Broadwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 1:46 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Optimally taking advantage of GB Ethernet
Hi Tom,
Well that's where I disagree. And where I am looking for clarification.
We were NOT using
Hi Tom,
> Well that's where I disagree. And where I am looking for clarification.
> We were NOT using systems with Buses limited to 32bit/33Mhz or Basic PCI.
The routers that we used for testing were using the Intel 7501 chipset,
spec'd at allowing 3GB of throughput, and PCI-X Bus.
> There are a
Jeff,
The solution is simply a hardware upgrade for starters. A 32-bit/33 MHz
bus
will top out around 200 Mbps. If you look for a bus with higher speed
slots, you can triple your throughput without adjusting ANYTHING in your
Linux kernel.
Well thats where I disagree. And where I am looking
Hi Tom,
Comments inline below:
> The problem is that most Internet and subscriber traffic is using a
1500MTU or smaller frame. So in theory, its would be just as efficient and
fast to bond two 100 mbps fiber connections than it would to buy 1- 1GB
fiber connection.
No, it wouldn't be.
> So t
1GB Fiber is typically using Packet over SONET.
I have typically seen over 500 mbps on these links, even from Telcove/L3.
But the distance is usually a factor.
Running from NoLa to ATL on a long-haul, single hop 1GB fiber run
introduces lots of regen issues, so 500 mbps would be a blessing.
Mo
Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Optimally taking advantage of GB Ethernet
Understand a major difference
AT&T for exa
DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Belton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 11:50 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Optimally taking advanta
end user custoemr base is smart enough to know the
difference.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 200
about?
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 10:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Optimally taking advantage of GB Ethernet
Tom,
How are the "big boys" doing it?
Tom,
How are the "big boys" doing it? Surely AT&T and others are transporting
more than 200Mbps across their 1GB fiber links.
Travis
Microserv
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Gigabit Ethernet, can pass 1 gbps when it uses greater than a 9600 MTU
frame.
But with a 1500MTU frame, it can barely pass 200 mb
Gigabit Ethernet, can pass 1 gbps when it uses greater than a 9600 MTU
frame.
But with a 1500MTU frame, it can barely pass 200 mbps.
The problem is that most Internet and subscriber traffic is using a 1500MTU
or smaller frame.
So in theory, its would be just as efficient and fast to bond two 100
11 matches
Mail list logo
