is here:
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0430/FCC-12-46A1.pdf
--
Fred R. Goldstein fred at interisle.net
Interisle Consulting Group
+1 617 795 2701
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http
The current FCC rules per November's CAF order allow ILECs to be
subsidized to provide broadband unless there is an unsubsidized
competitor who provides both voice and data service. Jack Unger has
written an excellent petition to the FCC to change that to allow it
to be unsubsidized
Does anyone have a standard letter to use to ask permission from
satellite earth stations to use the 3650 MHz band within the 150 mile
exclusion zone? Thanks.
--
Fred Goldsteink1io fgoldstein at ionary.com
ionary Consulting http://www.ionary.com/
+1 617 795 2701
At its October meeting, the FCC adopted an Order and Further Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking in a series of long-open dockets. These cover
related topics including the Universal Service Fund, Intercarrier
Compensation and VoIP. But the Order itself wasn't released until the
Friday before
On Friday, the FCC finally released the Order in their Intercarrier
Compensation and Universal Service Fund docket. The executive
summary had come out with the Adoption at last month's FCC Public
Meeting, but the 759-page (!) Order took a while to finish.
The results, from a WISP perspective,
I've been following the FCC's Intercarrier Compensation and Universal
Service dockets for over a decade now, and have filed a heap of
Comments on them. So naturally when an Order comes out, I pay a lot
of attention. Usually I send a memo about it to my clients.
However, while the FCC
What kind of experience does anyone here have in shooting backhaul
links over water? I know that it does all sorts of nasty things to
microwave propagation, but I have a large group of lakeside access
points that will depend on backhaul being delivered from across the
lake, about 10-15 miles.
I'm doing some path loss estimates in RadioMobile. Mainly 5.8 GHz stuff.
I have a place where I'd like to run a point-to-multipoint sector as
an injection feed to multiple APs in the mesh. This would need to
run AirMax or Nstreme or NV2 in order to manage the traffic, but that
part seems
If I have a site with, say, Ubiquiti Rocket M5 radios plugged into
120 degree sector antennas, with Airmax (TDMA) turned on, do they
have to be on separate frequencies, or can they coexist on one? The
5.8 GHz band is kind of crowded to be having three access frequencies
plus two or more
I wonder if any of you have experience with 5.8 GHz MIMO
antennas. I'm trying to design a point-to-point link, about 10
miles, that will carry a high percentage of a whole network's
backhaul. So I'd like it to go at about 80 Mbps, MCS 12 in 20 MHz.
The UBNT SR71-15 card can plug into a
A design I'm working on is in a hilly wooded rural/resort area, not
farmland. It will need a fair number (perhaps a few dozen) sites to
cover the planned turf. Each node will need both backhaul (mesh, in
the loose sense) and access antennas. The obvious place to put these
is atop utility
I'm just a little confused about some of these nice-looking access
points. The UBNT Rocket M5, for instance, can put out +27 dBm. It
plugs *right into* a nice 19dB sector antenna. Okay, the smaller,
120 dB sector is only 16 dB. Now math is not really my thing but I
get a total ERP there of
First off, I'd like to say hello to the list. Mike Hammett pointed
me at it a couple of weeks ago, after I posted a wireless-related
question (wireless in the trees) at isp-clec, and he reposted it
here. This list is a lot more active... I've been reading the past
few months archives and
13 matches
Mail list logo
