s...@unidata.com.ua
*Sent*: Sunday, September 05, 2010 3:50 PM
*To*: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
*Subject*: Re: [WISPA] mikrotik vs ubiquiti
2010/9/5 Jeromie Reeves jree...@18-30chat.net
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Vyacheslav Vasilyev s...@unidata.com.ua
wrote:
What
2010/9/5 Jeromie Reeves jree...@18-30chat.net
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Vyacheslav Vasilyev s...@unidata.com.ua
wrote:
Airmax was on or off? What were the single direction speeds for each?
In all Rocket ptp link tests Airmax is off.
Rocket
-max simplex ( one direction) throughput
We tested TDMA freebsd Sam Lefler MAC 802.11a implementation .at the
simular platform ( Alix, CM9) . It also has poor throughput at small
packet size ( but much better then standard 802,11a) and it is may be
improved by using more powerfull h/w.
Sorry freebsd8 tdma Sam 802.11a
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Vyacheslav Vasilyev s...@unidata.com.ua wrote:
2010/9/5 Jeromie Reeves jree...@18-30chat.net
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Vyacheslav Vasilyev s...@unidata.com.ua
wrote:
Airmax was on or off? What were the single direction speeds for each?
In all Rocket
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 14:15 -0700, Forbes Mercy wrote:
I keep adding filters as traffic presents itself but help and
training is very expensive and extraordinarily technical
While I would disagree that training is very expensive, I would have
to agree that it is very technical in nature. My
2010/9/5 Jeromie Reeves jree...@18-30chat.net
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Vyacheslav Vasilyev s...@unidata.com.ua
wrote:
What is a Rockets PPS with airmax on?
Ubnt does not recomend to use Airmax On in ptp due to lower performance. We
did not test it.
Ubnt , MT and any other
] mikrotik vs ubiquiti
2010/9/5 Jeromie Reeves jree...@18-30chat.net
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Vyacheslav Vasilyev s...@unidata.com.ua
wrote:
What is a Rockets PPS with airmax on?
Ubnt does not recomend to use Airmax On in ptp due to lower performance.
We did not test it.
Ubnt , MT
...@unidata.com.ua
Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 3:50 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mikrotik vs ubiquiti
2010/9/5 Jeromie Reeves jree...@18-30chat.net
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Vyacheslav Vasilyev s...@unidata.com.ua
wrote:
What is a Rockets PPS
...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Carullo
Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 6:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mikrotik vs ubiquiti
I'm not sure your assessment of UBNT not recommending to use airmax on PTP
as a general statement hold true. It is unlikely that they would have built
: [WISPA] mikrotik vs ubiquiti
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 14:15 -0700, Forbes Mercy wrote:
I keep adding filters as traffic presents itself but help and training
is very expensive and extraordinarily technical
While I would disagree that training is very expensive, I would have to
agree that it is very
I did not mean to sound like i was saying anything bad about MT. Their
NStream simply did not work for me and I did not have time to speed
weeks working it out. I love my MT firewalls. I have two issues with
the setup, once a month or two, DNS 'goes loopy' and I ahve to reboot
the router. This
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mikrotik vs ubiquiti
We are already there. I am firmly locked into Ubnt airmax. I tried MT's
NStream, it did not work well for me. I am
Yes we are using Ubiquiti instead of Mikrotik.
We always have, because we will not build our own uncertified gear. If it
comes down to an interference issue we do not want the FCC fine or the
stigma of being nailed for violating FCC rules.
That said, we like the routerboards pretty well for use
-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mikrotik vs ubiquiti
We are already there. I am firmly locked into Ubnt airmax. I tried MT's
NStream
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mikrotik vs ubiquiti
We are already there. I am firmly locked into Ubnt airmax. I tried MT's
NStream, it did not work well for me. I am seeing enough 5ghz noise that I
need airmax (or something like it). I was this close to going back to
canopy only
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mikrotik vs ubiquiti
We are already there. I am firmly locked into Ubnt airmax. I tried MT's
NStream, it did not work well for me. I am seeing enough 5ghz noise that I
need airmax (or something like it). I was this close to going back to
canopy only
To each their own... we use 100% MT on our backbone (over 70
production links, some up to 73 miles). We are fully routed (even on
each wireless hop), so using MT works great because I don't have to have
a separate router like if I used UBNT. I have full telnet, speed test,
packet sniffing,
Got to love this, a simple question about a comparison of 802.11n
performance on the two platforms turns into a tirade of primary school
'pissing contest' !
No ONE is trying to dis any platform... and hopefully we all are mature
enough to understand that ...
Mikrotik is a great routing
I like MT for APs but Ubnt for CPEs and ptp.
On Sep 4, 2010 11:52 AM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
Got to love this, a simple question about a comparison of 802.11n
performance on the two platforms turns into a tirade of primary school
'pissing contest' !
No ONE is trying to dis
can tell!
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Data Technology
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 4:50 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] mikrotik vs ubiquiti
I think that several of you are using Ubiquiti AirMax
Be lucky you didn't throw Motorola in the mix..
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 11:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mikrotik vs ubiquiti
Got
: Saturday, September 04, 2010 11:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mikrotik vs ubiquiti
Got to love this, a simple question about a comparison of 802.11n
performance on the two platforms turns into a tirade of primary school
'pissing contest' !
No ONE is trying to dis any
We have tested RB 411AH, (AR7161 680MHz, RAM 64 MB), miniPCI R52Hn (AR9220
802.11n, OS Mikrotik v.4.6 and UNBT Rocket M5 (Atheros MIPS 24KC, 400MHz)
1) LAB tests (connection via coax cable with attenuators)
-max duplex throughput (iperf udp, 1470 bytes payload ) in 20 MHz channel
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Vyacheslav Vasilyev s...@unidata.com.ua wrote:
We have tested RB 411AH, (AR7161 680MHz, RAM 64 MB), miniPCI R52Hn (AR9220
802.11n, OS Mikrotik v.4.6 and UNBT Rocket M5 (Atheros MIPS 24KC, 400MHz)
1) LAB tests (connection via coax cable with attenuators)
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mikrotik vs ubiquiti
We have tested RB 411AH, (AR7161 680MHz, RAM 64 MB), miniPCI R52Hn
(AR9220 802.11n, OS Mikrotik v.4.6 and UNBT Rocket M5 (Atheros MIPS 24KC,
400MHz)
1) LAB tests (connection via coax cable with attenuators)
-max duplex throughput (iperf udp, 1470
I think that several of you are using Ubiquiti AirMax Rocket now
instead of Mikrotik.
I would like to know how they compare:
1. As a point to point link.
2. As an access point.
Right now I only use Mikrotik for links and AP's and I use Ubiquiti for cpe.
I am ready to install
We have not used Mikrotik for wireless, but are using UBNT for Radios
Mikrotik for routing ...
While your concerns are valid, we have not seen anything that would
cause us to rethink our setup. Use good quality shielded outdoor rated
cable, and Grounded Power supplies, with or without surge
LaRoy,
I'm waiting to see how Nstreme (TDMA) v2 compares on the Mikrotik. So
far it looks very promising, and could give UBNT a run for the money.
UBNT has the price advantage, but not as much configuration-ability nor
can you choose to use cheap or high quality enclosures.
Randy
On
We have recently begun deploying the Rockets as backhauls to replace our
older and less reliable StarOS links. Without exception, they have
impressed us. It has only been a few months, and they have yet to
experience winter, so the real test won't be for a while. From a pure
reliability and
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 15:50 -0500, Data Technology wrote:
I would like to know how they compare:
1. As a point to point link.
2. As an access point.
This is one of the topics we will cover in my Training Before the MUM at
the end of this month.
What are you guys seeing in the real
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 15:08 -0600, Randy Cosby wrote:
I'm waiting to see how Nstreme (TDMA) v2 compares on the Mikrotik.
Another training topic. :-) In fact, if anyone who attends the MUM
wants to do a direct comparison test, I'm game.
--
I'll weigh in here, I have almost an equal mix of Ubiquiti and Mikrotik
I'll detail each plus put a summary analogy for these and Motorola at
the end of my email. One of the things that jumps out on me is how raw
Mikrotik is, if you want to be able to write every filter, detail every
part of
We're running a few hundred customers on Mikrotik PTMP and use it for
most of our backhauls. I really like the programability of the tiks,
and we use the API's extensively. I just don't have problems and they
outperform my expectations, but it does take a bit of a learning curve.
Really
What I wish is a standardized Linux TDMA mechanisim. Not airmax nor nstreame
2, a TDMA that you can use with a cross-vendor mix. Mikrotik is a (to me the
only) router OS. Ubiquity is my major Wireless vendor, from CPE's to the XR2
that go in each Mikrotik AP. I really like Tranzeos as well
We are already there. I am firmly locked into Ubnt airmax. I tried
MT's NStream, it did not work well for me. I am seeing enough 5ghz
noise that I need airmax (or something like it). I was this close to
going back to canopy only because I knew that while slow, it would
work. If moto had wised up
, September 03, 2010 10:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mikrotik vs ubiquiti
We are already there. I am firmly locked into Ubnt airmax. I tried MT's
NStream, it did not work well for me. I am seeing enough 5ghz noise that I
need airmax (or something like it). I was this close to going
I have nothing bad to say about Mikrotik as my RB1000 firewall runs without
complaint. I also have a tower in the forest running an RB433AH with an XR9
radio that I never hear from. LOL, that reminds me of an old saying, only
I'll amend it some: If a radio in the forest fails, does anyone hear it?
37 matches
Mail list logo
