After reading this, it becomes very obvious this person does not have a
clue? (Or should I say, he is owned by the telcos?)
wispa wrote:
You can take his views however you wish... But NN legislation is probably on
the way, and this could get real ugly...REAL ugly real fast. When DC takes
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 10:52:54 -0500, Tim Wolfe wrote
After reading this, it becomes very obvious this person does not
have a clue? (Or should I say, he is owned by the telcos?)
Now, let's not fall into this trap, of saying that everyone who doesn't
advocate NN in any and every form is owned by
Mark your calendars folks, me and Mark K are in agreement for once.
Those who support Net Neutrality without exception have never had to
track, isolate and repair infected PCs spewing out spam or replicative
exploits to the masses. We should have a right to decide what we allow
on our
http://ftc.gov/opp/workshops/broadband/index.html
If anyone is really interested in what the big boys have to say and how
each side looks at things.
I watched this last weekend, was interesting.
George
John Scrivner wrote:
Mark your calendars folks, me and Mark K are in agreement for once.
Panel 3 might get to the point quicker.
It's titled:
Discrimination, Blockage, and Vertical Integration
George Rogato wrote:
http://ftc.gov/opp/workshops/broadband/index.html
If anyone is really interested in what the big boys have to say and how
each side looks at things.
I watched this
You can take his views however you wish... But NN legislation is probably on
the way, and this could get real ugly...REAL ugly real fast. When DC takes
on a problem, whether or not it really exists, it turns political
instantly, and we could be the ones that get whipsawed.
