Re: [WISPA] 3.65Ghz and HAMs

2012-01-10 Thread Fred Goldstein
At 1/10/2012 12:03 PM, Jon Auer wrote: >On some online forums I have been seeing people claiming to be hams >saying that they can use 3.65 Ghz as it is a ham band. >Now, I thought it was for something else and now is license lite. Is >this a band we share with hams? No. The nearest ham band is 3.

Re: [WISPA] 3.65Ghz and HAMs

2012-01-10 Thread Pat O'Connor
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Hambands_color.pdf looks like 3300-3500MHz is available On 1/10/2012 9:03 AM, Jon Auer wrote: > On some online forums I have been seeing people claiming to be hams > saying that they can use 3.65 Ghz as it is a ham band. > Now, I thought it was for something else a

Re: [WISPA] 3.65Ghz and HAMs

2012-01-10 Thread Leon D. Zetekoff
I believe the amateur band is just below 3.5 to 3.6 I think Sent from my iPhone On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Jon Auer wrote: > On some online forums I have been seeing people claiming to be hams > saying that they can use 3.65 Ghz as it is a ham band. > Now, I thought it was for something else

[WISPA] 3.65Ghz and HAMs

2012-01-10 Thread Jon Auer
On some online forums I have been seeing people claiming to be hams saying that they can use 3.65 Ghz as it is a ham band. Now, I thought it was for something else and now is license lite. Is this a band we share with hams? -