Oh, I'm still a believer in Cisco for the edge :-) Although I'm
looking at Juniper for the next upgrade. MX80s or MX240s if the MX80
isn't out by then.
The problem I have is we are upgrading a couple of backhaul rings to
licensed links and I'm supposed to make sure they can pass 200Mbps of
traffic
Hi,
Has anyone tested the new Ubiquiti 2.4ghz MIMO stuff? I am specifically
interested in the NLOS capabilities of this product.
Or, has anyone tested the Ubiquiti 5ghz MIMO stuff in ptmp compared with
Canopy for NLOS? I'm just curious how much the OFDM and MIMO helps with
NLOS (trees).
Travi
Personally, I would be looking at an Intel Core2Duo or higher system.
There are many for sale on ebay in 1u cases. Something like item
#170451664096 would be perfect... I'm sure there are many other choices
on ebay, this was just the first one that came up.
Travis
Jon Auer wrote:
> Just saw T
It's hard to beat the price on an OC-12 card for a Cisco 12008 when you
can get them for $300 now. :)
Travis
Microserv
Josh Luthman wrote:
> ImageStream or Cisco would probably be best. ImageStream if it's Ethernet,
> Cisco if it's a card that isn't support (note there is an OC12 card now,
> Tr
ImageStream or Cisco would probably be best. ImageStream if it's Ethernet,
Cisco if it's a card that isn't support (note there is an OC12 card now,
Travis).
Realtek and Linux typically go together like fire and water. Having said
that, I believe the rb44 (non gigabit) is Realtek. The admin stat
Just saw Travis's mention of this board on the Mikrotik list.
Man. lots of action on this general topic all over the place.
What would you recommend for handling say, 200Mbps of VPLS and general
packet bashing (iBGP+OSPF). Connection tracking turned off and only
host-protection ACLs?
On Sun, Mar
The RB1000 I have bounces around CPU usage between 3-15%. Most of the time
it is below 10%.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Travis
Printed it, now use it... Thanks
Forbes
On 3/5/2010 8:46 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
> funny
> http://www.docstoc.com/docs/10751801/Vehicle-Weekly-Safety-Checklist-Form-8%28a%29
>
>
> _
> Glenn Kelley | Principle | Hos
Would that be the SYS-5015A-H 1U?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101262&cm_re=supermicro_atom-_-16-101-262-_-Product
It has Realtek GigE onboard. Anyone have experiences with that brand
of ethernet chipset under RouterOS?
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Gino Villarini
are we not paying for telecom?
if not hang up those phones folks ;-)
Let me ask 1 simple question.
WHAT CAN THIS GOVERNMENT GIVE YOU THAT IT HAS NOT FIRST TAKEN AWAY /
_
Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic |www
Nice call RickG
RickG wrote:
> I repeat, thats still a tax.
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Brian Webster
> wrote:
>
>> But USF comes from the ratepayers of the telecom services, not tax dollars.
>>
>>
>>
>> Brian
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mai
That's not bad at all.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: "Eric Rogers"
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 00:19:47
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Replace MT X86 with routerboard?
I must eat crow... I am horrible at addition and subtraction... 4 years
of calcu
your cpe may look like a dish 500 with the 45 degree "skew" but,hey...if it
works?who cares
--- On Sun, 3/7/10, Jeremie Chism wrote:
From: Jeremie Chism
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900Mhz sectors
To: "WISPA General List"
Date: Sunday, March 7, 2010, 7:57 PM
Only thing I would be worried about is
from my experience the x means x-pol or 45 degree pol ,likely designed for
iden 900?
--- On Sun, 3/7/10, Jeremie Chism wrote:
From: Jeremie Chism
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900Mhz sectors
To: "WISPA General List"
Date: Sunday, March 7, 2010, 7:57 PM
Only thing I would be worried about is pic
Only thing I would be worried about is picking up interference in the
800 MHz range.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 7, 2010, at 6:43 PM, RickG wrote:
> Label says 870MHz - 960 MHz, 90 degree, V-Pol. Part#DB844H90E-X. Cant
> find documents for the -X but -XY is attached. So, will they work with
>
I repeat, thats still a tax.
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Brian Webster
wrote:
> But USF comes from the ratepayers of the telecom services, not tax dollars.
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]on
> Behalf Of RickG
Chuck, thats still a tax.
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Chuck Bartosch wrote:
>
> On Mar 6, 2010, at 2:50 PM, RickG wrote:
>
>> As a WISP, I resent the idea that my tax dollars may be used to compete with
>> me.
>> As a taxpayer, at what point will the government realize we cant
>> afford all
I do the same which is why this came up - I saw it in the logs and my
curiosity got the best of me :)
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Admin wrote:
> We implemented policyd on our mail server and for most customers to use it
> ( If they have a good reason we let them go around it) By doing this we
Yes that too. Or be able to run Torch and see what's going on, etc.
We once had a DDOS attack on our main router (that was running at 20%
CPU). When the attack hit, the box was at 100% CPU and we couldn't even
get logged in to see what was going on to block it. After the fact, we
looked at
I'm assuming so if shit hits the fan, you still have room to mitigate the
damages?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Travis Johnson"
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 11:52 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
My brother got on my email! I need to log out/lock the computer when
I step away.
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
> Philip,
>
> I don't know if you are being serious or sarcastic with your comment to
> "vote them out of life" but IMO your comment is both ridiculous and
> irres
Hi,
Latency is king. We do everything we can in our network to optimize
latency. A router running at 50% CPU has a much higher chance of having
to delay a packet than a router running at 10%. You also don't have any
headroom if a large spike in traffic comes through and you are already
running
Why less than 10%? As long as peak is <75% or so you generally won't
get significant improvement in performance as the processor is not
always busy. Certainly anything less than 50% means it is waiting for
data more than it is processing it.
Travis Johnson wrote:
> What is the CPU running at?
Philip,
I don't know if you are being serious or sarcastic with your comment to
"vote them out of life" but IMO your comment is both ridiculous and
irresponsible. I ask that you try to contribute in a more responsible
fashion to this list.
jack
Philip Dorr wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at
The pinout is easily available online. Very easy. It's used so often
and cussed at so much for being non-rs232
On 3/7/10, Gino Villarini wrote:
> If you are looking for rackmount units, supermicro has a rackmount atom
> dual core bare bones system ... pricing is in the #250 - $300 range
>
> It h
What is the CPU running at?
The one RB1000 we have in production is moving 50Mbps with about 10
rules and 5 queues, and the CPU is at 30%. That's just too high for me,
we have it scheduled to be replaced this summer. I like CPU numbers to
be below 20% (ideally below 10%). :)
Travis
Microserv
If you are looking for rackmount units, supermicro has a rackmount atom
dual core bare bones system ... pricing is in the #250 - $300 range
It has 2 GBE interfaces and PCIE expansion
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
Fr
Thanks for all the replies and suggestions. I think I will stay with the PC and
try out the Atoms with a DOM. One of my goals was to cut down on electric usage
also, and it looks like they will do the trick.
Scottie
-- Original Message --
From: "Eric Roge
We have sites with the APC smart slots where we have the room for a larger
UPS.
We include a basic APC 500 UPS or larger with every circuit we install. Our
MRR "entry point" for a single tenant location is $329.95 a month. It's
nice to know when a client site loses power, so that when we do ge
you can get rid of the hard drive with a flash IDE form Eje
http://store.wisp-router.com/itemdesc.asp?ic=DOM-128&eq=&Tp=
No moving parts
Scott Piehn
- Original Message -
From: "Scottie Arnett"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday,
I monitor my APC ups with a Smart Slot Card. Don't know why anyone would
ever use USB, there's so much more you can do with the smart slot.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto
I am running a RB1000 at the NOC with 400 simple queues, couple dozen
firewall and mangle rules and about 50 routes. Always has at least 10mbps
traffic flowing through it and I love it. I had a RB333 before and it
couldn't handle during peak times. However the RB1000 isn't even breaking a
sweat.
K
Philip - Josh,
Yah, we tried that before and weren’t able to get it to work or work
consistently. That was v2.x...haven't tried a UPS using the serial port with
v3.x.
When a RouterBoard or x86 based MikroTik has a USB port it always seems to work
well with the APC brand UPS. APC provides a
We implemented policyd on our mail server and for most customers to use it
( If they have a good reason we let them go around it) By doing this we no
longer have to sweat that one of our customers got a virus and is spamming
the world giving our ip addresses a bad name. Customers are automatica
34 matches
Mail list logo
