Will bonding interfaces of 2 Rocket M5 Dish units result in full duplex
transmission? We are needing to increase the backhaul throughput of one
of our links. The obvious answer is to convert to a licensed full
duplex unit (which we plan to do) but in the meantime to get by will
bonding
No. For a secondary radio or backup connection only. You can't even control it.
Steve Barnes
General Manager
PCS-WIN / RC-WiFihttp://www.rcwifi.com/
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Patrick D. Nix, Jr
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 10:35 AM
To:
No. You will need to set one up as tx and one as rx. Bonding just
uses them both for tx/rx. The best way that I know to do this is with
OSPF and Mikrotik. That way one link is always tx and the other is
rx.
http://stfunoo.be/?p=696
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100
As far as performance is concerned which will offer the better end result?
Bonding or routing the interfaces? Can you elaborate on how to use ospf to
create dedicated tx / rx interfaces? We use ospf currently to facilitate a
self-healing network.
Thanks for the help and advice :)
Patrick
Since bonding would require the bridges be WDS, I would suggest
routing would offer a bit more speed.
The OSPF on your network won't matter, just be sure not to overlap
subnets. What you do is set the costs so one link is always tx while
the other is rx. The link details how to do it.
Josh
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 09:44 -0600, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
As far as performance is concerned which will offer the better
end result? Bonding or routing the interfaces? Can you elaborate
on how to use ospf to create dedicated tx / rx interfaces? We use
ospf currently to facilitate a
You can also look at the Arris C3 CMTS, it's EOL'd, but you can get them
refurbished. I would also stick with Cisco if you can make it work, the
uBR7246 is pretty reasonable on the refurb market.
On 11/8/2011 7:13 PM, Kevin Owen wrote:
I think we would like the Cisco better as well… however I
These kinds of things make it harder for all of us . . .
Open Range came into a neighboring county here with all kinds of hype and
noise, and never did a thing . . . .
http://www.agl-mag.com/newsletter/AB111411_Congress.htm
Dave Hannum
New Era Broadband, LLC
Which would give the better experience? When I run duplex speed test with
Rocket M5 I see 36ish Up and 45ish down. When I run transmit only (which would
equate to down) I see 70 mbps.
Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NET Internet Services
IT Manager
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/networking/2011/11/11/copper-not-dead-for-super-
fast-broadband-says-bt-40094401/?ps=twitter
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Thats the radio duplex to blame.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 14, 2011 1:17 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr pni...@cnetworksolutions.com
wrote:
Which would give the better experience? When I run duplex speed test
with Rocket M5
Right, so what I am thinking is if I run routed full duplex my download
should go to 70mbps and my latency should drop based on my speed tests
if I am understanding this right. One other question, I understand how
to configure the routers except for one thing, this will be at our core
backhaul
Any players out there?
---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 tel:314-735-0270 Website:
http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/
LIVE
If you follow my documentation correctly, the two Mikrotik ether1
ports will act like a transparent bridge, so more like a PTP600 (in
the ethernet not screwing with MACs, going above layer 2 sense). If
you just have one backhaul between fiber and core router, being the
link discussed here, there
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 12:17 -0600, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
Which would give the better experience?
It depends on what you need. If more it's just more throughput, then
either will likely give you what you need. Both can give you failover
capability. OSPF will act more like FDX, though it
I am on XBox.
Ben Royer, Operations Supervisor
Royell Communications, Inc.
From: Dennis Burgess
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 10:35 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] BF3
Any players out there?
---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik
16 matches
Mail list logo
