: Monday, November 16, 2009 4:21 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT on Atom
Travis,
If the machine is USB or CD bootable boot up a Linux live cd and see if
works. If it does you know MT is the issue.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100
Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 3:07 PM
To: n...@brevardwireless.com n...@brevardwireless.com, WISPA General
List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT on Atom
It's x86 so it should work.
Doesn't have RAM, you'll need to buy that.
It has Realtek
.
Nick Olsen
Brevard Wireless
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: Curtis Maurand cmaur...@xyonet.com
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 8:20 AM
To: n...@brevardwireless.com n...@brevardwireless.com, WISPA General
List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT on Atom
: [WISPA] MT on Atom
We bought several of the Supermicro Atom 330 units, with the case tha t has
I/O on the front and added a PCI-E Intel GigE 4 port card.
We have been very happy with them, Mikrotik reports 4 CPUS!
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun
Has anyone tried Mikrotik on a atom board?
I noticed this
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101262
I think this would make a decent router for the price.
Your thoughts?
Nick Olsen
Brevard Wireless
(321) 205-1100 x106
It's x86 so it should work.
Doesn't have RAM, you'll need to buy that.
It has Realtek NICs. Worst things in the world. Linux hates them
especially.
However much faith you want to put in SuperMicro is up to you - I have no
experience.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
Yes, that unit would work well for a small MT router. Probably about the
equivalent of the RB1000 (but only with 2 FE ports).
Travis
Microserv
Nick Olsen wrote:
Has anyone tried Mikrotik on a atom board?
I noticed this
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101262
I
n...@brevardwireless.com, WISPA General
List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT on Atom
It's x86 so it should work.
Doesn't have RAM, you'll need to buy that.
It has Realtek NICs. Worst things in the world. Linux hates them
especially.
However much faith you want to put in SuperMicro
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:10 -0600, Travis Johnson wrote:
Probably about the equivalent of the RB1000 (but only
with 2 FE ports).
About the equivalent of the rb1000? You gotta be kidding! RB1000 is
1.3GHz SINGLE CORE cpu. That one is 1.6GHz Dual-core. It'll be a LOT
more different than
Atom versus PPC though...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Butch Evans
: Thursday, October 15, 2009 8:49 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT on Atom
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:10 -0600, Travis Johnson wrote:
Probably about the equivalent of the RB1000 (but only
with 2 FE ports).
About the equivalent of the rb1000? You gotta be kidding
From: Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 8:49 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT on Atom
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:10 -0600, Travis Johnson wrote:
Probably about the equivalent of the RB1000
In our bench testing, the RB1000 actually performs very well. You can't
just compare CPU's (as I'm sure you know). The RB1000 was designed from
the ground up to move packets. The Atom CPU was designed as an
inexpensive computer system.
I think I have a dual-core 1.6ghz Atom board and CPU
, 2009 12:09 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT on Atom
In our bench testing, the RB1000 actually performs very well. You can't
just compare CPU's (as I'm sure you know). The RB1000 was designed from
the ground up to move packets. The Atom CPU was designed
-1100 x106
From: Travis Johnson t...@ida.net
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 12:09 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT on Atom
In our bench testing, the RB1000 actually performs very well. You can't
just compare
The price lol
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
Original Message
From: Travis Johnson t...@ida.net
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 12:09 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT on Atom
...@believewireless.net p...@believewireless.net
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 12:49 AM
To: n...@brevardwireless.com n...@brevardwireless.com, WISPA General
List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT on Atom
If you are doing BGP, I will take a dual core CPU over a single core
even if it's slower
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 21:18 -0400, Nick Olsen wrote:
My ignorance may be showing, but by 2xFE i assume you mean 2 fast ethernet
adapters ie 10/100
both the adapters on that supermicro are Gig (10/100/1000)
Perhaps I misread the specs.
--
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 22:09 -0600, Travis Johnson wrote:
In our bench testing, the RB1000 actually performs very well. You
can't just compare CPU's (as I'm sure you know). The RB1000 was
designed from the ground up to move packets. The Atom CPU was designed
as an inexpensive computer system.
19 matches
Mail list logo
