Rick, I didn't take any potshots at anyone.
I linked a couple of short blurbs on the net..
and asked... What's WISPA's official stand or statement? Is there one?
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
Ok, but the FBI wouldn't know I stuck the hardware there at the last
minute. And the tower glitches off whenever I do a firmware upgrade
anyway. The customer wouldn't know the difference.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Depends who you ask. Some might say the customer could
Depends who you ask. Some might say the customer could notice a "change in
network" and hence non compliant.
On Mar 5, 2011 10:43 PM, "Roger Howard" wrote:
> Would I cover myself for calea by having a mikrotik router on the
> shelf, set up as a bridge, with the calea module installed. Then if I
>
Would I cover myself for calea by having a mikrotik router on the
shelf, set up as a bridge, with the calea module installed. Then if I
get subpoenaed for a tap, I just run out to the appropriate tower and
put it on the ethernet interface of whichever AP the subscriber is on?
Thanks,
Roger
-
On 03/05/2011 05:23 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> What is the largest value you can put in for an OSPF cost? I'd almost
> recommend multiplying all of those numbers by 10 so you can do the fine
> level tweaking between the links.
See http://www.workrobot.com/sysadmin/routing/ospf_costs.html for a
bri
What is the largest value you can put in for an OSPF cost? I'd almost
recommend multiplying all of those numbers by 10 so you can do the fine
level tweaking between the links.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 3/5/2011 9:49 AM, can...@believewireless
Why is this far from CTIA?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
From: users-boun...@wug.cc [mailto:users-boun...@wug.cc] On Behalf Of
Rick Harnish
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 1:15 PM
To: memb...@wispa.org; 'WISPA General List'; us...@wug.cc
S
Just a reminder, I extended the Early Discount period for three days on
Thursday evening. This extension period ends on Sunday at midnight Pacific.
The FISPA/WISPA Service Provider Summit has had some great additions this
week. I really want to drive more WISP attendance this week and next.
I am working with several vendors to create programs to enhance the online
tools available for operators. These vendors have prompted me to conduct
the following survey so they can better understand the industry and operator
needs.
Please go to this Survey Monkey Link and complete the survey.
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 10:56 -0500, Justin Wilson wrote:
> Can someone explain, in plain English, the difference between type 1 and
> type 2 calculations? Mikortik only explains it is white box vs something
> else. Cisco says A type 1 route has a metric that is the
> sum of the internal OSPF cost
Can someone explain, in plain English, the difference between type 1 and
type 2 calculations? Mikortik only explains it is white box vs something
else. Cisco says A type 1 route has a metric that is the
sum of the internal OSPF cost and the external redistributed cost. A type 2
route has a metric
Basically, what is the fastest link in your network? Let's say you
have a GigE link. You'll set that cost to 1. Let's say you have a
backup link that is a licensed 18GHz link that runs 350 Mbps. You
would make that cost a 3. Then, you have a half-duplex Ubiquiti link.
Normally you would count
Mark,
Why don't you join WISPA and be part of the process instead of taking pot
shots from the "hinterlands". It is time you stepped up to be counted.
For the record, I am personally "totally against" Network Neutrality; at
least the versions that have been presented thus far. Forcing unm
The problem is I need to know if there is a tool or set of guidelines to
determine the proper path cost and priorities in an OSPF network so that
when a link goes down the next best route is chosen.
On 3/4/2011 8:01 PM, Patrick Shoemaker wrote:
> This is too general of a question to answer. What
And now is the time to jump back in on the fight because the republicans have
gained a lot of headway towards reversing the FCC's actions.
And they are likely going to win, with the support of the industry behind them.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
I cant speak for WISPA's official opinon but
I am still very much against NetNeutrality, as all it really is is an excuse
for more regulation and less competion, and protection for content providers,
and more liablilty for Access providers. And quite honestly, I am still
appauled that the F
16 matches
Mail list logo
