MTI stops at 120
Pac has two
http://www.streakwave.com/Itemdesc.asp?ic=SA24%2D180%2D12eq=Tp=
http://www.streakwave.com/Itemdesc.asp?ic=SA24%2D180%2D14eq=Tp=
Hyperlink has one
http://www.l-com.com/item.aspx?id=22079
More here...
Wait till you get a couple people doing netflix or hulu, 3 sectors instead
of 2 isn't a huge investment, and you'll have a lot more choices for
antenna vendors.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 03:54:38PM -0500, Mark McElvy wrote:
I have one of my towers that has grown to 32 subs, This is a MT ap and
Hey Mark. My experience on the Pac 120* H-Pol sectors is that you will come
very close to 360* with just two of them. I would stay away from 180's. I
think it was the good man Marlin that sent me some info about those a few
years back when I considered this and I decided on the 120's. Worked
cleared, ambition
inspired, and success achieved.
- Helen Keller
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Jason Hensley
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 5:39 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sectoring a tower
Hey
There is no magic number.
I have had MT based APs that with the customer usage and the RB that it
was really busy at 20 users. I have and know others that can provide
the throughput to well over 50 customers. It depends on a lot more than
the count.
That said, going to sectors can do much for
As an RF Engineer and an antenna designer, I can say that you don't want
180's. Go with the 120's or even some 90's. You'll get pretty good
coverage all the way around even with a couple of 90's back to back. If
you are really worried about the small nulls on the sides, make sure
your main
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sectoring a tower
While You are going to Sectors I recommend 802.11g 10Mhz channels. It has
changed my life going away from 20Mhz.
Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service
Character cannot
they not support the correct setting?
Scott Piehn
- Original Message -
From: Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sectoring a tower
While You
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sectoring a tower
Kind of embarrassed to ask, but to go 802.11g 10 MHz on MT is just setting
2.4-10? on the Interface
Using R52H, or do they not support the correct setting?
Scott
--
From: Scott Piehn li...@jcwifi.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 8:04 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sectoring a tower
Kind of embarrassed to ask, but to go 802.11g 10 MHz on MT is just setting
2.4-10
...@pcswin.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sectoring a tower
While You are going to Sectors I recommend 802.11g 10Mhz channels. It has
changed my life going away from 20Mhz.
Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service
Yeah, and the new Deliberant radios will do 1/2 and 1/4 channels. I
have had good luck with a mix of them. The new ones with the Atheros
chip set seem to be more sensitive too.
mike
At 05:05 PM 10/27/2009, you wrote:
There is no magic number.
I have had MT based APs that with the customer
I'd recommend against 180* antennas. They are really just lopsided omni's.
Go with three 120* antennas. Mix vpol and hpol. You'll be glad you went
this route over the long haul.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Mark McElvy mmce...@accubak.com
To: WISPA General List
13 matches
Mail list logo
