Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In Against Net Neutrality
Responses inline...
- Original Message
Good points Larry.
I agree with your defining backbone and last mile rules and how there
should be 2 different sets of standards.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
No such thing as middle ground in regulation.
I actually think No Regulation at this point would be better than any of
the plans proposed so far.
And after compromises, it will just be a litigation fest like the TA96.
- Peter
Larry Yunker wrote:
Dave,
I can see your points and I agree
George,
Regulation could not be put into effect that would define last-mile,
middle mile and backbone.
When I called by Congress Critter's office to ask about his position on
NN, the bonehead staffer that answered the phone did not even know what
that was! Most of the 500+ elected Congress
I personally think this whole net neutrality is a combination of much
ado about nothing and the little guys not learning how to work together.
Will the RBOCs be able to wield any real power against the major content
companies of the world? No, they won't. But, what about the small
operations?
ATT and VZ can't de-peer for another 17 months, so we have that long
before it becomes imminent.
Where did the 17 month timeframe come from? AFAIK, without Net Neutrality
legislation, there is nothing stopping the big guys from pulling the rug out
from under the rest of us TODAY. If you are
Because you're not involved and you, as a content provider, have NO
interest
in my network. My customer, however, DOES want his VOIP phone to work,
as
well as your pages to load. Both can happen with QOS employed, no?
Your
web page loads no matter what. His VOIP phone
- Original Message -
From:
Rich Comroe
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 10:07
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In
Against Net Neutrality
why do you do it?
I'm a top poster. I hate having to
essentially re-read the previous email to find
Turn off the option to compose E-mail in
HTML.
- Original Message -
From:
Tom
DeReggi
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:34
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In
Against Net Neutrality
Actually,
My Outlook Express does the same
@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In Against Net Neutrality
Turn off the option to compose E-mail in HTML.
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In Against Net Neutrality
you could put a hot tub in there, too...
Mark Nash
Network Engineer
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
] ; WISPA General
List
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:56
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In
Against Net Neutrality
The WCA is showing its true colors.. the WCA stands for
the interests of Verizon, ATT Wireless, Sprint, and the other big
Cell Carriers (many of which incidentally
I'd say we need to support WCA's post.
In politics it possible to get a double standard to pass.
ILECS / Cable companies need Net Neutrality, wireless providers do not.
Do you know what it would do to our cell phone bills, if Internet enabled
Cell phones were required to allow users to use
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In Against Net Neutrality
The WCA is showing its true colors.. the WCA stands for the interests of
Verizon, ATT Wireless, Sprint, and the other big Cell Carriers (many
On Jun 20, 2006, at 4:37 PM, David Sovereen wrote:
How many WISPs on this list are limiting P2P traffic separate from
other traffic? I'll bite... I am.
We don't
How many WISPs on this list are prioritizing VoIP traffic separate
from other traffic? I'll bite. I am. And I only
Yunker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In Against Net Neutrality
The WCA is showing its true colors.. the WCA stands for the interests of
Verizon, ATT Wireless, Sprint
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In
Against Net Neutrality
The WCA is showing its true colors.. the WCA stands for
the interests of Verizon, ATT Wireless, Sprint, and the other big
Cell Carriers (many of which incidentally are owned by ATT, Bell
South, and Verizon RBOCs
nt: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 8:17
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In
Against Net Neutrality
You guys that post using this incredibly annoying
bar at the left... why do you do it? It makes c
onversational email impossible...
Read on below. comments are prefaced
with
I'd like to point out that the RBOCs own the backbone, the last mile,
and the cellular companies, so if they filter or prioritize it should be
interesting. Word is L3 is buying all fiber so that they can be equals
with VZ att.
- Peter
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
mailto:wireless@wispa.org
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:37 PM
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In Against Net Neutrality
I respectfully disagree and think that WCA's position of less
regulation and allowing network operators operate their networks
how they want is the right
bone of the internet! The real question
is whether we can get legislators to understand this CRUCIAL
difference.
- Larry
- Original Message -
From:
David Sovereen
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:37
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In
Against Net
- Original Message -
From: Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In Against Net Neutrality
Responses inline...
- Original Message -
*From:* David Sovereen
22 matches
Mail list logo
