There is a ton of licensed 6 GHz systems already deployed. They make you
use a larger antenna so the beamwidth is narrower. I allows more frequency
reuse due to lower sidelobes and less footprint. We are in a rural area and
sometimes they have a hard time finding us a pair of 50 MHz channels
it, and
teach
the community, more than it was to bring broadband to the homes
themselves.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June
- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2012 - The End of the Internet
I can show you towns that have DSL where the RUS gave a local
, but it prevented anyone else from getting it - which was what
they
were after.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 6:53 AM
Subject: Re
ILEC.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2012 - The End
I have been watching this for years. I see systems selling all the way from
$200 to $1500 per subscriber. Some folks use the 5X EBIDTA formula. Each
system is different. We pay more for canopy systems than non canopy
systems.
- Original Message -
From: Kurt Fankhauser [EMAIL
Hold on there. I am an incumbent as in the I in ILEC. I have fiber
directly to Level 3, XO and the option of hitting all the rest. If there is
such a thing as the pipe I wish someone would point it out to me. We
don't control anything. If you are a wholesale customer, you are
essentially
nobody was intentionally
referring to you or your ILEC Chuck.
Scriv
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hold on there. I am an incumbent as in the I in ILEC. I have fiber
directly to Level 3, XO and the option of hitting all the rest
interests easily. I am certain nobody was intentionally
referring to you or your ILEC Chuck.
Scriv
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hold on there. I am an incumbent as in the I in ILEC. I have fiber
directly to Level 3, XO and the option of hitting
More populated?
Check out Grouse Creek, Utah. That is one of the towns that Bryan is
talking about.
Population about 75 people. And it will be GPON, not FIOS. Much better.
- Original Message -
From: Scottie Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent:
You really should get to be govt funded too. The RUS grant program is ideal
for guys like you.
- Original Message -
From: Scottie Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 10:06 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2012 - The End of the Internet
We have had bad experience with one of these but it was very high and had
severe icing.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Sharples [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 11:45 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Wind generators?
We're designing a
Good to be missed.
I am in Las Vegas at the Motorola Service Provider show instead.
Hope we were well represented in Charlotte.
- Original Message -
From: ralph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 9:27 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Chuck
stereo AM radio signal was QAM. Cable modems use QAM.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] modulation question
I think some disambiguation may be in order.
QAM
GHz RF using antennas
Level 2OFDM modulation on the RF
Level 2 VLANsQAM Sub Carriers
Level 3Ethernet data
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] modulation
of referring to those
carriers. Gheeze it is hard to change. Glad I learned something today...
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] modulation question
what
BTW, the 93 flood in the midwest was called a 500 year flood.
I lived in Quincy, Illinois then and lost some good test gear to the water.
Doesn't seem like it has been 500 years since that flood but time does fly.
In any event, I feel for you guys in the middle of the country. I filled
many
to correctly do link budget
calculations and what RSSI should be expected considering OFDM versus DSSS
style gear.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless
How critical?
Harris Constellation full hot standby space diversity is about as mission
critical as you can get with microwave.
That would be licensed.
A little less critical would be Dragonwave. We use them and love them. Put
up a double set redundant system with STP.
Trango 18 GHz stuff
Trango 45 is supposed to do 45 Mbps at 45 miles for less than $2K per
system.
- Original Message -
From: CHUCK PROFITO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mission critical 100Mbps links
Travis,
What
RSSI, strictly speaking, is the received signal strength. (Received Signal
Strength Indicator) The signal can be totally unmodulated or modulated in a
very complex method with the same RSSI. I am wondering if what you are
asking is about the minimum RSSI needed. Generally speaking, the more
more
information through the noise.
Does that make any sense?
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] modulation question
RSSI, strictly speaking
I think some disambiguation may be in order.
QAM is a vector modulation method:.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constellation_diagram
It shares almost nothing with OFDM methods.
Irrespective, all receivers (CW, AM, FM, SSB, VSB, angle modulation, OFDM,
QAM, TCM, etc) can have an RSSI output from
C/I ratio is a good metric
- Original Message -
From: Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:17 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] good multiradio wifi units for noise environments?
Jack Unger wrote:
The noise figure of the receiver front end or of a low noise amplifier will
help you to pick out a weak signal in the absence of interference. But you
are talking about an environment of interference. A low noise amplifier
could actually hurt in this case depending on the third order
Were you using the internal or external antenna option?
- Original Message -
From: Eric Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:08 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquity NS2 Grounding
Just a quick note to the group... Has anyone had
They seem to work fine. Not sure what the business plan is or how they can
do this, but they are working.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] easy voip
There
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] easy voip
They seem to work fine. Not sure what the business plan is or how they
can
do this, but they are working.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Shoemaker
I can actually see people in parking lots on Google earth for this area.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NASA Worldwind
That's pretty cool.
You cannot get anything certified without the schematic, block diagram, and
other pieces of information that you may not be able to get from the
manufacturer. If the manufacturer does not cooperate, there isn't any way a
WISP can obtain the certification. Moreover, the RF tests do have to be
The OIG reports that the first round of 459 audits pertaining to the
various universal service fund programs identified approximately $6.2
million in potential improper payments from the universal service fund that
it is planning to recover.
An improper payment is defined as any payment that
by.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
We ARE regulated now. Just try to go on some
Originally the telcos were unregulated. You had Bell, Gray, Home and
others. Market forces started to help settle who the larger players were
but there were still farmer lines in the 1960s that were unregulated. All
farmer lines that combined to become ILECs did pretty good. Regulation was
-
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
Originally the telcos were unregulated. You had Bell, Gray, Home and
others. Market forces started to help settle who the larger players were
I AM a telco and want to know where the handouts come from. Real work?
Plowing fiber through solid rock so I can earn $13.50/month providing basic
service, I guess that isn't real work, right? BTW, show me where any tax
dollars are used to support the telcos. That one has always eluded me
? Anyone do that in the WISP
world?
Randy
Chuck McCown - 2 wrote:
I AM a telco and want to know where the handouts come from. Real work?
Plowing fiber through solid rock so I can earn $13.50/month providing
basic
service, I guess that isn't real work, right? BTW, show me where any tax
Yep, I got nailed by this once myself.
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
This could turn in to something it shouldn't really fast...
When it is a regulation of common resources, like cellular spectrum, they
have to attempt to enforce fairness and foster competition. Problem is when
they craft a fix for cell or ILEC or IXC and it spills over into other areas
they regulate.
- Original Message -
From: Kurt Fankhauser
That will still happen. We give many free installs and $49 installs. We
have to to compete with Qwest and Comcast. I also provide a free DSL modem
to all DSL customers. Depends on your scale and competition. Why would
ATT not provide a free DSL modem?
- Original Message -
From:
Something that will repel water and not absorb any. Tarps will do fine.
Visqueen will do even better if it is durable enough.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Nix Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 5:02 PM
Talk to a judge for an emergency injunction. That is interfering with
interstate commerce.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Nix Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 1:36 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Watertower trouble
Got a
booted off the
tower completely once your current contract is up. I would talk to them and see
what can be worked out by having you work around their crews.
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 2 wrote:
Talk to a judge for an emergency injunction. That is interfering with
interstate commerce
kind of legal grounds,
and he signed a contract that clearly states 48 hours
notice.
Don't take your organs to heaven,
heaven knows we need them down here!
Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA
: [WISPA] Watertower trouble
The contract they have says the city only has to give them 48 hours...
they actually gave 72 hours. A judge is not going to grant an injunction
when they followed the contract that both parties agreed upon.
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 2 wrote:
If the choice
Nope, telecommunications are defacto interstate, especially internet and in
general anything that the FCC regulates.
The FCC had declared all internet communications as interstate in nature and
they have successfully kept the jurisdiction over such cases.
Federal judges are easy to find. And
Dang, hate happy endings...!
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Nix Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Watertower trouble
Well, I just met with the contractors and we were able to reach an
.
A temporary restraining order is normally the way to handle this if you
decide it is your only choice. However, they take a little longer to get
issued and you may not have the luxury of such time.
Be careful what you ask for ... You may get it!
On 5/21/08 4:29 PM, Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL
I would say if you have the time, money, desire and drive to get your BSEE,
by all means do so.
At least you already have all your general ed covered.
Normally technicians come up through the ranks, many times with various
forms of formal or semi formal education from a variety of colleges and
The way I test the surge suppressors I manufacture is to place a high
voltage across the suppression device (such as your gas tube). The voltage
must be higher than the breakdown voltage of the device. Frequently 120 VAC
from the outlet will do. I use a variac coupled to a step up
I think you should re-read the constitution. Interstate commerce, eminent
domain.
I can come (as a public utility) and TAKE your property. Read it. 5th
amendment. (not just for pleading the fifth).
(And I have done this in the past when forced into it).
You want to use the commons of the
-
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband’s reach
I think you should re-read the constitution. Interstate commerce, eminent
domain.
I can come
While at it, bill the IRS for your time in filling out their data requests
which they will use against you.
Ditto the census bureau, you must be really steamed when they roll around...
Or perhaps you are one of those that doesn't believe the govt has the right
to impose an imcome tax...
I feel
I just tease Patrick every chance I can.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] so who got a copy of the new NANO?...
Not that I think the same (though I sense joking),
No matter where you create a radio frequency service, you are forcing the
current occupant to share it with you or in some cases they are being booted
from their turf. UHF TV has been eaten away at for about 20 years. First
for trunking two way and SMR systems then for cellular and more
I think it is Microtik Users Meeting.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 4:02 PM
Subject: [WISPA] MUM
Who is at MUM?
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
I guess a benefit I can see (out west here) is that we constantly hear of
the need for government to step in and provide broadband because of the lack
of such. If there was a comprehensive coverage map, projects like UTOPIA,
iProvo and Philladelphia/Earthlink might not ever launch. They might
If you have ever renumbered your entire network due to changing upstream
providers or running out of IP, you will wish you had used DHCP everywhere.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:37 PM
RTTY or AMTOR
- Original Message -
From: Eric Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 6:23 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 60 miles (90 KM) P2MP with CPE on Vessels, possible?
I was told that about 40 miles is the limit
Is terrabeam still in business?
- Original Message -
From: Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 8:14 AM
Subject: [WISPA] UL 1Gbps Link
List
I have to propose a half mile 100
ATT cellular has stopped using any coaxial surge suppressors.
They have found them to be a waste of money.
(So they tell us).
- Original Message -
From: Harold Bledsoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
spent $40 million dollars to
roll out 15 cities (this is direct from their GM to me). She was
pretty
proud of herself with that statement. So that's $2.6 million per
city...
and I'm talking some cities with 15,000 population (their biggest had
120,000).
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 2
was
pretty
proud of herself with that statement. So that's $2.6 million per
city...
and I'm talking some cities with 15,000 population (their biggest had
120,000).
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 2 wrote:
WiMAX was dead, is dead and will remain dead. OK, not factually true
but
emotionally
$100M to date of it).
The main takeaway with Chuck's post is that WISPs will have strong
opportunities for a long time to come, and I agree 110%.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008
: 760.580.0080
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:08 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future
The official WiMax consultant training session I went to, showed
OK, so what is the answer to the question below?
- Original Message -
From: CHUCK PROFITO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future
Patrick,
If not 70 miles and 30 mbps,
what are the real
in turn smoke the Canopy and do it in the same
channel size.
Patrick Leary
AVP, Market Development
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Monday
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:26 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future
Speed is the only thing I have to sell. 5.4 has opened up plenty of BW
for
us now. I am fine with 20MHz channels. So what we
WiMAX was dead, is dead and will remain dead. OK, not factually true but
emotionally true. The cell companies will use WiMax frequencies and
technologies but they will be a premium service and not well suited to
compete with us for point to multi point fixed wireless. It will never live
up
My rule of thumb is you need 600 subscribers per employee.
- Original Message -
From: Kurt Fankhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 7:17 AM
Subject: [WISPA] when does a startup WISP become a successful WISP?
Whats the
787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 9:32 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] when does a startup WISP become a successful WISP?
My rule of thumb is you need 600 subscribers
per month? We are at 300 customers per employee and
MRC is $35. Owner isn't sweating.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 6:32 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] when does a startup WISP become a successful WISP?
My rule of thumb is you need 600 subscribers per employee
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 10:19 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] when does a startup WISP become a successful WISP?
I have one taking care of 600. He works about 2 installs a day and 2
troubles
No discounts. I will go to jail if there is any cross subsidization. We go
to extreme lengths to prove in an audit worthy fashion that our rate payers
on the regulated side are not footing any part of the bill for our
unregulated operations.
The WISP is owned by myself and the founder of the
?
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 2 wrote:
No discounts. I will go to jail if there is any cross subsidization. We go
to extreme lengths to prove in an audit worthy fashion that our rate payers
on the regulated side are not footing any part of the bill for our
unregulated operations.
The WISP
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 2 wrote:
I have one taking care of 600. He works about 2 installs a day and 2
troubles a day. The growth is pretty flat in that town. I have another
area where there are a few more and we have 2 installers and the growth is
pretty steady. I have 6 installers taking
And we only have 1000 telco customers. The WISP is a far larger operation.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] when does a startup WISP become a successful
BTW, our GigE from Level 3 costs $14/meg. That is a wonderful thing if you
can somehow get to one of their POPs. That has made a huge difference for
us. We started out paying something like $700/T1 from Sprint.
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
Hype and puffery. Many non technical folks have hyped this well beyond
reasonable expectations.
I have seen point to multipoint NLOS 70 mile @ 50 Mbps statements made in
the press.
And it has been going on for about 4 years now with very little deployment.
- Original Message -
From:
Is that canopy or alvarion results?
- Original Message -
From: Drew Lentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*21 Mbps @ ~1.25 Miles
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
You cannot port across rate center boundaries and in some cases you cannot
port outside the wirecenter.
- Original Message -
From: Larry Yunker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Frontier
: Monday, April 07, 2008 5:52 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Femtocells
I dunno if I'd use anything less than G.711.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
.711.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Femtocells
G.711 require
).
-- Bryan
Mike Hammett wrote:
I dunno if I'd use anything less than G.711.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, April
G.711 require 64kbps plus overhead. Normally about 90 kbps. But there are
lossless compression methods that can cut this in about half.
- Original Message -
From: Marty Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 8:24 PM
Subject:
PM, Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My question for you is why? 100 users are enough to be a headache and
use
up all your free time but not enough to even pay you for your time or
investment.
(Did I mention I'm writing a grant proposal for this? Cue the strings :)
It's
Is I2K wireless in Benton Harbor?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
My question for you is why? 100 users are enough to be a headache and use
up all your free time but not enough to even pay you for your time or
investment. Are you going to do email, DNS and authentication? Are you
going to do DHCP? If not who/what is? Are you worried about calea? On
with.
Smaller package for equivalent energy storage. Longer lasting equipment
(batteries die in 2 - 3 years).
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
http://www.horizonfuelcell.com/portable_power.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 8:04 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Hydrogen Power
My batteries last between 10
of 1000 times
more for the cost of the energy.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Hydrogen Power
Those are not rechargeable from mains power. Note the use
I get fuel cell magazine each month. It is full of sources. Probably an on
line version.
Just curious, why? Battery efficiency is just as good if not better. Bound
to be much cheaper. Fuel cells make water, and that causes problems in
cold weather.
- Original Message -
From:
How much gain do you want? That is pretty easy to build.
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 11:43 AM
Subject: [WISPA] 900 MHz 60 Degree Horizontal Polarization
SectorRecommendation
Does
The FAA is a huge stickler about this. One guy got fined for being 16
inches too tall, he thought he was under by a foot or so. I am very
interested in knowing if a waiver is even possible.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Goicoechea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List'
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 6:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] tower install
The FAA is a huge stickler about this. One guy got fined for being 16
inches too tall, he
I have paid a similar amount for a 120 foot monopole.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Goicoechea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] tower install
We already purchased the tower.
Mike Goicoechea
Steel housing? Not aluminum or die cast zinc?
Is it machined out of billet or folded and welded or what?
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:11 PM
Subject: [WISPA] TrangoLink-45 Review
My question is why a 22 dBi antenna for only 1.5 miles? Less gain will not
be nearly as sensitive to tower twist and bending in the wind etc.
- Original Message -
From: rabbtux rabbtux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 8:31 PM
Where do you get new ones for less than $4?
- Original Message -
From: Tim Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] satellite mounts
Hey Gang, I just hook up with the local Dish Network or Direct TV
installer.
Ed
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 14:54:13 -0700
Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where do you get new ones for less than $4?
- Original Message -
From: Tim Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 2:44 PM
Subject
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
