The manual says 2 days. But it depends on altitude and ambient temperature.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:30 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MikroTik
back to N-Male so its not an issue.
George
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 10:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MikroTik N- 52 Mbits in a 20MHz channel
Hi,
How similar
Nothing complicated. This link is 48.23 Kilometres.
Just using Nstreme with polling, exact size 3200.
The key seems to be clean spectrum, a decent signal level (about -57 in this
particular case), and a 411AH/XR-5 to get enough horsepower.
We are running 3.30 Wireless Test. The Wireless Test
Hi,
How similar are the Rocketdishes compared with the PacWireless dishes?
We have over 100 of the Pac dishes, so I am just wondering how they
compare as far as mounting, build, alignment, etc.?
Travis
Microserv
George Morris wrote:
Thought this might be interesting.
This is a live
The whole time the RDP session will stay connected and functional.
Are you sure it's functional? I expect it probably isn't usable while the
pings stop just like browsing isn't capable.
What are you pinging from/to?
Do you have the Tranzeo fix applied to your CPEs as you're using a Mikrotik
.
Mark McElvy
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 5:33 PM
To: Mikrotik discussions
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] Frustrating connectivity issues
@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] Frustrating connectivity issues.
The whole time the RDP session will stay connected and functional.
Are you sure it's functional? I expect it probably isn't usable while the
pings stop just like browsing isn't capable.
What are you pinging from/to?
Do
I want to run RouterOS on an x86 machine between a satellite internet
connection and a small wireless network (about 20 users) so that I can
give one group of users more bandwidth and another group of users less
bandwidth. It's also important that the bandwidth usage within a group
be
Of os10ru...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 8:23 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik consultant/help
I want to run RouterOS on an x86 machine between a satellite internet
connection and a small wireless network (about 20 users) so that I can
give one group of users more
AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik consultant/help
I want to run RouterOS on an x86 machine between a satellite internet
connection and a small wireless network (about 20 users) so that I can
give one group of users more bandwidth and another group of users less
bandwidth
Precision Data Solutions, LLC
(317) 831-3000 x200
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 8:23 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik consultant/help
I want
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 8:23 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik consultant/help
I want to run RouterOS on an x86 machine between a satellite internet
connection and a small wireless network (about 20 users) so that I can
give one group of users more bandwidth and another
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 8:23 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik consultant/help
I want to run RouterOS on an x86 machine between a satellite internet
Scott,
There is a Mikrotik list. QuickLink Wireless joined as a vendor member
and sponsored the list last week. I'll check into why it isn't showing
up on the mailing lists page.
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Gerard
Scott Reed wrote:
Are you sure there is Mikrotik list?
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik consultant/help
Scott,
There is a Mikrotik list. QuickLink Wireless joined as a vendor member
and sponsored the list last week. I'll check into why it isn't showing
up on the mailing lists page.
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Gerard
I got signed up. Thanks
Gerard Dupont III wrote:
Scott,
There is a Mikrotik list. QuickLink Wireless joined as a vendor member
and sponsored the list last week. I'll check into why it isn't showing
up on the mailing lists page.
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Gerard
, September 24, 2009 9:50 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Weirdness!?
Ok,
Im going bonkers. We are getting ping drops from our Mikrotik devices to
the other. Our main router is PC based with one of those 4 port RB cards
in it. Starting the other day out of the blue the net started acting funky
September 2009 17:51
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Weirdness!?
Ok,
Im going bonkers. We are getting ping drops from our Mikrotik devices to the
other. Our main router is PC based with one of those 4 port RB cards in it.
Starting the other day out of the blue the net started
Force the eth to 10M and see how it changes things.
sa...@michianawireless.com wrote:
Ok,
Im going bonkers. We are getting ping drops from our Mikrotik devices to the
other. Our main router is PC based with one of those 4 port RB cards in it.
Starting the other day out of the blue the net
Ok,
Im going bonkers. We are getting ping drops from our Mikrotik devices to the
other. Our main router is PC based with one of those 4 port RB cards in it.
Starting the other day out of the blue the net started acting funky and we were
getting large pauses. So I started pinging. Get ping loss
Ok,
Im going bonkers. We are getting ping drops from our Mikrotik devices to the
other. Our main router is PC based with one of those 4 port RB cards in it.
Starting the other day out of the blue the net started acting funky and we were
getting large pauses. So I started pinging. Get ping loss
...@michianawireless.com
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:50:45
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Weirdness!?
Ok,
Im going bonkers. We are getting ping drops from our Mikrotik devices to the
other. Our main router is PC based with one of those 4 port RB cards
injector like our poe-in-w.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: sa...@michianawireless.com
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:50:45
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Weirdness!?
Ok,
Im going bonkers. We are getting ping drops from
To: e...@wisp-router.com e...@wisp-router.com, WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Weirdness!?
You've looked into CPU load and firewall stuff, right?
I too would try a new POE - only $20 to help find out.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100
Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental
speeddegradetp Zero then drop- repeat.
WDS and nstreme can be used with wireless-test I hear. Before
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental
speeddegradetp Zero then drop- repeat.
WDS and nstreme can be used with wireless-test I hear. Before that it was
not workable at all.
Any load seems to kill your links - that has to be kept on mind.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937
Anyone else had a chance to play with MPLS much on the mikrotiks?
Having read the wiki article* about using MPLS to bridge two networks
(instead of WDS or EoIP) I have tried it on a new link I put up. So far
so good. I think I need to play with the MTU settings a bit more to
optimize it.
17, 2009 12:18 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik load balancing ( was backhaul choices )
Anyone else had a chance to play with MPLS much on the mikrotiks?
Having read the wiki article* about using MPLS to bridge two networks
(instead of WDS or EoIP) I
Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
Original Message
From: Randy Cosby dco...@infowest.com
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:18 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik load balancing ( was backhaul choices )
Anyone else had a chance to play
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik load balancing ( was backhaul choices )
Just curious - what routerboards are you using? Are you bridging vlans
across the link?
Randy
Scott Carullo wrote:
I've been using for bridging with the N hardware without issue (knock
knock)
Not sure about dual
...@brevardwireless.com; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik load balancing ( was backhaul choices )
Just curious - what routerboards are you using? Are you bridging vlans
across the link?
Randy
Scott Carullo wrote:
I've been using for bridging with the N hardware without issue
: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik load balancing ( was backhaul choices )
Friends don't let Friends Bridge Networks! ARG! LOL
---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org
Link Technologies, Inc
Message -
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental speed
degradetp Zero then drop- repeat.
Well your problem reminded me of wds + nstreme
, September 16, 2009 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental speed
degradetp Zero then drop- repeat.
Well your problem reminded me of wds + nstreme problem is why I
brought it up. I believe wireless-test will fix this.
Any way you could test the links
.
Tom S.
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental speed degrade
tpZero then drop- repeat.
I have a problem with Mikrotik
wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental speed degrade
tpZero then drop- repeat.
I have a problem with Mikrotik I have not been able to solve. Wondering if
anyone has
Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Tom Sharples tsharp...@qorvus.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 2:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental speed
degradetpZero then drop- repeat.
Maybe just bad
motherboard
(an
Alix) fixed it. Haven't gotten it back yet so don't know which went
bad.
Tom S.
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik
a few odd issues as well.
Mac
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 9:15 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental
You're not using nstreme are you?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Tom
, 2009 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental speed
degradetp Zero then drop- repeat.
You're not using nstreme are you?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental speed
degradetp Zero then drop- repeat.
You're not using nstreme are you?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy
I had this with XR9's. Replace the XR9 on sub B.
Tom DeReggi wrote:
I have a problem with Mikrotik I have not been able to solve. Wondering if
anyone has any insight.
A summary config is
I have a 433AH setup as AP with 1 XR900 and 1 R5H (5.8Ghz). The Cat5
Ethernet port goes to a
I have a problem with Mikrotik I have not been able to solve. Wondering if
anyone has any insight.
A summary config is
I have a 433AH setup as AP with 1 XR900 and 1 R5H (5.8Ghz). The Cat5
Ethernet port goes to a SMC VLAN switch, where the SMC tags and untags VLAN
ID, and continues to the
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:10:19
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Processor Load
I checked all of this before posting. That is the reason for the
original question about how to see processor load. I was hoping
someone
would know that Mikrotik had
, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Scott Reed scottr...@onlyinternet.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 7:24 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Processor Load
Anyone know an easy way to figure out what
the tool to view
the content of the .rif file.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Scott Reed scottr...@onlyinternet.net
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:10:19
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Processor Load
I checked all
to view the content of the .rif file.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Scott Reed scottr...@onlyinternet.net
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:10:19
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Processor Load
I checked all of this before
:10:19
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Processor Load
I checked all of this before posting. That is the reason for the
original question about how to see processor load. I was hoping someone
would know that Mikrotik had provided something like top
Anyone know an easy way to figure out what a 532 with 2 PtP links on it
would be running at 80+%? No queues, no filters. Moving about 2Mbps
from the 2 backhauls down the wire.
--
Scott Reed
Sr. Systems Engineer
GAB Midwest
1-800-363-1544 x4000
Cell: 260-273-7239
Connection tracking? Do you have all of the extra packages you don't
use disabled? I've seen this once with web proxy enabled and someone
using it to send spam.
-Kevin
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Scott Reedscottr...@onlyinternet.net wrote:
Anyone know an easy way to figure out what a 532
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 7:24 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Processor Load
Anyone know an easy way to figure out what a 532 with 2 PtP links on it
would be running at 80+%? No queues, no filters. Moving about 2Mbps
from the 2 backhauls down
I need a backhaul link outside of 2.4 and 5.8. If I put together a Mikrotik
system, say an RB600 with an Xr3 and put a 20db Grid on each end would that
be legal? Admittedly I'm not up to speed on what is and is not allowed in
3650 as far as power output, etc etc. This would be a short backhaul
I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80 are what I am
going to do.
I do know it works, though. You have to find the cable that matches
5.8 frequency in MT to 3.65 in actual output. No support by MT (or
even as much as an answer to my questions).
On 8/20/09, Jason Hensley
: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80 are what I am
going to do.
I do know it works, though. You have to find the cable that matches
5.8 frequency in MT to 3.65 in actual output. No support by MT (or
even as much as an answer to my questions).
On 8
On Thu, August 20, 2009 2:51 pm, Jason Hensley wrote:
I know it works, but will the FCC come crashing down on me if they find
out
I have these in place?
As long as you're licensed (just a couple hundred bucks), and every 3650
endpoint is registered with the FCC (you have to register not just
-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80 are what I am
going to do.
I do know it works, though. You have to find the cable
is just a little tight right
now and I've GOT to do something about my primary backhaul.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA
Any reason you're avoiding MT with 3.65?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I personally am avoiding 3.65
I think that should read table, not cable.
Josh Luthman wrote:
I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80 are what I am
going to do.
I do know it works, though. You have to find the cable that matches
5.8 frequency in MT to 3.65 in actual output. No support by MT (or
even as
-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80 are what I am
going to do.
I do know
: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I think I listed all my reasons.
No support from anyone on it
MT doesn't get the channel right (small but on a bad day big)
Poor bang/buck - Ligowave is best here IMO
On 8/20/09, Jason Hensley ja...@jaggartech.com wrote:
Any reason you're avoiding MT with 3.65
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I think I listed all my reasons.
No support from anyone on it
MT doesn't get the channel right (small
Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I think I listed all my reasons.
No support from anyone on it
MT doesn't get
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 11:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
You're correct with the liability thing... it sucks that people sue over
such petty things.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent
: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
Slander only applies if it is untrue. Stating a fact, regardless of how
embarrassing it is would not be slander. When your bank places a
foreclosure notice on your house because you haven't paid your mortgage
you don't get to sue. As was stated earlier, dish network
a n
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 11:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
You're correct with the liability thing... it sucks
...@michianawireless.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 4:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
Well. We kinda do this now. When a customer get to far out. We manually add
a rule to the router at the tower site he is connected to that redirects all
his port 80 traffic
, 2009 6:38 PM
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
There is some potential liability in this.
You don't know if friends are visiting and using the computer...or, the
subscriber has an Wi-Fi w/o WAP/WEP and others are (potentially
accidentally) using
] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 10:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
You're correct with the liability thing... it sucks that people sue
over
such petty things.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http
minutes until they call.
...just a further thought.
. . . j o n a t h a n
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 11:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik
If it is BillMax, it is also easy. Don't know about others.
Butch Evans wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 07:24 -0700, Chuck Profito wrote:
It sounds like wisp nirvana! Do you mind me asking what billing system you
are using, and are you trying to integrate the same? Can Butch Evans write a
Don't mean to start a flame war...so please don't...
This whole idea/feature is native with Powercode.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 14:27 -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
Don't mean to start a flame war...so please don't...
This whole idea/feature is native with Powercode.
Flame on, buddy! :-)
You are correct. Flexibility such as we are discussing is part of many
packages. The difference with PowerCode
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 11:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
You're correct with the liability thing... it sucks that people
sue over
such petty things.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 11:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
You're correct with the liability thing... it sucks that people sue
-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of sa...@michianawireless.com
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 7:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
What I am attempting to do is setup a script to put on the client
routerboard when
from
any computer.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Cheney
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 8:00 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
sa...@michianawireless.com wrote:
Really did not work
: Monday, August 10, 2009 6:05 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
Yepp bit expected. Because a web page consists of multiple images most of
the time and if you use every nth you never know if that rule will then hit
a icon, text page or picture file that is retrieved
bill page until paid.
I hope that explains it better.
Thanks,
John
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Profito cprof...@cv-access.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:45:59 AM GMT -05:00 Columbia
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
Why not just
: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 6:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
Well. We kinda do this now. When a customer get to far out. We manually
add a rule to the router at the tower site he is connected to that
redirects all his port 80 traffic to a webpage that says
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
Well. We kinda do this now. When a customer get to far out. We manually
add a rule to the router at the tower site he is connected to that
redirects all his port 80 traffic to a webpage that says basically, You
didn't pay you bill for a long time and you
on it
like Don't you to be an idiot and deadbeat like these morons.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: sa...@michianawireless.com
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:49:06
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
Hmm,
Well
List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
Hmm,
Well anything is possible, I guess. But I do not see how alerting a
customer that his account went past due and presenting the option to pay
it now, is slandering. If his account is past
What I am attempting to do is setup a script to put on the client routerboard
when there account becomes 30+ days behind. This script will occasionally
redirect the clients web browser to a notice page that lets them know there
account is past due and offer a payment page. If they refresh they
sa...@michianawireless.com wrote:
Really did not work as planned. Occasionally I would get the page at the
1.2.3.4 server but most of the time I would get broken links and partially
displayed pages?
Well, I can tell you why this is happening. Remember that each image,
each CSS/Javascript
I used to do what you did, but it resulted in many errors on the page as
you encountered. Using the web proxy works better but still won't solve
your problem completely.
This will redirect all 'deadbeats' to the web proxy, which will then
only allow them to your website.
/ip firewall
I am going to setup a mt 493ah for load balancing, and I see where to setup
check for def gw for internet up. How can I set it for checking something
other than def gw, something past the def gw? I posted on mt forum, but no
response yet..Thanks for any help..
Alan
: Alan Long alan.l...@aerowire.net
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 5:23 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] mikrotik how to check something other than def gw for link
up
I am going to setup a mt 493ah for load balancing, and I see where to
setup
check for def gw
Make a sys script that pings...4.2.2.2
Now make a route that sets the gateway for the primary interface when
the destination is 4.2.2.2
Normally it is best to pick a few hops away in that ISP.
On 8/3/09, Alan Long alan.l...@aerowire.net wrote:
I am going to setup a mt 493ah for load balancing,
.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik FCC
Lets not forget the rules may not be the same
, 2009 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik FCC
On May 12, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Scott Carullo wrote:
Ok... so back to original dilemma...
I take a XR5, the precise antenna they certified with this radio
card, a
RB411 and hook it all up and use it myself within FCC RF guidelines.
Criminal
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kevin Neal
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:14 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik OSPF question
Subject changed to help with filters. :)
Do you have both /30's
]on
Behalf Of rea...@muddyfrogwater.us
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 2:30 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik FCC
Nonsense, Matt.
Read the grant yourself. The grant is MODULAR certification, meaning you
can use the module in any way you choose, so long as you lable the device
Let me muddy the waters a bit more with an interesting thread:
http://ubnt.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8556highlight=fcc
"WTH" seems to be pretty knowledgeable and quotes chapter and verse to
back himself up. His arguments are largely based on the "professional
installation" rules in part-15.
@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik FCC
On another note. To do a FCC certification of a radio it's not just to do
the testing. Either you have to have approval from the original certifier
to reuse their cert filing to create a new FCC id to which you add your
antennas that been tested. Or you
General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik FCC
First, you have to be a distributor of MT to be able to certify. It has
to be a certified system, as well has to have all of the images, text
etc on it as well. You can only get those if you are a MT distributor
, May 11, 2009 3:43 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik FCC
First, you have to be a distributor of MT to be able to certify. It has
to be a certified system, as well has to have all of the images, text
etc on it as well. You can only get those if you
Do you see this differently?
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
Original Message
From: Dennis Burgess - Linktechs dmburg...@linktechs.net
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 3:43 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik
PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik FCC
Old thread, but just curious where this has progressed. I've seen
that
JeffSoHoCo has certified gear. Is that based on the same Mikrotik
program you describe here Mac? Is that information available from
Mikrotik
501 - 600 of 928 matches
Mail list logo
