, it is all
consideration.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] County
Yes, but he is on their tower for free in exchange for transporting traffic.
Travis
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote
BPL on HV was and is a stupid idea. HV infrastructure was not built with
the idea of being a transmission line for RF. To get any kind if speed you
have to use lots of power, even then it is very very short range. You might
as well set up a whole bunch of dragonwaves in a drop and insert
at 4:21 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
BPL on HV was and is a stupid idea. HV infrastructure was not built with
the idea of being a transmission line for RF. To get any kind if speed
you
have to use lots of power, even then it is very very short range. You
might
as well set
interference - I saw it with my own eyes
along with dozens of skeptical ham operators. Theory does not matter,
those issues are conquered. Seeing is believing.
-RickG
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One huge reason, powerlines are not constant
,
those issues are conquered. Seeing is believing.
-RickG
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One huge reason, powerlines are not constant impedance to RF. Nor are
they
balanced. This is like trying to pump natural gas down the water lines.
Pipe, right
This summer I had a couple of junior year EE interns in the shop to do some
dirtywork. They got very very familiar with antenna range measurements by
the end of the summer. But I had to laugh when I would ask them to measure
the return loss on a new design. They would look confused and then
We pay rent to one county to be in their building and on their tower.
The sheriff's office might be on some paperwork somewhere. Not unheard of.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday,
And their distributors are?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquity Bullet
Nope they have not shipped the first batch out yet expected to ship next
week to their
The licensed stuff is not frequency hopping or spread spectrum. It is
generally big time QAM with tons of margin. Like 40 dB+ of margin. Part 90
and Part 101 radios have been around for a very long time, way back before
microprocessors. So spectral efficiency is not the name of the game
We have an FCC attorney in Virginia do it for us.
- Original Message -
From: Randy Cosby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] My favorite quotes from the FCC TVWS meeting today...
Speaking of that,
So I guess satellite earth station minimum size requirements would really
make a barrier to entry.
I think we had to have a 21 foot dish minimum for an inmarsat uplink...
By the same logic should I be pissed at that requirement?
If you interfere with my 6 GHz system, E-911 links die, critical
Moreover, 6 GHz hardware is my most expensive stuff. I can get 11 GHz
dragonwave at a much lower cost and it will do more than 6 GHz for most
applications. Plus have all the perqs of license and exclusivity etc.
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA
: Re: [WISPA] My favorite quotes from the FCC TVWS meeting today...
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Shouldn't the standard for critical life safety infrastructure be a
bit higher than that used to surf porn?
If you've ever manned the phones during an outage, you'd understand
from the FCC TVWS meeting today...
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Shouldn't the standard for critical life safety infrastructure be a
bit higher than that used to surf porn?
If you've ever manned the phones during an outage, you'd understand
that internet access IS that critical
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] My favorite quotes from the FCC TVWS meeting today...
I believe all of Trango's licensed equipment (6ghz, 11ghz, 18ghz, 23ghz) is
the same price.
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Moreover, 6 GHz hardware is my most expensive stuff. I can get 11 GHz
board... so that isn't much of a reason either.
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
So I guess satellite earth station minimum size requirements would really
make a barrier to entry.
I think we had to have a 21 foot dish minimum for an inmarsat uplink...
By the same logic should I
I think we keep it alive for $5/month.
- Original Message -
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:12 PM
Subject: [WISPA] cancelled customer email
OK guys. I've never had this happen before so I'm not usre what to
Yep. Thats why many folks use a lower gain for their sectors and omnis.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage
16dB by 120* won't
Be nice to email the guy to tell him the dishes could be sold on ebay for
more than the tower is worth.
What a shame.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 7:33 AM
Subject: [WISPA] How
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 11:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] heavy usage customers
snmp is a wonderful thing
What exactly didn't we win?
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 5:08 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Looks like we didn't win
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/110408-fcc-whilte-spaces.html
:(
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looks like we didn't win
Useful power levels in the whitespaces.
B UT, we've not seen the actual rules from the FCC yet. It's entirely
possible that the rules will be better than what's being reported so far.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3
, and lobby
for
4watts.
But I'm gonna stop talking, as I'm getting all worked up, before I have
all
the facts posted to the public tommorrow.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED
the facts posted to the public tommorrow.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looks
You must not have competitors. I have both Qwest and Comcast giving away multi
megabit starting at $15.95
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] heavy usage customers
I guess that's
installs
than we can keep up with each month.
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
You must not have competitors. I have both Qwest and Comcast giving away
multi megabit starting at $15.95
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Sunday
complete (including PoE, antenna).
Canopy seems to work well for many people... but I've never been one to
follow the norm. And I get to put $50 in my pocket on every install, and
$1,000 for every AP we put up. ;)
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Well that is a testimony to your
interference from a new provider and all those
people get 100ms latency?
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
All of the complaints are easily overcome with the proper management
software, DHCP reservations etc. You can easily force the SM to connect
to the exact AP you want
snmp is a wonderful thing...
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] heavy usage customers
Our front end tech support only needs the phone number or account
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 8:29 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] heavy usage customers
All of the complaints are easily overcome with the proper management
software, DHCP
if a customer gets
8ms? And how do they test that measurement? And what happens when a
customer completely clobbers an AP and 160 customers are getting 20ms
latency? Or you have interference from a new provider and all those
people get 100ms latency?
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote
McCown - 3 wrote:
Can the 802.11 folks make that claim?
Next comes the Hitler? Take it offlist, guys.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwins_law
--
* Butch Evans * Professional Network Consultation*
* http
customers
How does Canopy fix a customer satisfaction problem? If they are used to
getting 5Mbps download speed and you have to cap them at 1Mbps, it doesn't
really matter what platform you are using.
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Canopy...
- Original Message -
From
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2008 12:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] heavy usage customers
Our Canopy customers are used to getting 10.2 Mbps download speed. If the
start a huge file transfer they get wide open throttle
I would ask them what a permissible level would be, then I would give them
some average levels of exposure due to cell phone and microwave oven leakage
(and wireless routers, maybe) showing them to be thousands of times higher
than the wisp gear. You could always put up an AP and use a
Looks like Tim Hogard's basement to me.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 8:00 AM
Subject: [WISPA] NOC
Here's a NOC...
Dang, so the rumor IS true. What a great idea... ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Drew Lentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Damn, Ubiquiti
I saw Wu running around with something like this at WiMax
Sorry, forget which list I am on at times.
AF09 == AnimalFarm '09
Motorola Canopy Users Groupie bash in January.
- Original Message -
From: Ben Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Damn, Ubiquiti
think the Nanostation has the horsepower to do 20Mbps, do they?
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Nanostations.
- Original Message -
From: Cooper Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 8:42 PM
Subject: [WISPA
I think I would fire the bad ones off to the manufacturer for a failure
analysis. Sounds like a nasty trend developing.
If they are honorable and actually care about remaining in the business they
would cooperate and offer to repair or replace all your other ones before
they all fail (assuming
We always did 5 feet plus 10% of all poles longer than 20 feet.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 7:28 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wood Pole Towers (Was: Re: Trylon Titan Foundation
Work)
Nanostations.
- Original Message -
From: Cooper Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 8:42 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Recommendations for equipment to create 15 mile 20 Mbit
PtPlink?
What unlicensed gear would you suggest to create
I still have my hooks and belt.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] old utility poles
Climb? I bought a bucket truck so that I'd never have to do that
Around here it takes a geotechnical soils report ($600-1200)
Wet stamped foundation drawing showing a foundation design for this area,
wind load and siesmic conditions ($800-$1200)
Then paying for the building permit showing the licensed general
contractor's license number.
We can have more
, no truck roll installs. That is a dream I would like to make into a
reality :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA
Depending on options, they average $300.
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.5Ghz highpass/lowpass filters?
What do you charge for BPF's?
We always assume we will get a signal. We are rarely wrong.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Tranzeo] New Update - Tranzeo/Mtik
disconnectissueOct7th, 2008
So
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
We always assume we will get a signal. We are rarely wrong.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Tranzeo] New Update - Tranzeo
PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Tranzeo] New Update -Tranzeo/Mtik
disconnectissueOct7th, 2008
We always assume we will get a signal. We are rarely wrong.
- Original Message -
From: Travis
] NOGO's
Wow Chuck! You've got it covered! How may square miles dor you service?
-RickG
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1% or less
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent
... :(
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
We always assume we will get a signal. We are rarely wrong.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Tranzeo] New Update
foot pine trees surrounding most homes on all sides. :(
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Nope. When you have about 65 APs up on high ground looking down into your
service territory and totally surrounding it, you can serve everyone.
- Original Message -
From: Brian
Yes, the normal float voltage for flooded cell batts is 2.25 VPC. For a 48
Volt battery that is 24 cells x 2.25 = 54 volts. Some folks charge at 55
volts.
Then during discharge, some consider 1.8 VPC to be the lower limit. 24 x 1.
= 43.2 volts. I personally like 44 volts as the lower limit.
A judge ordered the FCC to issue a decision on the intercarrier compensation
reform. Not sure the docket number, but they have to issue something in
November. There is a date certain. They can decide to not change anything.
Or they can decide to radically reform the whole works. If they do
True, ATT and the department of defense were best buddies. I remember HVAC
systems in the TD-2 microwave systems that kept heaters and airconditioners
running all year long so they could simply mix the air to get the temp they
wanted. Gold plated system. But it was a good system. Part of
It is a cost recovery mechanism. I got audited by USAC this year to prove
that the USF we receive is to cover the costs of providing the service. But
think how expensive it is to run a hundred miles of fiber and put in a class
5 switch to serve 30 or 50 customers.
You are right, I do love
Vector Network Analyzer. Anritsu makes a nice one. Plus some test
antennas. But you will be spending $6K and above.
- Original Message -
From: Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2008 4:33 PM
Subject: [WISPA] small RF testing
represented that
they can make them. But I don't
see
part numbers listed. I'd love to see
these in the sub $300 range.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3
[EMAIL PROTECTED
One of the quickest and easiest ways is the Wilife system. I think Logitech
owns the company now. It has relatively inexpensive but very smart cameras
and some stealth cameras (clock radio camera) etc. It communicates with the
computer via the power line (homeplug). Very simple to install.
A dual pol panel antenna can be an order of magnitude more difficult to make
than a single linear polarized antenna. Almost all panel antennas are
either an array of patches or an array of butterfly dipole elements over a
ground plane. Most designers are trying to put as much gain in the area
At 2000 feet a paper clip would work.
- Original Message -
From: Blair Davis
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:41 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Dual Pol Antennas
All this talk about Dual Pol feedhorns has got me curious
I'm looking for a dual pol
Sometimes. A NECA ILEC has the choice.
- Original Message -
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 8:11 PM
Subject: [WISPA] DSL Tariffed
I'm losing a business customer to DSL. They offered them a price much
below
Unlicensed 24 GHz has so little power that it is only good for a mile or
two. Is that still an attractive thing?
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 7:37 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
Huge diff between SA and Nigeria...
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] your thoughts on opps in Africa?
In the case of South Africa I
The good ones are always in Nigeria...
- Original Message -
From: Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:19 PM
Subject: [WISPA] your thoughts on opps in Africa?
Is it just me, or do African wireless opportunities rarely
We were in Sakhalin Island in Russia. The government just up and decided to
take over everything. Booted out the oil companies and said finders
keepers to everyone. I will never do any intl work again without full
money up front.
- Original Message -
From: Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] your thoughts on opps in Africa?
We were in Sakhalin Island in Russia
worked for them, they were part of the
consortium developing Sakhalin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] your
or a Russia thing... but
come to think of it I think I did hear something about Russia doing that a
few years back
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 1:06 PM
in here some where...
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Russia, the New Soviet Union.
- Original Message -
From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] your thoughts on opps in Africa?
I
in Africa?
I have heard of that happening on native lands here in the US too. I have
nothing to confirm that though.
ryan
-Original Message-
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 6:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Satellite internet
They all suck for latency.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
I'll bet its ping times are still in the hundreds of milliseconds.
- Original Message -
From: Aaron D. Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Satellite internet
If you had a really tiny monkey with really tiny hands and had them actually
grab one of the entangled photons, bring it to a rest and then shake it in
the opposite polarization, will the other monkey holding the other photo
feel the change?
- Original Message -
From: Forrest W.
I fully expect them to run into the same brick wall the prevents reverse
time travel.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Satellite internet
Forrest W.
We are a general contractor with 10 million I think. That much insurance is
not all that expensive.
Any general contractor should be able to buy a one time rider to their
policy to bump up the coverage.
- Original Message -
From: Randy Cosby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Canopy NAT and bootP filtering works like a champ to stop the mistake from
causing problems upstream.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Preventing backwards
They all suck for latency.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 3:52 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Satellite internet
I have a customer looking for enterprise quality ( his words) satellite
service. Money is
God bless Mac. There will be prayers.
- Original Message -
From: Mac Dearman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Golly Gustav
Well - - - here we (Louisiana) are again in the eye of a
I guess I could reverse the polarity of a 333SS. Do you know how much
current the POE would be drawing?
- Original Message -
From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Motorola Canopy User Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Will Canopy Surge work with 48v Redline?
They use the PowerDsine midspan poe...not sure
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I guess I could reverse the polarity of a 333SS
, 2008 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Will Canopy Surge work with 48v Redline?
how much?
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Our 333ss has leds for monitoring voltage and current. But the circuit
is
fine tuned to Canopy SMs.
I could reverse
Contact Panaway and Calix. They have lots of TV options. Directv will let
you do MTU systems. There should be a way to combine the two. FTTH systems
with analog lasers can transport conventional CATV signals. Or become a
Directv distributor. That is what do do for most of our areas.
-
I don't think that exemption applied to LNP. It did for a while to keep
CLECs out of the rural areas but that has now sunset.
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Will [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
Ron,
Do you want to present at AnimalFarm this winter?
I think this topic would be very interesting for all.
- Original Message -
From: Ron Harden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I want to port
as a customer. We appreciate your business.
You can call the office and ask for me directly at 256/638-2144, or you may
speak to any of our CSRs at the same number.
Sincerely,
Chris Townson
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL
should have picked this up before Chuck, but what is the
animal
farm event?
Yes if I can contibute and work it out with my schedule, what ever it is.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Tuesday, August 26
Do you really think the FCC has specified P-15 to the be the official
conduit for status reports?
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 9:19 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Emergency FCC
Used to be 200 kbps and above. But now everybody has to file.
- Original Message -
From: Jason Hodge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Reminder
Please define
BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:49:24
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] coax cables
Elliptical waveguide will lose 3 dB in 250 feet.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Brownson [EMAIL
130 feet on 5.8 through LMR 900 = serving about 20% of the area you could
serve if the coax was not in place.
I guess it depends on what folks call working.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent
We make 'em sign a statement saying they have read the employee handbook.
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Employee Tracking Program
In Missouri its only
Moldashel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] coax cables
Dude
That is not what I was commenting on. You made the following blanket
statement regarding radio links
I would never use coax for 5.8 period. Not unless you are only going a few
feet.
LMR900 can be used for up to 50 feet. It is better than 1/2 heliax. But
really, you gotta use waveguide if you are going any distance at all.
- Original Message -
From: Matt Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elliptical waveguide will lose 3 dB in 250 feet.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Brownson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] coax cables
To give you the facts. You can use just about any coax you
There are about 4 parts of federal code that allows the use, but it does not
get you out of the process. Planning cannot deny you but you still have to
apply for the conditional use permit. They will have a hearing for the
public to have a chance to comment, but at the end of the day you will
You gotta get a better lawyer. Some of this stuff, especially RF emissions
are federally regulated and wholly prempts local officials. It is actually
easier if you call your facility cellular like in most cases because federal
code can get most of this off your back. The building
They cannot require colocation, that is considered a taking.
- Original Message -
From: Joe Fiero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 7:30 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site licensing problem
My first question is, where is this
, but there goes another $10 grand to challenge that provision of
the
ordinance.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 9:58 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site
the application.
Let them school me for a while. After I get a relationship started, I try
to gently inform them that there are some federal preemptions but they don't
need to be too concerned about that.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless
101 - 200 of 300 matches
Mail list logo
