: jeffrey thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org; WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 12:45 PM
Subject: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz
Since everyone was talking about wimax, thought I would throw my 3 cents
broadband too, after all we are people just like in the
big cities...only thing is, it doesn't take us an hour or longer to get
to work everyday. :)
Scott
-- Original Message --
From: jeffrey thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Jack,
Drew is an operator who is already deployed with Airspan, I believe.
Is this correct Drew?
Yes, forested areas always present a challenge, whether its 900, 700,
3.65ghz,
5.8ghz, etc etc.
-
Jeff Booher
Channel Manager, North America
www.apertonet.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since everyone was talking about wimax, thought I would throw my 3 cents
in :)
Benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz
1. Spectral efficiency ( 4.85 gross bp/hz ) On a six sector
configuration with only 25mhz of spectrum, you can effectively deliver
approx 20mb per sector or 120 mb / per pop, 240 mb when
testing.
-Eric
jeffrey thomas wrote:
All,
Aperto actually has a really killer product launching next month in
3.65.
I would state its a lot more stable than Redline's product due to their
secret sauce. Its the same platform that is winning carriers overseas.
Airspan- yes
correct
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:15:18 -0400, Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
I thought it was
Airspan 5 mhz channel: 4.07 w
10 mhz channel 7.24 w
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
and actually Aperto has 21 mb throughput on a 7mhz channel
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:19:44 -0600, Mike Hammett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So then Airspan can go further (more applicable to rural markets)?
If Redline's 15 mbit throughput per 7.5 MHz is correct and is similar to
other products in
Bear in mind everyone- the Airspan product is also about 2x the price of
redline on base. Its ultimately designed for zero truck roll mobility
for indoor 2km cells ( and works, Im actually sitting in Airspan's boca
facility right now, getting training on Hipermax ) You could as well
use it for
This is due to the fact that they dont have the contention protocol.
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:56:49 -0500, Mike Cowan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Not sure why but the FCC dinged Redline 10DB of tx power due average
vs peak power calculations.
Mike
At 12:26 PM 1/12/2008, you wrote:
IIRC,
All,
Airspan has submitted for the lower band ( higher power ) and supposedly
been given the
thumbs up for their hipermax product and will be submitting for micromaxE
as well. Airspan
supports the full 5w output power on 10mhz and 10 watt output power on
20mhz, as well
as mimo. Currently
, at 7:01 AM, Dylan Oliver wrote:
MOFO? ATCA? SDR?
On 10/6/07, Jeffrey Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
802.16e in 5.8ghz would be absolutely the biggest waste of money ever
as you wouldn't get a true mobile network but your network costs
would be around, yaknow, 300k for a market of 20k people
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Thomas
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 6:00 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RF propagation map: WiFi vs WiMax?
All,
Bear in mind, Clearwire uses their own base station technology,
which is mostly Nextnet base stations ( now motorola ) . Nextnet's
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Thomas
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 3:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RF propagation map: WiFi vs WiMax?
802.16e in 5.8ghz would be absolutely the biggest waste of money ever
as you
All,
Bear in mind, Clearwire uses their own base station technology,
which is mostly Nextnet base stations ( now motorola ) . Nextnet's
performance is not wimax, just really high power base stations and CPE.
4 QAM / 2 WATT output power / 8dbi directional antenna on the CPE
and I think around 10
802.16e in 5.8ghz would be absolutely the biggest waste of money ever
as you wouldn't get a true mobile network but your network costs
would be around, yaknow, 300k for a market of 20k people for just
BASE station equipment.
The way to go if you are really worried about upward
roadmap. See for yourself:
https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Thomas
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 5:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA
PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 4:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Leasing 2.3 or 2.5 GHz Licensed Spectrum
They have submitted for several OET's from my understanding, for those
frequencies.
On Oct 1
, Market Development
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Thomas
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 2:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Leasing 2.3
Scriv,
I know of 2 MFR's that are SHIPPING wimax in your band you hold
licenses for. hit me offlist.
tks,
Jeff
On Aug 23, 2007, at 8:12 PM, John Scrivner wrote:
So Patrick, if an operator has an interest in launching WiMAX using
BreezeMax will Alvarion help them find and acquire access
All,
focusing on the future of white space is so far off that you can't even
assume that the current technologies used will even apply ( or there
will be a market
for WISPs to service ) If I was any of you I would be banging down the
FCC's door to get decent output power ( greater than 1w
offlist
On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
any pricing yet
On 6/20/07, Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.marketwirecanada.com/2.0/release.do?id=744234
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax
--
WISPA Wireless List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
*high fives charles*
On 4/2/07 3:44 PM, Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly,
Would you buy RB112/532/whatever boards if they cost $1k vs $100 each?
-Charles
---
WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
Coming to a City Near You
That's an age old question.
Anyone have any ideas what's up with it?
-
Jeff
On 3/2/07 1:29 AM, wispa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I spent some time reading the latest R O about the 3650 spectrum, which is
dated back in 2005.
Ryan,
The DNR is really flexible on those rates. Where is the tower you
Are considering leasing?
Btw, My Girlfreind's roomate works for the DNR in Wa state, I can ask her
what she would recommend to offer.
-
Jeff
On 2/14/07 1:00 PM, Ryan Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone?
ryan
- Original Message -
From: Jeffrey Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] churn, double play and why WLP is key - I
finallyunderstand it
I believe it can now be said without reservation
I believe it can now be said without reservation, that if you are using
unlicensed and wanting to implement a double play of VoIP + data, the
ONLY product out there that can do it in scale and with toll quality is
BreezeACCESS VL.
Bzzz.. Wrong.
Aperto supports toll quality voice of about
But you still date 24 year olds
;)
-
Jeff
On 1/5/07 3:29 PM, Forbes Mercy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
H I'm 48 - gawd I just looked at that in print and it is WAY too old for
me.
Forbes Mercy
Washington Broadband, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian,
Standards don't really matter unless you have interop on the mac layer as
well as QOS.With just MAC and phy layer interoperability, the only thing
that will be supported is simple bridging and routing when you use seperate
vendor's CPE and Base stations. btw, no one is currently
Congrats to Jim~ I know they worked long and hard to be bought out :)
-
Jeff
On 10/17/06 2:24 PM, Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://rcrnews.com/news.cms?newsId=27551
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
The core issue all these mesh networks is they were not built with proper
density which by our calculations for a network the size of mountain view
would be about 45 nodes per sq mile, instead of the 30-32 nodes per square
mile implemented.
YMMV...
-
Jeff
On 8/30/06 9:29 AM, Patrick
Its quicktime. The down arrow on the left hand side has an option save as
source..
-
Jeff
On 8/28/06 10:24 AM, Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great video !!!1
Anyone knows has to save this to disk ?
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
I take that back, the right hand side.
On 8/28/06 12:07 PM, Jeffrey Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its quicktime. The down arrow on the left hand side has an option save as
source..
-
Jeff
On 8/28/06 10:24 AM, Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great video !!!1
I use both. I find them pretty useful, actually.
On 7/24/06 5:14 PM, Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I keep getting offers to sign up for plaxo, linked in etc.
I've NEVER signed up for any. They seem too much like email harvesting or
porn jerks to me.
Am I
Sure- but they don't have any plans to make base stations, so none of the
base station manufacturer provided QOS mechanisms will work with zcomax
clients.
-
Jeff
On 6/12/06 7:44 PM, George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.zcom.com.tw/news001.htm
--
WISPA Wireless List:
Title: Re: [WISPA] Wimax corrections-The info is out there if you look
On the CPE pricing... Yup, and the only one shipping 5.8 product yet is Airspan.
-
Jeff
On 6/13/06 6:42 AM, Brad Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few corrections:
The issue with 3.650 is the FCC has not decided on
up to it's hype from what I have seen.
JohnnyO
Wanting to be a believer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Thomas
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 11:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good news on the wimax
the product you are suggesting, but the only dual radio
products I can find our base station products. I not looking for a base
station, I am looking for something client facing. Further, I see no
mention of VLAN support.
-Matt
jeffrey thomas wrote:
Airmatrix can do
Lets say you are using vlans to not only segment traffic, but priortize
traffic as well. So a double tagged vlan, would give you the ability to
create A vlan for segmentation and a VLAN within that vlan for
priortization, for additional segmentation as well.
I could be wrong though.
-
Jeff
Yup.
On 6/9/06 8:33 AM, Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey Thomas = Jeff Booher
Jeffrey Thomas Booher actually
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Mti's are a lot better antenna but a bit more pricey.
-
Jeff
On 6/7/06 9:16 PM, George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those MTI's are nice looking product. Nice price too. Have you checked
out the pac wireless 5 gig rootennas yet?
They are working great for me and they are cheap.
Airmatrix can do that.
www.defactowireless.com
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:17:30 -0400, Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
I am looking for a device with the following requirements:
* Can backhaul at 11Mbps operating in the 5.2Ghz band
* Can support VLANs
* Can assign a VLAN to one Ethernet
Fyi everyone, wrap boards have been discontinued
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:45:00 -0500, Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
If you order it all from wisp-router they will assemble it for your so
you would get a die-cast case with the RB mounted the radios and
pigtails installed. All you
Matt,
The airmatrix flex can do what you require, i think list on them is
around 350 or so but that price is coming down to around 250.00. An
additional card shouldnt be too much more per side.
-
Jeff
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:19:35 -0400, Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
I don't think i am
Phone Service
- No Phone Line Required for DSL
- FREE Activation Equipment
- Affordable Upfront Pricing
- Locally Owned Operated
- We Also Service Most Rural Areas
===
- Original Message -
From: jeffrey thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
Guys,
Just got out of training for the new AIRSPAN wimax product for 5.8.
Unlike
most other vendors, they are going to market with their 802.16-2004
5.4-5.9
solution and are shipping in JULY, and expect FCC certification for
their 802.16-2004
product for 4.9 Ghz as well in July! I am very excited
to set up the
roof mount.
-
Jeff
On 6/8/06 8:04 PM, Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Color me jaded, but how can you get a zero truck roll CPE in 5.4-5.9
unlicensed?
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
jeffrey thomas wrote:
Guys,
Just got out of training for the new
- Original Message -
From: jeffrey thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 4:02 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment
The benchmark is the ability to provide NLOS, portable or fixed service
to at least a 2 mile radius per
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of jeffrey thomas
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 11:37 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment
service to 2000 subscribers?
I can't say due to non disclosure agreements. The funny thing about them
Is they got the STA's and have yet to really use them, so all the money
They spent on lawyers obtaining the STA's is going to waste anyways.
jack
jeffrey thomas wrote:
Jack
Actually, on the Ap Side Airspan is around 5000.00 and 400 or so for the
CPE.
-
Jeff
On Tue, 23 May 2006 08:43:29 -0500 (CDT), Butch Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Jon Langeler wrote:
If your looking for equipment manufacturers, you'll be looking at
companies like
www.airmatrix.com
On Tue, 23 May 2006 09:25:51 -0700, Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So where is my danged wifi cpe that can keep a list of 36 ap's and is
smart
enough to switch between them automatically?
sheesh I could have sold thousands of these over the
sure.
On Tue, 23 May 2006 12:58:34 -0700, George Rogato
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I understood that the 3650 was not to be used in commercial links. I'm
assuming money makes it commercial.
I would like to deploy a couple links for non paying situations, cameras
for a city park. I'd also like
Patrick,
It doesnt change the fact that many have launched limited deployments
as a test but still charged for the access service, banking on the
fact that the FCC has set the band aside for unlicensed anyways, and
that the chance of the FCC cracking down on them is very low.
Im not saying this
will likely turn out to be their own worst enemy
4. NOT someone who I could rely upon to provide me reliable, long-term
WISP service.
jack
jeffrey thomas wrote:
Patrick,
It doesnt change the fact that many have launched limited deployments
as a test but still charged
turn out to be their own worst enemy
4. NOT someone who I could rely upon to provide me reliable, long-term
WISP service.
jack
jeffrey thomas wrote:
Patrick,
It doesnt change the fact that many have launched limited deployments
as a test but still charged
jeffrey thomas wrote:
Patrick,
It doesnt change the fact that many have launched limited deployments
as a test but still charged for the access service, banking on the
fact that the FCC has set the band aside for unlicensed anyways, and
that the chance of the FCC cracking down on them
That wouldn't be correct- because the 2.4 access and 4.9 distribution layers
are 2 different things. So essentially the distribution layer would only be
legal for the muni to connect to ( the 4.9 layer )
-
Jeff
On 5/10/06 12:30 AM, Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bump...
On Wed, 26
Aperto packetwave is your best bet then, contact me off list for details.
-
Jeff
On 5/5/06 8:10 AM, Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick Leary wrote:
But which WiMAX are you talking about? There are lots of versions and the
one version that no one has...and no one should be
HEY NOW,
out here in eastern washington we dont need none of that high falootin
facts to back up our research.
as the great steven cobert would say, we just know if something is
right, based on our gut feelings.
;)
Jeff
On Tue, 02 May 2006 13:29:08 -0600, Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Re: [WISPA] Tranzeo BH
The biggest issue I have heard or seen with tranzeo BHs is if you are running a flat network ( ie your pops are not routed @ the edge ) they have a lot of trouble passing a large bridge table.
-
Jeff
On 4/26/06 12:21 PM, Jory Privett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey folks,
I was wondering if anyone knew of companies that lease class C's to small
ISP's looking for the ablity to announce the leased IP classes as their own
As to avoid being locked in to a specific provider. Please let me know
If you know of anyone.
Best,
Jeff Booher
--
WISPA Wireless
Arin isnt an option I don't think because these guys arent multi-homed yet.
-
Jeff
On 4/25/06 9:35 AM, David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, April 25, 2006 11:26 am, Jeffrey Thomas wrote:
I was wondering if anyone knew of companies that lease class C's to small
ISP's looking
there is no specifications
for that either. For example, many photo-cell taps are limited to 240v,
but many street lights are 277v/480v.
-Matt
Jeffrey Thomas wrote:
Airmatrix offers very similar features for less than 1/3 the cost of tropos.
They also ofer Pole mounted power, and actually
I am trying to find out how many folks out there use low cost CPE
like tranzeo. please hit me off list if you
do.
Best,
Jeff
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
agreed, VL is far from carrier grade
On Apr 12, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Charles Wu wrote:
snip
Motorola designed Canopy specifically for the WISP market, not the
carrier market.
Alvarion designed VL specifically for the carrier market, not the WISP
market.
/snip
Ah, the mis-perceptions of the
Airspan has an 802.16a 4.9 product ( Not wimax, because there is no interoperability and no profile for interop in 4.9 for wimax ) that they just got certified with the FCC. Give me an email if you want some pricing.-JeffOn Apr 10, 2006, at 4:14 PM, Jason Hensley wrote: Anyone have some pricing
is interoperability!
The market is going to have to sort out the vendors who falsely
claim WiMAX for their systems; apparently the WiMAX Forum has no
intention of doing so.
Thanks,
Steve
On Apr 4, 2006, at 21:37, Jeffrey Thomas wrote:
That is correct, however those companies are expected
On Apr 5, 2006, at 9:46 AM, Charles Wu wrote:
snip
That is correct, however those companies are expected to be shipping
product ( and are taking pre orders ) that will comply with the
testing whenever the gods at wimaxforum decide to get off their
collective arses and certify 5.8. Airspan for
Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 11:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Un- licensed WIMAX?
George,
I am sure there will be others
Actually,
I would argue that the great thing about wimax is not really interop-
its lower costs on CPE. Until there is an agreed upon profile for
WImax QOS, then literally everyone who buys wimax base stations will
use the same manufacturers client devices. The only major difference
is
Indeed.
Alvarion is not expected to request wimax certification until they
determine
a WIMAX approved QOS mechanism, at least thats what I have heard as
well.
-
Jeff
On Apr 4, 2006, at 3:29 PM, Charles Wu wrote:
Alvarion VL is based on a WiFi chipset (this isn't meant to knock
George,
I am sure there will be others, but likely the first will be Airspan
( May is Beta ) and Aperto ( shipping
in June ). Redline likely will have product as well, but based on the
fact that both Aperto and Airspan
have considerable experience with QOS PTMP, I would think they will
industry.
Thanks,
Steve
On Apr 4, 2006, at 11:37, jeffrey thomas wrote:
George,
Yes there is. Airspan and Aperto both have products and are taking
orders now.
-
Jeff
On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 08:16:46 -0700, George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
What is going on with unlicensed WIMAX?
Is there any products
Can anyone help someone at this address?Begin forwarded message:From: "Ian Haight" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: April 3, 2006 5:25:47 PM PDTTo: "'Jeff Booher'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Bellevue WISP ?? Here is the address.. 1621 114th ave SE Bellevue, WA 98004 --
WISPA Wireless List:
If your contract with a tower specifies that you hold access rights to
spectrum within the bands whether you are USING THEM currently, or not
using them currently, then I would suppose your exclusive rights would
hold up, but am unaware of any legal precedence to show this.
There was a company
they tried to sue us :)-JeffOn Jan 23, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Mark Koskenmaki wrote: http://www.verilan.com/ I was hoping to have a closer additional source for things (I always try to have more than one) and these people have some stuff I use listed for sale at decent prices. But, over the
erity" and "Verilan" contain the element "veri". Maybe they'll sue me, too! They own the Local Area Network of Truth!.. But I've got got the Original claim to Truth. On 1/31/06, Jeffrey Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: they tried to sue us :)-- Dylan OliverPrimaverity, LLC--
in the city and other built up areas. Not those of us out here with the great tree infestation. I really think the only thing that will help us out here where the trees are is a lower frequency say below 700MHzJeffrey Thomas wrote: All, Before everyone jumps for joy, Wimax CPE
Because in 6 months, you will be able to buy a Wimax Cpe for 200 bucks.
-
Jeff
On Jan 18, 2006, at 4:22 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Hope that affects the price of everything else, at this point who
would
by an 802.11a cpe for $250 when you can buy a trango for $150?
Kurt Fankhauser
Additionally on the whole co-op idea, there are different non profits
for
co-op's, which wispa is not set up as.
-
Jeff
On Jan 5, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Charles Wu wrote:
Tom,
Your idea is sound, but personally, I would think that what you
propose
falls into the same category as the WISP
/
http://www.alvarion-usa.com/presscenter/pressreleases/
-Original Message-
From: jeffrey thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 8:50 PM
To: WISPA General List; 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Alvarion VL as a PtMP Platform
3.5 / 2.5 / 5.8
Alvarion
The only product on the market today that will have backwards
compatibility to
wimax where a cpe can talk to a wimax base station is Aperto.
Additionally,
Alvarion will not be one of the first round products certified for
wimax,
Airspan and Aperto however, will be.
-
Jeff
On Wed, 04 Jan
I would second that- you can usually find good quality ( stratex for
example ) used backhauls on ebay for around a few grand.
-
Jeff
On Dec 20, 2005, at 3:35 AM, G.Villarini wrote:
John ,
Youre best and cheap option here is a 38 ghz lic. Backhaul. For
around
$1000 or less you can buy
Airspan can be had around 3 and change for indoor su's. outdoors around
4 and a quarter...
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:09:58 -0600, Mac Dearman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
OUCH! I have bought singles that cheap from doubleradius
Mac Dearman
Maximum Access, LLC.
www.inetsouth.com
and 15 grand a pop. Would have never made it underneath their pricing
model.
Also- their first version wasnt a beam forming switch.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:26:23 -0600, Joe Laura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Ya, they kind of resembled a billboard if you ask me. Serious windload.
Superior Wireless
/delurk
Top 5 reasons why legacy navini sucks
1.SCDMA phy/mac increases latency to low of 80msec peak 280msec and avg
of 100msec with 14-25% jitter.
( in english, the latency sucks arse )
2. only truely makes sense for sub 2 mile cell NLOS deployment with
BRS/MDS/ITFS Licensed spectrum. ( 2.5
If the donation is going to a NPO, I Think my company could make a
contribution, or myself personally. So- someone let me know the
details...
On Sep 12, 2005, at 9:38 AM, Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Another great reason to support ISPCon if you can. (For those that
don't
88 matches
Mail list logo
