I think the key would be that these portable devices require a AP to
talk to, and that AP's be limited as licensed devices (like 3650). The
protocol would need to be setup so that they do not talk unless they
can hear a AP (and handshake a stable link). This is my opinion of the
best middle ground
If they had not dried up, Buffalo units with openwrt/ddwrt and a
pptp/pppoe tunnel back to a mikrotik. There are a number of other
compatible units. I wold sugest anything that will let you do a tunnel
back to a central hotspot. You can have MT only allow them X time
and/or Y bits.
On 12/10/07,
It looks like the FCC making us be CALEA compliant was a total waste
of time effort (on both parties sides) and only made a atmosphere of
fear. It also sounds like while they filed for information that has
classically been available pre-calea, has anyone had to comply with
the real time streaming
Looked to me they had at least one snapped guy wire. Storm damage or a
errant backhoe maybe? Wonder if it was fixed or if it came down.
On 11/21/07, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Holy error rates Batman!
LOL, even *I* know this isn't the way to build a tower for all of those big
Ehh I do not know about through it self. I do know that small spaces
can will suck air (and water vapor with it) in as they do the
heat/cool cycles due to pressure changes. This can be seen by leaving
a kids sealed plastic toy out side for a few weeks. If you wish to
test it you first have to
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 4:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WR 900 question
Ehh I do not know about through it self. I do know that small spaces can
will suck air
Oh man that does not look fun at all. Am I understanding this right,
you were 4ft off the ground hung by your arm? Hope you have some pain
meds and a updated tetanus shot.
On 11/5/07, JohnnyO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This didn't happen during an install, but it happened while climbing a
ladder
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 4:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Please Use Caution During Installs
Oh man that does not look fun at all. Am I understanding this right,
you were 4ft off the ground hung
I have used many WHR HP's with openwrt and ddwrt and never had the
dhcp server stop (some have 20PC's on them). I have v24 rc2 09/04/07
on most of them, iirc I went to RC3 about 2? 3? weeks ago. I would
roll back to this version or one very close and see what happens. If
the dhcp keeps going out I
My take is that this is the that fateful first step on a very
slippery slope. Today they rate shape the traffic, next week they out
right block it. I agree that any provider needs to use what ever tools
they have to keep users in line. The problem that Forbes is pointing
out (I think) is that they
You can dump their software and build your own. I have not seen
anything else quite like them but would also like to know what else
exists.
On 10/25/07, Anthony Lemons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know if there is an equipment line along the lines of what
Meraki is selling? I've been
Tony, Does your product allow multi SSID's and routed wds links? Do
you have or plan to have a out door omni unit? The optional poe
protection is nice looking.
Jeromie
On 10/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony
Our complete RWR HPG product line has Mesh based on OLSRd
Ive been looking myself, Best price so far has been $150 with a 2yr
plan. With no ATT out here I think I will still hold out for a iClone.
On 10/14/07, Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So... Can any of these phones be aquired inexpensively new from ATT, with a
new signup plan?
Or are
Jeromie Reeves wrote:
Ive been looking myself, Best price so far has been $150 with a 2yr
plan. With no ATT out here I think I will still hold out for a iClone.
On 10/14/07, Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So... Can any of these phones be aquired inexpensively new from ATT, with a
new
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pick up 4 for the price of one? I paid $354 for a brand new, 4GB iPhone on
ebay... including shipping.
And WiFi is a huge reason to have the iPhone, if you ask me.
Travis
Microserv
Jeromie Reeves wrote:
Has anyone picked up a Cect P168, Cect 599, or any
Has anyone picked up a Cect P168, Cect 599, or any of the other
iClones? I am thinking I would rather get 4 of the clones for the
same price as 1 iPhone (and not be locked into ATT whom does not work
out here). So far the only missing feature I want on the clones is
wifi
On 10/2/07, Brad Belton
My research show that the main cost is the STB more so then the head
end. VLS makes a pretty decent head-end depending on what you want to
serve out. I had setup VLS with access to current IPTV stations as
well as HD stored media. The streaming was very simple to to, albeit
network intensive. I
You mean they use echo
On 9/8/07, cw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Real men use vi.
Mac Dearman wrote:
(The UNIX version is text user interface based-its message editor inspired
the text editor Pico.)
Signed,
Anonymous from LA. (That's Los Angeles)
Winbox runs under wine (mostly) fine. If you have Wine .44 then you
must upgrade MT to 2.9.40 or better and to loader 2.2.11
It would not be to hard to replicate winbox natively for Linux, it
would be the GUI that would be a issue. Has MT documented the winbox
interface? Mmmm ideas.
On 9/8/07,
The Fon is nice (and ddwrt supported). It is a big shame the whr hp
g54s was dropped, I use a lot of them and they are great units. The RX
amp was a blessing at times. The WHR HP G125 does NOT have a RX amp,
it has 4 or 5db antenna over the g125's 2db. Once my supplies of whr
hp's runs out I will
Sounds like your using SATA. If so, disable the AHCI in the bios, it
will drop the chipset into compatibility mode. worse case you might
need to drop a small PATA drive (or flash) in and use it to boot from
first.
On 8/6/07, David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zack Kneisley wrote:
[ snip:
,
so are we talking $5-10 per customer or $5-10 per month commission
payout as long as the customer pays?
On 8/2/07, Jeromie Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I to would be interested in such a referral program. Spot checking is
a great idea and could worked right into the referral
customer or $5-10 per month commission
payout as long as the customer pays?
On 8/2/07, Jeromie Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I to would be interested in such a referral program. Spot checking is
a great idea and could worked right into the referral form by asking
them to update
, Jeromie Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I to would be interested in such a referral program. Spot checking is
a great idea and could worked right into the referral form by asking
them to update them on the status with a email in 60 ~90 days. My
referrals and relay hosts shake out
I was going to offlist this, but, I might as well put my foot where my mouth is.
In my opinion the top things I want addressed would be:
I would like to see a WISP License like a Ham License. Its very simple
in idea but I think it would truly change the industry. Any one
wanting to be a wisp
I to would be interested in such a referral program. Spot checking is
a great idea and could worked right into the referral form by asking
them to update them on the status with a email in 60 ~90 days. My
referrals and relay hosts shake out to the same price, $5 per user or
customer signup. A few
The problem (as I see it) is that it will start with just the AAA, and
then it will be all emails, then all IM, then all voip. Where will it
end? That is why I think the cost of it should be on the ISP and
should be very clearly explained in the TOS/AUP. Government funding
for it will lead to
UHG!!! What a waste of resources. Can anyone point to even ONE
terrorist that has even been sniffed out due to data from an ISP? I
did a few quick Google searches and no case has popped up. IMO
terrorist groups have show that they know how to operate and not leave
a trail that leads anyplace
of us as individuals as well as what
the employees of our 15 different national intelligence agencies can and
can not legally do.
Yup I know that. I speak up when I can, not that I feel my voice is very loud.
jack
Jeromie Reeves wrote:
UHG!!! What a waste of resources. Can anyone point to even
Depending on what you need MythTV might do it for you.
On 7/25/07, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have suggestions for an IP DVR system? I'm looking for something
more integrated than a few independent IP cams .
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
What ever did happen with UWB products?
On 7/25/07, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the engineers need to get off their butts and get us software defined
radios capable of accessing large amounts of spectrum.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
4.1 million users, say 1/4 were paying 19.99. Thats 20.4 million.
Assume each call takes 20 min to handle. I person can take 24 20 min
calls in 8 hours, assuming no breaks. That would need 468 call support
personnel. Someone correct me, but did not AOL release numbers that
they had like 7 million
http://www.clearcoproducts.com/cold_galvanize_primers.html
5 gallon buckets.
On 7/23/07, Scott Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need touch up a tower I have. I would like to cold galvanize it, but
all I can find it spray cans of Zinc. Where do you folks get gallons of
Zinc Cold Galvanize that
I can see getting 3 or 4 AP's on a site if everything is GPS synced
with 10mhz channels. I agree this is more a cell phone killer then a
wisp killer (read my post a bit back for my view on likely devices).
And if it goes Google's way then its just the tip. There is a fair bit
of spectrum from 600
My understanding of the rules is that they would not have to allow any
specific level of service for free. Only make the protocol, channel
spacing/width, etc, open and free. Ok so everyone gets dialup for
free, with ads (Think NetZero here). Then, anyone that wants a faster
service pays. They
For now Google will be better. I just hope that it stays that way. I
think the telcos will pull out more money then 4.6b. Will Google be
willing to up the ante?
On 7/21/07, Jory Privett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree better Google than the telcos
Jory Privett
WCCS
- Original Message
Jeromie Reeves wrote:
For now Google will be better. I just hope that it stays that way. I
think the telcos will pull out more money then 4.6b. Will Google be
willing to up the ante?
On 7/21/07, Jory Privett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree better Google than the telcos
Jory Privett
WCCS
$1500 aps sure would hurt me. I do complete relays for less then $500
as it is (legal too!)
In a few months you will be able ot roam 100% (or very close to it) my
town on my service. I would love to have 5.3/5.4 for my short hops.
Right now 2.4 does fine but I know that will not always be the
How is having a discussion about a real issue hijacking a list? What
is so hard about ignoring a thread?
On 6/12/07, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I think we're evolving past I say this because I want to and you say
that because you want to into a discussion citing facts and
The IXP is not x86. It is a XScale CPU. ARM based if I remember correctly.
Now hopefully ADI's move will cause others to move too
On 6/12/07, Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally, an OEM manufacturer stepping up to the plate, to get this done!
I hope their certified case allows enough
The FCC is speaking with a forked tongue. I have a stack of routers
from Netgear, WITH FCC cert #'s, and one of the first things it asks
is what country I am in. Now Why can Netgear get away with it and not
MT? Jack, Who exactly did you get a response from? I want to pose this
question directly
really going on and then figure out a wise and constructive path to
follow. As often as I can remember it, I remind myself to Seek first to
understand, and then to be understood.
I look forward to hearing your test results.
jack
Jeromie Reeves wrote:
The FCC is speaking with a forked tongue. I
PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. Which non-legal channel did you confirm that it transmitted on?
Jeromie Reeves wrote:
Already looked into that and it does use non legal channels if you
tell it to. I only shoot from the hip when I have a target, and I
plainly do in this case. Seek first to understand
Only if all radios were required to use the same time slot
assignments. That would make full duplex links impossible (or at least
hinder them greatly since they would have to have a down time not to
step on another radios RX period)
On 6/9/07, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WiMAX, scheduled
The site is just a barometer of the internet weather. Its like
comparing the habitats of the Inuit to those of the Berbers.
On 6/7/07, Peter R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
The USA show's the fastest, most reliable connections!
I guess that must be
If you use openwrt you can get the meshing back. There are products
that have the same mesh (olsr) and are certified.
On 5/30/07, John Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cisco AP1242's are certified, and can put out 20 dB. They can be used
with the Cisco 21 dB dish. In the config menu, there is a
The MIPS version of MT will not run on these. They would need to patch
and recompile for this SoC. I would love to see a atheros SoC version
of MT. Maybe if enough people ask MT to do the support they will, I
know I would love to have MT on my atheros units.
On 5/30/07, Mike Hammett [EMAIL
And if so, Is that per day, week, month or year? 1.5mbit/s maxed for a
month is a little shy of 475GB/mo.
On 5/14/07, JohnnyO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would 50gb worth of traffic be allowed via EDVO ? :)
JohnnyO
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Burgess - 2K Wireless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would suggest a content filter on each PC. I have a client that uses
something called BeSafe. I think the URL is www.besafe.com I have
little contact with the software so I can not tell you much about it.
The client is a church ran store similar to TSA.
On 5/7/07, Tim Kerns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roaming is not the same as sending the Client Account to the other company.
On 4/29/07, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's called roaming. It happens with everyone but Nextel.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
out my
youth, which is one exciting piece of history, Patrick Henry and Give me
Liberty or give me Death has to be one of the cornerstone of my beliefs.
Jeromie Reeves wrote:
On 4/26/07, George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jeromie Reeves wrote:
On 4/19/07, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
as Patrick
On 4/19/07, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as Patrick Henry once said
Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
Who is Patrick Henry??
/end sarcasm
Seriously tho, I do not remember that being a quote from him but from
Patrick Stewart. I happen to like:
The liberties of a people
You would classically arrange a peering agreement. You hand each other
a equal amount of capacity (say 1mbit) and a BGP table. You each use
the link like another upstream provider, balancing routes vs capacity
vs (what ever else you want). Some peerages have a set cost per bit
transfered and the
Steve, well you did get me thinking about him (and my best remembered
quote from him).
On 4/26/07, Peter R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's more likely that you would get 100 maximum to say I can't comply,
since most won't want to make themselves known.
And those 100 would be contacted.
Cripes
The way I understand it, is that Mark has to do the capture. His
provider can not do it for him. Also per a previous conversation the
tap needs to be done at the CPE. To me that should be real simple with
a few firewall rules in the CPE or at worst the AP. If PPPoE were in
use then it would be
That is not much of a issue, or should not be. Atheros cards have a
wide RF range (2.3ghz to 2.5ghz for most of the 2.4ghz cards) that
they can do. The drivers they are certified with only allow the US
spectrum. They likely use a custom driver for the FCC, as some Atheros
gear is spec'ed in
But does that meet CALEA specs? Not really, since it does not do the
MD5 hash and such. At least that is what I get from reading about
CALEA. Basically if a TTP doesn't sign off on it you might be at the
wrong end of a investigation when the lawyers start saying it was not
captured correctly. You
What if they wanted to share the network but only with people who
could figure that out? =-)
On 2/28/07, David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick Smith wrote:
Can't vendors make it so that whatever you use as the securing KEY can't be
contained in the hostname, essid or anywhere else ?
On 2/8/07, Brian Whigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 12:50 -0600, Matt wrote:
What I would like to know is what is the cheapest router that is
supported by OpenWRT?
I'd almost guarantee it's the Buffalo WHR-G54S. I've only one so far.
It's been at grandma's house doing a
Was the test with 5, 10 or 20mhz channels? What was your noise floor at
each test site? How was the mobile end
mounted? What is the beamwidth on those antennas (or model numbers to
look them up) and what elevation were
each at? Any tilt on the antennas?
Jeromie
Joe Laura wrote:
Well, I
Looks good. What radio are you using with what looks to be a Realtek
SoC? Is that
a PoE splitter, a surge supressor, or both? How long is that RF pigtail?
Jeromie
Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
I take a self tapper and run it out the bottom of my metal box, attach
a #12 piggy tail, and attach the
Is that not that what faster accounts are for?!?
Jeromie
Cliff Leboeuf wrote:
CNN Report…
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/internet/05/25/the.web.toll/index.html
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
I need to send a picture but I was rejected by the list. What is the
format that is small. bmp, jpg, ect
What should I use?
JPG is fairly small. Host it and send a link. It takes a large amount of
bandwidth to send a attachment to a list.
say that is a 250KB
That guy needs to do more research. AirGo MIMO is far better then the
other MIMO's products. Netgear
dumped the majority of its older MIMO in lue of AirGo because of these
reasons. Its pure misunderstanding
about AirGo mimo not working with old hotspots. I bought a Pre-N card
the week they came
http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/News/Local/2006/03/11/1482485-sun.html
Is it me or is this out of line? I thought all free countries had
settled this
in their respective courts already?
Jeromie
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
Message -
From: Jeromie Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 3:19 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Class: How to stomp Internet Freedom 101
http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/News/Local/2006/03/11/1482485-sun.html
Is it me
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 6:00 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Class: How to stomp Internet Freedom 101
It does to a degree. I did not realize that (Canadian only?) FTA: The
Human Rights Act
talking about with the Moto.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
114 S. Walnut St.
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 8:23 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re
I said the same thing on the moto wireless list. We are being pushed to
be eaten by the larger wisps or closed down. I do
not like it and can only try and fight it but I have no idea how.
Hopefully wispa knows the direction as i do not thing part-15
knows.
Jeromie
Pete Davis wrote:
The
of
wireless-based mesh networks being terrible ideas, but that doesn't
mean there is anything wrong with mesh itself. I would argue that in
almost all cases the topology is not what is at fault.
-Matt
Jeromie Reeves wrote:
There is a very big difference from fiber mesh and wireless mesh.
Wireless
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
I am in agreement. Mesh is being abused by some people. Mesh is a
routing mechanism in the same way that RIP and OSPF are routing
mechanisms.
No. OLSR is a routing protoco like RIP/OLSR. Meshis a network design
like Bus, Star and Ring.
Mesh is overloaping Stars
There is a very big difference from fiber mesh and wireless mesh.
Wireless is classicly a bunch of HDX links
where fiber is PtP links. Your example doesnt make it clear that the
difference is what cause's 802.11[a|b|g]
mesh suck and fiber/copper mesh's not suck. The solution is multi
radio
or less use it or lose it tag. If you get a license for
first rights in area XCV then you better get to using it or let someone
else in to use it. Ive got my asbestos skivvies so flame on.
Jeromie Reeves
John Scrivner wrote:
If I read this right it does not specifically mention unlicensed
would be willing to pay for such
but not on current spectrum, its just to
clogged up with so much consumer hardware.
Jeromie Reeves
Mac Dearman wrote:
I say whoooa mule!
I think before we jump the gun we ought to see what lies ahead of
us. If they plan on taxing the free spectrum
Right of Way access is available to anyone right now. Ask your local
city/county for the ROW contracts
that they have with the gas, cable, telco, electric, and others.
Jeromie Reeves
Rudolph Worrell wrote:
This is a good thought to get something out of the deal. I really think that
we need
Can you explain how it is not available? Yes the insurance is killer.
Jeromie Reeves
Bob Moldashel wrote:
Jeromie Reeves wrote:
Right of Way access is available to anyone right now. Ask your local
city/county for the ROW contracts
that they have with the gas, cable, telco, electric
I know my stand on this: Evil Evil Evil
Jeromie
Blair Davis wrote:
Does WISPA have a stand on this?
http://techrepublic.com.com/2100-1035-5959140.html?tag=nl.e550
As one who has built my network without any public money, I have no
interest in collecting special taxes. I have more than
Would it be possible to have standard 802.11a support from this client?
What about 5/10mhz channels?
That would make this a super killer product even more then it sounds
now. Personally I would pay a
small fee per unit to have 11a support, 5/10mhz channels are becoming
standard.
Jeromie
Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
The water at my home is not billed on usage, but a flat rate each
month. It's a community system with about 300 homes. Even water inside
city limits of a town with 50,000 population is not billed on usage,
but a flat rate.
Also, another difference between
Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
The elecric company doesn't care what you do with their electricity...
The gas company doesn't care what you do with their gas...
The water company doesn't care what you do with your water...
Not totaly true. You can not resell the service. You can not share your
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Jerome,
SBC has NO RIGHT to decide that say a XO pipe
has to pay for access to the SBC end user just cause the SBC end user
use's a service on the XO network.
Agreed, but thats not what I'm saying. I'm saying SBC or any ISP
should be able to charge content providers
inline
Tom DeReggi wrote:
The truth is services like VOIP and IPTV are going to challenge end
user's connections, and they are going to learn what over
subscription. And end users are going to kick and scream about how
their service provider is ripping them off, and service is poor
because
Barry at Mutual Data wrote:
Hello Jeromie,
First, I'm with Mark on this issue. This form sucks lemons.
Same Here.
But on to the article, I see no reason why I need to submit to a city
if I wish to send video over my system.
We are not talking YOUR system. We are talking about COAX/FIBER
We hit 2.60/gal this week. I heard some places are over 3.00/gal. This
is insane. Just 3 more years of it, anyone think they can make it at
5/gal? Time for a air powered car. http://www.theaircar.com/
or maybe just a bicycle
Jeromie
Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
Is anyone bumping up their install
301 - 384 of 384 matches
Mail list logo
