maybe time to stock up on dishes.
--
On 2/8/2014 8:11 PM, Jason Bailey wrote:
Chuck has it right. See below.
33.
/Antenna Gain/. Under Section 15.247, the assumed antenna gain is 6
dBi, with a 1 dB
reduction in power required for every 1 dB that the antenna gain
exceeds 6 dBi. For fixed
The use of compliance test is one of the reasons the FCC is clamping down on 5
ghz…
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Mike Hammett
Sent:
On 2/9/2014 9:42 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
The use of compliance test is one of the reasons the FCC is clamping
down on 5 ghz...
UBNT says that they got DFS2 working in 5.5.2, in 2012, so at least some
radios, including the NSM5, are compliant. Aren't these officially
approved yet for
I'm going to agree with others...
Running outside legal limits doesn't look good to the FCC, and it sounds
like you are definitely running outside the limits since you are whining
about the ability to run your radios in a mode which seems to have no use
than to exceed the limits.
I will also add
Forrest...what is your offlist email ?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
- Reply message -
From: Forrest Christian (List Account) li...@packetflux.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Are we being muscled out of the 5265 - 5700 frequencies?
Date:
All right, looks like I answered my own question. We just fired up
authentication thru billing and the net, meaning we have never run it. Part of
the healing process from doing too much of the wrong thing. We just moved from
manual billing thru Quick Books to an automated process, then added
Sounds like the walled garden is filtering ports that it should not be—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:29 PM, heith petersen wi...@mncomm.com wrote:
All right, looks like I answered my own question. We just fired up
authentication thru billing and the net, meaning we
I just went and read a bunch of the comments on the proceeding...
I didn't read them all, but I didn't find one in favor of the lower
antenna gain...
Has anyone else?
--
On 2/8/2014 8:11 PM, Jason Bailey wrote:
Chuck has it right. See below.
33.
/Antenna Gain/. Under Section 15.247, the
