I figured the 1:1 was what would have to happen. Since that ties up a
public address, we charge for it. He wasn't real keen on that.
Yes, we have 100+ customers per NATted public IP address.
On 12/28/2010 11:10 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
The only way to make it Open is to 1:1 NAT or make it
Another reason why you don't NAT at the border.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 12/28/2010 6:57 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
Well now I don't think I can do that to the one customer since the NAT
is at the border. Then all the other customers would call
My XBox has had Open NAT since 2.9.x. You just forward port 3074 (I
think that's the port) to the XBox's IP.
Newer versions (I forget the starting version) will do uPNP with
multiple XBoxes.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 12/28/2010 7:04 PM,
4.6 in Mikrotik
On Dec 29, 2010 7:59 AM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote:
My XBox has had Open NAT since 2.9.x. You just forward port 3074 (I
think that's the port) to the XBox's IP.
Newer versions (I forget the starting version) will do uPNP with
multiple XBoxes.
-
Mike
Doesn't UPnP require the NAT device be the next upstream device?
On 12/29/2010 7:59 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
My XBox has had Open NAT since 2.9.x. You just forward port 3074 (I
think that's the port) to the XBox's IP.
Newer versions (I forget the starting version) will do uPNP with
multiple
I would assume so.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 12/29/2010 8:23 AM, Scott Reed wrote:
Doesn't UPnP require the NAT device be the next upstream device?
On 12/29/2010 7:59 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
My XBox has had Open NAT since 2.9.x. You just
Yes
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.netwrote:
I would assume so.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 12/29/2010
I NAT at the border just fine. It is 1:1 and not 100:1 however. I
provide the first public free, the next (for 2+ consoles) is extra. I
wish IPv6 was moving faster.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote:
Another reason why you don't NAT at the border.
I know someone posted a link to an excellent description of Microsoft's
definition of restrict NAT, etc.
I can not find that link. Would someone please remind me where to look.
--
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays Networking, LLC
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
Not the best description, but
http://forum.teamxbox.com/showthread.php?t=451043
I know the post you are talking about, but I can't seem to find it either.
On 12/28/10 4:43 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
I know someone posted a link to an excellent description of Microsoft's
definition of restrict NAT,
Since we have all ports open, well at least the ones described in
anything I can find about XBox NAT, and NAT at the border, why would
customers not have open NAT?
On 12/28/2010 7:03 PM, Sam Tetherow wrote:
Not the best description, but
http://forum.teamxbox.com/showthread.php?t=451043
I
Did you PAT to the xbox? Ie if a packet is sent to the customers ip seen by
the world, would it hit the xbox?
On Dec 28, 2010 7:08 PM, Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
Since we have all ports open, well at least the ones described in
anything I can find about XBox NAT, and NAT at the border,
Since we NAT at the border, a packet sent to the address/port
combination will get to the customer XBox. They are using a switch on
the inside.
On 12/28/2010 7:13 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Did you PAT to the xbox? Ie if a packet is sent to the customers ip
seen by the world, would it hit the
Then you will need to port forward 3074 to the xbox. Obviously limited to 1
that way.
On Dec 28, 2010 7:16 PM, Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
Since we NAT at the border, a packet sent to the address/port
combination will get to the customer XBox. They are using a switch on
the inside.
On
On Dec 28, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
I know someone posted a link to an excellent description of Microsoft's
definition of restrict NAT, etc.
I can not find that link. Would someone please remind me where to look.
http://www.xbox.com/en-US/Live/EngineeringBlog/NATs-and-xbox-live
Well now I don't think I can do that to the one customer since the NAT
is at the border. Then all the other customers would call because their
game doesn't work.
And that customer has a least 2 units.
On 12/28/2010 7:19 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Then you will need to port forward 3074 to the
That's my point. I am pretty sure you can dstnat and the other xbox will
stay closed/restricted NAT.
On Dec 28, 2010 7:57 PM, Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
Well now I don't think I can do that to the one customer since the NAT
is at the border. Then all the other customers would call
Thank you, Blake. That is the one. After the memory refresh, I still
have one question. The router doing the NAT is a Mikrotik running
3.30. Is there a way to make it do Open NAT?
On 12/28/2010 7:41 PM, Blake Covarrubias wrote:
On Dec 28, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
I know
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] XBOX Restricted NAT Reminder
I know someone posted a link to an excellent description of Microsoft's
definition of restrict NAT, etc.
I can not find that link. Would someone please remind me where to look.
--
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays Networking, LLC
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Reed
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 5:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] XBOX Restricted NAT Reminder
I know someone posted a link to an excellent description of Microsoft's
definition of restrict NAT, etc.
I can not find
The only way to make it Open is to 1:1 NAT or make it the default for
all packets on their NAT IP. I nat at the border and just assign
another IP and do subnet:1 NAt and then make the console the default.
Do you have more then 1 customer per NAT IP??
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Scott Reed
21 matches
Mail list logo
