nd make
sure we use the optimal port.
Tom DeReggiRapidDSL & Wireless, IncIntAirNet- Fixed Wireless
Broadband
- Original Message -
From:
Blair Davis
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:49
AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.8GHz
Radio c
less, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
-
Original Message -
From:
Blair
Davis
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
'WISPA
General List'
Sent:
Thursday, February 09, 2006 3:04 PM
Subject:
Re: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.8GHz Radio cards and
Broadband
- Original Message -
From:
Blair Davis
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 3:04
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.8GHz
Radio cards and settings.
I was/am aware of the mmcx issue and all tests were done wi
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006
5:31 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MikroTik
5.8GHz Radio cards and settings.
If it help, we got SR5’s as soon as they
where available. When I put them in a real world environment on a StarO
: Thursday, February 09, 2006
5:31 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MikroTik
5.8GHz Radio cards and settings.
If it help, we got SR5’s as soon as they where
available. When I put them in a real world environment on a StarOS/WRAP set-up
I saw no increase in signal
Behalf
Of Blair Davis
Sent: 09 February 2006 20:10
To: Scott Reed
Cc: WISPA
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MikroTik
5.8GHz Radio cards and settings.
That makes sense as an explanation for the CM9
issue. Thanks...
Doesn't explain the low output on the SR5 cards
Scott Reed
That makes sense as an explanation for the CM9 issue. Thanks...
Doesn't explain the low output on the SR5 cards
Scott Reed wrote:
Seems to me there are posts that the MT setting values
do not equate to dB. Maybe on P15's MT maillist.
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays
Wirel
Seems to me there are posts that the MT setting values do not equate to dB. Maybe on P15's MT maillist.
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
www.nwwnet.net
-- Original Message
---
From: Blair Davis <
Thank you.
Performance is not the issue here. The issue is predicted signal
strength vs measured signal strength. The link works and works well.
Thruput and latency are well within expected ranges. I am just getting
numbers that don't make sense. Like the high power SR5 cards having a
lo
I was/am aware of the mmcx issue and all tests were done with the same
u.fl pigtails on each end. When the radio cards were changed, the same
u.fl pigtails were used. Only the radio cards were changed.
They were the older SR5 cards with the mmcx problem. (proven by
testing!!) The mmcx port
Upgrade to 2.9.12. It has better wireless performance. Chech the mikrotik
forums.
- Original Message -
From: "Blair Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 8:07 PM
Subject: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.8GHz Radio cards and settings.
Hey all:
I'
What pigtails and connectors? Mmcx on the SR5 or u.fl? are these new SR5's or
older sr'5s?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Blair Davis
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 2:08 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] MikroTik 5.
12 matches
Mail list logo