+1. thanks for the work Josh.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> Looks like I was able to get Adam @ Observium's attention in relation to
> the Netonix switches. Netonix has a little more work to go (mainly their
> date fixed and their own Enterprise number),
Hey guys,
Looks like I was able to get Adam @ Observium's attention in relation to
the Netonix switches. Netonix has a little more work to go (mainly their
date fixed and their own Enterprise number), but then they should be
good to go as far as the major counters go (I think).
I also have b
With Josh & Sean on this one. They have a 3 foot long mount to accommodate the
longer panels, plus with the space the standoff provides will give you plenty
of room to rotate the Antennas to the proper azimuth, so having 2 mounts on a
single leg is no big deal. I wish WBM offered these from the
wbmfg.com M-TOW-3P-48
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Larry A. Weidig wrote:
>
> Most of the time we have been using 120 sectors, but we are planning some
> new deployments with 90 degree sectors instead. Since most of the towers
> we are on had three "legs" it made 120 degree mounting pretty
MTOW or MTOWP
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 16, 2014 2:51 PM, "Larry A. Weidig" wrote:
> Most of the time we have been using 120 sectors, but we are planning some
> new deployments with 90 degree sectors instead. Since most
Most of the time we have been using 120 sectors, but we are planning some new
deployments with 90 degree sectors instead. Since most of the towers we are on
had three "legs" it made 120 degree mounting pretty simple - one antenna per
leg. What sort of mounting are people using for 4 sectors on t
Hi -
I am looking to hear from anyone who has tested the 5 GHz Point to Point
products from Mimosa, Ubiquiti, and Cambium and see what are the clear
advantages of these versus one another.
Thanks!
Daniel Mullen
ISN Inc.
___
Wireless mailing list
Wir