Yeah, I have a new gateway netbook with a atheros N card in it, And it will
connect to a Nano station M2 on 40mhz channels. No legacy devices can
connect though unless its on 20.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: "Greg Ihnen"
Sent
Thanks! Yeah, now I googled "macbook pro 802.11n 40MHz channels" and I'm seeing
that. Oh well. I still would rather fight than switch. I love the Mac OS.
Here's one thing I found that confirms that:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1561703&tstart=0
Greg
On May 22, 2010, at 8:0
I think Apple has a position on 11n on 2.4 GHz that their devices
won't do 40 MHz on 2.4 GHz.
Rubens
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> The clients are all Macintosh computers, some the newer MacBooks and some are
> the older MacBooks. They're all Intel based.
>
> Greg
> On M
The clients are all Macintosh computers, some the newer MacBooks and some are
the older MacBooks. They're all Intel based.
Greg
On May 22, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> N is MIMO with 5, 10, 20, or 40 MHz channels. What type of clients are
> you using?
>
> I'm not even sure why UBNT
N is MIMO with 5, 10, 20, or 40 MHz channels. What type of clients are
you using?
I'm not even sure why UBNT still makes the Bullets.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 5/22/2010 12:19 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> I have a BulletM2 (with 5.2 firmware) whic
Thanks!
Greg
On May 22, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> FYI... I did a quick test with a NanoM2, and a Ausus netbook that I have
> with built in 802.11n support.. I was able to connect my netbook to the
> NanoM2 using 40Mhz Channel
>
> Cannot speak for Bullet M2, but it would be
FYI... I did a quick test with a NanoM2, and a Ausus netbook that I have
with built in 802.11n support.. I was able to connect my netbook to the
NanoM2 using 40Mhz Channel
Cannot speak for Bullet M2, but it would be fair to say... it is most
likely an issue with the client you are using
I didn't know that. Is there any reason you know of that 802.11n capable
clients can't connect to a BulletM2 doing non-Airmax 40MHz channels?
Greg
On May 22, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> N is more mimo I think. B and G can do 40Mhz.
>
> On 5/22/10, Greg Ihnen wrote:
>> I have a Bu
N is more mimo I think. B and G can do 40Mhz.
On 5/22/10, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> I have a BulletM2 (with 5.2 firmware) which I'm using as AP. Clients will
> only associate with it when it's using 20MHz channels. Isn't the whole idea
> with wireless N about using 40MHz channels ("channel bonding") f
I have a BulletM2 (with 5.2 firmware) which I'm using as AP. Clients will only
associate with it when it's using 20MHz channels. Isn't the whole idea with
wireless N about using 40MHz channels ("channel bonding") for higher
throughput? So I started googling. I saw one Google return (on the searc
Yes, small world - I grad'd from Pacifica in '78! As you know, we
played out football games at GGHS.
Surfin Huntington was my 2nd favorite sport behind dirt biking in the desert.
I've never been up to Oregon but when I do, Ill look you up. Of
course, Rickeesha may beat me there :)
On Sat, May 22,
I grad'd from GG high school... small world. I lived in this little town of
4500 people for about 12 years... Junction City, OR. Found 4 people who
grad'd from my high school, different generations.
Mark Nash
UnwiredWest
1702 W. 2nd Ave
Suite A
Eugene, OR 97402
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
ht
12 matches
Mail list logo
