Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

2007-07-10 Thread Tom DeReggi
Steve, I actually read your arcticle this time, and have a further response. I agree with a large part of what you wrote. Although it may be unpopular or discouraging with many WISPs, it brings up some fair valid arguements and likely outcomes. My response is... Life is hard, and chances are

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

2007-07-09 Thread Steve Stroh
Scriv: I disagree your statement that If they use [700 MHz] to sell broadband wireless Internet then by definition those parties will then become WISPs. I doubt that Verizon Communications (landlines) and Verizon Wireless would consider themselves WISPs merely by acquiring more spectrum - any

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

2007-07-09 Thread Felix A. Lopez
Steve/John: I worked with local rural WISP operator in rural foothills Nothern California. He told me that the large carrier told him they typically seek at least a block of 10,000 rural customers before entering a rural space. This is anecdotal and I searching the web for evidence of this rule

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

2007-07-09 Thread Tom DeReggi
General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 11:55 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View Scriv: I disagree your statement that If they use [700 MHz] to sell broadband wireless Internet then by definition those parties will then become WISPs. I doubt that Verizon

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

2007-07-09 Thread Steve Stroh
Tom: Agreed that WISPs can make very effective use of license-exempt spectrum. And if I thought that it was a reasonable thing to posit that 700 MHz should become mostly license-exempt (public safety portion being the exception), I would do so. But, that 700 MHz will be auctioned off to the

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

2007-07-09 Thread John Scrivner
On 7/9/07, Steve Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scriv: I disagree your statement that If they use [700 MHz] to sell broadband wireless Internet then by definition those parties will then become WISPs. I doubt that Verizon Communications (landlines) and Verizon Wireless would consider themselves

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

2007-07-09 Thread Steve Stroh
John: I didn't say that no use was being made of 700 MHz. Yes, there is, mostly by rural telephone companies, and of course, Qualcomm's MediaFlo television system. But those are the exception - to my knowledge, Aloha Partners (the largest owner of 700 MHz spectrum...) hasn't deployed any systems

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

2007-07-09 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
- Original Message - From: Steve Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 8:55 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View Scriv: I disagree your statement that If they use [700 MHz] to sell broadband wireless Internet

[WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

2007-07-08 Thread John Scrivner
Steve Stroh and I usually see things the same way. We have somewhat varying views on the 700 MHz auction coming up. Here are his views on the upcoming 700 MHz auction. http://www.wispnews.net/2007/07/my-take-on-700-.html It is important to note that part of what is going to happen is that

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

2007-07-08 Thread Felix A. Lopez
John, Thank you for the posting. Most know 700 mhz but if not, I included a weblink on 700 Mhz explained: http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/ ...including interesting Comments section. Also, Aloha Partners is reputed to be the largest owner of 700 MHz spectrum; including 700 MHz plans