Yes, but the syntax is a little cumbersome. I had it jotted down
somewhere...I'll see if I can find it. Or maybe Butch can pipe in with the
correct command/syntax?
Brad
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
: Re: [WISPA] BGP Question
Prepending is not an effective way of forcing other providers to send their
traffic through your preferred upstream. In fact, there is no good way to do
it at all. It is far better to just have quality upstreams.
-Matt
Don Annas wrote:
When peering with multiple
Jeff Broadwick wrote:
AS prepending is fairly effective method. Assuming you have more then just
a /24 network, you also can use selective advertising of more specific
prefixes through a preferred provider to influence inbound traffic.
AS prepending is not as effective as it used to be. I
Prepending is not an effective way of forcing other providers to send
their traffic through your preferred upstream. In fact, there is no good
way to do it at all. It is far better to just have quality upstreams.
-Matt
Don Annas wrote:
When peering with multiple providers, is it a
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Don Annas wrote:
When peering with multiple providers, is it a requirement that you
pick a primary to send and receive traffic or can you not prepend
AS hops and allow traffic to arrive to you via the 'best' BGP
route.
There is no way to insure that traffic will come
