Re: Wierd ... was [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-06-14 Thread Jason
This happens to me every so often; usually just 3 or 4 emails at a time. This was just a bigger jolt of it. Jason David E. Smith wrote: John Scrivner wrote: It is not a clock issue. All the messages that were sent with old dates were already delivered previously. These are duplicate

Re: Wierd ... was [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-06-14 Thread Michael Watson
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Comroe Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 11:21 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Wierd ... was [WISPA] 3650 equipment My appologies to the list. I'd added a couple cents to a thread that had ended weeks ago. Wierd, but my email client just pulled about 30 emails today

RE: Wierd ... was [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-06-14 Thread Dustin Jurman
Unfortunately I know that song. Dustin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Watson Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 12:49 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: Wierd ... was [WISPA] 3650 equipment Lets do the Time Warp Again! Its

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-06-13 Thread Rich Comroe
' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:29 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment You make the mistake of assuming that I am talking about an unlicensed 3.65 product Charles. We would not likely build a UL version of all that. I am in complete agreement with you on 3.650 in terms

Wierd ... was [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-06-13 Thread Rich Comroe
. Rich - Original Message - From: Rich Comroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:33 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Nah. What Charles misses in his commentary But all the fancy schmancy technology you implement won't do

Re: Wierd ... was [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-06-13 Thread Brian Rohrbacher
equipment and This is HUGE! I thought that these topics had reborn again! :-) My mistake. Rich - Original Message - From: Rich Comroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:33 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Nah. What

RE: Wierd ... was [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-06-13 Thread Gino A. Villarini
: Wierd ... was [WISPA] 3650 equipment My appologies to the list. I'd added a couple cents to a thread that had ended weeks ago. Wierd, but my email client just pulled about 30 emails today on these old threads as if they were new. I'm reading along ... and this thread looks familiar

Re: Wierd ... was [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-06-13 Thread David E. Smith
Gino A. Villarini wrote: I ogt them too... I peeked at the headers (sorry, that's my schtick) and while the Date: header said three weeks ago, they were only sent today. I'm guessing Patrick just has a computer with a really squirrely clock. David Smith MVN.net -- WISPA Wireless List:

Re: Wierd ... was [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-06-13 Thread John Scrivner
It is not a clock issue. All the messages that were sent with old dates were already delivered previously. These are duplicate messages. Scriv David E. Smith wrote: Gino A. Villarini wrote: I ogt them too... I peeked at the headers (sorry, that's my schtick) and while the Date:

Re: Wierd ... was [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-06-13 Thread David E. Smith
John Scrivner wrote: It is not a clock issue. All the messages that were sent with old dates were already delivered previously. These are duplicate messages. Hm. Hmmm (digs around through mail server logs) Well, the old posts from three weeks ago and the new posts from today have

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-31 Thread Brad Larson
List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment In other words, the number of licenses is infinite. Yes, but you leave out that there is a requirement to attempt to coexist, or cooperate to attempt to co-exist. And it brings out into the open, all possible interferers, where they are located, and how

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-31 Thread Tom DeReggi
that impression based on my views that I expressed earlier in this post. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc -Original Message- From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 9:37 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment In other words

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-30 Thread Matt Liotta
Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:59 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment The radios that exist for 900Mhz today barely qualify from a delivered bandwidth perspective. We hardly ever lead with a 1.5Mbps service

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-30 Thread Matt Liotta
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:59 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment The radios that exist for 900Mhz today barely qualify from a delivered bandwidth perspective. We hardly ever lead with a 1.5Mbps service, but sometimes

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-30 Thread Patrick Leary
4:34 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment There is only 50Mhz available if I recall, so how many licensees can their be if each is given multiple 5Mhz channels? If only one or two companies are allowed to play in a given market then I expect 3.65Ghz to miss the market

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-30 Thread Matt Liotta
Marketing Alvarion, Inc. o: 650.314.2628 c: 760.580.0080 Vonage: 650.641.1243 -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 4:34 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment There is only 50Mhz available if I recall, so how many

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-30 Thread Patrick Leary
their position somewhat. Patrick -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 8:56 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment I misunderstood one of your earlier emails then. I thought you were advocating the split of the entire

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-30 Thread Tom DeReggi
DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:49 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Matt, I am not sure you understand the rules

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-30 Thread jeffrey thomas
- Original Message - From: jeffrey thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 4:02 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment The benchmark is the ability to provide NLOS, portable or fixed service to at least a 2 mile radius per

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-27 Thread Charles Wu
--- CWLab Technology Architects http://www.cwlab.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:59 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment The radios that exist

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-26 Thread Charles Wu
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jeffrey thomas Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 3:02 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment The benchmark is the ability to provide NLOS, portable or fixed service to at least a 2 mile radius per cell

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-26 Thread Matt Liotta
] On Behalf Of jeffrey thomas Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 3:02 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment The benchmark is the ability to provide NLOS, portable or fixed service to at least a 2 mile radius per cell, indoors. 5.8 doesnt really give true NLOS to that distance indoors

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-26 Thread Charles Wu
: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment All WiMAX vendors will have some version of this type of CPE since that is a mandatory requirement for licensed band operators. Each will have their own attempts at special sauce to differentiate their offering. It will get very interesting come fall (which is not to say

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-26 Thread Charles Wu
--- CWLab Technology Architects http://www.cwlab.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Leary Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 4:41 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment A. More power Tom. B. Much

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-26 Thread Charles Wu
Technology Architects http://www.cwlab.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:17 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment But, 3.65 isn't going to be unlicensed; it is going

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-26 Thread Matt Liotta
Charles Wu wrote: What do you think is going to happen? Exactly the same thing that we have with 5.8Ghz, but without all the non-operators. While that isn't the same as mutually exclusive spectrum, it is a big step forward for all of us successful companies using 5.8Ghz. -Matt -- WISPA

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-26 Thread Patrick Leary
--- CWLab Technology Architects http://www.cwlab.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Leary Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 4:41 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment A. More power Tom. B

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-26 Thread Matt Liotta
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:46 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Hi Patrick, But all the fancy schmancy technology you implement won't do @#$@ unless 3650 is licensed b/c interference from 20 other systems in the area (including several from our GPS

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-26 Thread Patrick Leary
range should be usable. Patrick -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:58 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Splitting up the band will just make it useless and interference free. -Matt Patrick Leary

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-26 Thread Matt Liotta
that will use the entire swath of band from one radio UNLESS it is a P2P radio, in which case the entire range should be usable. Patrick -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:58 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-26 Thread Patrick Leary
radio. Patrick -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:59 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment The radios that exist for 900Mhz today barely qualify from a delivered bandwidth perspective. We hardly ever lead

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-25 Thread Tom DeReggi
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Frankly, The FCC should really hurry up and finish the rules to allow the industry to really take off. The common view with most manufacturers I have found is that until there is 3.5ghz or near spectrum available, there will be small and limited deployments

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment, WIMAX?

2006-05-25 Thread Patrick Leary
, 2006 5:20 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment, WIMAX? So Patrick, can we expect 3.65 be available at the same time as 5.4 ... q3-q4 ? Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-25 Thread Patrick Leary
PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 2:59 PM To: WISPA General List; 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Patrick, It doesnt change the fact that many have launched limited deployments as a test but still charged for the access service, banking on the fact that the FCC has set

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-25 Thread Patrick Leary
Alvarion, Inc. o: 650.314.2628 c: 760.580.0080 Vonage: 650.641.1243 -Original Message- From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 9:23 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment 3.5Ghz does, I find that hard to believe. 2.4Ghz couldn't

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-25 Thread George Rogato
To make it easier, maybe you can give what you believe to be an industry price. I realize you can't give a price of Alvarion at this point. But you can give us a hip shoot of what you think common pricing for ce and ap are. Thanks George George -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-25 Thread Tom DeReggi
Pretty exciting. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:40 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment A. More power

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-25 Thread Tom DeReggi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:40 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment A. More power Tom. B. Much more sophistication in the equipment yielding much higher spectral efficiency and system gain. Frequency plays a major role, but you

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-25 Thread Patrick Leary
have not been interesting!) Patrick -Original Message- From: George Rogato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 3:15 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Patrick Leary wrote: A. More power Tom. B. Much more sophistication in the equipment

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-25 Thread Patrick Leary
: 650.641.1243 -Original Message- From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:58 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Is Alvarion going to do the same for 5.8G unlicensed Wimax? All though license and high power may not be there, the technical

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment, WIMAX?

2006-05-24 Thread Patrick Leary
] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:24 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment, WIMAX? Will the 3650 be WIMAX'able. I understand that the 3650 is supposed to be contention based and WIMAX is not contention based. Any updates? -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment, WIMAX?

2006-05-24 Thread George Rogato
: 650.314.2628 c: 760.580.0080 Vonage: 650.641.1243 -Original Message- From: George Rogato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:24 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment, WIMAX? Will the 3650 be WIMAX'able. I understand that the 3650 is supposed

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment, WIMAX?

2006-05-24 Thread Gino A. Villarini
: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:18 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment, WIMAX? That is part of the reconsideration process. The FCC (per multiple talks with the folks that wrote the rule) did not intent to exclude WiMAX, 802.16, or 802.11 products from use in 3650MHz

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-24 Thread Jeffrey Thomas
--- CWLab Technology Architects http://www.cwlab.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jeffrey thomas Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 11:37 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-24 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
: [WISPA] 3650 equipment All the same time, the industry doesn't bother to fill out their Form 477s also The sad thing is is that there are long term consequences towards flaunting the rules -- namely the fact that you are just reinforcing the ILEC argument that unlicensed spectrum just creates

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-24 Thread Jeffrey Thomas
: Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 8:40 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Read below and you can decide on whether or not you will be breaking the law w/ a 3650 deployment --- To: 'WISPA General List

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-24 Thread Brad Belton
So, 3650MHz isn't going to fall under Part90 rules? Brad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Thomas Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 10:51 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Comments inline. Even given

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-24 Thread DB
To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Can you blame them? Congress is now considering demanding that ALL ISP's log ALL data to and from thier customers. Seems like a few someones a while back thought that we needed more government involvement in the ISP business

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-24 Thread John Scrivner
! - - Original Message - From: Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 6:14 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment All the same time, the industry doesn't bother to fill out their Form 477s also The sad thing

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread Charles Wu
Read below and you can decide on whether or not you will be breaking the law w/ a 3650 deployment --- To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Cc: isp-wireless@isp-wireless.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 6:32 AM Subject: [equipment-l]

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
: Monday, May 22, 2006 1:57 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment No one. The allocation is not yet finalized. Any licenses being granted are 24 month STAs (special temporary authority). One cannot deploy fee-based services using an STA as STA's are intended for testing purposes. Sources within

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread George Rogato
General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Read below and you can decide on whether or not you will be breaking the law w/ a 3650 deployment --- To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Cc: isp-wireless@isp-wireless.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread Patrick Leary
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment I understood that the 3650 was not to be used in commercial links. I'm assuming money makes it commercial. I would like to deploy a couple links for non paying situations, cameras for a city park. I'd also like to have the licenseand not be wasting my limited

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread jeffrey thomas
Message- From: Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 8:40 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Read below and you can decide on whether or not you will be breaking the law w/ a 3650 deployment

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread George Rogato
jeffrey thomas wrote: sure. Hi Jeff, so sure is your answer, and no is Patricks. You got something different than Patrick that says a wisp can set up a link and put it into production 24/7? George -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment, WIMAX?

2006-05-23 Thread George Rogato
Will the 3650 be WIMAX'able. I understand that the 3650 is supposed to be contention based and WIMAX is not contention based. Any updates? -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives:

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread jeffrey thomas
CANNOT launch any commercial services using 3650MHz. - Patrick -Original Message- From: Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 8:40 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Read below and you can decide on whether or not you

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread Gino A. Villarini
: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Jeffrey, I have to question the judgement ability (or the lack of it) of anyone who abuses the FCC rules to the extent of taking a licensed experimental system and using it for a commercial, revenue-generating purpose. Someone who would do this is (IMHO): 1. Someone

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread Jack Unger
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Unger Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 6:56 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Jeffrey, I have to question the judgement ability (or the lack of it) of anyone who abuses the FCC rules to the extent of taking a licensed experimental

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread Gino A. Villarini
787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Unger Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 9:07 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Gino, Is Towerstream doing this - using 3650 to deliver commercial

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread Jack Unger
Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Unger Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 9:07 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Gino, Is Towerstream doing

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread Gino A. Villarini
To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Gino, They may need that many to test the full throughput capabilities. So what are the details of what they are doing? jack Gino A. Villarini wrote: Do you really think towerstream need 150 field units or cpes to test a single

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread jeffrey thomas
-Original Message- From: Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 8:40 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Read below and you can decide on whether or not you will be breaking the law w/ a 3650 deployment

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread jeffrey thomas
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Unger Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 6:56 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Jeffrey, I have to question the judgement ability (or the lack of it) of anyone who abuses the FCC rules to the extent

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread jeffrey thomas
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Unger Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 9:07 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Gino, Is Towerstream doing this - using 3650 to deliver commercial service? jack Gino A. Villarini wrote: Towerstream anyone ? Gino A. Villarini

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-23 Thread Jack Unger
23, 2006 8:40 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Read below and you can decide on whether or not you will be breaking the law w/ a 3650 deployment --- To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Cc: isp-wireless@isp-wireless.com; [EMAIL

[WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-22 Thread George Rogato
Who has FCC aproved 3650 equipment on the market, and is there any balpark pricing? Thanks George -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

RE: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-22 Thread Patrick Leary
, maybe as soon as this summer. Patrick Leary AVP Marketing Alvarion, Inc. o: 650.314.2628 c: 760.580.0080 Vonage: 650.641.1243 -Original Message- From: George Rogato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 1:12 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Who has FCC

Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment

2006-05-22 Thread George Rogato
: 760.580.0080 Vonage: 650.641.1243 -Original Message- From: George Rogato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 1:12 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] 3650 equipment Who has FCC aproved 3650 equipment on the market, and is there any balpark pricing? Thanks George