-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 03:11 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
No one is suggesting that we dont challenge big companies with vested
interests. I'm suggesting the opposite.
I'm suggesting that we challenge big company spectrum hogs to give back
spectrum, if they
,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 2:57 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question
I want to thank you gentlemen for taking the time
on the list.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Fred Goldstein
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question
Tom asked,
A relevent
AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question
Fred,
Tom DeReggi's comments were business-case based and constructive; basically
exploring whether the Commission's NPRM on auxiliary stations would benefit the
large operators or WISPs or both. In WSI's opinion the answer
] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 7:41 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question
At 1/14/2011 01:31 AM, Michael Mulcay wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary==_NextPart_000_0013_01CBB371.AEA7F3F0
Content
it. The
fear is that those who fail to be proactive will be left on the outside
looking in.
Mike
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 7:41 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing
Larsen - Lists
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 11:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question
Wow Michael,
That was an outstanding post. Thank you for taking the time to put it
together.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 1/13/2011 11:31 PM, michael mulcay
I believe the license database is now available in the more friendly CSV format.
See: http://data.fcc.gov/download/license-view/
and
http://data.fcc.gov/download/license-view/fcc-license-view-data-csv-format.zip
I'd make a page that shows what percentage is owned by who but I
already have a
At 1/14/2011 01:31 AM, Michael Mulcay wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary==_NextPart_000_0013_01CBB371.AEA7F3F0
Content-Language: en-us
Fred,
Tom DeReggi's comments were business-case based and constructive;
basically exploring whether the Commission's NPRM on
Tom asked,
A relevent question is... What percent of Pre-existing PArt-101
licenses are owned by who? For example, what percentage of PArt101
licenses are owned by Sprint or Fiber tower? Surely without those
numbers disclosed, we really cant understand who these auxilary
stations really
At 1/13/2011 02:40 PM, Michael Mulcay wrote:
...
The FCC committee was correct as spectrum is the life blood of all
WISPs and conservation of spectrum is absolutely essential.
Of course. I read your presentation, and some of the Reply Comments
and other parties' views. So please take my
: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question
At 1/13/2011 02:40 PM, Michael Mulcay wrote:
...
The FCC committee was correct as spectrum is the life blood of all WISPs and
conservation of spectrum is absolutely essential.
Of course. I read your presentation, and some of the Reply
.
*From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
*On Behalf Of *Fred Goldstein
*Sent:* Thursday, January 13, 2011 12:34 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question
At 1/13/2011 02:40 PM, Michael Mulcay wrote:
.../
/The FCC committee
General List'
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question
In comments and reply comments to the FCC's NPRM WT Docket 10-153; ATT,
Verizon and Comsearch et al are proposing that the FCC impose unnecessary
regulation on the operation
From: Bob Moldashel lakel...@gbcx.net
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 3:16 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question
FYI
There are a lot cheaper coordinators out there than Comsearch. This
is like buying a Escalade
: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question
FYI
There are a lot cheaper coordinators out there than Comsearch. This is
like buying a Escalade and then buying replacement tires from the dealer.
Just a comment...
-B-
On 1/7/2011 7:54 AM, michael mulcay wrote:
Adaptive modulation
, 2011 2:46 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question
Comsearch has this to say on one of the sites in coordination, anyone know
what it is supposed to mean? They are closed now, I'm not being patient sry
:)
Path Warnings Document
FCC Rule Part(s
...@brevardwireless.com ; 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question
Adaptive modulation is the subject of an FCC NPRM WT Docket 10-153. Can you
lock the equipment in a non adaptive mode?
Mike
Wireless Strategies Inc
you lock the equipment in a non adaptive mode?
Mike
Wireless Strategies Inc
831-601-0086
*From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
*On Behalf Of *Scott Carullo
*Sent:* Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:46 PM
*To:* wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing
Comsearch has this to say on one of the sites in coordination, anyone know
what it is supposed to mean? They are closed now, I'm not being patient
sry :)
Path Warnings Document
FCC Rule Part(s)
Description
://www.wirelessmapping.com www.wirelessmapping.com
www.Broadband-Mapping.com
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Carullo
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 5:46 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] 11Ghz Licensing Warning Question
Comsearch has this to say
21 matches
Mail list logo
