emmm
On 5/3/2017 12:28 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
Don't they have support?
On May 3, 2017 11:19 AM, "Jeff Evans" > wrote:
Anyone on list who is familiar with the NetSapiens platform who
can jump
on GoToMeeting and help
Don't they have support?
On May 3, 2017 11:19 AM, "Jeff Evans" wrote:
> Anyone on list who is familiar with the NetSapiens platform who can jump
> on GoToMeeting and help with a provisioning issue?
>
> Hit me off list, Thanks in advance
>
> -
>
> Jeff Evans, Managing
John,
Did you switch from Momentum to Nextiva? I didn't think Nextiva had a true
wholesale offering? They want to have you sell their brand, and get a lousy
20 to 50 percent commission. We are buying seats for under $8, and then
marking them up to $20+ dollar per seat.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:06:03 -0500
> From: Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP Vendor Recommendation
> To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
> Message-ID:
>
What firmware version?
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Paolo Di Francesco <
paolo.difrance...@level7.it> wrote:
> we are having issues with mikrotik+NAT+SIP in some circumstances... it
> looks like NAT is not doing its homework after some time. Rebooting the
> mikrotik solves the issues
>
We switched to Nextiva and haven't regretted it for a second. Their
support is US based and top notch. Email me offline if you want our
rep. She did a great job for us.
John Hendrich
On Mon, 2017-03-13 at 09:50 -0500, Joey Craig wrote:
> We are having many problems with our current VoIP
we are having issues with mikrotik+NAT+SIP in some circumstances... it
looks like NAT is not doing its homework after some time. Rebooting the
mikrotik solves the issues
Regards
Paolo
We are back online as of this time. Momentum claims they fixed their
problem this morning, (which there was
We are back online as of this time. Momentum claims they fixed their
problem this morning, (which there was a problem). Still not working on our
end. After plugging one of the VoIP phones into a Comcast circuit, it came
right online. They logged into the the logs on the phone and found that the
VoIP.ms has been great
On Mar 13, 2017 10:17 AM, "Chris Fabien" wrote:
> We have been happy with VOIP Innovations. They did have some problems a
> year or two ago with DOS attacks but I think they handled it well and made
> several key network improvements to prevent it
We have been happy with VOIP Innovations. They did have some problems a
year or two ago with DOS attacks but I think they handled it well and made
several key network improvements to prevent it happening agian.
On Mar 13, 2017 11:07 AM, "Joey Craig" wrote:
> Yes, this
Yes, this is a serious problem. Not only is our office down, but also to
the residential and business companies we resale too.
We currently use Momentum are they claiming routed issues from their
Atlanta switch. Sure, I can understand, but no word since Friday and
ongoing since then?
On Mar 13,
FreePBX or grandstream.
Flowroute for origination and termination.
On Mar 13, 2017 9:50 AM, "Joey Craig" wrote:
> We are having many problems with our current VoIP vendor and would like
> any recommendations that anyone would have.
>
>
>
> Currently, our phone service
We are.
There are number of things to check for
Not knowing much about your network setup
Making assumption that your BH and AP's are not over loaded.
Making assumption that your MT's are not over loaded
Making assumption that your Queue mech. are not an issue...
Making
Imtiaz
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 10:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP - Who is using successfully?
We are.
There are number of things to check for
Not knowing much about your network setup
Making assumption that your BH and AP's are not over loaded
Is the VOIP traffic encapsulated in any way, such as EoIP, PPPoE, etc?
If so, AirMax will not be able to prioritize it correctly, assuming the
correct DSCP value is assigned to the traffic to begin with.
Josh Reynolds, CIO
SPITwSPOTS
www.spitwspots.com
On 07/31/2014 11:56 AM, Matt Brendle
prioritizing.
-Matt
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 4:00 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP - Who is using successfully?
Is the VOIP traffic encapsulated in any way, such as EoIP, PPPoE
(855) FLSPEED x106
From: Matt Brendle mattagator.mailingli...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 4:10 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP - Who is using successfully?
Nope. Public IP on the CPE. CPE is set
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:56:33 -0400
Matt Brendle mattagator.mailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
So a question for the masses. We are selling VoIP services and the number
of Support Calls we get about poor performance is more than I would expect.
Our basic setup is UBNT backhauls and APs, Mikrotik
on my
network.
Anybody else with suggestions/info? I welcome all input no matter how minor
or critical it may seem.
-Matt
-Original Message-
From: l...@mwtcorp.net [mailto:l...@mwtcorp.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 4:59 PM
To: WISPA General List; Matt Brendle
Subject: Re: [WISPA
General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP - Who is using successfully?
Larry,
Thanks for the feedback. I have a mix of ATAs deployed, but I am going to
make sure they all have the right DSCP flags set for Airmax to prioritize.
I will also take your advice on sniffing and include in my testing
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Matt Brendle
mattagator.mailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
So a question for the masses. We are selling VoIP services and the number
of Support Calls we get about poor performance is more than I would
expect. Our basic setup is UBNT backhauls and APs, Mikrotik
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 6:08 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP - Who is using successfully?
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Matt Brendle
mattagator.mailingli...@gmail.com mailto:mattagator.mailingli
Hi Chris,
Not withstanding security on Freepbx, you know there is no way for freepbx to
do anything if one of the endpoints are compromised, or a valid user /ext
password is jacked.
We use an external system (a2billing) as a means of managing and controlling
such compromises...
If this is
You'll probably get a visit from the fbi soon. We had a server penitrated
for a couple hours one day a few years back. I pulled the hd and rebuilt
the box on a new disk and tightened up my firewall. A year later I got a
visit from two agents asking about it with a warrant. I told them what
This was someone relaying international calls through somehow. I don't
think the server itself was compromised. We caught very quickly but need to
figure out where the security flaw is.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote:
You'll probably get a visit from the
Chris,
I'm on an Asterisk mailing list where a lot of folks do this for a living.
Would you like me to forward your request onto that list??
Chris Stradtman
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Chris Fabien ch...@lakenetmi.com wrote:
This was someone relaying international calls through
That would be fine, thank you
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Chris Stradtman
cstradt...@greenpointcommunications.com wrote:
Chris,
I'm on an Asterisk mailing list where a lot of folks do this for a living.
Would you like me to forward your request onto that list??
Chris Stradtman
Doesn't sound right to me, unless they are going to do all the billing
and tax filing in your behalf.
If they charge you USF on your wholesale rate, who pays on the
difference between your wholesale rate and the customer's marked up rate?
On 3/26/2014 10:51 AM, Roger Howard wrote:
So I've
This can vary by locality too. We offer voip and collect/pay USF, sales
tax, state 911, and a different county 911 fee for each county we serve.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Randy Cosby dco...@infowest.com wrote:
Doesn't sound right to me, unless they are going to do all the billing
and
On 3/26/2014 12:53 PM, Randy Cosby wrote:
Doesn't sound right to me, unless they are going to do all the billing
and tax filing in your behalf.
If they charge you USF on your wholesale rate, who pays on the
difference between your wholesale rate and the customer's marked up rate?
USF rules
Roger
I have experience with VoIP but no experience with US VoIP rules.
Anyway, the rule is always the same: who owns the customers? If you are
a RESELLER (how powerful are words!) then you resell the service, i.e.
it sounds like you are not selling the service but re-selling, i.e. you
are
This is a matter where you really need a telecom lawyer with knowledge of
your state.
What we found is you really need to avoid hitting that interconnected VoIP
requirement. As for how you do that, check with your lawyers.
Once we crossed that it's been a chain of paperwork that seems to never
So if I'm de minimis, do I have to register anything with the FCC? or just
ignore it and let Vitelity pay until I get big?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.comwrote:
On 3/26/2014 12:53 PM, Randy Cosby wrote:
Doesn't sound right to me, unless they are going
On 3/26/2014 1:44 PM, Roger Howard wrote:
So if I'm de minimis, do I have to register anything with the FCC? or
just ignore it and let Vitelity pay until I get big?
If you're de minimis -- and just reselling might be an out, if the
underlying carrier owns the customers, pays USF, and
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:44:57 -0500
Roger Howard g5inter...@gmail.com wrote:
So if I'm de minimis, do I have to register anything with the FCC? or just
ignore it and let Vitelity pay until I get big?
Get a telcom lawyer. This is a minefield and can blow up in your face if you
do it wrong.
Only the person sending the bill to the end user can do all of that.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Roger Howard g5inter...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014
There is another issue I've found when dealing with the taxes and fees
that I think gets overlooked. If you are charging your federal portion
(USF) at 64.9% safe harbor for interstate, I have been told that the
intrastate portion (state, county, regional) taxes should be charged on
on the
...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 6:59:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP Taxes, Fees, Insanity
How much are you charging for it?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 28, 2013
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 7:39:02 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA
- Original Message -
From: Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 6:06:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP Taxes, Fees, Insanity
On 7/28/2013 2:20 PM, Jeremy wrote:
So while I am de minimus should I not be charging a USF fee? You stated
: [WISPA] VoIP Taxes, Fees, Insanity
On 7/28/2013 2:20 PM, Jeremy wrote:
So while I am de minimus should I not be charging a USF fee? You
stated that I cannot charge more than I pass along but if I pass
along nothing until I am at the 10K mark then am I not supposed to
bill it until
On 7/28/2013 12:46 AM, Jeremy wrote:
From what I read it seems like you can collect whatever you want
directly from your customers but it may be considered as income and
taxed as such. So you can't really pass it on as a direct fee and
bypass your income tax liability for it.
No. Federal
So while I am de minimus should I not be charging a USF fee? You stated
that I cannot charge more than I pass along but if I pass along nothing
until I am at the 10K mark then am I not supposed to bill it until that
point?
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Fred Goldstein
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP Taxes, Fees, Insanity
On 7/28/2013 12:46 AM, Jeremy wrote:
From what I read it seems like you can collect whatever you want directly from
your customers but it may be considered as income and taxed as such. So you
can't really pass it on as a direct fee and bypass
: [WISPA] VoIP Taxes, Fees, Insanity
On 7/28/2013 12:46 AM, Jeremy wrote:
From what I read it seems like you can collect whatever you want
directly from your customers but it may be considered as income
and taxed as such. So you can't really pass it on as a direct fee
and bypass
This is one reason I won't touch VoIP.
On Jul 28, 2013, at 0:20, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am attempting to figure out all of the taxes for VoiP and the main thing
that has me confused is the Universal Service Fund. It seems that my state
(Utah) has a USF of 0.45%
I would highly suggest you go talk to a telecom tax lawyer. Taxes on voice are
all over the place and in most cases it's up into interpretation, and this is
where things can go really bad if you think it's one way and they think it's
the other. Just my 2 cents.
Carlos Alcantar
Race
List wireless@wispa.org
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 3:51:55 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP Taxes, Fees, Insanity
This is one reason I won't touch VoIP.
On Jul 28, 2013, at 0:20, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am attempting to figure out
, 2013 3:51:55 PM
*Subject: *Re: [WISPA] VoIP Taxes, Fees, Insanity
This is one reason I won't touch VoIP.
On Jul 28, 2013, at 0:20, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am attempting to figure out all of the taxes for VoiP and the main thing
that has me confused is the Universal Service
On 7/28/2013 2:20 PM, Jeremy wrote:
So while I am de minimus should I not be charging a USF fee? You
stated that I cannot charge more than I pass along but if I pass along
nothing until I am at the 10K mark then am I not supposed to bill it
until that point?
Carlos has good advice --
Josh - $21.95 residential and $29.95 business.
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.comwrote:
On 7/28/2013 2:20 PM, Jeremy wrote:
So while I am de minimus should I not be charging a USF fee? You stated
that I cannot charge more than I pass along but if I pass
I meant those getting 80% profit.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 28, 2013 7:17 PM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote:
(plus taxes and fees)
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Josh -
Accidentally hit send. There is more! We also have:
*Municipal Telecommunications License Tax (MTLT) - *3.5% ...this is the
tricky one. It is never charged on a county level and is determined by the
zip+4 of the municipality. It appears that most charge it but some don't
and unincorporated
Our $25 phone service ends up being between $29 and $33 depending on what
county the customer is in Sounds like your taxes are higher there.
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Accidentally hit send. There is more! We also have:
*Municipal
That looks about right, it varies by state/locality of course. We collect
Federal USF, State use tax, state and county E911. The USF you get to
pocket until your required contributions are $10k/year - under that you are
considered de minimus and just have to file the annual form.
When we set up
From what I read it seems like you can collect whatever you want directly
from your customers but it may be considered as income and taxed as such.
So you can't really pass it on as a direct fee and bypass your income tax
liability for it.
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Chris Fabien
*A* solution would be to simply not do RTP redirect. Not the best
solution, but it is one.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 3/1/2012 6:20 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
We are considering doing some limited VoIP offerings to supplement our
GSM offerings in
Matt:
Given traffic that is not originated or terminated by your soft switch,
intercept orders for that traffic is only subject to the requirements
for network access providers that do not provide VoIP services. However,
traffic that is originated or terminated by your soft switch would be
Don't think the requirement is to record the call, but CALEA would
allow you to record, or capture the packets, that would include the
call. The LEA would be required to extract or retrieve the call from
the data. Its more of a digital wire-tapping of packets, vs what kind
of packets. So, you
Do a google search on Mikrotik CALEA, take a look at The Mikrotik
WIki as well as Butch's CALEA (MUM 2007) presentation.
This will give you an excellent idea on how to accomplish what you are
asking for .
Regards.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, Fl 33155
Tel:
I'm obviously not asking the question properly.
I know how to do a CALEA capture for regular IP traffic. My question is
related to VoIP traffic in particular.
(e.g. Yes, if a customer has Vonage I obviously can't record the call...
but I can capture the packets).
However, my understanding
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP CALEA Question
I'm obviously not asking the question properly.
I know how to do a CALEA capture for regular IP traffic. My question is
related to VoIP traffic in particular.
(e.g. Yes, if a customer has Vonage I obviously can't record the call...
but I can capture
What will make the most difference is the firmware you run on them. Each
firmware they have released dramatically affects voip performance.
I don't have a good answer for your next question - just use the newest one
and see how it goes for you, its as good as any of the past ones...
(5.3.3)
From my furthest device to my offnet, public server in Chicago... 6
ms. I'm not sure it could be much better.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 7/27/2011 11:06 AM, Zach Mann wrote:
How many are sucessfully doing this for businesses and what
Is someone already using v6.5 in BreezeAcess VL radios?
I'm looking for some input about its performance.
Any comments?
Thanks,
Eduardo
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Shoemaker
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP LNP
Found it:
http://www.sittelletech.com/RPS3000.html
--
Patrick Shoemaker
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Patrick Shoemaker
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 23:46
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] VoIP LNP line switch
Are they really only $6-7?
Regards,
Chuck
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Patrick Shoemaker
shoemak...@vectordatasystems.com wrote:
Found it:
http://www.sittelletech.com/RPS3000.html
--
Patrick Shoemaker
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
$10 from Vetco Supply, http://www.vetcosupply.comhttp://www.vetcosupply.com/
--
Patrick Shoemaker
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Chuck Hogg
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 14:32
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP LNP line switch
Seems like they're $10 each in low quantity, should have a quote in a few
minutes.
--
Patrick Shoemaker
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Chuck Hogg
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 14:32
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP LNP line switch
On 11/29/2010 9:07 PM, Liam Cummings wrote:
We are looking to start offering VOIP but are having a hard time
finding a provider that offers a service at a price that we can markup
and resell. Anyone know of a good VOIP provider?
check out vitelity and voip.ms
Leon
On 11/29/2010 10:41 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Well right. There's 38746546574 VoIP carriers in Chicago's 358 LATA.
38746546571 of them only cover the contiguous ATT portion. Only say 3
cover the remaining ATT and Frontier portions of that LATA. Obviously
all of these numbers were made up
...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Leon D. Zetekoff
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 6:58 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VOIP Provider
On 11/29/2010 9:07 PM, Liam Cummings wrote:
We are looking to start offering VOIP but are having a hard time finding a
provider that offers a service at a price
We actually had that happen with Verizon once. It took two months for
them to finally remove the number so that local customers could call.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have ported lots of them in their clec area. It is always a problem.
Typical Att
It happens automatically every 30-60 days for their DID inventory
process or something. I do not have customers that will wait 30 days,
so I call in and make sure they clear it up. Almost always fixed
within the day, maybe two. I typically call it in in the morning and
before I leave for the
With VOX, does your VoIP traffic traverse the Internet, or do/can you
get a cross connect with VOX?
-Kristian
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 14:17 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote:
It happens automatically every 30-60 days for their DID inventory
process or something. I do not have customers that will wait
We make something like 30 to 40 percent. Happy with our service.
On Nov 29, 2010 9:29 PM, Liam Cummings lcummi...@datacomspecialists.com
wrote:
We are looking to start offering VOIP but are having a hard time finding
a provider that offers a service at a price that we can markup and
resell.
VOX.
Sent from my iPhone4
On Nov 29, 2010, at 8:07 PM, Liam Cummings lcummi...@datacomspecialists.com
wrote:
We are looking to start offering VOIP but are having a hard time finding a
provider that offers a service at a price that we can markup and resell.
Anyone know of a good VOIP
The second most important thing about VoIP (aside from the quality of
the service) is local numbers. Everything else relatively means nothing.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 11/29/2010 8:07 PM, Liam Cummings wrote:
We are looking to start
Somewhere at least 90% of out customers ported their numbers.
On Nov 29, 2010 10:12 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote:
The second most important thing about VoIP (aside from the quality of
the service) is local numbers. Everything else relatively means nothing.
-
Mike
I think I have something like 10 numbers that weren't ported. Everything we do
is port.
Sent from my iPhone4
On Nov 29, 2010, at 9:14 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Somewhere at least 90% of out customers ported their numbers.
On Nov 29, 2010 10:12 PM, Mike Hammett
Porting only works if the receiving LEC has the ability to receive ports
from that rate center. They have to be on the same tandem switch and
may even be more restrictive than that.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 11/29/2010 9:14 PM, Josh Luthman
Our provider has a dozen carriers or more, I expect others are comparable.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote:
Porting only works if the receiving LEC has
Well right. There's 38746546574 VoIP carriers in Chicago's 358 LATA.
38746546571 of them only cover the contiguous ATT portion. Only say 3
cover the remaining ATT and Frontier portions of that LATA. Obviously
all of these numbers were made up (other than the LATA number), but I
think I got
For domestic we have...off hand...
Level3, Global Crossing, Pac West, XO, Paetec, One Communications,
Broadvox, Com Partners, Verizon
Between these carriers we've had 1 number we couldn't port.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On
Only place I couldn't port was a small town outside of Baton Rouge where
Centurytel was the ilec.
Sent from my iPhone4
On Nov 29, 2010, at 9:43 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
For domestic we have...off hand...
Level3, Global Crossing, Pac West, XO, Paetec, One
I know we ported a CenturyTel customer, I remember dealing with those
idiots. One of those ports that personify hell.
You were probably better off.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Jeremie Chism
I have ported lots of them in their clec area. It is always a problem. Typical
Att ports are 7-10 days. Centurytel is 90-120 days. Even when they port they
sometimes don't remove the numbers from their switch so any centurytel customer
that calls their numbers gets a ring with no answer. They
Ohio is a fairly well populated state. (You may think not, but just
wait until the next election to see how big Ohio is.) More than likely
multiple of those carriers service those areas. I'm just trying to say
that most WISPs that don't already have VoIP live areas that I guarantee
you XO
Verizon just sold out to Frontier around here. It's routine to use the pstn
line and force them to update their switches.
On Nov 29, 2010 10:57 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have ported lots of them in their clec area. It is always a problem.
Typical Att ports are 7-10 days.
Hit.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Layne Sisk
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 8:31 PM
To: WISPA General List; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP Providers
I can put you in touch with a good business provider. Hit me
I can put you in touch with a good business provider. Hit me offlist for more
info.
-Layne
Layne Sisk
ServerPlus.com
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org on behalf of Robert West
Sent: Fri 10/1/2010 6:51 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] VoIP
Vox voice quality is very good. I only sell to business and no complaints.
Sent from my iPhone4
On Oct 1, 2010, at 7:51 AM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
Phone contract with Time Warner is about up and looking for some cheaper
options. Anyone using a VoIP provider for
I use our own. Couldn't survive without it being so busy.
Let me know if you'd like a quote.
On Oct 1, 2010 8:51 AM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
Phone contract with Time Warner is about up and looking for some cheaper
options. Anyone using a VoIP provider for business phones?
On 09/22/2010 10:18 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
DECT phone in the install rig with a 10mhz radio and a ATA.
or A DECT IP phone and 10 mhz radio. I have a Siemens A580IP base +
handsets works fine...cuts one item out of the picture.
leon
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Josh Luthman
I had forgot about the IP base's as none of them did what I wanted. I
would murder to have a IP base stations that could hand off to each
other and handle 4 lines. So far everything I find use's its own
repeaters and limits the handsets to 1 or 2 lines.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Leon D.
SIP app on Android or iPhone?
On 09/22/2010 10:09 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
I am looking for a Wireless VOIP Phone that my installers could have to use
out at customers. What would be a clincher is if it had the ability to also
do 10Mhz Channels so when at a tower they could use it. Some
10mhz will be rough. Maybe an ns2 an voip phone?
One installer used a cisco phone for this. He liked it, made me smile.
On Sep 22, 2010 1:11 PM, Charles N Wyble char...@knownelement.com wrote:
SIP app on Android or iPhone?
On 09/22/2010 10:09 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
I am looking for a
DECT phone in the install rig with a 10mhz radio and a ATA.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
10mhz will be rough. Maybe an ns2 an voip phone?
One installer used a cisco phone for this. He liked it, made me smile.
On Sep 22, 2010 1:11 PM,
We use the two latter provides.
On Sep 3, 2010 8:21 PM, Scott Carullo sc...@brevardwireless.com wrote:
If any of you are dealing direct with any of the 3 mentioned carriers for
VoIP services?
Scott Carullo
Technical Operations
877-804-3001 x102
Direct?
What kind of commit did they require?
On Sep 3, 2010 8:21 PM, Scott Carullo sc...@brevardwireless.com wrote:
If any of you ar...
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
1 - 100 of 388 matches
Mail list logo