Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread John J. Thomas
General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st http://www.fcc.gov/broadband/broadband_data_faq.pdf 20. Are there penalties for not filing Form 477? Entities that are required to file Form 477 but fail to do so may be subject to the enforcement provisions of the Communications Act

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread A. Huppenthal
. John Thomas -Original Message- From: Frank Muto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 06:20 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st http://www.fcc.gov/broadband/broadband_data_faq.pdf 20. Are there penalties for not filing

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread Blair Davis
, 2006 06:20 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st http://www.fcc.gov/broadband/broadband_data_faq.pdf 20. Are there penalties for not filing Form 477? Entities that are required to file Form 477 but fail to do so may be subject to the enforcement provisions

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
- Original Message - From: John J. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 11:04 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st There has been so much talk about this, I might be inclined to help the FCC find those WISPs

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread Bob Moldashel
John J. Thomas wrote: There has been so much talk about this, I might be inclined to help the FCC find those WISPs that are snubbing their noses at the law. This is a professional list and those here should be abiding by the law. I wonder if it would be a good thing to kick out those that

RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread Chuck
AMEN ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blair Davis Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 1:39 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Do you report people to the authorities for not wearing their seat belts

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread JohnnyO
to that. If the FCC wants you, they will eventually find you. John Thomas -Original Message- From: Frank Muto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 06:20 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st http://www.fcc.gov/broadband

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-25 Thread JohnnyO
I 2nd that one Bob ! - Noone likes a lil tattle tale - I think John Thomas just let his alligator mouth overload his mockinbird butt on this one. Definitely lost my respect. JohnnyO On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 18:49 -0500, Bob Moldashel wrote: John J. Thomas wrote: There has been so much talk

Re: Fw: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-23 Thread Mario Pommier
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam - Original Message - From: "Ellen Burton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Marlon K. Schafer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:44 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

Re: Fw: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-23 Thread Mario Pommier
ruary 22, 2006 10:44 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st See #20 in the set of Form 477 FAQs that's available at http://www.fcc.gov/broadband/broadband_data_faq.html: 20. Are there penalties for not filing Form 477? Entities that are requi

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-22 Thread Dawn
: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Kurt, With all due respect I would like to ask that you not post suggestions that are blatantly against FCC regulations. In both of your messages I included below it appears you are advocating the complete disregarding of FCC regulations. I like to think

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-22 Thread Bob Moldashel
Marlon K. Schafer wrote: - Original Message - From: Bob Moldashel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:28 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Oh Marlon, Marlon, Marlon.. Hey Scott

Fw: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-22 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
/cam - Original Message - From: Ellen Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:44 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st See #20 in the set of Form 477 FAQs that's available at http://www.fcc.gov/broadband

Re: Fw: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-22 Thread Bob Moldashel
11:30 PM To: Ellen Burton Subject: Fw: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Hiya Ellen, Remember when I asked what the penalty is for not filing the 477? Got an answer for me yet? thanks! marlon - Original Message - From: Bob Moldashel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless

[WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Rick Harnish
This is a notice that the FCC Form 477 is due March 1st. The link below is for the FCC Website concerning this report. http://www.fcc.gov/broadband/data.html Also one of the FAQs concerning WISPs 8. Are Wireless Internet Service Providers (WISPs) exempt? No. Entities that provide

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Dawn
Kurt, With all due respect I would like to ask that you not post suggestions that are blatantly against FCC regulations. In both of your messages I included below it appears you are advocating the complete disregarding of FCC regulations. I like to think of the WISPA list as a professional

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Bob Moldashel
OK...OK. I agree that all should probably file. I have several partners so I am not the only one to decide so I will leave it at that as it pertains to my WISP entity. BUT...What is the penalty for not filing Does anyone know??? Can we get an official statement for this

RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Chuck
, 2006 5:20 PM To: WISPA General List; Marlon Schafer (509-982-2181) Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st OK...OK. I agree that all should probably file. I have several partners so I am not the only one to decide so I will leave it at that as it pertains to my WISP entity

RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Chuck
21, 2006 5:20 PM To: WISPA General List; Marlon Schafer (509-982-2181) Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st OK...OK. I agree that all should probably file. I have several partners so I am not the only one to decide so I will leave it at that as it pertains to my WISP entity

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Frank Muto
- Original Message - From: Bob Moldashel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org; Marlon Schafer (509-982-2181) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st OK...OK. I agree that all should probably file. I

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Bob Moldashel
Hey Scott, By no means am I attempting to dig this up again but there are 2 trains of thought that have been brought out on this list. One is to file and let the Commission know they exist and the other is to fly under the radar. Some say letting the FCC (and others) know they exist could

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Scott Reed
2006 21:28:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Hey Scott, By no means am I attempting to dig this up again but there are 2 trains of thought that have been brought out on this list. One is to file and let the Commission know they exist and the other

RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Rick Harnish
-4340 VoIP www.oibw.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Muto Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 9:21 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st http://www.fcc.gov/broadband

RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 4:20 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Kurt, With all due respect I would like to ask that you not post suggestions that are blatantly against FCC regulations. In both of your messages I included below it appears you

RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Rick Harnish
To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Hey Scott, By no means am I attempting to dig this up again but there are 2 trains of thought that have been brought out on this list. One is to file and let the Commission know they exist and the other is to fly under

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Rick Smith
Fankhauser WAVELINC 114 S. Walnut St. Bucyrus, OH 44820 419-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Rick Harnish *Sent:* Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:54 AM *To:* 'WISPA General List' *Subject:* [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
time or two but after that it shouldn't be too hard. Thoughts? marlon - Original Message - From: Rick Harnish To: 'WISPA General List' Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 12:21 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st I believe I heard a stat that 475 WISPs filled them out last

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Checking now. thanks marlon - Original Message - From: Bob Moldashel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org; Marlon Schafer (509-982-2181) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:20 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st OK...OK

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st

2006-02-21 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
- Original Message - From: Bob Moldashel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:28 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st Hey Scott, By no means am I attempting to dig this up again but there are 2 trains