks, I
have become an MT student. I bought some equipment and have been
teaching myself.
Is it possible to set R52N cards to fractional channels? I can pick
a band on the XR2 which includes 1/4 and 1/2, but not the R52N.
Thanks,
Make sure you have the latest RouterOS installed.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:21 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] MT channels
OK, maybe just to prove to
v4.0beta3
At 10:23 AM 10/7/2009, you wrote:
Make sure you have the latest RouterOS installed.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:21 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject:
Regardless of your tech choice -- Moto, 802.11-based, WiMAX or other, I
am interested to know what are the greatest barriers to growth and why?
Some possibilities:
Is it funding and if so, are your normal channels for money frozen or
otherwise gone?
Is it competition? If so, how specifically.
Mikrotik added it in 4.0beta4.. 4.0rc1 is out now too btw..
Gerard
Mike wrote:
v4.0beta3
At 10:23 AM 10/7/2009, you wrote:
Make sure you have the latest RouterOS installed.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf
Got back to both ends of our WB 5.8GHz links today.
RadioMobile says it's 10km, we should have 5-degrees up/down tilt, and using
the WB dishes see -59dBm.
We're seeing only -80dBm on both polarities.
Cables are new, professionally made and tested. Pigtails are new, tested.
Radios are new,
I assume you checked for reverse polarization?
Jayson Baker wrote:
Got back to both ends of our WB 5.8GHz links today.
RadioMobile says it's 10km, we should have 5-degrees up/down tilt, and using
the WB dishes see -59dBm.
We're seeing only -80dBm on both polarities.
Cables are new,
Doubt the antenna itself is bad. Many DP feeds have no electronics in them just
the connectors and a open air column so depending on type of feed I doubt it is
the feed itself. My guess is it's more of a incorrect installed feed than
anything.
On the cabling have you had it tested for 5GHz
Yeah, we flipped polarity. It's an 802.11n link, so shouldn't matter but
changed anyway. No difference. Tried chain 0, chain 1, chain 0+1, no
difference.
Cables came from Tessco, are brand Wireless Solutions I think. 3' long.
Times cable, but look like RFI connectors. The bag they came in
What radios?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Jayson Baker
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:42 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WB 58DP - 20dB off? WAS: Candy
Yeah, we flipped polarity. It's an
MT R52N
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Jerry Richardson
jrichard...@aircloud.comwrote:
What radios?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jayson Baker
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:42 AM
To: WISPA General List
Mystery
30dB is a lot to lose. I would suspect a feed horn issue or dish alignment.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Jayson Baker
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:46 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
Or polarity...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Jerry Richardson
We switched the polarity -- made no difference at all.
Just scanning for other radios in the area (or at the same site) the signals
look a little low too.
Pigtails are from different shipments about 2 years apart on either end.
But the jumper cables are the same. I wonder if we got a bad batch
Tried flip pol on just one end instead of on both at the same time?
On the tilt sounds like your hitting strong side lobes which sometimes can give
better gain the main but the side lobes are usually very narrow so little
movement can change signal a lot.
Consider the antenna probably has a 6
Only flipped pol on ONE end. Nobody at the other end to flip.
It does make a difference on that chain, but not overall. Meaning...
If chain 0 is enabled, signal is -80, I flip polarity then I get nothing
unless I enable chain 1.
Makes sense what you're saying about the alignment. I've tried
I am using an R52N card for the first time.
Does chain 0 go with J2 connector and chain 1 go with J3 connector?
The docs on the card does not state which connector is which.
Also, I am looking to use this card with just 1 antenna.
Not looking to use 'N', just using because cm9's were not
Data Technology wrote:
Also, I am looking to use this card with just 1 antenna.
Not looking to use 'N', just using because cm9's were not available when
I bought the card.
I assume this will work ok as long as both TX and RX chains are set to
the same setting.
Assuming you're using
Yeah, I forgot to mention the board and OS.
It's an RB433AH with 4.0rc1.
If you are looking down at the card with the connectors at the top and
the gold pins at the bottom, J2 is on the upper left and J3 is on the
upper right.
I was planning on just connecting to J2 and if that did not work then
6 dB difference at the ends? It sounds like the weaker link might be
seeing an incidental signal from a reflection source. Have you tried
setting the link to 20 MHz or 10 MHz channels? If it is severe
multipath a minor change in height may make a big difference. Water
tower or big steel
Patrick,
#1- Labor: There is very little skilled resources here.
#2- Funding: Especially for labor. Normal financing channels are
available but I will not take on too much debt at one time.
#3- Time: There is little extra time to dedicate towards expansion
versus daily operations.
Notes-
Kahn was trial/shareware. They used your windows key to generate their
21 day key. They used a IRC interface for the chat room. I spent a lot
of time on both the IRC room and playing Warcraft I/II Decent and
DukeNukem...Mmmm Bubblegum =)
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Adam Kennedy
FYI, we powered up a card without an antenna on both ports and damaged the
card.
It's TX power is extremely low now.
Just a warning. I don't remember if it was in N-mode, or B/G mode.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Data Technology w...@dtisp.com wrote:
Yeah, I forgot to mention the board and
I will try that. The link is clear. One end atop a 12-story building. The
other end is on the side of a house.
Elevation at the building is about 6200', house is probably around 9000'
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Mike m...@aweiowa.com wrote:
6 dB difference at the ends? It sounds like
Some of our voip works well on wifi, other towers it doesn't.
Mostly we try to make sure that people use our voip vs. vonage or something
like that.
If it's a business we try to get them on some higher end services of ours,
anything but wifi. That works really well!
marlon
- Original
26 matches
Mail list logo
