We carry quite a few different ones. Most popular are the PolyPhasers,
go thru 7GHz.
http://www.quicklinkwireless.com/items.asp?Cc=LIGHTNINGPROT&iTpStatus=0&;
Tp=&Bc=
Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com
-Original Message-
From:
They are rflinx quarterwave rated from 2.1-2.7, they were used instead
of polyphasers on a couple of new backhauls we deployed. I'm seeing
unusual noise floors on both of them which I know are incorrect due to
the readings from previous 5.8 gear that was replaced. I'm just
wondering if this wou
I second that. Most ARE rated for up to 5.8 but don't seem to list it
unless you ask. Last time I purchased them I found the ones listed for 5.8
only were much more $$ than the 2.4. Turned out the 2.4's I was buying were
indeed rated to 5.8, I just had to ask to find out. Makes sense, why make
Nope, but they weren't much interested in throughput at the hotels, the ones
I have done didn't provide much bandwidth anyhow. They would have from 3mb
to 10mb and share it with all the guests. As it is, I never see much usage
in the logs, just the usual Skype, email and porn.
Bob-
-Origi
Hello,
Yes if it is not rated for up to 5.8ghz. You should be able to find
specs on the lightning arrestor.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 10:01 PM
To: WISPA Gene
What happens if you use a 2.4 lightning arrestor on a 5.8 radio? Will it
cause degraded signal or incorrect lightning protection.
Regards
Michael Baird
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Didn't your throughput just pretty much to pot? I tried it with some
tranzeos and that's what happened.
On Nov 22, 2009, at 5:07 PM, "Robert West" wrote:
> I've done plenty of WDS AP's in hotels. Quick and easy.
>
> Bob-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailt
Thanks Jeremy.
Chuck
On Nov 27, 2009, at 12:14 PM, jp wrote:
> We use this for setting up VL radios, including speed. If you want to
> automate it, just use $1,
> $2 as command line variables instead of reading in answers from questions.
> Then you could
> include it in a loop that cycles th
