If I were in John's shoes, I'd feel the same way.
Personally, I'd have more respect for Tranzeo if they complied with the
GPL and BSD licenses. The ER1000 series is Linux-based. Nowhere in
Tranzeo's documentation or on their web site do I find the information
required by the GPL. If one gets
These are new: 5 year warranty. I just installed two of these in one of
my servers at home. Love 'em.
Bob
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
Thanks!
Do you happen to know if those are new or reman units? Seems pretty dang
cheap. I'm after inexpensive, not cheap.
I could sure see putting one of
We've got 4 solar sites. Our first relay site was solar, 7+ years ago.
2nd went in 6 years ago. Kyocera panels, Morningstar controllers w/LVD,
Concorde batteries.
Bob
Lists wrote:
Curious how many WISPs are using Solar and what type of solar products?
We are looking at this as
We have four solar locations, two of which have operated for over five
years without any lightning damage. At least one of them is in a
location and with a mast that I'd consider to be a prime target.
The one that really nailed us was a nearby building strike - it
destroyed an antenna and the
As for lightning, I've thought that replacing the radio card with one
with the appropriate atheros chipset might be effective. mini-pci IIRC.
Never have done it, though.
Bob
Josh Luthman wrote:
I guess us around here must have been over tightening it or something, huh...
On 8/27/09, Phil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
See http://forums.cacti.net/about12851.html and
http://forums.cacti.net/about12438.html.
See also
http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/cgi-bin/oid/display?oid=iso.2.840.10036.1submit=Displayaction=display
for the iso section. iso.2.840.10036 appears to be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John - that is truly bizarre, as you say. We've bought a lot of antenna stuff
from
Hyperlink in the past, but your experience sours me on doing business with them
in the
future. I've found that a lot of vendors to the WISP space are very helpful and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If I'm not mistaken, WRAPs are only rated to 18VDC.
Bob
Blair Davis wrote:
WRAP 2? what specs? will it take 48V POE?
chris cooper wrote:
We are rolling out some wrap 2 based nodes. The node, including power
will be mounted externally.
We are in NM 2, Tom Udall. NM 1 has the Sandoval County-wide wireless initiative (which,
IMNSHO, is a money sink of the finest kind: NM political and economic development
history repeated in classic form with the usual up-front grandiose claims and goals, award
of funds, under-delivery of
Nah. The One True Editor: emacs.
Bob
Jeromie Reeves wrote:
You mean they use echo
On 9/8/07, cw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Real men use vi.
Mac Dearman wrote:
(The UNIX version is text user interface based-its message editor inspired
the text editor Pico.)
Signed,
Anonymous from LA.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We are doing something similar. La Cañada Wireless Association
(www.lcwireless.net), located in rural NM, S/SE of Santa Fe. Terrain
here seemed pretty flat when we started but seems to have gotten real
up and down since :). We have about 150 members
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Matt - I am definitely interested in why. We are tipping our toes
into the Tranzeo pond, and Airaya was a possibility.
I'm (negatively) impressed with the pics, of course.
Thanks,
Bob
Matt Glaves wrote:
!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My apologies to the list. I didn't check the reply-to before I pulled
the trigger.
Bob
- Original Message
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RE: Solectek Skyway 7000 -- Follow Up
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:59:51 -0700
From: Bob
13 matches
Mail list logo
