[WISPA] outdoor fiber
Travis, I have always had good luck with fiber.com. At one point, I thought they were going to join WISPA as a vendor member. Thanks, Rick Harnish General Manager - Midwest Region Great American Broadband Hi, Anyone have a source for outdoor, UV rated, pre-made fiber cables? I need a 20 meter cable for an outdoor run. thanks, Travis Microserv WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Article
Mark, Comments inline: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > That is a TERRIBLE idea. I don't see obtaining a seat at the table which is defining future policy for broadband in the US a terrible idea. Not participating would do our industry much more disservice than participating. > > To chop our noses off for the chance to wallow at the DC trough? Please. I just looked in the mirror, my nose is still intact! I didn't even OINK today. :) > > It would be far more in our favor if we could get better tax treatment on > capital investment, if there were easier rules to deal with trading shares > of our companies to investors, if we had gaurantees that we would not be > mandated to do anything expensive, so we could have some kind of confidence > in our business models... Actually, tax incentives were a major discussion point for operators who make investment in broadband networks. I'll take the rest of this paragraph to heart as I proceed wallowing in the trough. > > Those are FAR more conducive to the success of all of us, than to put a > majority of us outside the standard of 'broadband' in return for a handful > sucking at the taxpayer teat in DC - We're all taxpayers, get off my back > already! Boosting the statistical average speed of broadband in the US will benefit the whole economy. With the majority of the population living in metropolitan areas, I would see the bar being raised in these areas much sooner than it will affect rural areas. That being said, I will be seeking funding for new research for faster wireless technologies to assist WISPs in achieving the highest speeds possible. I believe there will be a multiplier affect of dollars invested in broadband infrastructure. Enabling businesses and people to be more efficient will definitely boost the economy more than giving tax rebate checks back as part of an economic stimulus plan. The group reached a solid consensus that investing in broadband infrastructure would be one of the wisest uses of tight capital as it would create revenue in multiples of the original investment in all industry sectors. Respectively, Rick Harnish > > - Original Message - > From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "WISPA General List" > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 1:59 PM > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Article > > >>I agree, and one of my concerns with the coalition, is that defining >> broadband as 10mbps would be bad for WISPs. >> Rick is aware of these concerns. Please recognize that being a member of >> teh >> Coalition does not mean we endorse all their initial ideas for policies. >> It simply means we endorse the intent of the group, to work togeather to >> compromise and debate the best national broadband policy. >> WISPA being a member of the group is what allows WISPA to influence and >> educate the group on WISPs, and one issue to heavilly push influence, is >> to >> change their viewpoint on the minimum speed qualified as Broadband. 10mbps >> is way to high, and if that position stayed long term, I'd probably >> eventually have to drop endorsement for the group. >> But I believe raising teh requirement for "broadband" above DSL typical >> speed is critical, in order to help get WISP's grants and and Tax >> incentives. >> If we can disqualify typical DSL as Broadband (sub 3 mbps), it opens the >> door wide open to call so many more markets "underserved" and worthy to >> invest in WISP's deployment of such markets. >> >> >> Tom DeReggi >> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc >> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "WISPA General List" >> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 3:40 PM >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Article >> >> >>> And which telco is this going to bail out?Money from Congress to >>> industry = pay off Unions for votes. >>> >>> We will never, ever, ever, ever qualify. >>> >>> Another headliner article I read on this will redefine "broadband" as >>> over >>> 10 Meg. >>> >>> Nothing like disqualifying almost the entire WISP industry... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Rick Harnish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "'WISPA General List'" >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 11:20 AM >>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Article >>> >>> Jeff, Just to let you know, I am in Washington DC this week participating in the events below. WISPA has signed on as a supporter of the Call to Action to define the Nationwide Broadband Strategy. It was great to see all the players of the Broadband Industry working together to attempt to bring the US back up to the top of the Broadband Access ladder. It will be a busy three months while this strategy is defined and presented to the Obama Administration. Respectfully, Rick Harnish -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROT
RE: [WISPA] Tranzeo 900's and SR9's
Lonnie, To clarify please, I assume your saying that you are awaiting your first shipment of Tranzeo 900's for your own usebut others have already deployed WAR Boards V3 or WRAPs with the Tranzeo 900 solution. Is that correct? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lonnie Nunweiler Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:44 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tranzeo 900's and SR9's We are awaiting our own shipment but customers have reported good results with WAR boards and the new V3 for x86 WRAP boards. Lonnie On 8/3/06, Rick Harnish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > So, has anyone successfully deployed the Tranzeo 900 solution with SR9's > yet? Mikrotik, Ikarus or Star-OS? I'm looking for real results so I can > start making decisions. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rick Harnish > > President > > OnlyInternet Broadband & Wireless, Inc. > > 260-827-2482 > > Founding Member of WISPA > > > -- > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > -- Lonnie Nunweiler Valemount Networks Corporation http://www.star-os.com/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] 900 radio
What? You mean EVERYTHING on these lists isn't factual? Matt have you installed any 900 yet? Probably not too much need out there where the trees don't grow? Out there in Wireless Paradise! We should get together this fallI'm in need of a break! Later, Rick Harnish President Supernova Technologies, Inc. 260-827-2482 Office [EMAIL PROTECTED] Founding Member of WISPA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 2:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900 radio This is not true. The Tranzeo 900mhz radios can use 20, 10 or 5mhz channels. They only use it all up if that is how you configure it. Matt Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blair Davis wrote: > I've looked at the specs for these units. They eat the ENTIRE 900MHz > band as one channel. > > Carl A Jeptha wrote: > >> Contact WAV for pricing on Tranzeo 900 802.11g. My Rep. in Canada is >> Claudio Ricci. >> >> You have a Good Day now, >> >> >> Carl A Jeptha >> http://www.airnet.ca >> office 905 349-2084 >> Emergency only Pager 905 377-6900 >> skype cajeptha >> >> >> >> Butch Evans wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Blair Davis wrote: >>> Hoppers don't play nice with Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum. On the other hand, hoppers can get through more noise >>> >>> >>> While this is almost accurate, it is not exacly right. FHSS can >>> cause serious problems for a DSSS system, as the hopper runs across >>> the band. HOWEVER, DSSS will trash about 30% of that spectrum for >>> the hopper. (At least that is the approximate ratio for the 2.4GHz >>> range.) Having said that, FHSS in 900 DOES make a lot of sense, so >>> long as you have the ability to choose where it hops. >>> > > -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] FW: See what's new at DragonWave @ WCA 2006
Thanks for all your efforts over the weekend George. I'm not sure why the boxing gloves always need to come out on the weekend. Let's put this behind us NOW everyone. We all have more important things to be doing than to bicker on this mailing list. People tend to make poor judgements in the heat of the moment, I have seen several posts and replies from this weekend that enforce this assumption. Although we do not allowing spamming of the list, there is not much we can do about list harvesting and spamming outside the list. Bringing these actions and rebuttals to the list is in effect, secondary spamming of the list. Just take it up with the vendor directly or refuse to purchase from them if it offends you that much. It should be everyone's right to make those decisions for themselves. THREAD CLOSED! Rick Harnish President Supernova Technologies, Inc. 260-827-2482 Office [EMAIL PROTECTED] Founding Member of WISPA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Rogato Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 2:22 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FW: See what's new at DragonWave @ WCA 2006 I don't think anyone is condoning anything Lonnie. But I am trying to defuse the issue without pissing both of you off. George Lonnie Nunweiler wrote: > You miss the point George. I am not fighting. I called Johnny on his > actions and he immediately went personal and abusive. I rarely speak > up anymore but I thought this was a critical misuse of the list. > > Are you saying it is appropriate for everyone to forward their spam to > this list and use offensive language as they ask if anyone else got > the spam? Is it then appropriate to try and defend one's actions by > slandering a whole lot of people based on their country? > > Is this what WISPA is about and do the members condone such behaviour? > > Lonnie > > On 6/4/06, George Rogato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> At least you apologized Johnny, but it does get old watching people >> fight. >> >> Can't you guys just agree to not get along and ignore each other? >> >> George >> >> JohnnyO wrote: >> > Lonnie - my experiences and my opinions of Canadian companies are that >> > of my own. Apparently you're looking to make an ass out of both you and >> > I or else you wouldn't have responded the way you did Slander - not >> > even close. >> > >> > I KNOW DragonWave Harvested this list - Just like Tranzeo has harvested >> > this list as well in the past...and so has Trango ... They are Canadian >> > Companies who are spamming from the list addresses as of late. Should I >> > expect some email from StarOS anytime soon ? >> > >> > I won't continue this any further and if I offended you by asking the >> > list if the pricks at DragonWave (my opinion solely) are spamming >> others >> > as well, my appologies. >> > >> > If you don't accept my appology, you leave me no other choice then to >> > plea temporary insanity and appologize for my verbal offense which I >> did >> > not realize I committed nor was I aware of any such actions and any >> > future repetition of the above said that I may not be aware of. >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > JohnnyO >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> > Behalf Of Lonnie Nunweiler >> > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 12:03 AM >> > To: WISPA General List >> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] FW: See what's new at DragonWave @ WCA 2006 >> > >> > >> > To the Board: >> > >> > Is this behaviour condoned? Not only did he spam the list and use >> > offensive language, but he now slanders all Canadian companies. >> > >> > Lonnie >> > >> > On 6/4/06, JohnnyO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >>Ahhh my old good friend Lonnie :) How are you these days ? Get a clue >> >>. I did - don't buy from Canadian companies - they'll bend you >> >>over every chance they get :) >> >> >> >>Prick : please see >> >>http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=prick for a better run >> >>down on the term Lonnie. I did watch my language. Don't be so >> >>sensitive unless you fit the shoes... >> >> >> >>I know I do ! >> >> >> >> >> >>JohnnyO >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-Original Message- >> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>On Behalf Of Lonnie Nunweiler >> >>Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 10:53 PM >> >>To: WISPA General List >> >>Subject: Re: [WISPA] FW: See what's new at DragonWave @ WCA 2006 >> >> >> >>If you object to spam as much as you say you do, then why on earth >> >>would you send that spam to a list? Get a clue. Also, watch your >> >>language. >> >> >> >>Lonnie >> >> >> >> >> >>On 6/4/06, JohnnyO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>Anyone Else receiving these from these pricks ? >> >>> >> >>>JohnnyO >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>-Original Message- >> >>>From: APGWireless Info [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>>Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 9:18 PM >> >>>To: 'Chris Russell' >> >>>Cc:
RE: [WISPA] 4ft 5.8Ghz dual polarized grid
I just ordered 7 4' Dual Pol Andrews dishes. They are rated at 34.9 db. Rick Harnish President Supernova Technologies, Inc. 260-827-2482 Office [EMAIL PROTECTED] Founding Member of WISPA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 6:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 4ft 5.8Ghz dual polarized grid 32-34dbi -Matt Blair Davis wrote: > What kind of gain is that gonna have? > > Say maybe 40db? > > Matt Liotta wrote: > >> Anyone know where to find such a thing? >> >> -Matt > > > > -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
