RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

2006-10-04 Thread Chad Halsted
Marlon,

Just curious, have you ever had to force this issue with property
management?  I imagine this could be a difficult fight to win for a
WISP.  What happens at the end of the day when the Property Manager
tells the WISP to shove off?  Legal action?  For what, potential lost
subscribers?  


- Can property managers prevent my subscribers from having an
externally
mounted antenna?

mks:  No. OTARD covers wisps too.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:13 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Legal insight?



- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:29 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Legal insight?


This outta be a fun and interesting thread:

mks:  You are one mean drunk, Superman!

As it relates to this space, rate the following 1-10 (1 being high
priority and 10 being I could care a less) in terms of important if
you could bend the mind of top legal experts to get an opinion. Add
other questions you like answered in your reply.

mks:  I guess I'm a bit confused.  Those are not really 1 thru 10 type 
questions.  Those are questions begging answers.  I'll try to do both 
though.

Comment or add to this list:
- What good is Form 477

mks:  It's the ONLY official head count of broadband customers.  1

 and do we really need to file it?

mks:  Absolutely.  Without known customers we have NO value in the food 
chain.  The more customers we have the more power we have.  1

- Does CALEA affect me?

mks:  Still trying to figure that one out.  I've got a note in to the
FCC 
for some clarification on this issue.  3

 How? When? How do I solve it without it costing
an arm and a leg?

mks:  Not only that, but it is really any of MY buisiness what my
customers 
do on the net?  If someone thinks there's a problem with a customer,
come to 
me with a search warrent and the needed tools for the search (just like
you 
would come to my house) and have fun.  No one is going to want 
everything they've ever done on the internet saved forever.  That's the
kind 
of silly crap that the Nazis and Soviets did.  Look where it got them.
2

- What's the real risk, if any, of not using certified systems?

mks:  Realistically?  Little or no risk.  Although, under the rules
changes 
from 2005 it's pretty hard to be out of certification these days.  Power

levels, that's a whole nother issue though.  Gotta pay attention to
them!  5

- What does it mean to have a certified system in the first place?

mks:  It means that ALL of your radio gear, clear down to the cable
level, 
has made it past the FCC and is certified to work within certain
parameters. 
Note: I did NOT say work as advertized :-).  8

- Don't the revised rules allow me to make the choice about what base
station antennas I wish to use?

mks:  Yes.  3

- How is 3650 coming along and how do it look like it will shape up?

mks:  Great question.  I sure wish I could get something out of the FCC.

Sinces it's an issue on the table at this time they won't talk to me.
Will 
they change the rules that they put out for us last year?  I hope not.
1

- Does the FCC really read comments I file on anything?

mks:  Yes.  Even the late filings.  3

 How important
(and difficult) is it for me to officially voice my comments?

mks:  Within WISPA it's easy.  When we find out about issues that mater
to 
the industry we file on the issue.  We also point out EXACTLY how our 
membership can also file on the issue.  EVERYTHING that the FCC does,
rules 
wise, comes from the written reccord.  If you don't voice your thoughts
they 
CAN'T legally act on them.  And it has to be in writing, you can't just
call 
in and tell them what you want them to do.  3

- What the deal with the TV bands?

mks:  I'm loosing hope on this one.  The broadcasters are very powerful.

And they seem to be willing to pull out all of the stops on this.  Clear

down to a 60 Minutes exploding gas tank version of the truth.  And
because 
we, as an industry, aren't good at filling out our 477s we're not even
give 
pimple on the but status these days.  The current chairman at the FCC
has 
turned out to be far less of a fan of the entrepenure than Powell was
and 
that's not gonna help either.  1+

- Are there realistic options for WISPs to get licensed bands?

mks:  Not at this time.  I know people have done so.  But lets look at
the 
real numbers here.  Last I heard the latest auction raised 14 billion 
dollars.  Lets say that over the next 5 years that spectrum services,
oh, 
500,000 subscribers.  That's 28,000 per subscriber!  At a profit of $10
per 
broadband subscriber per month that gives us a 2,800 month payback on
the 
investment.  Heck, get 1,000,000 subs and it's still not gonna add up to

anything but another huge dent in the broadband rollout.  Auctions only
do 
two things.  They put money 

RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

2006-10-04 Thread Mike Bushard, Jr
When I read the otard rules it seems to me that they CAN stop you from
mounting on the roof. The only place you could mount was tenant exclusive
areas. Basically the balcony attached to the apartment.

I hope I misread it though. 

Mike Bushard, Jr
Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chad Halsted
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 2:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

Marlon,

Just curious, have you ever had to force this issue with property
management?  I imagine this could be a difficult fight to win for a
WISP.  What happens at the end of the day when the Property Manager
tells the WISP to shove off?  Legal action?  For what, potential lost
subscribers?  


- Can property managers prevent my subscribers from having an
externally
mounted antenna?

mks:  No. OTARD covers wisps too.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:13 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Legal insight?



- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:29 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Legal insight?


This outta be a fun and interesting thread:

mks:  You are one mean drunk, Superman!

As it relates to this space, rate the following 1-10 (1 being high
priority and 10 being I could care a less) in terms of important if
you could bend the mind of top legal experts to get an opinion. Add
other questions you like answered in your reply.

mks:  I guess I'm a bit confused.  Those are not really 1 thru 10 type 
questions.  Those are questions begging answers.  I'll try to do both 
though.

Comment or add to this list:
- What good is Form 477

mks:  It's the ONLY official head count of broadband customers.  1

 and do we really need to file it?

mks:  Absolutely.  Without known customers we have NO value in the food 
chain.  The more customers we have the more power we have.  1

- Does CALEA affect me?

mks:  Still trying to figure that one out.  I've got a note in to the
FCC 
for some clarification on this issue.  3

 How? When? How do I solve it without it costing
an arm and a leg?

mks:  Not only that, but it is really any of MY buisiness what my
customers 
do on the net?  If someone thinks there's a problem with a customer,
come to 
me with a search warrent and the needed tools for the search (just like
you 
would come to my house) and have fun.  No one is going to want 
everything they've ever done on the internet saved forever.  That's the
kind 
of silly crap that the Nazis and Soviets did.  Look where it got them.
2

- What's the real risk, if any, of not using certified systems?

mks:  Realistically?  Little or no risk.  Although, under the rules
changes 
from 2005 it's pretty hard to be out of certification these days.  Power

levels, that's a whole nother issue though.  Gotta pay attention to
them!  5

- What does it mean to have a certified system in the first place?

mks:  It means that ALL of your radio gear, clear down to the cable
level, 
has made it past the FCC and is certified to work within certain
parameters. 
Note: I did NOT say work as advertized :-).  8

- Don't the revised rules allow me to make the choice about what base
station antennas I wish to use?

mks:  Yes.  3

- How is 3650 coming along and how do it look like it will shape up?

mks:  Great question.  I sure wish I could get something out of the FCC.

Sinces it's an issue on the table at this time they won't talk to me.
Will 
they change the rules that they put out for us last year?  I hope not.
1

- Does the FCC really read comments I file on anything?

mks:  Yes.  Even the late filings.  3

 How important
(and difficult) is it for me to officially voice my comments?

mks:  Within WISPA it's easy.  When we find out about issues that mater
to 
the industry we file on the issue.  We also point out EXACTLY how our 
membership can also file on the issue.  EVERYTHING that the FCC does,
rules 
wise, comes from the written reccord.  If you don't voice your thoughts
they 
CAN'T legally act on them.  And it has to be in writing, you can't just
call 
in and tell them what you want them to do.  3

- What the deal with the TV bands?

mks:  I'm loosing hope on this one.  The broadcasters are very powerful.

And they seem to be willing to pull out all of the stops on this.  Clear

down to a 60 Minutes exploding gas tank version of the truth.  And
because 
we, as an industry, aren't good at filling out our 477s we're not even
give 
pimple on the but status these days.  The current chairman at the FCC
has 
turned out to be far less of a fan of the entrepenure than Powell was
and 
that's not gonna help either.  1+

- Are there realistic options for WISPs to get licensed bands?

mks:  Not at this time.  I know

Re: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

2006-10-04 Thread Matt Liotta
OTARD is all well and good, but that doesn't help you with MTUs or MDUs. 
OTARD only applies to areas of exclusive control by the tenant. That 
means common areas such as roofs of apartment and office buildings are 
not affected by OTARD.


In cases where OTARD does apply, the property manage has the burden to 
prove that it doesn't by filling with the FCC. One can quickly (and 
cheaply) get a court order forcing the issue with the landlord until the 
FCC responds.


Remember, FCC regulations trump all local jurisdictions.

-Matt

Chad Halsted wrote:

Marlon,

Just curious, have you ever had to force this issue with property
management?  I imagine this could be a difficult fight to win for a
WISP.  What happens at the end of the day when the Property Manager
tells the WISP to shove off?  Legal action?  For what, potential lost
subscribers?  



- Can property managers prevent my subscribers from having an
externally
mounted antenna?

mks:  No. OTARD covers wisps too.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:13 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Legal insight?



- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:29 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Legal insight?


This outta be a fun and interesting thread:

mks:  You are one mean drunk, Superman!

As it relates to this space, rate the following 1-10 (1 being high
priority and 10 being I could care a less) in terms of important if
you could bend the mind of top legal experts to get an opinion. Add
other questions you like answered in your reply.

mks:  I guess I'm a bit confused.  Those are not really 1 thru 10 type 
questions.  Those are questions begging answers.  I'll try to do both 
though.


Comment or add to this list:
- What good is Form 477

mks:  It's the ONLY official head count of broadband customers.  1

 and do we really need to file it?

mks:  Absolutely.  Without known customers we have NO value in the food 
chain.  The more customers we have the more power we have.  1


- Does CALEA affect me?

mks:  Still trying to figure that one out.  I've got a note in to the
FCC 
for some clarification on this issue.  3


 How? When? How do I solve it without it costing
an arm and a leg?

mks:  Not only that, but it is really any of MY buisiness what my
customers 
do on the net?  If someone thinks there's a problem with a customer,
come to 
me with a search warrent and the needed tools for the search (just like
you 
would come to my house) and have fun.  No one is going to want 
everything they've ever done on the internet saved forever.  That's the
kind 
of silly crap that the Nazis and Soviets did.  Look where it got them.

2

- What's the real risk, if any, of not using certified systems?

mks:  Realistically?  Little or no risk.  Although, under the rules
changes 
from 2005 it's pretty hard to be out of certification these days.  Power


levels, that's a whole nother issue though.  Gotta pay attention to
them!  5

- What does it mean to have a certified system in the first place?

mks:  It means that ALL of your radio gear, clear down to the cable
level, 
has made it past the FCC and is certified to work within certain
parameters. 
Note: I did NOT say work as advertized :-).  8


- Don't the revised rules allow me to make the choice about what base
station antennas I wish to use?

mks:  Yes.  3

- How is 3650 coming along and how do it look like it will shape up?

mks:  Great question.  I sure wish I could get something out of the FCC.

Sinces it's an issue on the table at this time they won't talk to me.
Will 
they change the rules that they put out for us last year?  I hope not.

1

- Does the FCC really read comments I file on anything?

mks:  Yes.  Even the late filings.  3

 How important
(and difficult) is it for me to officially voice my comments?

mks:  Within WISPA it's easy.  When we find out about issues that mater
to 
the industry we file on the issue.  We also point out EXACTLY how our 
membership can also file on the issue.  EVERYTHING that the FCC does,
rules 
wise, comes from the written reccord.  If you don't voice your thoughts
they 
CAN'T legally act on them.  And it has to be in writing, you can't just
call 
in and tell them what you want them to do.  3


- What the deal with the TV bands?

mks:  I'm loosing hope on this one.  The broadcasters are very powerful.

And they seem to be willing to pull out all of the stops on this.  Clear

down to a 60 Minutes exploding gas tank version of the truth.  And
because 
we, as an industry, aren't good at filling out our 477s we're not even
give 
pimple on the but status these days.  The current chairman at the FCC
has 
turned out to be far less of a fan of the entrepenure than Powell was
and 
that's not gonna help either.  1+


- Are there realistic options for WISPs to get 

Re: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

2006-10-04 Thread Tom DeReggi

The first thing to determine, is whether your case is covered by OTARD.
(space controlled by the tenant, and not condo). If it is, you don't fight 
it out with the property owners or homeowner associations, you just go 
install it.
You have the right to install, and then the property owner can try and fight 
it, if they want to. But the secret is to put the burden on them, and NOT 
the DELAY on you.
If confronted, hand them the OTARD papers andtell them to call the FCC if 
they have questions, and if they touch your stuff, they are violating FCC 
Federal regulations.
But the catch here is that you need to be certain you meet the requirement 
of what Otard covers.


Where the problem come in is what the value of broadband is and the value of 
time.  A home owner doesn;t want to have to be a lawyer or a protester to 
get Internet service. If they have to create a commotion, they often will 
just back out, regardless of whether they are legal allowed to deploy. 
Nobody wants hassle. So you have to keep the hassle from the subscriber.


As far as MTU building and shared space, they win the ball is in their 
court. The sooner one learns that the better. Start making friends, and 
start finding value for the property owner, because it can be a timely 
battle.  In our case it was the largest source of time spent in the company 
that was unanticipated in our early years.


So rule one, don't waste time fighting it, just follow the rules, and run 
with them.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Chad Halsted [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 3:35 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers


Marlon,

Just curious, have you ever had to force this issue with property
management?  I imagine this could be a difficult fight to win for a
WISP.  What happens at the end of the day when the Property Manager
tells the WISP to shove off?  Legal action?  For what, potential lost
subscribers?


- Can property managers prevent my subscribers from having an
externally
mounted antenna?

mks:  No. OTARD covers wisps too.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:13 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Legal insight?



- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:29 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Legal insight?


This outta be a fun and interesting thread:

mks:  You are one mean drunk, Superman!

As it relates to this space, rate the following 1-10 (1 being high
priority and 10 being I could care a less) in terms of important if
you could bend the mind of top legal experts to get an opinion. Add
other questions you like answered in your reply.

mks:  I guess I'm a bit confused.  Those are not really 1 thru 10 type
questions.  Those are questions begging answers.  I'll try to do both
though.

Comment or add to this list:
- What good is Form 477

mks:  It's the ONLY official head count of broadband customers.  1

and do we really need to file it?

mks:  Absolutely.  Without known customers we have NO value in the food
chain.  The more customers we have the more power we have.  1

- Does CALEA affect me?

mks:  Still trying to figure that one out.  I've got a note in to the
FCC
for some clarification on this issue.  3

How? When? How do I solve it without it costing
an arm and a leg?

mks:  Not only that, but it is really any of MY buisiness what my
customers
do on the net?  If someone thinks there's a problem with a customer,
come to
me with a search warrent and the needed tools for the search (just like
you
would come to my house) and have fun.  No one is going to want
everything they've ever done on the internet saved forever.  That's the
kind
of silly crap that the Nazis and Soviets did.  Look where it got them.
2

- What's the real risk, if any, of not using certified systems?

mks:  Realistically?  Little or no risk.  Although, under the rules
changes
from 2005 it's pretty hard to be out of certification these days.  Power

levels, that's a whole nother issue though.  Gotta pay attention to
them!  5

- What does it mean to have a certified system in the first place?

mks:  It means that ALL of your radio gear, clear down to the cable
level,
has made it past the FCC and is certified to work within certain
parameters.
Note: I did NOT say work as advertized :-).  8

- Don't the revised rules allow me to make the choice about what base
station antennas I wish to use?

mks:  Yes.  3

- How is 3650 coming along and how do it look like it will shape up?

mks:  Great question.  I sure wish I could get something out of the FCC.

Sinces it's an issue on the table at this time they won't talk to me.
Will
they change the rules that they put out for us last year

Re: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

2006-10-04 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
I haven't had to.  But I've heard of people pulling out the OTARD rules and 
waving them in front of landlords.


The rule originally was there for sat. services etc.  But it's been expanded 
to wisp services etc.


You are limited to areas that are exclusively in the control of the tenant. 
So, yeah, decks etc.


What you can't do, is force an AP type situation.

I've not heard of a ruling on mesh systems yet.  I'd think they'd fall under 
the rules as a broadcast site and not be covered under otard.


Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: Chad Halsted [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 12:35 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers


Marlon,

Just curious, have you ever had to force this issue with property
management?  I imagine this could be a difficult fight to win for a
WISP.  What happens at the end of the day when the Property Manager
tells the WISP to shove off?  Legal action?  For what, potential lost
subscribers?


- Can property managers prevent my subscribers from having an
externally
mounted antenna?

mks:  No. OTARD covers wisps too.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:13 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Legal insight?



- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:29 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Legal insight?


This outta be a fun and interesting thread:

mks:  You are one mean drunk, Superman!

As it relates to this space, rate the following 1-10 (1 being high
priority and 10 being I could care a less) in terms of important if
you could bend the mind of top legal experts to get an opinion. Add
other questions you like answered in your reply.

mks:  I guess I'm a bit confused.  Those are not really 1 thru 10 type
questions.  Those are questions begging answers.  I'll try to do both
though.

Comment or add to this list:
- What good is Form 477

mks:  It's the ONLY official head count of broadband customers.  1

and do we really need to file it?

mks:  Absolutely.  Without known customers we have NO value in the food
chain.  The more customers we have the more power we have.  1

- Does CALEA affect me?

mks:  Still trying to figure that one out.  I've got a note in to the
FCC
for some clarification on this issue.  3

How? When? How do I solve it without it costing
an arm and a leg?

mks:  Not only that, but it is really any of MY buisiness what my
customers
do on the net?  If someone thinks there's a problem with a customer,
come to
me with a search warrent and the needed tools for the search (just like
you
would come to my house) and have fun.  No one is going to want
everything they've ever done on the internet saved forever.  That's the
kind
of silly crap that the Nazis and Soviets did.  Look where it got them.
2

- What's the real risk, if any, of not using certified systems?

mks:  Realistically?  Little or no risk.  Although, under the rules
changes
from 2005 it's pretty hard to be out of certification these days.  Power

levels, that's a whole nother issue though.  Gotta pay attention to
them!  5

- What does it mean to have a certified system in the first place?

mks:  It means that ALL of your radio gear, clear down to the cable
level,
has made it past the FCC and is certified to work within certain
parameters.
Note: I did NOT say work as advertized :-).  8

- Don't the revised rules allow me to make the choice about what base
station antennas I wish to use?

mks:  Yes.  3

- How is 3650 coming along and how do it look like it will shape up?

mks:  Great question.  I sure wish I could get something out of the FCC.

Sinces it's an issue on the table at this time they won't talk to me.
Will
they change the rules that they put out for us last year?  I hope not.
1

- Does the FCC really read comments I file on anything?

mks:  Yes.  Even the late filings.  3

How important
(and difficult) is it for me to officially voice my comments?

mks:  Within WISPA it's easy.  When we find out about issues that mater
to
the industry we file on the issue.  We also point out EXACTLY how our
membership can also file on the issue.  EVERYTHING that the FCC does,
rules
wise, comes from the written reccord.  If you don't voice your thoughts
they
CAN'T legally act on them.  And it has to be in writing, you can't just
call
in and tell them what you want them to do.  3

- What the deal with the TV bands?

mks:  I'm loosing hope on this one.  The broadcasters are very powerful.

And they seem

RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

2006-10-04 Thread Patrick Leary
Many WISPs have fought the OTARD battle over the years. I'm not sure I
recall of one that lost if they knew the rules. OTARD is a federal act
that pre-empts state and local rules.

Patrick 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chad Halsted
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 12:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

Marlon,

Just curious, have you ever had to force this issue with property
management?  I imagine this could be a difficult fight to win for a
WISP.  What happens at the end of the day when the Property Manager
tells the WISP to shove off?  Legal action?  For what, potential lost
subscribers?  


- Can property managers prevent my subscribers from having an
externally
mounted antenna?

mks:  No. OTARD covers wisps too.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:13 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Legal insight?



- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:29 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Legal insight?


This outta be a fun and interesting thread:

mks:  You are one mean drunk, Superman!

As it relates to this space, rate the following 1-10 (1 being high
priority and 10 being I could care a less) in terms of important if
you could bend the mind of top legal experts to get an opinion. Add
other questions you like answered in your reply.

mks:  I guess I'm a bit confused.  Those are not really 1 thru 10 type 
questions.  Those are questions begging answers.  I'll try to do both 
though.

Comment or add to this list:
- What good is Form 477

mks:  It's the ONLY official head count of broadband customers.  1

 and do we really need to file it?

mks:  Absolutely.  Without known customers we have NO value in the food 
chain.  The more customers we have the more power we have.  1

- Does CALEA affect me?

mks:  Still trying to figure that one out.  I've got a note in to the
FCC 
for some clarification on this issue.  3

 How? When? How do I solve it without it costing
an arm and a leg?

mks:  Not only that, but it is really any of MY buisiness what my
customers 
do on the net?  If someone thinks there's a problem with a customer,
come to 
me with a search warrent and the needed tools for the search (just like
you 
would come to my house) and have fun.  No one is going to want 
everything they've ever done on the internet saved forever.  That's the
kind 
of silly crap that the Nazis and Soviets did.  Look where it got them.
2

- What's the real risk, if any, of not using certified systems?

mks:  Realistically?  Little or no risk.  Although, under the rules
changes 
from 2005 it's pretty hard to be out of certification these days.  Power

levels, that's a whole nother issue though.  Gotta pay attention to
them!  5

- What does it mean to have a certified system in the first place?

mks:  It means that ALL of your radio gear, clear down to the cable
level, 
has made it past the FCC and is certified to work within certain
parameters. 
Note: I did NOT say work as advertized :-).  8

- Don't the revised rules allow me to make the choice about what base
station antennas I wish to use?

mks:  Yes.  3

- How is 3650 coming along and how do it look like it will shape up?

mks:  Great question.  I sure wish I could get something out of the FCC.

Sinces it's an issue on the table at this time they won't talk to me.
Will 
they change the rules that they put out for us last year?  I hope not.
1

- Does the FCC really read comments I file on anything?

mks:  Yes.  Even the late filings.  3

 How important
(and difficult) is it for me to officially voice my comments?

mks:  Within WISPA it's easy.  When we find out about issues that mater
to 
the industry we file on the issue.  We also point out EXACTLY how our 
membership can also file on the issue.  EVERYTHING that the FCC does,
rules 
wise, comes from the written reccord.  If you don't voice your thoughts
they 
CAN'T legally act on them.  And it has to be in writing, you can't just
call 
in and tell them what you want them to do.  3

- What the deal with the TV bands?

mks:  I'm loosing hope on this one.  The broadcasters are very powerful.

And they seem to be willing to pull out all of the stops on this.  Clear

down to a 60 Minutes exploding gas tank version of the truth.  And
because 
we, as an industry, aren't good at filling out our 477s we're not even
give 
pimple on the but status these days.  The current chairman at the FCC
has 
turned out to be far less of a fan of the entrepenure than Powell was
and 
that's not gonna help either.  1+

- Are there realistic options for WISPs to get licensed bands?

mks:  Not at this time.  I know people have done so.  But lets look at
the 
real numbers here.  Last I heard the latest

RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

2006-10-04 Thread Patrick Leary
Mike, they can prevent you from roof mounting if it is a multi-tenant,
multi-floor sort of building. If your customer rents a townhouse style,
you should have access. Maybe they can prevent you from holing the roof
itself for under some loop hole that protects them from risks to the
structure, but certainly they could not prevent an eave mount. 100% they
cannot prevent a mount on a subscribers' balcony.

Here is the FCC factsheet on the issue:
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/facts/otard.html


Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Bushard, Jr
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 12:42 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

When I read the otard rules it seems to me that they CAN stop you from
mounting on the roof. The only place you could mount was tenant
exclusive
areas. Basically the balcony attached to the apartment.

I hope I misread it though. 

Mike Bushard, Jr
Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chad Halsted
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 2:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

Marlon,

Just curious, have you ever had to force this issue with property
management?  I imagine this could be a difficult fight to win for a
WISP.  What happens at the end of the day when the Property Manager
tells the WISP to shove off?  Legal action?  For what, potential lost
subscribers?  


- Can property managers prevent my subscribers from having an
externally
mounted antenna?

mks:  No. OTARD covers wisps too.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:13 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Legal insight?



- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:29 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Legal insight?


This outta be a fun and interesting thread:

mks:  You are one mean drunk, Superman!

As it relates to this space, rate the following 1-10 (1 being high
priority and 10 being I could care a less) in terms of important if
you could bend the mind of top legal experts to get an opinion. Add
other questions you like answered in your reply.

mks:  I guess I'm a bit confused.  Those are not really 1 thru 10 type 
questions.  Those are questions begging answers.  I'll try to do both 
though.

Comment or add to this list:
- What good is Form 477

mks:  It's the ONLY official head count of broadband customers.  1

 and do we really need to file it?

mks:  Absolutely.  Without known customers we have NO value in the food 
chain.  The more customers we have the more power we have.  1

- Does CALEA affect me?

mks:  Still trying to figure that one out.  I've got a note in to the
FCC 
for some clarification on this issue.  3

 How? When? How do I solve it without it costing
an arm and a leg?

mks:  Not only that, but it is really any of MY buisiness what my
customers 
do on the net?  If someone thinks there's a problem with a customer,
come to 
me with a search warrent and the needed tools for the search (just like
you 
would come to my house) and have fun.  No one is going to want 
everything they've ever done on the internet saved forever.  That's the
kind 
of silly crap that the Nazis and Soviets did.  Look where it got them.
2

- What's the real risk, if any, of not using certified systems?

mks:  Realistically?  Little or no risk.  Although, under the rules
changes 
from 2005 it's pretty hard to be out of certification these days.  Power

levels, that's a whole nother issue though.  Gotta pay attention to
them!  5

- What does it mean to have a certified system in the first place?

mks:  It means that ALL of your radio gear, clear down to the cable
level, 
has made it past the FCC and is certified to work within certain
parameters. 
Note: I did NOT say work as advertized :-).  8

- Don't the revised rules allow me to make the choice about what base
station antennas I wish to use?

mks:  Yes.  3

- How is 3650 coming along and how do it look like it will shape up?

mks:  Great question.  I sure wish I could get something out of the FCC.

Sinces it's an issue on the table at this time they won't talk to me.
Will 
they change the rules that they put out for us last year?  I hope not.
1

- Does the FCC really read comments I file on anything?

mks:  Yes.  Even the late filings.  3

 How important
(and difficult) is it for me to officially voice my comments?

mks:  Within WISPA it's easy.  When we find out about issues that mater
to 
the industry we file on the issue.  We also point out EXACTLY how our 
membership can also file on the issue.  EVERYTHING

RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

2006-10-04 Thread Patrick Leary
...and 100% they CAN prevent mesh, repeater, or other AP mount.

Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 3:20 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

Mike, they can prevent you from roof mounting if it is a multi-tenant,
multi-floor sort of building. If your customer rents a townhouse style,
you should have access. Maybe they can prevent you from holing the roof
itself for under some loop hole that protects them from risks to the
structure, but certainly they could not prevent an eave mount. 100% they
cannot prevent a mount on a subscribers' balcony.

Here is the FCC factsheet on the issue:
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/facts/otard.html


Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Bushard, Jr
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 12:42 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

When I read the otard rules it seems to me that they CAN stop you from
mounting on the roof. The only place you could mount was tenant
exclusive
areas. Basically the balcony attached to the apartment.

I hope I misread it though. 

Mike Bushard, Jr
Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chad Halsted
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 2:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

Marlon,

Just curious, have you ever had to force this issue with property
management?  I imagine this could be a difficult fight to win for a
WISP.  What happens at the end of the day when the Property Manager
tells the WISP to shove off?  Legal action?  For what, potential lost
subscribers?  


- Can property managers prevent my subscribers from having an
externally
mounted antenna?

mks:  No. OTARD covers wisps too.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:13 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Legal insight?



- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:29 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Legal insight?


This outta be a fun and interesting thread:

mks:  You are one mean drunk, Superman!

As it relates to this space, rate the following 1-10 (1 being high
priority and 10 being I could care a less) in terms of important if
you could bend the mind of top legal experts to get an opinion. Add
other questions you like answered in your reply.

mks:  I guess I'm a bit confused.  Those are not really 1 thru 10 type 
questions.  Those are questions begging answers.  I'll try to do both 
though.

Comment or add to this list:
- What good is Form 477

mks:  It's the ONLY official head count of broadband customers.  1

 and do we really need to file it?

mks:  Absolutely.  Without known customers we have NO value in the food 
chain.  The more customers we have the more power we have.  1

- Does CALEA affect me?

mks:  Still trying to figure that one out.  I've got a note in to the
FCC 
for some clarification on this issue.  3

 How? When? How do I solve it without it costing
an arm and a leg?

mks:  Not only that, but it is really any of MY buisiness what my
customers 
do on the net?  If someone thinks there's a problem with a customer,
come to 
me with a search warrent and the needed tools for the search (just like
you 
would come to my house) and have fun.  No one is going to want 
everything they've ever done on the internet saved forever.  That's the
kind 
of silly crap that the Nazis and Soviets did.  Look where it got them.
2

- What's the real risk, if any, of not using certified systems?

mks:  Realistically?  Little or no risk.  Although, under the rules
changes 
from 2005 it's pretty hard to be out of certification these days.  Power

levels, that's a whole nother issue though.  Gotta pay attention to
them!  5

- What does it mean to have a certified system in the first place?

mks:  It means that ALL of your radio gear, clear down to the cable
level, 
has made it past the FCC and is certified to work within certain
parameters. 
Note: I did NOT say work as advertized :-).  8

- Don't the revised rules allow me to make the choice about what base
station antennas I wish to use?

mks:  Yes.  3

- How is 3650 coming along and how do it look like it will shape up?

mks:  Great question.  I sure wish I could get something out of the FCC.

Sinces it's an issue on the table at this time they won't talk to me.
Will 
they change the rules

Re: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

2006-10-04 Thread Joe Laura
I did direct tv for years. Still do. You really have to read the rules to do
a install and be sure you are in the clear. For instance, you can not just
bolt a satellite arm on the wall even if it is not a common area. Thats why
you see alot of 5 gallon buckets of concrete with pipes in them. From memory
I do not think you are allowed to drill through the wall either. I used to
use a 6 or so flat cable coupler that the window would close on. I would
try to do the install in the late evenings after the managment office closed
and leave a copy of the Otard rule with the tennant with my phone# on the
front of it. Joe
Superior Wireless
New Orleans,La.
www.superior1.com
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 5:19 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers


Mike, they can prevent you from roof mounting if it is a multi-tenant,
multi-floor sort of building. If your customer rents a townhouse style,
you should have access. Maybe they can prevent you from holing the roof
itself for under some loop hole that protects them from risks to the
structure, but certainly they could not prevent an eave mount. 100% they
cannot prevent a mount on a subscribers' balcony.

Here is the FCC factsheet on the issue:
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/facts/otard.html


Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Bushard, Jr
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 12:42 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

When I read the otard rules it seems to me that they CAN stop you from
mounting on the roof. The only place you could mount was tenant
exclusive
areas. Basically the balcony attached to the apartment.

I hope I misread it though.

Mike Bushard, Jr
Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chad Halsted
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 2:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Legal insight? - OTARD VS Property Managers

Marlon,

Just curious, have you ever had to force this issue with property
management?  I imagine this could be a difficult fight to win for a
WISP.  What happens at the end of the day when the Property Manager
tells the WISP to shove off?  Legal action?  For what, potential lost
subscribers?


- Can property managers prevent my subscribers from having an
externally
mounted antenna?

mks:  No. OTARD covers wisps too.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:13 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Legal insight?



- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:29 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Legal insight?


This outta be a fun and interesting thread:

mks:  You are one mean drunk, Superman!

As it relates to this space, rate the following 1-10 (1 being high
priority and 10 being I could care a less) in terms of important if
you could bend the mind of top legal experts to get an opinion. Add
other questions you like answered in your reply.

mks:  I guess I'm a bit confused.  Those are not really 1 thru 10 type
questions.  Those are questions begging answers.  I'll try to do both
though.

Comment or add to this list:
- What good is Form 477

mks:  It's the ONLY official head count of broadband customers.  1

 and do we really need to file it?

mks:  Absolutely.  Without known customers we have NO value in the food
chain.  The more customers we have the more power we have.  1

- Does CALEA affect me?

mks:  Still trying to figure that one out.  I've got a note in to the
FCC
for some clarification on this issue.  3

 How? When? How do I solve it without it costing
an arm and a leg?

mks:  Not only that, but it is really any of MY buisiness what my
customers
do on the net?  If someone thinks there's a problem with a customer,
come to
me with a search warrent and the needed tools for the search (just like
you
would come to my house) and have fun.  No one is going to want
everything they've ever done on the internet saved forever.  That's the
kind
of silly crap that the Nazis and Soviets did.  Look where it got them.
2

- What's the real risk, if any, of not using certified systems?

mks:  Realistically?  Little or no risk.  Although, under the rules
changes
from 2005 it's pretty hard to be out of certification these days.  Power

levels, that's a whole nother issue though.  Gotta pay attention to
them!  5

- What does it mean to have a certified system in the first place?

mks:  It means that ALL of your radio gear, clear down to the cable
level,
has made it past the FCC