Re: [WISPA] dual ethernte port router
How about a used 2621. HFC -- Henry F. Camacho Jr. Unplugged Cities, LLC 511 11th Ave South Suite 241 Minneapolis, MN 55415 763-235-3005 (Office) 763-257-6898 (Cell) tknightowl (Skype) h...@unpluggedcities.com (email) www.unpluggedcities.com (www) KC0KUS (Amateur Radio) Alan Long wrote: Anyone have a suggestion for a dual ethernet port router, that can handle 30-50mb/s of traffic. I do not need it to do nat or anything like that, just need it to route..I have looked at a cisco 2811..but know there are other options..Thanks for any help. http://www.aerowire.net Alan Long Director of Network Operations Aerowire http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?Pyt=Tmapaddr=687+North+Dean+Roadcsz=Aubu rn%2C+AL+36830country=us 687 North Dean Road Auburn, AL 36830 mailto:alan.l...@aerowire.net alan.l...@aerowire.net tel: mobile: http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?lang=ensrc=jj_signatureTo=3342759998E mail=along5...@yahoo.com 3342759998 http://www.plaxo.com/click_to_call?lang=ensrc=jj_signatureTo=336092E mail=along5...@yahoo.com 336092 https://www.plaxo.com/add_me?u=30065206883src=client_sig_212_1_card_joini nvite=1=en Always have my latest info http://www.plaxo.com/signature?src=client_sig_212_1_card_sig=en Want a signature like this? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Proxim WORP Protocol
the highest I've ever done was 24 Mb/s TCP using iperf with -w64K HFC -- Henry F. Camacho Jr. Unplugged Cities, LLC 800 Washington Ave No Suite 501 Minneapolis, MN 55401 763-235-3005 (Office) 763-257-6898 (Cell) tknightowl (Skype) h...@unpluggedcities.com (email) www.unpluggedcities.com (www) KC0KUS (Amateur Radio) Gino Villarini wrote: My experience in ptmp 5054 was about 22 - 25 mbps total in highest modulation Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of 3-dB Networks Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:55 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Proxim WORP Protocol Okay... I guess my big question would be... they say they do 54Mb of traffic... but that sounds like 802.11a where that is the over the air rate... your actual TCP throughput is say 20Mb or so. Does WORP overcome this? From your description and what I see on the spec sheets I wouldn't think so. Thanks! Daniel White 3-dB Networks http://www.3dbnetworks.com -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Henry F. Camacho Jr. Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:49 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Proxim WORP Protocol I've spent a lot of time working with the Proxim 5054 products that implement WORP, the protocol is TDM, it slices time slots for each subscriber unit connected to a base station. A base can act as subscriber or a base. It supports timeslot skipping if SU don't have traffic to send. I've had really good luck with these units. there are a lot of integrators using the 5054 units to deploy cameras for public safety. HFC -- Henry F. Camacho Jr. Unplugged Cities, LLC 800 Washington Ave No Suite 501 Minneapolis, MN 55401 763-235-3005 (Office) 763-257-6898 (Cell) tknightowl (Skype) h...@unpluggedcities.com (email) www.unpluggedcities.com (www) KC0KUS (Amateur Radio) 3-dB Networks wrote: Anyone here know much about it? What are the improvements over standard 802.11 A/B/G protocol? Thank you in advance Daniel White 3-dB Networks http://www.3dbnetworks.com - - -- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ - - -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ --- - WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ --- - WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VRRP
Sam I believe the problem you are having here related to the fact that the VRRP aren't synchronized on both sides of your routers. For example: MT1 world fails to MT2, however MT1 still has a valid VRRP for the AP side. Down stream traffic from world actually now is hitting MT2 and proceeds to AP, however the upstream path for AP to the world actually passes through MT1 which has the failed link. Unless there is a process to synchronize the VRRPs you will not be able to get the desired effect. Ideally when MT1 fails, MT2 must become master for all VRRPs. HFC Sam Tetherow wrote: I've been testing out VRRP and it seems to work pretty well if you want to fail over from one machine to another on a single interface. But what I would really like to be able to do is duplicate my MT routers against equipment failure rather than network failure. Example: CPE AP ---+--MT1- + - WORLD | | +--MT2 - + MT1 and MT2 are both routing between AP and the world. AP is 172.16.2.0/24 WORLD is 10.0.0.0/24 MT1 has Internal (AP) address of 172.16.2.1 External (WORLD) address of 10.0.0.1 vrrp1 (AP) address of 172.16.2.254 vrrp2 (WORLD) address of 10.0.0.254 MT2 has: Internal (AP) address of 172.16.2.2 External (WORLD) address of 10.0.0.2 vrrp1 (AP) address of 172.16.2.254 vrrp2 (WORLD) address of 10.0.0.254 172.16.2.0/24 is routed to 10.0.0.254 172.16.2.0 side has a default gateway of 172.16.2.254 When the AP side of MT1 is unplugged MT2 takes over and only a couple of pings are dropped. However if the WORLD side of MT1 is unplugged about 4 pings time out and then I start getting destination unreachable. The VRRP failover works on both sides. If the WORLD side of MT1 is unplugged I can ping 10.0.0.254 and get a response from MT2. But on the internal end of things MT1 is still 172.16.2.254 so I get the host unreachable message. So what I'm really looking for is high availability for the router and I was hoping that VRRP would do the trick. I thought about bridging but at NOC I have several networks that all connect to my main MT router and I really don't want to bridge the traffic. If anyone has a clue, or can definitively say it can't be done with VRRP I would greatly appreciate the help. -- Henry F. Camacho Jr. Unplugged Cities, LLC 800 Washington Ave No Suite 501 Minneapolis, MN 55401 763-235-3005 (Office) 763-257-6898 (Cell) tknightowl (Skype) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (email) www.unpluggedcities.com (www) KC0KUS (Amateur Radio) WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
