I agree with Scottie, great info thanks.
Ryan
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 16:14 -0500, Scottie Arnett wrote:
Thanks Blake. This will help me tremendously on the correct way to go about
this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Blake
Patrick,
What do you have for more information. I would be interested in it. I
just need to run it past Phil and Dave.
Thanks,
Ryan
Patrick Leary wrote:
Hi folks,
We are looking for a handful of WISPs to do some product testing on an
entirely new WISP multipoint product line from
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 15:27 -0400, Matt Liotta wrote:
Mike Hammett wrote:
I'm not sure when it was changed, but you need one less bit of address
space to get your own, direct allocation.
http://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four222
You now only need two /24s to request your own /22
(inline comments)
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 08:32 -0700, Patrick Leary wrote:
Wow, that's a big surprise since it is a 180 degree contradiction to
what Julie and his staff told us at the FCC after the rule was released.
But I am good with it. It is a flexibility that makes sense. As a
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 10:08 -0700, rabbtux rabbtux wrote:
Just looking for suggestions. Would like to offer a simple indoor
webcam we can sell preconfigured to new wireless customers. This is a
new reason for those with second homes to buy our year round service
for them. Any camera
Mac:
I wonder what we are doing wrong then, we have been using RBS for 3
years, and it has been a pita. The scheduling problems have been the
major problem (its scheduler is crap for us). Are you using the RBS
native task scheduler, or running via Windows's task scheduler?
That is the major
I think Mac means more on the storage side. RBS sends encrypted
files to the remote server. the type where if the key is lost, so
are your files. And the files are worthless without the key. It is
fine and dandy to have an encrypted network, but if the remote backup
server has
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
