Re: [WISPA] [Fwd: [isp-clec] Latest FCC outrage -- no UNEs AT ALL in Omaha]

2005-09-17 Thread Matt Liotta
I disagree and I certainly am not interested in seeing CLECs get into 
the WISP business. I see CLECs as execution companies. They need to have 
great sales, marketing, and operations, but they do really need to own 
facilities connecting them to their customers. I see WISPs as operators 
capable of providing CLECs with facilities to connect to their 
customers. Such a partnership can result in great mutual benefits along 
with creating a force that can rival RBOCs.


Partner with your local CLEC and help them succeed in the market. Don't 
let your local CLEC become a WISP.


-Matt

George wrote:


The writing is on the wall.
Be a wisp or be dead..

George

This is a posting by one of the industry leaders via  the isp-clec list.

 Original Message 
Subject: [isp-clec] Latest FCC outrage -- no UNEs AT ALL in Omaha
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:10:12 -0400
From: Fred R. Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: isp-clec@isp-clec.com
To: isp-clec@isp-clec.com

The FCC today granted a Qwest petition to forbear from enforcing its
obligations as an ILEC in 9 of the 24 wire centers in the Omaha MSA.  
This

means NO UNEs at all, no raw copper loops, no IOF, no nuttin'.  The FCC
justifies this on the basis that Cox has invested heavily in its cable
plant, thereby providing an intermodal competitor.

This means that any CLEC that has invested money in collocated 
equipment in

that area is hereby Out Of Business.  What a flagrant flouting of the
Telecom Act!  Section 271 obligations to provide loops and transport 
still

remain in effect, but not subject to Section 251 cost-based rates -- only
just and reasonable prices, which are generally interpreted to be any
outrageous gouge that an ILEC can whimsically come up with.  The FCC has
also waived the price caps on its Exchange Access services across the 
MSA,

allowing Qwest to gouge other carriers (especially IXCs) -- even though
intercarrier compensation is supposedly at the top of the FCC's agenda.

IANAL, but this strikes me as not only a flagrant violation of the 
Telecom

Act, but as a possible Taking under the Fifth Amendment.

I would love to testify against Qwest and the FCC in a judicial review of
this one
--
 Fred Goldsteink1io  fgoldstein at ionary.com
 ionary Consulting   http://www.ionary.com/


__
ISPCON Fall 2005 - October 18-20, Santa Clara, CA
FREE EXHIBITS ONLY PASS AVAILABLE NOW!  www.ispcon.com
ISPCON in Baltimore was jumping! Sign up NOW for the fall event in Santa
Clara.. don't miss a minute!


_  The ISP-CLEC Discussion List  _
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://isp-lists.isp-planet.com/isp-clec/archives/
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Copyright 2005 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved.



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] [Fwd: [isp-clec] Latest FCC outrage -- no UNEs AT ALL in Omaha]

2005-09-16 Thread George

The writing is on the wall.
Be a wisp or be dead..

George

This is a posting by one of the industry leaders via  the isp-clec list.

 Original Message 
Subject: [isp-clec] Latest FCC outrage -- no UNEs AT ALL in Omaha
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:10:12 -0400
From: Fred R. Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: isp-clec@isp-clec.com
To: isp-clec@isp-clec.com

The FCC today granted a Qwest petition to forbear from enforcing its
obligations as an ILEC in 9 of the 24 wire centers in the Omaha MSA.  This
means NO UNEs at all, no raw copper loops, no IOF, no nuttin'.  The FCC
justifies this on the basis that Cox has invested heavily in its cable
plant, thereby providing an intermodal competitor.

This means that any CLEC that has invested money in collocated equipment in
that area is hereby Out Of Business.  What a flagrant flouting of the
Telecom Act!  Section 271 obligations to provide loops and transport still
remain in effect, but not subject to Section 251 cost-based rates -- only
just and reasonable prices, which are generally interpreted to be any
outrageous gouge that an ILEC can whimsically come up with.  The FCC has
also waived the price caps on its Exchange Access services across the MSA,
allowing Qwest to gouge other carriers (especially IXCs) -- even though
intercarrier compensation is supposedly at the top of the FCC's agenda.

IANAL, but this strikes me as not only a flagrant violation of the Telecom
Act, but as a possible Taking under the Fifth Amendment.

I would love to testify against Qwest and the FCC in a judicial review of
this one
--
 Fred Goldsteink1io  fgoldstein at ionary.com
 ionary Consulting   http://www.ionary.com/


__
ISPCON Fall 2005 - October 18-20, Santa Clara, CA
FREE EXHIBITS ONLY PASS AVAILABLE NOW!  www.ispcon.com
ISPCON in Baltimore was jumping! Sign up NOW for the fall event in Santa
Clara.. don't miss a minute!


_  The ISP-CLEC Discussion List  _
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://isp-lists.isp-planet.com/isp-clec/archives/
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Copyright 2005 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved.

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/