Re: [WISPA] Active Ethernet switches

2017-03-02 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
IgniteNet has some 24-port sfp switches. Havent tried them, don’t know how good 
they are.

Bryce D
NETAGO

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Chris Fabien
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 9:24 AM
To: WISPA General List 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Active Ethernet switches

There is a 10 SFP mikrotik switch...

On Mar 2, 2017 11:22 AM, "Fred Goldstein" 
> wrote:
On 3/2/2017 10:54 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
CRS series. As well. Depending on how dense you want.  229 bucks gets you a 
pair of 10 gig ports and 24 copper. ?


I'm not looking for copper, except maybe a couple ports for the local 
connection; I'm looking for lots of SFPs, something that could be useful for a 
rural FTTP build, dropped into a pedestal somewhere in the middle of noplace, 
to feed a cluster of nearby buildings. MikroTik isn't in that space yet; CRS 
seems to be lots of copper.


Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant
 – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 9:37 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Active Ethernet switches

On 3/1/2017 8:31 PM, Chris Fabien wrote:
Planet mgsw-28240


Thanks for the model number. I had looked on Planet's web site but there were 
no switches under "Braodband Communications"; that model was in the "LAN 
switch" section. The product name then says "Managed Metro Ethernet Switch" but 
it doesn't mention any MEF compliance, the application page says 
"core/department network" (though it uses SFPs, which is odd there), and its 
QoS features don't seem up to MEF standards (three-color marking, etc.). So it 
might work but I'm not sure if it really wants to be a carrier box.

What's the price? My recollection is that Planet was very very reasonable.

The other one that looks really interesting is the new IgniteNet Fusion Switch. 
The 20-SFP/4-SFP+ box is under $500, and seems to be aimed at Active carrier 
deployments. Of course it's kinda new so I don't know if anyone has it deployed 
yet. And I have no need for higher-layer features in a switch; I'd rather let a 
real router do that.


On Mar 1, 2017 7:07 PM, "Fred Goldstein" 
> wrote:
For a small outdoor or semi-outdoor (not a/c) deployment of a couple of dozen 
ports or so, what's a good cheap Active Ethernet switch? This would be to 
supplement wireless and focus on business customers, so Active makes more 
sense. Thanks.


--
 Fred R. Goldstein  k1iofred "at" interisle.net
 Interisle Consulting Group
 +1 617 795 2701


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




--

 Fred R. Goldstein  k1iofred "at" interisle.net

 Interisle Consulting Group

 +1 617 795 2701


___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




--

 Fred R. Goldstein  k1iofred "at" interisle.net

 Interisle Consulting Group

 +1 617 795 2701

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Static IP Pricing

2017-02-02 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
Agreed, at that point you should be selling them a dedicated connection, not 
just a regular business account.
I don’t think that $5-10/IP is too much.

Bryce D
NETAGO

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Brad Belton
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 8:25 AM
To: 'WISPA General List' 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Static IP Pricing

If they are able to legitimately justify a /26 in IP space then it’s possible 
you aren’t charging enough for your service.

Brad

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Tim Way
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 9:14 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Static IP Pricing

Life in IPv4 is getting more expensive as scarcity increases.

On Feb 2, 2017 9:13 AM, "Colton Conor" 
> wrote:
So a /26 has 64 total IPs, but only 62 are useable. So you are saying you would 
charge $5 - $10 per IP times 62 IPs? The cost of their statics would then cost 
more than the actual service?

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Scott Pope 
> wrote:
We charge $8.50 per month/per IP for our Static IP addresses.  This has been 
our pricing for 10+ years.


--
Scott Pope
Network and Operations Officer
Arbuckle Communications, LLC
Office: 580-226-1234
Mobile: 580-277-1108
sp...@arbucklecomm.com
www.arbucklecomm.com
"We Are Built For Business"


On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net 
> wrote:
$5/month/IP



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

 Original message 
From: Judd Dare >
Date: 2/1/17 9:28 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: WISPA General List >
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Static IP Pricing

Typical cost is around $1-2/IP/Month with various fiber providers.

I've been planning to charge something like $10-20/IP/Mo for commercial in 
order to only sell to people who really need it.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Colton Conor 
> wrote:
How much do you charge business customers for static IPs?

Comcast Business class cable internet charges
 1 - $14.95/mo.
 5 - $19.95/mo
 13 - $34.95/mo.

What do fiber providers charge?

I have a potential client that currently has a /27 with his current provider, 
and would like at least a /27 or preferably a /26 from us.

We only have a /21 worth of space from ARIN.

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Which CCR Router OS combo is the most solid?

2017-01-19 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
I've got a CCR1036 running on 6.32.3 for 453 days, hasn't missed a beat. (last 
reboot was to update, was running 6.27 before that)
Planning upgrading the network to 6.36.4 soon.

Bryce D
NETAGO

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Nick Bright
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 08:35
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which CCR Router OS combo is the most solid?

Careful, that's like saying

[cid:image001.jpg@01D27230.8F15E860]

On 1/19/2017 7:07 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
For L3 OSPF routed network capable of gigabit traffic



Gino Villarini

President

Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968


[cid:image002.png@01D27230.8F15E860]




___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




--

---

-  Nick Bright-

-  Vice President of Technology   -

-  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -

-  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -

-  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -

---

- Are your files safe?-

- Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -

- More information & 30 day free trial at -

- http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -

---



This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the 
addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain information 
that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited 
from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise 
using this transmission. If you have received this message in error, please 
promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately delete this message 
from your system.
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] MDU Ethernet Switch

2016-11-02 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
Cisco ME3400. There is a 12-port Ethernet/sfp combo version.

Bryce Duchcherer
NETAGO

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Colton Conor
Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 12:44
To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
Subject: [WISPA] MDU Ethernet Switch

I am in need of a recommendation for a small Ethernet switch for an MDU 
applications. This is a garden style community where each building has between 
4 to 8 units inside of the building. There are 15  buildings on the property. 
We would run a new CAT6 drop from a central point in the building to each unit. 
This central point would either be in the attic, or on the side of the exterior 
wall in some type of enclosure.

 Then we would run fiber uplink from each building's switch to a headend room. 
The headend room would have the aggergation fiber switch, a router, and an 
uplink to the internet.

We would hand a copper Ethernet hand off to the client in a unit, and then the 
could use whatever router they wanted, or plug their computer in directly to 
the wall.

I think all I need is a switch per building (not a router), and ideally this 
switch needs to have:

- At Least 1 SFP fiber uplink port. 2 would be nice for daisy chaining, but not 
required.
- 4 to 8 Copper Gigabit Ports. I don't need POE output power on these ports.
- SNMP For remote monitoring
- CLI or some sort of web based remote management
- Temperature Hardened or able to be in a hot attic
- Some sort of L2 port isolation or private vlans where other subscribers can 
see each other. All traffic goes in and out of uplink
- Rate limiting for each individual port
- Full duplex speed and wireline switching is preferred.
- We be nice to be remotely powered using PoE in, but not required. Might be 
hard however to get power to the attic or side of building.


So far, options that come to mind are:

https://routerboard.com/RB260GS for $36. Looks like a good option, but not sure 
about SwitchOS. Worried Mikrotik won't continue to improve switchOS. Feature 
set seems limited. Not sure about port isolation options? Says it support 
Poe-In for power. Temp range looks good. No CLI.

https://www.ubnt.com/edgemax/edgerouter-x-sfp/ $72. Double the price of the 
Mikrotik. OS seems more robust. Seem more like a router than switch so might be 
overkill for application. NO Poe-IN power option, but could I used a passive 
poe injector to still power it remotely?

https://www.ubnt.com/edgemax/edgepoint/ The EP-R6 is about $105. Looks like its 
basically the edgerouter-x-sfp but in an outdoor case, and this model supports 
PoE Input. This smaller unit doesn't seem to have any fiber slack management 
like the other units in the edgepoint lineup. Includes POE injector to power 
unit.

I was thinking maybe a GPON ONT per building that has 4 to 8 Ethernet ports on 
it. However, there are no small GPON OLTs out there. Plus, most outdoor ONT's 
are like $250+ each.


What else is out there? I would say price range would be sub $200 per building 
max.






___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Network/infrastructure design for WISP's

2016-10-23 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
We do DHCP with Radius authentication, then our billing system sets the lease 
to static via API, so the customer always gets the same IP (For tracking 
purposes).
The odd business customer requests that they set a static IP on their device 
rather than DHCP.

I like the idea of a firewall rule that only allows assigned IP’s.

Bryce Duchcherer
NETAGO

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Tim
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2016 14:16
To: 'Ian Fraser' <ian_fra...@gozoom.ca>; 'WISPA General List' 
<wireless@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network/infrastructure design for WISP's

We deployed for the last 10 years using fixed IP schemas per tower
Allocating IP addresses from a fixed pool (not dhcp)
Firewall rules locking out unassigned IP addresses
Plus we do 99% managed routers

However we are reevaluating PPOE with redundant radius servers that have 
geographic separation.  With an addition of Mac address authentication

From: Ian Fraser [mailto:ian_fra...@gozoom.ca]
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 5:32 PM
To: Tim 
<t...@cherrycapitalconnection.com<mailto:t...@cherrycapitalconnection.com>>; 
WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network/infrastructure design for WISP's

OK.  What's your alternative?

Ian


 Original message 
From: Tim 
<t...@cherrycapitalconnection.com<mailto:t...@cherrycapitalconnection.com>>
Date:10-21-2016 10:21 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network/infrastructure design for WISP's
Not a fan of ppoe.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID


Tim Way <t...@way.vg<mailto:t...@way.vg>> wrote:

2k12r2 ha DHCP service, Linux clustering or simple dual scopes!

On Oct 21, 2016 6:16 PM, "Adair Winter" 
<ada...@amarillowireless.net<mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net>> wrote:
What happens when DHCP quits and you can't manage anything?
Powercode assigns the next available management IP for whatever tower/range and 
we statically assign to the CPE

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Ian Fraser 
<ian_fra...@gozoom.ca<mailto:ian_fra...@gozoom.ca>> wrote:
Not sure how static would be safer than DHCP for CPE mgmt?

Ian


 Original message 
From: Fred Goldstein <f...@interisle.net<mailto:f...@interisle.net>>
Date:10-21-2016 6:31 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: wireless@wispa.org<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network/infrastructure design for WISP's

On 10/21/2016 5:55 PM, Ian Fraser wrote:
>
>
> PPPOE for Res traffic. VLAN's for Biz. Public IP's are statically
> assigned.  DHCP for CPE's MgMt IP assignment.  PPPOE session and CPE's
> connection to the AP authenticated by Radius. Radius Accounting  is
> used for traffic billing and session info.
>

Wouldn't it be safer to use static IPs for CPE management? I'd do that,
private IPs of course on a management VLAN not visible to customers.

> Per site: 2 VLANs for MgMt (1 for Tower/AP/UPS etc and 1 for CPEs) and
> 1 VLAN per AP for PPPOE or a dedicated VLAN per Biz. AP's are bridged
> for CPE's PPPOE to NAS.  uPnP enabled CPEs. Cust Routers are not
> allowed to initiate PPPOE.  PPPOE NAS's are mostly colocated tower
> sites so that backhauls can see QOS markers on traffic and not just a
> Tunnel.
>
> BGP Advertises IP range per Fibre POP and feeds 0.0.0.0/0<http://0.0.0.0/0> 
> into OSPF
> for redistributing routes inside the AS.  Infrastructure MgMt is on
> RFC1918 and customers are Public IPs.  Firewall rules on
> NAS/Router/CPE prevent Customer IP's from reaching MgMt IP's.
>
Nice if you have enough public IPs for customers. I'm not sure BGP and
PPPOE are necessarily the easiest protocols for this purpose, but
definitely do use the VLANs and keep the routing out of the radios.

> Mikrotik for all routing.  Netonix for most switching. Mikrotik for
> most PtMP (probably uncommon) but LTE is Telrad in areas where it is
> deployed, which skews the above architecture a bit :(  LTE is not for
> newbies though mind you maybe Mikrotik isn't either lol...  but in
> 13 years I've never been floored by a virus "infecting" my gear ;-)
>
You can't do 5 GHz with MikroTik in the US; they don't have valid FCC
approval any more. Not that they admit it, but the US isn't a big market
for them. The wireless design itself has to be based on the local
terrain, clutter (trees, etc.), subscriber density, and other conditions.

You do want a nice SNMP monitoring system that allows you to pull
whatever parameters you want out of the MIB, not one that charges per
line item (like PRTG) or that only pulls a few selected details. I do
enjoy the detail I can get out of InterMapper, for instance. Where are
you (or your planned network) located, Jordan?

>

Re: [WISPA] WISPA Webpage is down

2016-09-27 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
Must watch! 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8_Kfjo3VjU 

Bryce D
NETAGO

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Sam Morris
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 13:50
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WISPA Webpage is down

Running on Windows? :)

On 9/27/2016 12:23 PM, Jim Patient wrote:
> Ok, Trina, I'll be Patient.
>
> cid:image001.png@01D03C92.EFCBD870
>
> _jpati...@linktechs.net _
>
> www.LinkTechs.net *| *www.TowerCoverage.com 
> 
>
> usa_flag *Phone:* 314-735-0270 *FAX*: 636-660-1534
>
> *canada_flagPhone:*647-725-7011
>
> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Trina Coffey, Director of Operations
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 27, 2016 11:12 AM
> *To:* memb...@wispa.org; 'WISPA General List' ; 
> wi...@wispa.org
> *Subject:* [WISPA] WISPA Webpage is down
> *Importance:* High
>
> Hello all
>
> The server that houses our website is down.  This means until it is 
> fixed you will be unable to login to your account or register for 
> WISPAPALOOZA.  Please be patient, we have contacted our software 
> company and they are aware of the problem.
>
> My staff and I will also be unable to access your profile, account, or 
> membership information during the outage.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Trina Coffey
>
> Director of Operations
>
> WISPA
>
> 260-622-5775 direct
>
> 866-317-2851 ext. 102 (US only)
>
> 530-227-6696 cell
>
> www.wispa.org 
>
> Come see us at WISPAPALOOZA !!
>
>
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Need UPS recommendations

2014-12-01 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
We started using Alpha UPS’ and we have been happy with them.
You have to use your own batteries, but it’s nice that you’re not locked down 
to proprietary batteries like you are with the likes of APC and TrippLite.

TrippLite also has SNMP cards you can put in some of their UPS’ if you are 
looking for a more complete UPS solution besides APC.

Bryce D
NETAGO

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 11:12
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Need UPS recommendations

Something like that for a CPE setup would be nice. Powers the radio, router and 
ATA (preferably at least some of those units are integrated) for a few hours.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/ICSIL


From: Bob M lakel...@gbcx.netmailto:lakel...@gbcx.net
To: Wispa wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 12:06:14 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Need UPS recommendations
Looking for a UPS with SNMP that can send me a loss of AC power alert and power 
up the backhand radio for maybe 5-10 minutes.  Worse case scenario on the radio 
will 80 watts of draw at 110 vac.

Other option would be a basic ups and an external monitoring device.  Need 
something economical because I need to do about 50 sites.

Tnx

Bob


Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] small 24GHz radio

2014-10-23 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
Does anybody know of a 24GHz radio that is smaller than 1'?
It doesn't have to go very far, but we are wanting 24GHz.

Bryce D
NETAGO

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio

2014-10-23 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
Is the SAF that small?
The only specs I see are 9 but I think that may be just the radio itself, but 
I am not sure.

60GHz may work, but price is also a concern.

Bryce D
NETAGO

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 13:17
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio

Saf free mile is small, maybe a 6 antenna



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.comhttp://www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr



From: Bryce Duchcherer bduc...@netago.camailto:bduc...@netago.ca
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org
Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 at 3:00 PM
To: WISPA General List (wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org) 
wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio

Does anybody know of a 24GHz radio that is smaller than 1'?
It doesn't have to go very far, but we are wanting 24GHz.

Bryce D
NETAGO

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio

2014-10-23 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
Do you have a link?

Bryce D
NETAGO
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 16:12
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio

Bryce,

I thought you wanted a 38 GHz unit - the 24 GHz antenna would be a -26 model, 
and you could pair it up with a Canopy radio or anything else of course.

Daniel

wi...@metrocom.ca wrote ..
 Hi Bryce,
 
 Of course - there is an 8 antenna - 20 cm for us in Canada - that 
 will do the job.
 
 I do not know if it is an ETSI Class 4 antenna, which everyone should 
 use if they can, but the Andrew VHLP200-38 is small enough. Keep in 
 mind it would not be a dual-polarized antenna at that size.
 
 Daniel Mullen
 
 
 Bryce Duchcherer bduc...@netago.ca wrote ..
  Does anybody know of a 24GHz radio that is smaller than 1'?
  It doesn't have to go very far, but we are wanting 24GHz.
  
  Bryce D
  NETAGO
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio

2014-10-23 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
24GHz Unlicensed.

Bryce D
NETAGO
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 17:18
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio

On 10/23/2014 6:36 PM, daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca wrote:
 Sure -

 http://www.commscope.com/catalog/wireless/2147485870/product_details.a
 spx?id=27271

 I will sell it to you with a radio attached too! ;-)


That's for the licensed 24.25-26.5 GHz band.  Was the original poster referring 
to the unlicensed or licensed band?  Different rules -- the smaller antenna has 
only 32 dB gain.

 Daniel


 Bryce Duchcherer bduc...@netago.ca wrote ..
  Do you have a link?
 
  Bryce D
  NETAGO
  -Original Message-
  From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf
  Of daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca
  Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 16:12
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio
 
  Bryce,
 
  I thought you wanted a 38 GHz unit - the 24 GHz antenna would be a
 -26 model, and
  you could pair it up with a Canopy radio or anything else of course.
 
  Daniel
 
  wi...@metrocom.ca wrote ..
  Hi Bryce,
 
  Of course - there is an 8 antenna - 20 cm for us in Canada - that 
  will do the job.
 
  I do not know if it is an ETSI Class 4 antenna, which everyone 
  should use if they can, but the Andrew VHLP200-38 is small enough. 
  Keep in mind it would not be a dual-polarized antenna at that size.
 
  Daniel Mullen
 
 
  Bryce Duchcherer bduc...@netago.ca wrote ..
  Does anybody know of a 24GHz radio that is smaller than 1'?
  It doesn't have to go very far, but we are wanting 24GHz.
 
  Bryce D
  NETAGO
  ___
  Wireless mailing list
  Wireless@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 
  ___
  Wireless mailing list
  Wireless@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


--
Fred R. Goldstein k1io fred at interisle.net Interisle Consulting Group
+1 617 795 2701
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] NanoBeam Problems

2014-09-16 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
Anyone else having problems with nanobeams crashing after a firmware update?
It's starting to be a common occurrence for us.

Bryce D
NETAGO

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] NanoBeam Problems

2014-09-16 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
5.5.9 from 5.5.6

Bryce D
NETAGO

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of timothy steele
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 13:06
To: WISPA General List
Cc: WISPA General List (wireless@wispa.org)
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NanoBeam Problems

You using 5.5.9 or the new 5.5.10 beta?
—
Sent from Mailboxhttps://www.dropbox.com/mailbox


On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Bryce Duchcherer 
bduc...@netago.camailto:bduc...@netago.ca wrote:
Anyone else having problems with nanobeams crashing after a firmware update?
It’s starting to be a common occurrence for us.


Bryce D
NETAGO



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] NanoBeam Problems

2014-09-16 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
They come with 5.5.6 out of the box – all the ones we have gotten have anyway.

Bryce D
NETAGO

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of timothy steele
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 13:09
To: WISPA General List
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NanoBeam Problems

A nano beam had 5.5.6 on it? That seems strange
—
Sent from Mailboxhttps://www.dropbox.com/mailbox


On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

To 5.5.9 no.  Are you using the XW?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sep 16, 2014 3:00 PM, Bryce Duchcherer 
bduc...@netago.camailto:bduc...@netago.ca wrote:
Anyone else having problems with nanobeams crashing after a firmware update?
It’s starting to be a common occurrence for us.

Bryce D
NETAGO


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] NanoBeam Problems

2014-09-16 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
We have been using a config for each AP.
Personally, when I have set them up I have applied the Config with 5.5.6 and 
then upgraded to 5.5.9 and things seemed to work, but when applying a config on 
5.5.9 I had some M5’s that reset to defaults.
I am not sure which order our tech’s are doing it in, but we had several today 
that flat out quit after trying to upgrade firmware.

I May have to create a blanket Config for M2 beams and M5 beams that aren’t set 
up for any specific AP.

Bryce D
NETAGO

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 13:26
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NanoBeam Problems

We have had to reset them to factory and upgrade them in office before putting 
them out.
If you use a standard config file for all your radios, STOP! All configs are 
not created equal.  What we found was our NnoBidge config worked great on 
NanBeams until the next upgrade and then they crashed. We now have a separate 
config file for every model, every revision, and every firmware change we 
remake then all.

Steve Barnes
General Manager
PCSWIN.com
Howard LLC.

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NanoBeam Problems

Nope I was wrong.  I just got a box of them and they're all 5.5.6.  These were 
airshipped and arrived this morning to my address.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Josh Reynolds 
j...@spitwspots.commailto:j...@spitwspots.com wrote:
It's possible. Very old ones. Maybe beta only. I can't remember if 5.5.4 or 
5.5.6 was the first.

Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.comhttp://www.spitwspots.com
On 09/16/2014 11:10 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
That doesn't seem possible...


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:09 PM, timothy steele 
timothy.pct...@gmail.commailto:timothy.pct...@gmail.com wrote:
A nano beam had 5.5.6 on it? That seems strange
—
Sent from Mailboxhttps://www.dropbox.com/mailbox


On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

To 5.5.9 no.  Are you using the XW?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sep 16, 2014 3:00 PM, Bryce Duchcherer 
bduc...@netago.camailto:bduc...@netago.ca wrote:
Anyone else having problems with nanobeams crashing after a firmware update?
It’s starting to be a common occurrence for us.

Bryce D
NETAGO


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] NanoBeam M5 no DFS?

2014-06-26 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
Apparently the NanoBeam M5's don't support DFS. Another product from Ubiquiti 
that could be awesome, but falls short!
They are so much greater than the NanoBridges in many aspects, but the no DFS 
support really sucks.

Bryce D
NETAGO

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] NanoBeam M5 no DFS?

2014-06-26 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
Yeah, firmware will do it. With the 5.5.6 that came out of the box it 
connected, upgraded to 5.5.9 and wouldn’t connect. Looked under wireless and no 
more DFS.

Bryce D
NETAGO

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:36
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NanoBeam M5 no DFS?

They're getting DFS.  All it takes is time.  I'd expect a simple firmware 
update unlocks the use of the band.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Bryce Duchcherer 
bduc...@netago.camailto:bduc...@netago.ca wrote:
Apparently the NanoBeam M5’s don’t support DFS. Another product from Ubiquiti 
that could be awesome, but falls short!
They are so much greater than the NanoBridges in many aspects, but the no DFS 
support really sucks.

Bryce D
NETAGO


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] 4g router device

2014-06-06 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
I haven't done it, but it should work.
MikroTik has a list of supported 3G/4G modems that should work:
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Supported_Hardware#4G_LTE_cards

Bryce D
NETAGO

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of heith
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 15:59
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] 4g router device

A while back in Vegas Baltic Networks had a mikrotik router that operated on 
Verizon or Sprint. We were told it could be used for a back up at a remote site 
if you lost standard access through your regular network. In the past week I 
have had 2 ranchers hit me for a solution where they could check their water 
tanks with camera. The ranch property is leased ground so there is no standard 
wireline or wisp in the area and is way out of our service area.

Has anyone done anything similar to this? From what we gathered it would use an 
existing cell plan for the data usage. I also heard that it could be used on 
Verizon  Sprint, but ATT may be an issue. These places all have power at the 
tank/pumps, so we were just thinking a ubnt camera and this device, maybe a 
small battery backup, but we were just unsure if the router was a viable 
product for this application

Thanks
heith
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Small IP PBX - Grandstream UCM

2014-05-14 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
I have one of these coming in to try out, they're dirt cheap and are supposed 
to be decent. They support up to 8 calls and are supposed to run on asterisk.
http://www.atcom.cn/IP02.html


Bryce D
NETAGO

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Scott Carullo
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 16:08
To: WISPA General List; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Small IP PBX - Grandstream UCM

I've never been a fan of anything grandstream has ever made so I wouldn't go 
there.  JMO

Get some other solution for the PBX (running your own software on a nice little 
atom works great / some flavor of asterisk) and do yourself a favor and pick up 
some yealink phones.  The name kept me away from the longest time but I have 
tried dozens of phones and right now a T46G is on my desk and I won't give it 
up.  Great price too.  Best phone I have ever used and previously I had polycom 
soundpoint 650.  This one hands down is a better solution and its half the 
price.

Sh...  don't tell everyone I need them in stock!

Scott Carullo
Technical Operations
855-FLSPEED x102

[http://www.flhsi.com/files/emaillogo.jpg]


From: Chris Fabien ch...@lakenetmi.commailto:ch...@lakenetmi.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 1:29 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Small IP PBX - Grandstream UCM


It seems like a box on site would make routing/nat issues easier to manage 
especially for customers who may not have our Internet or want to keep a second 
internet provider for redundancy.  It seems like a bunch of ip phones behind 
nat connecting up to our switch or a hosted solution would be problematic.

  If you have a suggestion on a solid solution i'm all ears, want to learn 
whats available and how others are doing this.
On May 14, 2014 1:21 PM, Faisal Imtiaz 
fai...@snappytelecom.netmailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net wrote:
Why do you want to put  a 'box' on-site ?

Why not hosted PBX, and have IP Phones  ?

Regards.

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232tel:305%20663%205518%20x%20232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518tel:%28305%29663-5518 Option 2 or Email: 
supp...@snappytelecom.netmailto:supp...@snappytelecom.net


From: Chris Fabien ch...@lakenetmi.commailto:ch...@lakenetmi.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 11:40:10 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Small IP PBX - Grandstream UCM

Anyone tried out this Grandstream IP PBX? Looking for a low cost option we can 
use for small businesses with 4-8 phones. Also need to redo our office phones 
so I have a nice chance to try out a new product before selling one to a 
customer. Any suggestions other than the grandstream are welcome too.

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] Still Offline

2014-04-09 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhHtwIkihL8list=UU0x5SU5ekB6LTZjLN7szyEg


Bryce D
NETAGO

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Motel WiFi Authentication

2014-03-25 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
I did a hotel a few months ago using UniFi and MikroTik.
We are running Hotspot service on the MikroTik (RB1100AHx2) and UserManager.
For user account creation I put in a HotSpot printer from Technologic. It uses 
API to create user accounts in UserManager so it is very easy for clerks to be 
able to create users for guests. You can set limits for days, speed, data 
transfer, etc.
It’s not cheap, and not the easiest to set up but once it is in it works well.

Check out www.hotspot-printer.com

Another option, depending on the billing system they use, could be to use 
radius integrated with their billing system to create users.

Or, you could just enable user manager and the clerk could create users in the 
web interface.

If you want some more info shoot me an email off list.

Bryce D
bduc...@netago.ca

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of wi...@mncomm.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:24
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Motel WiFi Authentication

Not sure if I should post to UBNT or Mikrotik. Anyways we have a few motels 
that we run the UniFi APs in and they offer free use of the service. Of course 
its all you can eat for anyone across the street from the motel, or those who 
loiter in the parking lots. I havent really stayed in enough motels to see how 
they do them but what’s a way that users can get a temp username  password 
when they check in? I havent dinked with it much on the UniFi. I can see how to 
do it, kind of, with hotspot on a Mikrotik, but I am not sure I would want a 
desk clerk dinking with the router. I am assuming that UniFi would be easier to 
use for this. Problem I have is with the few motels using UniFi they hardly 
ever keep the software running, and only turn it on when they need remote help 
from me. We have something similar set up with our ISP billing system for a few 
campgrounds where they create their own credential then pay a few, but I had to 
contract a lot of that out due to my inexperience. Maybe I need to look into 
the Amazon solution. Would be cool to run UniFi on a Mikrotik router.

I also assume with them being authenticated we can track bandwidth hogs better. 
We have quite a few motels that have mostly permanent guests full time, people 
that never leave the room constantly downloading movies. On the unifi we could 
always see who they were by MAC only, but forcing someone to log in may help 
with the abuse.

thanks
heith


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Recommend Managed Switch

2014-02-05 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
TP-Link has some decent switches that aren't very expensive
They will do what you want.


From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 12:53
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Recommend Managed Switch

Not sure if it's outdoor temp rated, but for the price of an HP 1810-24G v2 
(around $250), you really can't go wrong. Very good feature sets, excellent 
prices.

http://h17007.www1.hp.com/us/en/networking/products/switches/HP_1810_Switch_Series/index.aspx#tab=TAB2
Josh Reynolds :: Chief Information Officer :: SPITwSPOTS
:: Ubiquiti Certified AirMax Trainer ::
On 02/05/2014 10:49 AM, Chris Fabien wrote:
I am trying to set up a VLAN trunk between our office and tower over a 60ghz 
gigabit link. I want to have all the tower APs and backhauls plugged in to a 
port at the tower and have them show up on a matching port in the office, one 
VLAN per port.

I tried to do this with one of the new Mikrotik CRS but the configuration is 
incredibly clunky and I can't get it working. They also seem to be missing a 
few key features like STP.

I need a switch that has:
tag/untag traffic on access ports
run STP/RSTP on two trunk ports for a primary and backup wireless link
1 or preferably more SFP ports (gigabit link is fiber interface)
min 16 copper gige ports
outdoor temperature rated
prefer runs on DC power

Any suggestions? I've not done much with managed switches and VLANs before, so 
no idea what is out there.

Thanks
Chris Fabien
LakeNet LLC




___

Wireless mailing list

Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] Life Lesson in IT

2013-09-06 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
Found this, thought I would share

A few years ago I was hired to replace a retiring veteran in IT, and on his 
last day, he handed me 3 envelopes. I asked about these and he told me that 
when things got crazy and I didnt know what to do, open the first envelope and 
it would help me out. Then he said that after a while I would run into another 
bind and for me to open the 2nd envelope for guidance. He then told me that I 
would no doubt encounter another crisis and for me to open the 3rd envelope 
when that happened. So a few months down the road a situation came up and I was 
clueless so I opened the first envelope. It simply said,  Tell them you are 
still new to the position and it takes time to build your own footprint in this 
business but you are almost there. I did this and to my amazement it bought me 
some relief from upper management. A few months later, I again had things go 
haywire and opened the 2nd envelope. It simply said,  Blame everything on me. 
Tell them I had gotten soft in my execution and it must be the reason for my 
retirement. I felt bad to do this but he suggested it so I did and it worked 
amazingly well. Finally a good bit of time passed and I again ran into a bind 
and just didnt know what to do and opened the final envelope. I slumped in my 
chair as it said: Prepare 3 envelopes.
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Fwd: Mikrotik RouterOS 5.* and 6.* sshd remote preauth heap corruption

2013-09-03 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
Upgraded my router at home right after I sent the last email, now I can't get 
back into it and it does not respond to pings very  well. So maybe wasn't a 
good move lol.
Will have a look when I get home and see what's goin on with it.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 12:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fwd: Mikrotik RouterOS 5.* and 6.* sshd remote preauth 
heap corruption

http://www.mikrotik.com/download/routeros-ALL-6.3.torrent


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Bryce Duchcherer 
bduc...@netago.camailto:bduc...@netago.ca wrote:
I noticed today when I was upgrading one of my routers that 6.3 is now out, but 
haven't got the announcement from Mikrotik yet and it does not show up under 
the downloads on MikroTik's Website.

I attached a screenshot of the changelog.


From: wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Ben West
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 10:26 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fwd: Mikrotik RouterOS 5.* and 6.* sshd remote preauth 
heap corruption

Quoting Mikrotik's response (indicating it is more of a DOS risk than auth 
bypass)

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2t=76310

We have researched the exploitation claim in first post of the topic.

We can find no basis for this claim Exploitation of this vulnerability will 
allow full access to the router device. Following these instructions will NOT 
allow access/control of the router and will NOT allow further efforts to enable 
access/control of the router.

By following the instruction for the first sshd heap corruption, the sshd 
service of the router will exit and will not restart. This is a denial of 
service as only a reboot of the router will make the ssh remote management 
service available again.

The second method that causes a crash of the sshd program also provides a 
denial of service as the sshd does not restart and the router requires a reboot 
to have sshd available. It does not allow or make it possible for further 
efforts to gain access/control of the router.

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Micah Miller 
mi...@nbson.commailto:mi...@nbson.com wrote:
If I'm reading this correctly, an npk file is forged with the /etc/devel-login 
file, then the install iso is modified to include the forged npk.

Is this correct?

So you'd have to install this modified iso?

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Ben West 
b...@gowasabi.netmailto:b...@gowasabi.net wrote:
I haven't had a chance yet to verify whether this affects any of the RouterOS 
v5.25 boxes I've deployed, but forwarding along FYI ...

-- Forwarded message --
From: king cope 
isowarez.isowarez.isowa...@googlemail.commailto:isowarez.isowarez.isowa...@googlemail.com
Date: Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:45 AM
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Mikrotik RouterOS 5.* and 6.* sshd remote preauth 
heap corruption
To: 
full-disclos...@lists.grok.org.ukmailto:full-disclos...@lists.grok.org.uk, 
bugt...@securityfocus.commailto:bugt...@securityfocus.com, 
submissi...@packetstormsecurity.commailto:submissi...@packetstormsecurity.com


Hello lists,

here you find the analysis of a vulnerability I recently discovered.

Mikrotik RouterOS 5.* and 6.* sshd remote preauth heap corruption

http://kingcope.wordpress.com/2013/09/02/mikrotik-routeros-5-and-6-sshd-remote-preauth-heap-corruption/

Additionally it includes a way to drop into a development shell for
recent Mikrotik RouterOS versions.

Cheers :

Kingcope

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/




--
Ben West
http://gowasabi.net
b...@gowasabi.netmailto:b...@gowasabi.net
314-246-9434tel:314-246-9434

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



--
Micah Miller
Network/Server Administrator
Network Business Systems, Inc.
Phone: 309-944-8823tel:309-944-8823

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



--
Ben West
http://gowasabi.net
b...@gowasabi.netmailto:b...@gowasabi.net
314-246-9434tel:314-246-9434

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Hotspot Router/Software

2013-07-17 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
MikroTik with Radius Manager works fairly well.
You can enable the trial account under the Hotspot in MikroTik and use Radius 
Manager to manage paid users.

[NETAGO-INTERNET_DNP]
Bryce Duchcherer
bduc...@netago.camailto:bduc...@netago.ca
WWW.NETAGO.CA


From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Chris Fabien
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 7:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Hotspot Router/Software

I need suggestion for a hotspot system for a campground. Requirements:
Need to provide two levels of service
Basic Free Service - lower speed, limited MB per day
Paid Service - faster speed, unlimited use, billed as daily, 3 days or monthly 
service
Paid service can be purchased via credit card in online portal, would be 
easiest if it could collect payment to our Propay merchant account, paypal is a 
less desirable option, but we do have a paypal acct as well.
Compatible with any wifi APs, this year we will connect to current wifi APs in 
the park, probably overhaul that next season. Capable of handling 100-200 
users, maybe 50megs traffic max.
I would prefer an all in one box type system over a home made/server/open 
source solution. Needs to be proven reliable product and just work. Budget is 
ideally 200-300 for hardware and some modest monthly cost is OK if necessary.
So, any suggestions? Thanks!
inline: image001.png___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Netflix Open Connect Platform

2013-06-11 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
Do you know anything about the caching server? 
Do they install that at the IX's or can you install that at your site when you 
peer?
It looks intriguing.

Bryce Duchcherer
NETAGO
bduc...@netago.ca



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Carlos Alcantar
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 6:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Netflix Open Connect Platform

+1 on this netflix super hd video can eat up some good amount of bw at
6/7mbps per flow for super hd.

Carlos Alcantar
Race Communications / Race Team Member
1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010
Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com





-Original Message-
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Monday, June 10, 2013 2:43 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Netflix Open Connect Platform

Anything the public peer accepts.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

- Original Message -
From: Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 4:41:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Netflix Open Connect Platform

You have to peer with them at 10g, right? Or do they have other options?

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 10, 2013, at 13:09, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net wrote:

 We are peering with them on the Telx TIE in Atlanta.
 (We are not only using this connection for our own network peering, 
but also have a few other ISP, which are interconnected, utilizing this 
peering connection... some in Atlanta, other in Miami)

 :)


 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom
 7266 SW 48 Street
 Miami, FL 33155
 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 1:34:25 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] Netflix Open Connect Platform

 Anyone been able to connect up with Netflix on this new platform?

 -mike

 Sent from my iPhone
 ___
 Wireless mailing list
 Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 ___
 Wireless mailing list
 Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Blocking Torrents

2013-06-03 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
You don't necessarily need to block torrents. They can be used for legitimate 
uses, such as Linux distros.
One way you can cut down on torrent traffic is to limit the number of 
connections to clients. That will drastically cut down on the number of torrent 
connections someone can open, slowing down torrent downloads drastically.

Bryce Duchcherer MTCWE
Network Admin
NETAGO
403-854-4600
bduc...@netago.camailto:bduc...@netago.ca
[NETAGO-INTERNET_DNP]

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of ~NGL~
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 11:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Blocking Torrents

Can I block all Torrents using the Ubiquiti ERLite-3 ?
Thanx
NGL

ERLite-3
[cid:image002.gif@01CE6061.7B4ED060]

If you can read this Thank A Teacher.
And if it's in English Thank A Soldier!


inline: image001.pnginline: image002.gif___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Blocking Torrents

2013-06-03 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
You can do it in MikroTik fairly easily. There Is a way to limit connections 
per subnet, if you limit /32 it will set a limit of x connections for every IP 
address going through the router.
It's hard to say an exact number of connections, it depends what people are 
doing. For most residential, ~200 connections should be lots. Businesses, 
depending on the number of users, could be more.

Bryce Duchcherer MTCWE
Network Admin
NETAGO
403-854-4600
bduc...@netago.camailto:bduc...@netago.ca
[NETAGO-INTERNET_DNP]

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of ~NGL~
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 2:13 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Blocking Torrents

Where do I set the limit?
In the router or radio?
How many?
NGL
From: Bryce Duchcherermailto:bduc...@netago.ca
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 12:51 PM
To: WISPA General Listmailto:wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Blocking Torrents

You don't necessarily need to block torrents. They can be used for legitimate 
uses, such as Linux distros.
One way you can cut down on torrent traffic is to limit the number of 
connections to clients. That will drastically cut down on the number of torrent 
connections someone can open, slowing down torrent downloads drastically.

Bryce Duchcherer MTCWE
Network Admin
NETAGO
403-854-4600
bduc...@netago.camailto:bduc...@netago.ca
[NETAGO-INTERNET_DNP]

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of ~NGL~
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 11:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Blocking Torrents

Can I block all Torrents using the Ubiquiti ERLite-3 ?
Thanx
NGL

ERLite-3
[cid:image002.gif@01CE6065.F2F774B0]

If you can read this Thank A Teacher.
And if it's in English Thank A Soldier!



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
inline: image001.pnginline: image002.gif___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] tips for ptp link

2013-05-13 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
I would stay away from 5.5.4 for P2P links. Every P2P link we have installed it 
on has had problems.
But definitely try to keep power levels as low as possible and RSS at both ends 
above -50 if possible.

Bryce Duchcherer MTCWE
Network Admin
NETAGO
403-854-4600 - 403-435-0047
bduc...@netago.camailto:bduc...@netago.ca
[NETAGO-INTERNET_DNP]

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Chris Fabien
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 8:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] tips for ptp link

Update to latest firmware, 5.5.4. If you want it to be a transparent bridge 
link, enable WDS on both sides.
At that distance, what antennas are you using? If you are using the 30db rocket 
dishes you will have to turn down the TX power on both radios, ubnt radios like 
signal around -50 at strongest.
If it's a noisy area, it would be advisable to run airview on both sides to see 
what channels are cleanest. Actually that is always advisable.
At that distance, consider using the DFS frequencies which are lower power but 
generally less noisy. New rockets should come with this enabled, you have to 
get a company-specific unlock code from ubiquiti to unlock it on older radios.


On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Terry White 
twh...@ueci.coopmailto:twh...@ueci.coop wrote:
I am creating a ptp link for the first time using rocket m5s. the distance is 
only ½ mile. Anything I should be on the look out for. Tips/tricks?

Terry White
United Services
(800) 585 - 6454tel:%28800%29%20585%20-%206454
twh...@ueci.coopmailto:twh...@ueci.coop

  [WildBlue] http://www.unitedsky.net/WildBule/index.html[DIRECTV] 
http://www.unitedsky.net/DirecTV/index.html   [United Sky] 
http://www.unitedsky.net/UnitedSky/index.html
Your Local Satellite Professionals


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

inline: image004.pnginline: image005.jpginline: image006.jpginline: image007.jpg___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] tips for ptp link

2013-05-13 Thread Bryce Duchcherer
We run 5.5.2 on all our P2P. Every one we upgrade drops connection after a 
while - random times. Downgrade to 5.5.2 no problems.
We have 5.5.4 running on our P2MP just fine though. It could just be a setting 
somewhere, but we haven't taken the time to figure it out, just been keeping 
5.5.2 on them because we know it works.

Bryce Duchcherer MTCWE
Network Admin
NETAGO
403-854-4600 - 403-435-0047
bduc...@netago.camailto:bduc...@netago.ca
[NETAGO-INTERNET_DNP]

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Chris Fabien
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 12:16 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] tips for ptp link

Curious what version do you run on ptp links? I haven't seen issues with 5.5.4, 
but have not deployed it on many ptp links yet. What problems did you see?

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Bryce Duchcherer 
bduc...@netago.camailto:bduc...@netago.ca wrote:
I would stay away from 5.5.4 for P2P links. Every P2P link we have installed it 
on has had problems.
But definitely try to keep power levels as low as possible and RSS at both ends 
above -50 if possible.

Bryce Duchcherer MTCWE
Network Admin
NETAGO
403-854-4600tel:403-854-4600 - 403-435-0047tel:403-435-0047
bduc...@netago.camailto:bduc...@netago.ca
[NETAGO-INTERNET_DNP]

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Chris Fabien
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 8:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] tips for ptp link

Update to latest firmware, 5.5.4. If you want it to be a transparent bridge 
link, enable WDS on both sides.
At that distance, what antennas are you using? If you are using the 30db rocket 
dishes you will have to turn down the TX power on both radios, ubnt radios like 
signal around -50 at strongest.
If it's a noisy area, it would be advisable to run airview on both sides to see 
what channels are cleanest. Actually that is always advisable.
At that distance, consider using the DFS frequencies which are lower power but 
generally less noisy. New rockets should come with this enabled, you have to 
get a company-specific unlock code from ubiquiti to unlock it on older radios.


On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Terry White 
twh...@ueci.coopmailto:twh...@ueci.coop wrote:
I am creating a ptp link for the first time using rocket m5s. the distance is 
only ½ mile. Anything I should be on the look out for. Tips/tricks?

Terry White
United Services
(800) 585 - 6454tel:%28800%29%20585%20-%206454
twh...@ueci.coopmailto:twh...@ueci.coop

  [WildBlue] http://www.unitedsky.net/WildBule/index.html[DIRECTV] 
http://www.unitedsky.net/DirecTV/index.html   [United Sky] 
http://www.unitedsky.net/UnitedSky/index.html
Your Local Satellite Professionals


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.orgmailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

inline: image001.pnginline: image002.jpginline: image003.jpginline: image004.jpg___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless