A WISP is a Community based, Wireless Internet Service Provider that
operates using terrestrial-based radio technology, primarily governed by FCC
Part 15 regulations; to transport and sell fixed wireless broadband access
or related Internet Protocol derived services to end users.
Title: signature
I think this looks great.
Thanks for taking this on Victoria!
Martha
Huizenga
DC
Access, LLC
202-546-5898
Friendly,
Local,
Affordable, Internet!
Connecting
How about:
A company started by a real person (s) who sees a need and decides to try to
meet it with a minimum of funding, little to no government support, crazy
weather issues, and lots of technical hurdles. They aren't crazy, but it
wouldn't be all bad if they were!
:-)
Regards,
Gotta go with this one...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists jeffl...@att.netwrote:
How about:
A company started by a real person (s) who sees a need and decides to try
to
Thanks Martha, but it was just manipulating the members suggestions .
multiple times! ;-)
~V~
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Martha Huizenga
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 9:06 AM
To: victo...@stlbroadband.com; WISPA Board Members List
But we are crazy or we would not be in this industry! ;-)
~V~
From: Jeff Broadwick - Lists [mailto:jeffl...@att.net]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 9:09 AM
To: li...@stlbroadband.com; 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] WISP A Final Definition ...
How about:
A company
Title: signature
Need to yank the " primarily governed by FCC Part 15 regulations"
part, There are WISP all across the globe plus it's never a good
idea to tie a government entity into an industry unless you want to
invite yet more government regulation into that industry.
Bret and all that have made comments about FCC Part 15 that is why we used
the term PRIMARILY, this gives us the 'wiggle' room.
Most, if not all, WISPs got their start with Part 15 and I believe that is
important to include it in our definition.
Victoria Proffer - President/CEO
http://blogs.broughturner.com/2011/02/extending-white-spaces-rules-to-other-under-utilized-spectrum.html
http://blogs.broughturner.com/2011/02/extending-white-spaces-rules-to-other-under-utilized-spectrum.html
Few seem to have noticed, but the FCC has an open Notice of Inquiry
I will ask again, what do the regulations have to do with anything?
What about non-US, especially Canadian and Mexican organizations?
Why are we excluding them?
Why exclude wholesalers and others that only provide middle mile
transport?
I dropped the word
Again Scott, that is why we used Primarily so as not to exclude non-US
based organizations.
A WISP is a Community based, Wireless Internet Service Provider that
operates using terrestrial-based radio technology, primarily governed by FCC
Part 15 regulations; to transport and sell fixed
We need to take part 15 out of there. 3.65 is part 90 and those outside the
US do not abide by FCC rules. There are also WISP's who would operate on EBS
frequencies plus there is the whole part 101 thing.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
214 Eggleston Hill Rd.
Cooperstown, NY 13326
(607)
Some of us noticed this which is part of the reason the pleading for the
voluntary registration in the TDWR database and the interest in the TVWS
database methods. TVWS is a test to see if people can behave enough to
extend the methodology to pretty much any spectrum that is not being
utilized in
At 2/4/2011 11:35 AM, you wrote:
Again Scott, that is why we used Primarily so as not to exclude
non-US based organizations.
Definitions are tricky; unnecessary adjectives can be
problematic. WISPs in the US are primarily but not exclusively
unlicensed, which here means Part 15; in the UK,
I'd look at Imagestream or Vyatta. Cisco, like you say is pretty high priced
(You'd probably want a ASR1K). I love my Foundry routers, but they don't do
services (Great at moving packets though) i would look to a CER from
Foundry, but price will still be higher than you may want, think 10k.
+1
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Bret Clark bcl...@spectraaccess.comwrote:
Need to yank the * primarily governed by FCC Part 15 regulations *part,
There are WISP all across the globe plus it's never a good idea to tie a
government entity into an industry unless you want to invite yet more
like
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Brian Webster bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
wrote:
We need to take part 15 out of there. 3.65 is part 90 and those outside the
US do not abide by FCC rules. There are also WISP’s who would operate on EBS
frequencies plus there is the whole part 101 thing.
Then we need to include Part 90 and 101. We have to be frequency specific,
IMHO.
Victoria Proffer - President/CEO
www.ShowMeBroadband.com
www.StLouisBroadband.com
http://farmingtonforum.com/ www.FarmingtonForum.com
314-974-5600
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
A WISP is a Community based, Wireless Internet Service Provider that
operates using terrestrial-based radio technology, primarily governed by FCC
Parts 15, 90 and 101 regulations (when applicable); to transport and sell
fixed wireless broadband access or related Internet Protocol derived
services
*Why? How about:
A WISP is a Community based, Wireless Internet Service Provider that
operates using terrestrial-based radio technology, governed by FCC
regulations; to transport and provide wireless broadband access and derived
services to end users.
Victoria, you're doing very well with a
Better .
A WISP is primarily a Community based, Wireless Internet Service Provider
that operates using terrestrial-based radio technologies governed by FCC
Parts 15, 90 and 101 regulations (when applicable); to transport and sell
fixed wireless broadband access or related Internet Protocol
Trying to fill out the application to get our FCC 499 Filer ID Number and
one of the sections is for DC Agent for Service Process. I've done a
little research and made a few phone calls and from what I understand I must
hire a Law firm in Washington DC that the FCC will contact me through if
http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/policy/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=229201157cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Ours...
From: Law Offices of Thomas K. Crowe f...@tkcrowe.com
Date: Nov 30, 2010 6:10 PM
Subject: LEGAL ALERT; Important FCC Deadlines
To: Clients Interested Parties f...@tkcrowe.com
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS K. CROWE, P.C.
LEGAL ALERT
Clients and Interested Parties:
The information below
Stephen Coran a WISPA member is also someone to use.
Regards,
Chuck
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:
Ours...
From: Law Offices of Thomas K. Crowe f...@tkcrowe.com
Date: Nov 30, 2010 6:10 PM
Subject: LEGAL ALERT; Important FCC Deadlines
To:
This is the kind of FUD that the world does not need.
On 2/4/2011 1:10 PM, Data Technology wrote:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/policy/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=229201157cid=RSSfeed_IWK_All
Thanks, I will give Stephen a call.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Chuck Hogg
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 4:47 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question about FCC Form 499-A Telecommunications
Reporting Work Sheet.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone here successfully modified redboot configuration? On a
nanostation2? Turns out they don't have telnet on by default. I executed
fconfig -w -d /dev/mtd6 -n bootp_my_ip -x 192.168.1.1
and now I get
Config verification failed
anytime I try to
The NS2s can be odd.. You have to pretty much keep booting them while
running the open-mesh-flash.exe app from a windoze machine.
I sometimes have to reboot the NS2 3 or 4 times to get it happy.
ryan
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You did this from stock ubnt firmware? Or post openwrt flash? Or...
On 02/04/2011 02:09 PM, D. Ryan Spott wrote:
The NS2s can be odd.. You have to pretty much keep booting them while
running the open-mesh-flash.exe app from a windoze machine.
I'd be interested in this. Please send some more info.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kevin Sullivan
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 4:06 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Remote monitoring/ remote reboot
Hello,
We've
It should not matter. IIRC when the device boots it is pre-insert firmware
here.
ryan
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Charles N Wyble
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:17 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
32 matches
Mail list logo