Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management

Here is a link that does a decent job describing the Mikrotik implementation using burst-limit, burst-threshold and max-limit. Scroll down to the section labeled Burst (second to last section). http://www.mikrotik.org.pl/jakto.php?g=13PHPSESSID=5193496d65073e909b1f130b2e234135 Sam Tetherow

Re: [WISPA] Service Offerings - Competing

in the quantity, not quality world have made billionaires. The trick seems to be, if you can somehow manages to be the cheapest and do it right you can make a boat load of money and it doesn't have to be at the expense of the customer. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Peter R. wrote: John J

Re: [WISPA] Form FCC477 - I called CPI

disclaimerIANAL/disclaimer The problem is, that if they win the suite, I think it would be for all the information. Regardless of what their intent it, once that case is made, the information is there for anyone. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Forbes Mercy wrote: So I was a bit

Re: [WISPA] Service Offerings - Competing

, but the one person in the US who is richer than him is Bill Gates who made his billions exclusively in the tech market. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Peter R. wrote: They have made billions by serving billions of customers. Walmart and McDonalds only work on scale -- huge scale

Re: [WISPA] Service Offerings - Competing

when we were paying by the minute. As a businessman you should be trying to squeeze every last dime out of your customers. The trick is to provide the service that will make them want to pay every last dime of it. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless John J. Thomas wrote: Sam, Walmart has

Re: [WISPA] Form 445

Me as well, if you didn't imply that from the private email this morning. Sandhills Wireless, LLC Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Tim Wolfe wrote: Get me in there!. Include me in WISPA 445 Filing WaveCrazy Communications Rick Herrmann wrote: Include me in WISPA 445 Filing Zing LLC

Re: [WISPA] State Leader's needed

One thing I noticed is the state lists aren't mentioned or linked from the web pages at www.wispa.org. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Rick Harnish wrote: As most of you know, we have a mailing list for every state designed specifically for WISPs to communicate with each other on a more local

Re: [WISPA] Fw: ooe intro video

Didn't really pay much attention to the video format, but Hello World is Amway for the internet. Its a pyramid scheme. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote: What do you guys think of this Marlon (509) 982-2181

Re: [WISPA] yahoo Maps API ?

That would be my post from 1/23/07 Here it is again in case you haven't found it yet. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless SNIP- I've had good luck with Yahoo's Maps service. You have

Re: [WISPA] cost effective reliable 5.8G cpe suggestions?

RB112+CM9+Rootenna if you are not sticker conscious. If you are sticker conscious I use the Tranzeo TR5a-24/20 with MT/CM9 setups and they work great. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless rabbtux rabbtux wrote: Not to stir the fcc sticker debate, but what gear is out there today

Re: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simply about being sticker conscious or not??

that vendor/product A is on the east side of your coverage area... 4. Replace CPEs with new line of product There is a LOT more to the certified debate than the fact that Motorola, Trango and Alvarion have finally gotten CPE price down to $200. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Patrick Leary wrote

Re: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules ?????

How true, how true. It is just a question of how much regulation Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Peter R. wrote: wispa wrote: Once we're a regulated industry, and at this point the FCC and Congress are SERIOUSLY attempting to take control the WISP and ISP business, we exist

Re: [WISPA] Brief report from FCC visit

oven... Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Um, the FCC is getting innovation and advancement - look at Clearwire. When there weren't Clearwire, NextWave, Sprint Nextel and ATT actively deploying Broadband Wireless Internet Access, the FCC needed WISPs. Now they've got those big players starting

Re: [WISPA] Brief report from FCC visit

can't certify a minipci with software? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless ! --- SNIP --- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] No, Patrick, it's not about the stickers...

the component changes aren't going to make a difference. I don't see how the component rule would be a bad thing, if it is possible to certify radio/software/antenna sets. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless I see nothing wrong with piecing together components like Mikrotik, WRAP boards, CM9's, SRx's

Re: [WISPA] Brief report from FCC visit

George Rogato wrote: Sam Tetherow wrote: So are you saying that a PCMCIA card with software and internal antenna is not certified? No one has yet to answer this question for me. Is it legal for Best Buy to sell DLink/Linksys/Netgear/Belkin/... pcmcia cards for laptops? What about USB

Re: [WISPA] Is it enough ?

barely have the time to keep things running, let alone try and tackle comments on every FCC proposal. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Dylan Oliver wrote: It might also do to review and propose compromises for the very valid concerns raised by other organizations. I'm still working on my

Re: [WISPA] Justice Department Takes Aim at Image-Sharing Sites

Wouldn't this be the equivalent of requiring all store owners to install surveillance cameras and retain the tapes for 2 years just in case law enforcement might need the footage for a conviction of some crime that may happen in the future? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Jack Unger

Re: play time was..Re: [WISPA] news

Or you could show up in the summer when it is REALLY miserable. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Cliff Leboeuf wrote: Well you can also visit any time here in South Louisiana where when visiting you can get eatin' up by mosquitoes whist sucking on crawfish heads, eatin' hog crackling

Re: [WISPA] Strange Symptoms

Have you looked at it with a spectrum analyzer? I see this type of behavior in a high noise environment. Does it persist through all channels? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Rick Smith wrote: yeah, 100' away from the pop. across the street (dead side street, antenna way up above car level

Re: [WISPA] Calea - what will we need to provide ?

to remember that they felt CARNIVORE was legal and justified. Seems odd that one of the more hardcore conservatives (okay I'm betting he really is a true libertarian) is the one saying WHOA to a Republican run FCC and DOJ on an issue of privacy vs security. Sam Tetherow Sandhills

Re: [WISPA] FYI - 802.16e now commercially shipping into North America

certified in 5.x yet as I understand it). My question is, will WiMAX UL be subject to interference just like WiFi but have a higher throughput or are there other significant issues at play in UL? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Patrick Leary wrote: Hi folks, I just wanted this community

Re: [WISPA] Netflix

http://www.netflix.com/Register looks fine to me. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless George Rogato wrote: Anyone else having a problem viewing the images at netflix.com? All the images are coming up broken links

Re: [WISPA] Look how ComCast deals with P2P

of previous occupations would probably produce some interesting reading. If their market won't bear the cost for an independent ISP to offer service than the argument has been settled that the public is satisfied with the price/performance that they are receiving. Sam Tetherow Sandhills

Re: [WISPA] Politics as Usual

through it. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Forbes Mercy wrote: After reading a story this morning on a industry related blog I wrote a letter to my Republican Congressman. I sent the same to my two Democrat Senators but just took out the reference to being a Republican. :) Anyway I'm

Re: [WISPA] Politics as Usual

want a more net netrality-minded service provider. I agree with you here. To ask for a different set of rules makes us no different than the worst of the monopolies. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless On 10/26/07, Jeromie Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My take

Re: [WISPA] traffic logging

Do they want to be able to actually disect packet contents or just connection information? If they don't need contents than anything that stores netflow data will work on the gathering side and your border router should support netflow. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Travis Johnson

Re: [WISPA] netflow

. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Travis Johnson wrote: Hi, Anyone have any suggestions for a good Netflow package (collector, reporting, archiving, etc.)? I am mainly interested in AS Souce and Destination, along with protocol information (% of http, etc.). thanks, Travis Microserv

Re: [WISPA] ImageStream Routers/PowerCode OSS

for this is that I was using a MT for all this prior to getting the Rebel and I've been too busy to migrate my provision system over using the Rebel. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Mark Nash wrote: I've narrowed my OSS solution down to 2 vendors. The PowerCode solution requires us to use an ImageStream

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 499

Isn't the 499 only for voice (traditional or VOIP)? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Mike Hammett wrote: If you have equipment, you fill it out. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem

on one end or the other. I have had RB532 ethernet connections that are crappy unless autonegotiate is off. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote: I have a Ubiquiti PowerStaion2 that is having some weird issues. It has a -68 signal and good LOS to the AP however

Re: [WISPA] Vuze / Comcast / Peer to Peer / FCC

, if it is too many packets per second then throttle pps. Just killing P2P doesn't solve the issue, unless your issue is not allowing P2P. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Anthony Will wrote: Here is some food for thought, We may want to approach this issue with a free market approach. We may

Re: [WISPA] Vuze / Comcast / Peer to Peer / FCC

and developers have a juvenile view towards bandwidth usage and the ISP in general. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Matt wrote: Is WISPA or Part-15 posting follow up comments on this? Is anyone? Don't most broadband Internet user agreements have a clause that says something like no servers

Re: [WISPA] Vuze / Comcast / Peer to Peer / FCC

other people that we are always there when they need help. That type of advertising is hard to put a dollar on. If you are making the requirement that each customer must have x% profitability are you willing to reduce the cost to those customers that have in access of x%? Sam Tetherow

Re: [WISPA] Vuze / Comcast / Peer to Peer / FCC

is not answering the phone. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless David E. Smith wrote: Matt wrote: Don't most broadband Internet user agreements have a clause that says something like no servers? Is bittorrent a server? If you want to get really technical, there is no such thing as a server. :P

Re: [WISPA] Vuze / Comcast / Peer to Peer / FCC

is check email and occasionally browse the web. Most customers don't know what 'burstable' is and they could care less, the just want it to go fast. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless George Rogato wrote: I think the way to go is to be able to identify the various types of traffic and rate limit

Re: [WISPA] Vuze / Comcast / Peer to Peer / FCC

on rare occasions when there has been an issue, but it is usually when the Nebraska Public Power people are in town for something. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Travis Johnson wrote: Hi, First let me say that we cap p2p traffic during the business day, but otherwise we let it run wide

Re: [WISPA] Vuze / Comcast / Peer to Peer / FCC

a transfer cap. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless CHUCK PROFITO wrote: I agree, you are fairly well protected, Travis, but for how long. But more and more we are seeing encrypted P2P and encrypted Bit Torrent... This will soon be the norm across the world because so many like you and I and George

Re: [WISPA] Non-paying Subs

And if you have a way to send them to a captive page that says the account has been restricted due to billing issues we have found that the respond even quicker. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Mark Nash wrote: Hey everyone. I've recently cleaned up alot of billing/past due issues

Re: [WISPA] Vuze / Comcast / Peer to Peer / FCC

to define and then defend what a p2p application is. Whereas if we say we need to be able to manage the network traffic characteristics on an individual and network wide basis we have covered what the root problem is without limiting the tools we use. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Matt

Re: [WISPA] Non-paying Subs

. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless D. Ryan Spott wrote: Hey Sam, want to elaborate? How do you do this? Thanks! ryan -Original Message- From: Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: 11/23/07 5:01 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Non-paying Subs

Re: [WISPA] Non-paying Subs

of payment. Heck, I've taken service in kind from another business if that was the only way they could pay the bill. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Tom DeReggi wrote: All sounds good but... So what happens when the customer, sends the check for the monthly fee, but refuses to send

Re: [WISPA] Interesting observation on the $199 Wal-Mart PC

is a Walmart closer than 120 miles away and it might be a real viable solution. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Brian Webster wrote: I was just reading the on line reviews of the Wal-Mart $199 PC. It comes with Linux and Open Office. While it does not come with a monitor, it seems

Re: [WISPA] Net Equalizer Anyone?

I'm sure you don't want to turn this into a why you should use X thread, but I am curious what you are having problems limiting with the other devices you have tried? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless John Scrivner wrote: I have been considering the Net Equalizer as a possible platform

Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service

to be dead I really don't see the point. At least with WISPA I know the money from my dues is put to good use and the organization is doing things to help the industry (calea, fcc commitee, etc). Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Chuck McCown - 2 wrote: WiMax is sure getting lots of press

Re: [WISPA] Equipment liquidation

How used is the partridge? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Cliff - Home wrote: And I have: A Partridge in a Pear Tree ... :) left over from Christmas of course. On 1/15/08 3:58 PM, Joe Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have roughly about 20 Cisco 1310 radios to clear out

Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!

the frequency to the 2.4 and 5.8 range and everything would be good. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Travis Johnson wrote: Mac, Here is where it will get interesting... in the actual MT software. How are they going to lock down the software so the power outputs, channels, etc. are all

Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!

-certified equipment. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Tom DeReggi wrote: But PLEASE don't sugget that!!! Remember backwards comaptibility, to in place networks. WISPs have tons of small mini networks running on 5.3Ghz. If one of my CPEs fry, it would be nice to replace it with a Certified unit

Re: [WISPA] Linux mail solution

Postfix Cyrus IMAP or Courier IMAP amavisd with ClamAV and SpamAssassin The only webmail I have messed with is Squirrelmail and while it works the stable version is non-javascript by design so it is very plain Jane. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Mike Hammett wrote: I currently just use

Re: [WISPA] Private vs Public addresses for end-users

their 12 year old has hosed the router trying to get their xbox 360 set up. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Ryan Langseth wrote: Yea, actually I have looked that and would love to have that. This is a network I inherited, it was this way when I got it. If it was mine from

Re: [WISPA] Note about the Noon Webinar....

Thanks for the first impression Steve, I wished I could have made the call but was in middle of a crisis helping out another WISP. Looking forward to more detail either from you or Patrick... Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Steve Stroh wrote: I posted my initial impressions

[WISPA] PCQ Question

be greatly appreciated. I've tried moving the unknown_user managle to the bottom of the mangle chain but that hasn't helped either. -- Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless WISPA Wants You! Join today

Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] PCQ Question

the time investigating once I got it fixed. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Sam Tetherow wrote: I've been trying to help another WISP with a new bandwidth limiter since their ancient YDI box finally died. The BCU did everything via mac-address so I've set up mangle rules for src

Re: [WISPA] Did I order wrong Tranzeo product?

While I have never used an SR5 for the card in the MT I have plenty of TR5a's connect to MTs using CM9 and R52 cards. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless rabbtux rabbtux wrote: All, I have mikrotik SR5 AP deployed, and wanted to use it for high end customers in addition

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VRRP

MT1 fails, MT2 must become master for all VRRPs. HFC Sam Tetherow wrote: I've been testing out VRRP and it seems to work pretty well if you want to fail over from one machine to another on a single interface. But what I would really like to be able to do is duplicate my MT routers

Re: [WISPA] Sometimes I forget how cheap and easy it is for us to build systems. Then I see something like this! Worlds biggest yagi

I wonder what the wife had to say when he said he just wanted to put a yagi in the front yard... Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Marlon K. Schafer wrote: http://www.1982crew.com/PHP-Nuke/PDF/K9LTN.pdf marlon

Re: [WISPA] traffic reporting

You might be able to get ntop to show what you need or you could use netflow and nfcapd along with custom accounting scripts? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Travis Johnson wrote: Hi, I posted this message a few months ago, and never found anything that was what I needed

Re: [WISPA] MUM

Like going to Disney ;) Jeff Broadwick wrote: Yeah, you have to leave everything you know about what things cost outside the tradeshow door. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Burgess Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:02 AM To:

Re: [WISPA] 'family friendly' isp filtering solutions

responsible for harm. Hmm, that brings up a good question, does anyone have a terms of service on their email filtering? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless David E. Smith wrote: Travis Johnson wrote: Sorry to be coming in late on this thread... are we talking about content

[WISPA] SarOS PPPoE and Radius

I'm trying to get StarOS setup to work with Radius for PPPoE authentication and am not having any luck. The documentation seems pretty thin and I haven't had much luck with google. Does anyone here use PPPoE with radius on StarOS? -- Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless

Re: [WISPA] Nanostations

While I haven't tried it, wouldn't limiting packets per second cause the IP stack on the sending machine to back down just like limiting throughput? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Matt Ferre wrote: It's not about the upload speed, it's about the packets per second. Get just one

Re: [WISPA] Nanostations

is requesting that they be transmitted. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Matt Ferre wrote: Not really because virus program will purposely keep opening new connection. P2P apps will be doing the same. On 7/21/08, Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While I haven't tried

Re: [WISPA] Nanostations

I think for the most part those that would like something like this and have the skills to do it, don't have the time to do the initial work or support it. It is easier to just buy StarOS or ROS, or buy equipment that already has the license for it. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless

Re: [WISPA] Nanostations

have the software side of my CPE business if I could put it on a NS, but since they are more interested in the hardware, and the constant changing stream of hardware to boot, I have stopped deploying MT except in a pinch when I lose equipment and don't have an upgrade handy. Sam Tetherow

Re: [WISPA] Nanostations

or other bits, but to actually spend the time to implement a new MAC, I don't have the skills and don't see me having the time to acquire those skills to make it happen. But if we find someone, count me in ;) Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Chuck McCown - 3 wrote: Well

Re: [WISPA] Nanostations - question

You've summed it up pretty good. I have a few in the field and so far they are holding up well. I've been buying the NS5s when I need new CPE equipment (and I can find someone who has them in stock). For residential deployments they are currently my CPE of choice. Sam Tetherow

Re: [WISPA] Broadband work with Indian Reservation

to get the deal done. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Travis Johnson wrote: The reservation in our area put an actual ordinance in effect that bans all outdoor antennas on any structure (including their homes, sheds, garages, barns, etc.). We still do installs there (along with 2 or 3

Re: [WISPA] Broadband work with Indian Reservation

One thing to keep in mind when thinking about strong arming any tribal entity, they have plenty of lawyers on staff who are more than happy to set in court and argue sovereign immunity as long as you want. You may win in the end, but at what cost? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Leon

Re: [WISPA] [Motorola II] Broadband work with Indian Reservation

appreciate any assistance I could get in navigating tribal politics. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless On 08/13/2010 09:16 PM, Jerry Richardson wrote: Wow. Can we kill this thread now before it erupts in flames? Jerry Richardson Sent Mobile On Aug 13, 2010, at 7:12 PM, MDKrea

Re: [WISPA] IPTV

will stick with a dish/cable and a HD PVR. Going to the network sites only in a last ditch to get that episode of Lost that they missed. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless George Rogato wrote: Nice easy reading here. http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1264 Looks like

Re: [WISPA] IPTV

would prefer Desperate Housewives in 1080p HD especially if they shelled out the bucks for the TV that will do it. Honestly, what, other than content on demand (and I mean really on demand not available ever 15 minutes for the next week), does IPTV offer over regular broadcast TV? Sam

Re: [WISPA] IPTV

that they broadcast freely over the air... Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Peter R. wrote: Remember that like the term wireless, iptv has way too many meanings. IPTV to the telcos is TV to the cablecos. By saying IPTV, they figure they get around a lot of stuff and make it sound better than broadcast TV

Re: [WISPA] IPTV

. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless David Hughes wrote: One of the major cable systems just lost that fight. The studios and networks filed suit and won on the issue of copyright infringmement. Dave David T. Hughes Director, Corporate Communications Roadstar Internet 604 South King Street -Suite 200

Re: [WISPA] For George - just because you were thinking of me.

Even worse than the Friday night phenomenon is say Saturdays in the fall. Layne Sisk had some pretty nasty things to say about the IPTV solution used in Utah on football saturdays and how the usage would honestly bring the fiber ring to it knees. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Dawn

Re: [WISPA] For George - just because you were thinking of me.

Now Marlon, that's not why we ALL insult you ;) Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Marlon K. Schafer wrote: sigh having no viable options vs. having one's head buried in the sand are two totally different things. Boy I'm getting tired of being insulted for having a successful business

Re: [WISPA] Wireless ISP's (shows)

The poker game would have been a lot better if someone would have had actual chips. ;) It may be that I knew fewer people at that last 2 ISPCONs but it seemed to me that the WISPCON folks do a lot more socializing than the ISPCON crowd does. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Peter R

Re: [WISPA] Senao Ap

. The original thread was either here or on isp-wireless and I'm pretty sure it had either CB3 or 2611 in the subject. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless chris cooper wrote: We have deployed a couple dozen Senao aps, both the 2611 and 3220. All are less than a yr. old. Approximately half have died

Re: [WISPA] Man I LOVE this wireless stuff!

woohoo, congrats Dawn and Ken! Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Dawn DiPietro wrote: Scriv, There will be another DiPietro around to one day troll the lists. ;-) Regards, Dawn DiPietro John Scrivner wrote: Dawn, Is that a hint that there is a new baby DiPietro on the way? Scriv

Re: [WISPA] Slow Internet across MT Router

with an SBE interface and it handles the bandwidth just fine, although I am having some locking problems from time to time, but I think they are related to the sbe DS3 card as opposed to MT itself. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Ron Wallace wrote: To All, I have had a good system. I have

Re: [WISPA] Slow Internet across MT Router

running. It depends on load on the machine as well as time up. Which makes me think there is a memory leak somewhere in the driver code. The machines were put together using the the MB, RAM, NIC and CPUs you said you used in your router so I don't think it was that either. Sam Tetherow Sandhills

Re: [WISPA] Slow Internet across MT Router

is fire up a popular torrent on an unmetered connection in the office and it will not last a full 24 hours before lock up. Glad to hear that they do work for some people because I won't feel bad about selling them on ebay then ;) Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless David Sovereen wrote: We

Re: [WISPA] Network Monitoring and Graphing

I use nagios and cacti for notification and graphing respectively. Both were simple to set up on a debian box via apt-get. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Jory Privett wrote: I am looking some a software package that does network monitoring and graphing. I have used MRTG for graphing

Re: [WISPA] Network Monitoring and Graphing

using a chunk of their bandwidth. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Ryan Langseth wrote: Nagios for notifications and cacti for graphing. I am also looking at a pretty nice oss project called zenoss. It has auto discovery, graphing and notifications. It also does some asset tracking

Re: [WISPA] Network Monitoring and Graphing

graphing just fine.) Nagios works, but is a royal PITA to set up. Maybe I just do really simple stuff, or maybe I'm just twisted, but I never found nagios to be all the complicated to setup. Installed from package, edited hosts.cfg and services.cfg and you are good to go. Sam Tetherow

Re: [WISPA] Outdoor rated cable

I get mine from either ElectroComm or Wisp-Router for about $100/1000'. The biggest problem I have had for the past 12-18 months is finding people with stuff in stock when I need it. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Mike Hammett wrote: I last asked a couple years ago. What does

Re: [WISPA] Pig tails

Roger Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] Erik Jansson wrote: I'm looking for the best quality lowest loss pigtails, mostly ufl and mmcx to N female bulkhead. Who sells the best? I recall reading a post somewhere that some on on ebay made a top notch jumper... Any experiences would be appreciated.

Re: [WISPA] Ok, here's my CALEA statement, and farewell.

to reading his opinion on many of these topics as I have come to value his insights. (Sorry this post was so long, there was plenty more I had to say but I hate long winded posts, thanks for reading this far...) Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote: Mark

Re: [WISPA] Was lemmings... now What is WISPA?

You probably should have then. Last I checked treason was just that, which is what the founding fathers did when they declared their independance from England over unjust taxation (a law) which they refused to pay (ignored/disobeyed it). Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless J. Vogel wrote

Re: [WISPA] CALEA Exemption for Small Wireless ISPs

for the American public. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless cw wrote: My opinion is that you're not helping the big picture by saying compliance is more than you can handle. The FCC is not going to go out of their way to hand out more spectrum to providers that can't perform basic requirements

Re: [WISPA] CALEA Exemption for Small Wireless ISPs

model quite well. Most of my customers are within 3 miles of my towers. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Marlon K. Schafer wrote: Uh Sam, you do remember the 5.4 gig band right? 255 mhz of NEW spectrum, made available last year. There's also 24ghz and 60ghz available. We just need

Re: [WISPA] Yup, lemmings

house. If the warrant is for a specific type of traffic that is all they should have access to. Again, this is my citizen view, by no means construe this as support for CALEA regulation of data networks. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Operating as a CLEC we actually have a regulatory

Re: [WISPA] CALEA FAQ Questions

you know? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Martha Huizenga wrote: This is not the sense that I get from the meeting we had with the FBI. They will know who the target is and be issuing an order for that person. However, if they happen to live with several people all on one wireless

Re: [WISPA] Qwest as Upstream

Dittos, but a DS3 via Bandwidth.com Scott Reed wrote: Qwest T-1 from Bandwidth.com. No complaints. Bandwidth is responsive and easy to work with. They handle all the Qwest and Verizon (last mile) issues. Jason wrote: Gang, Anyone using Qwest as an upstream? Care to share the in/outs

Re: [WISPA] Wispa@ ISPCON

I am, I get in early Tuesday afternoon and am staying at the Best Western up the street. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Peter R. wrote: Gino Villarini wrote: Any special activities from WISPA on the Tuesday preeciding ISPcon ? Im about to book my flight Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL

Re: [WISPA] Wispa@ ISPCON

I get in just after noon so I'll be poolside sippin' mimosa's by then ;) Did a little checking around and Pointe Orlando has a cantina and margarita bar which appears to have live music every night except tuesday, which is poker night. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Matt Larsen

Re: [WISPA] Outsourced vs in-house email

Like Microsoft? If you read user agreements, you will find that many software vendors do not allow license transfer. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Mike Hammett wrote: I'd refuse to do business with a company like that. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http

Re: [WISPA] Wispa@ ISPCON

interference on a backhaul 1200 miles away ;) Yeah, Adobe's was the place. My flight lands at 12:45 so I'll probably be checked in around 2:00. I'll see what I can scope out in the afternoon. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Cell: 402-376-4752 Peter R. wrote: Sam, Poolside, where? (What

Re: [WISPA] Wispa@ ISPCON

Got to love google :) http://maps.google.com/maps?f=qhl=enq=howl+at+the+moon+orlando,+flie=UTF8z=11om=1 Sounds like a cool place and looks to be only about 10 blocks away. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Dylan Bouterse wrote: Howl at the Moon (Piano Bar) is right down there. Good times

Re: [WISPA] online doc sharing

What part of the CALEA stuff requires an NDA? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote: Law enforcement stuff. Google hasn't signed the needed NDA so we can't host the docs there. Marlon (509) 982-2181 (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting

Re: [WISPA] High Gain 8186HP CPE

They are a standard universal mount. My biggest gripe is the fact that you have to order them Vertical vs Horizontal due to the ethernet passthrough. I have had issues with them disconnecting from the tower but they do have a watchdog feature which will reboot them when they do. Sam

<    1   2   3   4   >